52.4 F
Davis

Davis, California

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Home Blog Page 1348

Column: Feed me, Seymour

0

Listen, I’ll tell you a secret.

Food is great. It’s what keeps you and me alive.

In my four years as a college student, I’ve learned what it takes to afford food and survive to see another day. First, it takes discipline, and second, it takes knowing which restaurant or grocery store has the best, most affordable food for your budget. How, might you ask, will we ever know what our options are for affordable food? Well, I’m glad I asked that for you, because I’m going to be telling you your options all quarter long.

Yeah, that’s right. Welcome to my column.

I can sympathize with all of you who can’t go out to eat or buy all the food you want. Times are tough, this I know. For that, I’ll tell you another secret: I’m a poor college student who punishes herself by watching “Top Chef” and “Iron Chef” when she’s hungry.

I can’t tell if I hate myself or if I’m feeding my goal of a more appetizing future. But one day as I sat there watching “Top Chef” season five with my roommates, my stomach growling because I only had a can of beans and tomato soup in the kitchen, I started looking at my life and looking at my food options and I started asking myself, “What are you doing? WHAT WHAT WHAT ARE YOU DOING?” (Sassy Gay Friend, anyone? Whatever, just YouTube it.)

The first thing I did was to look at my money in my bank account. I asked myself how much could I use for food, not how much I want to use. Once I figured out the pathetic amount of money I had left for food, I walked out the door for the most epic food journey of my life, or something like that.

Before I get into my epic food journey though, I should bring up how my food spending habits became so bad.

For my freshman year, I didn’t venture far outside of the campus vicinity because I had everything I needed on campus. I had the Segundo DC (considered the best dining commons out of the three) right outside my dorm window. They serve food four times a day, which includes a “make your own omelet” for breakfast and yummy cookies for late night.

Also in Segundo, I had the Junction, which used to be the Segundo DC until they built the bigger DC in 2005. At the Junction, they sell junk food, drinks and other convenience items that freshmen want to buy.

Located further inside campus are the ASUCD Coffee House and the Silo, located on opposite ends of campus. As a freshman, I would go to the CoHo at the Memorial Union when I wanted pizza, baked goods, a sandwich or a snack for cheap. Even though it is called the Coffee House, students rarely go there for coffee. Instead, I would go to the Silo for coffee. At the Silo, you can also get a smoothie, a deli sandwich or a crepe. The Silo is a tad more expensive than the CoHo, but is better quality food.

When I got sick of being on campus all the time, I would go to the U-Mall or Rite Aid, located on opposite corners of Anderson and Russell, and walking distance from the Segundo and Cuarto dorms. The U-Mall has places like Cost Plus, Starbucks, Subway, The Grad and others that are worthwhile to check out. As a freshman, I was spoiled.

Once I moved off-campus, I had no clue what I was doing. I didn’t know which grocery store was cheaper, which Chinese food restaurant had better chow mein or even which Mexican restaurant had a bigger combination platter. It was a food nightmare, unlike when I was nine and had a nightmare that involved mustard. I don’t know why.

But as I faced my food dilemma, I realized I wasn’t alone. Many students leaving the dorms to live off campus are suddenly overcome by many options, including what food to spend money on.

So during these next couple of weeks, I’m going to try to help by writing about what options you have for Chinese food, Mexican food, pizza, frozen yogurt, grocery stores, etc. You’ll be able to read about my epic food adventure, and hopefully try out some new places in the process.

For now, I’ll give you guys some quick pointers. For cheap pasta and grains, go to the North Davis Safeway. For cheap produce, go to Save-Mart. For obscure, cheap goods, there’s the Davis Food Co-op. And lastly, for the love of everything good in this world, go to the Nugget for their awesome sandwiches.

Now get out of here and feed yourselves!

JENNIFER RICHWOOD knows there are other people out there with food nightmares. If you have one, e-mail her at jcrichwood@ucdavis.edu.

Aggie Daily Calendar

0

TODAY

East Quad Farmers Market

10 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

East Quad

Support local farmers and get fresh produce, nuts, flowers and more.

Sigma Nu: Alumni Meet and Greet

7 p.m.

