It's about time UC Davis passes a T.G.I.F. initiative, but the language of this particular initiative may not be worth the YES vote. The success of this program at other UC's has shown the things students can accomplish when given the funds. Senator Bianchi's claim that this fee doesn't benefit all students is very odd given the many programs that ASUCD funds that only affects some students. Besides, if students don't find it worthwhile, or find it too expensive, they have the ability to vote nay.
The structure provided by this particular initiative is worrisome though. Most questionable is the fact that the Co-op and Domes have the power to choose the undergraduate representative (in addition to RHAB). While both cooperative living communities are known for their sustainability, they in no way legitimately represent the undergraduates of UC Davis. Having the ASUCD Senate or the Environmental Policy and Planning Commission weigh in would make much more sense.
Dan Xie