Sigma Nu House, 525 Oxford Circle

Meet the brothers and their alumni to learn about the long term benefits of rushing.

Sigma Phi Epsilon: Tiki Alumni BBQ Night

7 p.m.

Sigma Phi Epsilon House, 500 Parkway Circle

Meet the brothers and their alumni at their Tiki BBQ.

THURSDAY

Meat Lab Sale

1 to 5:30 p.m.

Cole C Facility

The UC Davis Meat Lab is offering sales that are open to the public. Cash and check only.

Sigma Nu: Luau with Pi Beta Phi

6:30 p.m.

Sigma Nu House, 525 Oxford Circle

Join the brothers and the lovely ladies of Pi Phi for a luau in their backyard.

Sigma Phi Epsilon: Casino Night with Sigma Alpha Epsilon Pi

7 p.m.

Sigma Phi Epsilon House, 500 Parkway Circle

Place your odds with the brothers and the lovely ladies of SAEpi.

A2F Open House Dinner and Bible Study

7:30 p.m.

1007 Giedt

Acts2Fellowship invites you to join their open house with a free dinner and engaging bible study.

FRIDAY

Open House at The House

11 a.m. to 2 p.m.

TB-16, in the Student Co-ops

Stop by their open house and learn about their services.

Folk Music Jam Session

Noon

Wyatt Deck, Old Davis Road

Pull out your fiddles, guitars and mandolins for an informal jam session in the Arboretum.

Meat Lab Sale

1 to 5:30 p.m.

Cole C Facility

The UC Davis Meat Lab is offering sales that are open to the public. Cash and check only.

Woodland Corn Maze

4 to 10 p.m.

2200 East Main Street, Woodland

The Woodland Corn Maze is back for 2010! Visit to try your luck during the day or brave the dark at night.

Koinonia Open House and Sports Night

6:30 p.m.

1001 Giedt

You’re invited to participate in their open house with a thought provoking talk and fun with sports.

“Change for Change” Eid Banquet

7 p.m.

UC Davis Conference Center

Attend this banquet by the UCD Muslim Student Association to help victims of the floods in Pakistan.

First Friday Taizé Style Service

7 to 8 p.m.

Davis Community Church, Fourth and C streets

Help foster Christian unity in our community by worshipping in this special style of song and prayer.

SATURDAY

Arboretum Guided Tour: Great Container Gardens

11 a.m.

Arboretum Terrace Garden, First and D streets

Learn about container gardening during a free public tour.

Woodland Corn Maze

4 to 10 p.m.

2200 East Main Street, Woodland

The Woodland Corn Maze is back for 2010! Visit to try your luck at day or brave the dark at night.

To receive placement in the AGGIE DAILY CALENDAR, e-mail dailycal@theaggie.org or stop by 25 Lower Freeborn by noon the day prior to your event. Due to space constraints, all event descriptions are subject to editing, and priority will be given to events that are free of charge and geared toward the campus community.

Woodland gets corny

0

What do you get when you combine Halloween, agriculture and haunted house-type thrills?

The Woodland Corn Maze, of course.

Yolo County’s cult favorite fall attraction will be open from Oct. 1 to 31. Opening day was postponed one week when it was determined the maze was too wet to walk on.

Brian Williams, owner and co-founder of the maze, likened it to a large-scale version of popular childhood pastimes.

“You get out there in the corn and it’s sort of like when you put a blanket over the dining room table and turn it into a fort,” Williams said. “The corn maze brings out the kid in people and they just start having a good time. It’s a hilarious thing.”

Williams and his brother founded the maze in 1998. While looking for a venue to host an “agri-tainment” event, the two discovered Woodland’s Heidrick Ag History Center online and asked them if they knew of a farmer who could help them put on the maze.

To the Williams’ surprise, the history center said they wanted to host the event themselves. Now, the maze acts as a fundraiser for the history center.

Colleen Thompson, administrative director of the Heidrick Ag History Center, described the corn maze as a natural marriage between Yolo County’s farming tradition and family fun.

“It kind of heralds the season I think,” Thompson said. “It’s the fall harvest; we’re an [agricultural] community [and] you see a lot of cornfields around here.

“There’s always the mystery that’s been attached to it for many generations – anything from Ichabod Crane to Halloween. I think you’re just combining a lot of different focal points together into something that’s pure entertainment.”

Williams and his team began farming the corn in July, and plotted the maze design while the corn was still relatively short. Mike Trujillo, one of the event planners, said that there is no exact science to how the maze is built. In fact, they don’t even see the finished product until they fly over the field in an airplane just before opening day.

“We drew the design on the coffee table, went out and did our thing,” Trujillo said. “It’s always fun to see what it looks like from the air so we’re pretty excited to fly over and see what the design is.”

This year’s design features the image of an antique John Deere tractor. Past designs include the gold rush and the state quarter.

In addition to simply finding their way through the maze, participants can also brave the haunted “field of screams” trail on Friday and Saturday nights. Scavenger hunts and “geo-dashes,” which allow contestants to use GPS-enabled devices to find their way through the maze, are also on the agenda.

Williams said the maze is most popular with teenagers and young adults, though families also come out in large numbers. Typically, about 18,000 to 20,000 people visit each year.

“The year 2001, right after the Sept. 11 attacks, was our number one attended year,” Williams said. “Everyone was staying home. People were doing things with their families and people weren’t flying anywhere. That was a huge turnout.”

Though staff is on hand to help directionally-challenged people through the maze, not everyone minds getting a little lost.

“Sometimes I ask myself, ‘is anybody really going through the maze or are they just going in circles looking for their friends?'” Williams said. “There are people who come out here and they don’t make any effort to go through the maze or find their way, and then there are other people who are adamant about not cutting through the corn and they love to conquer the challenge of the maze.”

Though many participants are regulars, the corn maze continues to attract eager new fans from Woodland, Davis and other cities further away.

“We’ve had people as far as Reno get in the car and drive two hours to see us,” Trujillo said. “And that’s pretty special to have somebody go that far out of their way to share in the event.”

For prices and hours of the Woodland Corn Maze, visit woodlandcornmaze.com/Home.html.

ERIN MIGDOL can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

Report blames swelled administration for increasing costs and inefficiency

0

A recent study echoes a common complaint of protestors who rally against student fee hikes and declining state funding to higher education: the growth of administrators is partly to blame.

In their examination of 198 universities in the United States from 1993 to 2007, the Goldwater Institute, a think-tank based in Arizona, found that the number of full-time administrators increased by 39 percent. Meanwhile teaching, research or service employees grew at 18 percent.

According to the report, compiled with data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), UC Davis experienced a growth from 3.2 full-time administrators per 100 students to 13.5, a 318.8 percent increase and the third highest on the list. Meanwhile full-time employees in instruction, research and service dropped 4.5 percent from 9.6 to 9.1 per 100 students.

“A significant reason for the administrative bloat is that students pay only a small portion of administrative costs,” wrote lead author Jay P. Greene, Senior Fellow, Goldwater Institute and head of the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas.

“The large and increasing rate of government subsidy for higher education facilitates administrative bloat by insulating students from the costs. Reducing government subsidies would do much to make universities more efficient.”

This comes as the system has witnessed a dramatic rise in student fees. Estimated tuition for 2010-2011 is $11,285 after the UC Board of Regents approved a 32 percent increase in November to address declining state support. UCD currently faces a budget shortfall of $113.5 million and a projected deficit of $77.7 million for 2010-2011 pending ongoing state budget talks.

The university has disputed the conclusion of the Goldwater report. In their response, the UC Davis Office of Budget and Institution Analysis (OBIA) said the institute’s methodology “resulted in a distorted view of true administrative growth.”

Using UC financial schedules from 1992-2007, the OBIA calculated that total expenditures – minus the medical center – climbed from $651 million to $1.45 billion. Spending for non-academic administrators increased from $130.8 million to $263.5 million while teaching, research and public service spending increased from $398.3 million to $983.8 million.

Chris Carter, a director and principal budget analyst of the OBIA, said the Goldwater report, in using the information from IPEDS, did not separate employees with administrative duties who supported teaching, research and public service from those with non-academic administration positions.

“The vast 73 percent of the growth over this time period … has come in these core academic areas of teaching, research and public service,” Carter said.

However, Matthew Ladner, vice president of research at the Goldwater Institute, said the claim that staff helping in teaching and research contributed to the university’s academic mission is difficult to prove. He cited the 50 percent four-year graduation rate as proof for more improvement needed.

“The point is we seriously need to rethink what exactly it is we want from our universities and what we’re willing to pay for,” Ladner said.

The response also cited the campus’ efforts in downsizing and revamping its administration. The university has already cut 342 of 4,251 positions in administrative units compared to 402 of 5,796 in academic units. Ladner noted that this was good news to hear but that it indicated there was administration to cut.

Chancellor Linda Katehi has also introduced the Organizational Excellence Initiative, a drive to streamline and consolidate administrative functions in areas like human resources, finance and information. Examples of such services include student and staff hiring and termination, time reporting and salary transactions.

These functions will be consolidated in a Shared Service Center (SSC) to be housed within Administrative and Resource Management (ARM) technology. This could save the university $9 to $16 million in administrative costs over the next two to four years, according to estimates from Scott Madden, a consultant for UC Davis.

“One of the main goals of the SSC initiative is to reduce the cost of administration and redeploy funds to support UC Davis’ mission of research, teaching and service to the community,” said Lisa Terry, the project director of the SSC in an e-mail interview.

“To that end, cost savings realized through the implementation of shared services will be redirected to academic programs, student programs and high priority administrative initiatives. Priorities set by the Chancellor and the Provost will determine the exact amount and distribution of the reallocations.”

LESLIE TSAN can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Mobility Assistance Shuttle expands to serve faculty, staff

1

Previously available to just students, the Mobility Assistance Program is introducing a pilot shuttle to serve UC Davis faculty and staff with injuries or disabilities as well.

The Mobility Assistance Shuttle (MAS) offers service to specified stops on campus for a weekly fee to individuals with documented disabilities. There are more than 40 pick-up and drop-off locations across campus.

Although the services provided by the Student Disability Center (SDC) were once free, alternatives to the shuttle can be costly.

“If students become temporarily disabled or if their mobility becomes limited unexpectedly during the quarter, they may face withdrawal from school if they are unable to make it to classes,” said Erica Brown, Campus Recreation’s member services coordinator, in an e-mail interview.

Similarly, faculty and staff either miss work or rent a scooter or wheelchair to get around. These cost much more than the shuttle’s weekly fee, Brown said.

For the first week of service, students pay $20, Transportation and Parking Services (TAPS) customers pay $30 and non-TAPS customers pay $40. The weekly fee goes down for weeks two through six to $18, $27 and $36, respectively. It decreases once more at week seven to $15, $22.50 and $30, respectively.

Due to budget cuts, SDC’s program was in jeopardy of being eliminated. SDC collaborated with Campus Recreation, TAPS and the American Disability Act Special Access Funding Committee in order to continue as a fee-for-service program.

“I’m thrilled we are able to continue,” said SDC Director Jeanne Wilson. “We were in a difficult situation with the budget cuts.”

SDC will continue to look for future partners for further funding options, Wilson said.

MAS costs more to operate than SDC’s previous shuttle service due to extended hours and serving faculty and staff. MAS operates from 7:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. instead of 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. These extra funds come from the user fees and campus departments involved.

MAS will use the same fleet of motorized vehicles, similar to golf carts, and operate in a similar manner to SDC’s shuttle service. It will continue to offer point-to-point service rather than a long route like a bus would, Wilson said.

Wilson also said SDC aims to make things easier for students with disabilities. SDC is working on a system with the Student Health Center, so if a student becomes mobility impaired, he or she can sign up for MAS right away.

Alex Steady, sophomore political science and communication double major, utilized the SDC shuttle for a month last year while he was on crutches. The shuttle is a service that UC Davis should supply for free, he said.

“This is a service that many students depend on,” he said in an e-mail interview. “I could not imagine deciding between choosing to pay or crutching across campus to class.”

Individuals might be able to sign up for MAS online in the future, Wilson said. But for now, those with documented disabilities can contact Campus Recreation at 752-1730 to schedule rides.

Next September, the involved campus departments will evaluate the pilot program and determine if any changes need to be made. They will examine budget, user fees, staffing structures, ride structures and other factors, Brown said.

JANELLE BITKER can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

The insect invasion

Across the state of California stretches one of the world’s largest invader colonies: Argentine ants.

“In their native range, [Argentine ants] live in colonies about the size of a room. But in their non-native range, they’ve become an agricultural and household pest,” said Rick Grosberg, professor of evolution and ecology at UC Davis. “Now they live in colonies the size of the state of California or central Europe.”

Argentine ants, also called sugar ants, are remarkably adaptable to unfriendly terrain like housing developments and newly-plowed fields, so the area they can inhabit is enormous.

But the ants may have met their match in the students of the Collaborative Learning at the Interface of Mathematics and Biology (CLIMB) program at UC Davis. Under the guidance of Grosberg and Professor Sebastian Schreiber, and with a grant from the National Science Foundation, seven undergraduates spent the past year devising a way to control the invaders. Each year’s CLIMB cohort chooses its own research question, and this year’s group has targeted Argentine ants.

The small, dark ants form a “supercolony” that can decimate native species as it spreads across the globe. Normally, each ant carries a waxy hydrocarbon “tag” on its body that identifies its colony affiliation, letting its nest-mates know it’s one of them and its enemies know it’s unfriendly. Under this territorial system, competing colonies keep each other in check.

But when the first few ants arrived from central Argentina, they seeded a new population with less genetic variation among tags. This narrowing of the genetic pool, known as the bottleneck effect, seems to be the reason that an ant from Davis and an ant from San Diego will still recognize each other as friends.

“They can beat up native ants because of their sheer numbers,” said Ivy Gardner, senior biological sciences major and CLIMB participant.

One problem for researchers has been trying to introduce new tags without the mob of original ants attacking the new ants.

After months of trials and adjustments, the students presented their results in a one-day workshop on Sept. 17. They found that to create the kind of monstrous colony now living in Calif., a bottleneck would have to eliminate 60 percent of the variation in hydrocarbon signals.

The group found that changing environmental factors made only a small bottleneck necessary. In particular, raising the carrying capacity of the land – adding more space, more resources – affected whether the colony stayed united or broke into smaller groups. With a higher carrying capacity, the team’s model predicted it would only require a tiny genetic loss to create the “supercolony.”

As for how the ants migrated originally, genetic clues implicate international sea trade: the ants of the “supercolony” are all genetically similar to those living near Argentina’s Paraná River. In the late 19th century, trading ships would dock there on the way to the southern U.S.

“They would scoop up dirt to use as ballast on ships, and that’s probably how [the ants] got established here,” said Matt Wein, senior genetics major.

For now, a solution eludes the CLIMB team. Some researchers have successfully coaxed ants to fight each other by coating one ant in “foreign” signal hydrocarbons, but applying these waxy substances to whole colonies is problematic.

“Wax is pretty hard to aerosol,” said Wein.

If the “supercolony” develops to fill new territory, the similar hydrocarbon signals might not be the only issue. Finding a solution will involve looking at both ecological and genetic factors. Wein, Gardner and some of their colleagues plan to continue this project independently.

Find more information about the CLIMB program at climb.ucdavis.edu.

Emily Goyins can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

Column: Cloning Abe Lincoln, Part I

I stood six inches away from Abraham Lincoln’s DNA.

Last spring, I interned in D.C. – a shrine to Lincoln. I visited Ford’s Theater and gaped at Lincoln’s impressive memorial. But at the National Museum of Health and Medicine, my nose could almost touch pieces of the man himself: a lock of his hair, fragments of his skull and a handkerchief with his blood on it.

As I stood there, I wondered: could we clone Abe Lincoln?

Since Dolly the sheep was cloned in 1996, scientists have cloned mammals from mice to mules, but we’ve never cloned a human. Maybe it’s a gruesome desire, but if we ever decide to clone someone, I’d vote for Lincoln.

Before we start that debate (regarding celebrities and/or ethics), here’s how cloning works: First, scientists need a somatic cell from the original animal. A somatic cell is any cell that has a full set of chromosomes; this means sperm and eggs cells are excluded. Scientists then remove the nucleus – the part of the cell with the DNA – from that somatic cell. That nucleus is transferred to a donor cell that has no nucleus. The newly assembled cell is then implanted into the womb of a surrogate.

While this process sounds as straightforward as a Betty Crocker recipe, it is extremely difficult. The nucleus and its new cell might not be compatible. The embryo might not divide. The implantation into the surrogate might fail. After all that, the pregnancy might fail.

Cindy Batchelder, a postdoctoral scholar at the Primate Research Center at UC Davis, entered the field of cloning research just as the birth of Dolly made news. Batchelder made it her goal to produce the first cloned calf. The process took more time than she thought, and while she did produce some of the earliest clones, she didn’t meet her goal.

“I had imagined that it would be feasible to produce 20 or more cloned calves in a few years from the same donor animal,” said Batchelder. “In reality, the efficiency rate was so low that it took me five years to produce eight calves.”

It’s clear why we banish the thought of human cloning. With so much “sanctity of life” debate over stem cells and abortion, no scientist would dare experiment with a developing human fetus. But human tissue? That’s another story.

Cloning certain human cells – not entire humans – could solve the problem of tissue rejection. Transplanted organs are sometimes rejected by the host because the host’s immune system thinks the new organ is a threat. This mix-up happens because all cells have specific protein markers on the cell surface – when the immune system detects a foreign marker, it sounds the alarm.

Charles Nicolet, facility manager at the DNA Technologies Core and Expression Analysis Core at the UC Davis Genome Center, explained that cloning a patient’s cell would be a good solution.

“If you can generate tissues from your specific cells, then you get around the problem of rejection,” Nicolet said.

Nicolet said that scientists are already working with animals to clone “patches” of cells that can be used for transplants. He said that with the way the animal tests are going, we might see this technique in humans within the next five years.

With custom-grown organs on the horizon, it’s easy to skip past DNA experimentation going on today.

In 2006, President Bush sparked anti-genetic-modification outrage when he mentioned “human-animal hybrids” in his State of the Union Address. While I can’t help but picture centaurs or mermaids, the technology for inserting human genes into animal DNA is very real. It’s freaky, but it’s a good kind of freaky.

Alison Van Eenennaam, a specialist with the Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Extension at UC Davis, told me about several hybrid success stories. There was a goat that was engineered to produce a protein that treats blood-clotting problems in humans. There was also a cow engineered to produce antibodies to help immuno-compromised people. These human proteins and antibodies are microscopic; the animal is not a 50:50 mix.

“It’s still a cow. It looks like a cow – it’s not like it has a human head or anything,” Van Eenennaam said.

Now, back to Abe Lincoln.

After he was shot, his doctors and friends collected bits of his skull and bloody pieces of cloth as souvenirs of his autopsy. Locks of his hair were passed around like saintly relics. Long before they knew about DNA, these pieces of Lincoln represented the essence of the man.

While we do have remnants of his genes, we probably don’t have the entire DNA sequence needed for cloning. Sheryl Bernauer, lab supervisor for the DNA Sequencing Facility at UC Davis, said that when cells decay over time, the DNA is compromised. The DNA in Lincoln’s 145-year-old bloodstains and hair is probably useless for cloning.

“The hair itself would be very hard to get DNA from unless you have a complete follicle,” Bernauer said.

We don’t have any of Lincoln’s follicles, so that’s a no-go. Still, it’s interesting to think about how the development of cloning has changed the way we view human remains. Humans have always honored the dead, but now we know that – in DNA at least – part of the dead lives on.

I asked Nicolet, the scientist from the Genome Center, who he would clone if he could. He voted for George Washington.

“He was a cool dude,” Nicolet said.

Next week: It’s a nature vs. nurture showdown. Pretend we could clone Lincoln. What would his 21st century life be like?

MADELINE McCURRY-SCHMIDT also wants to clone J.K. Rowling. Rowling’s not dead, but come on, someone’s got to write more Harry Potter. That epilogue just won’t cut it. E-mail Madeline at science@theaggie.org.

Can smartphone apps help science?

The average cost of red Roma tomatoes at Safeway is $0.56 each. The average cost of a pack of 75 seeds to grow tomato plants – yielding bunches of tomatoes seasonally – is $1.59. For most college students, the latter, cheaper price holds more appeal. But how do you know if your backyard is suitable for growing tomatoes?

UC Davis soils and biogeochemistry Ph.D. student Dylan Beaudette, along with his advisor, soil research specialist Anthony O’Geen, have developed SoilWeb, a smartphone application that identifies the soil type and properties at your location from any mobile phone with GPS.

The SoilWeb application allows users to access information from the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for all soil survey areas in the lower 48 states.

SoilWeb classifies the soil you are standing on and links you to vital information about that soil, such as chemical and physical properties. This information helps determine potential uses for the land.

Beaudette said this application is useful for many different people.

“For a student or gardener or someone who owns property, SoilWeb allows them to identify all major soils mapped at their location and read about any limitations the soils might have in respect to growing crops,” Beaudette said.

According to O’Geen, SoilWeb could also contribute to soil conservation efforts.

“I think the benefit is that this [application] is generating a lot of enthusiasm for students, and that is good for just general soils knowledge,” said O’Geen. “The more we know about them, the more in the future we take better care of them. Most people don’t consider soils, they just walk on it … there is a lot to soil, and this is an opportunity for people to be exposed to that.”

Soil Survey has been collecting data for years on soils throughout the U.S. Now, through the use of the SoilWeb application, that information can be accessed anywhere – from your backyard to a crop field in the middle of Montana.

“Soil Survey is best used when you are out in the field…but you need a computer to look it up. That is mainly why we developed the smartphone app; it frees you from your desk,” O’Geen said.

Randy Dahlgren, chair of the department of land, air and water resources at UC Davis, identifies accessibility as one of SoilWeb’s major draws to the general public. “If you are driving along in the country side, you could just hit the button on the iPhone there … it’s kind of like a travel guide, providing you with information on what you see as you are driving along,” Dahlgren said.

Many terms typically used to classify and describe soils are foreign to the average person. The SoilWeb application provides information in language any interested person could understand.

“All the different terms are linked back to definitions in plain English … our primary goal with this project and related projects is to make soil information more accessible to non-specialists,” says Beaudette. “If something we have done has made people more aware of soils around them and the limits of that soil, we think it’s a good thing.”

CAMMIE ROLLE can be reached at science@theaggie.org

Aggie Digest

0

Senior Austin Graham posted two 70 scores at Northwestern’s Windon Memorial Tournament as the Aggies finished 10th at the event.

Graham finished the tournament three-over par. Freshman Matt Hansen shot a 72 on the final day to finish the event tied for 24th with a score of 219.

Andrew Haggen, Tyler Raber and Josh Granger each finished in the top 70, shooting a 222, 227 and 228 for the tournament, respectively.

Michigan won the event, topping rival Ohio State by only one-shot.

The Aggies will return to competition Oct. 10 to 12 when they co-host The Prestige at PGA West.

– Jason Alpert

Brown, Whitman battle for votes in first gubernatorial debate

0

The governor’s race got local last night as UC Davis hosted the first of three debates between Democrat Jerry Brown and Republican Meg Whitman. Around 750 audience members gathered in the Mondavi Center to watch candidates discuss issues ranging from UC fee hikes to the death penalty. The event was also broadcast live on TV, radio and online.



MEG WHITMAN FOCUSES ON BUSINESS, REFORMING THE SYSTEM

Meg Whitman made jobs and accountability the focus of her responses at last night’s debate.

Whitman, former CEO of eBay, said California has the most dysfunctional
budget in the entire country. She said she’ll fix that by getting
Californians back to work and cutting taxes. She pointed out the factory
tax, which she said discourages business from coming to California.

“If we lose manufacturers, we will lose the soul of our state,” she said.

Whitman also said she would reduce state spending by reforming the state’s welfare and pension systems.

When asked what she would do about fee increases at public colleges,
Whitman, who has a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University and a
master’s from Harvard University, said higher education is a gem and
that it breaks her heart to hear stories of students struggling to
afford public universities.

She said she would bring more money
to the system through cuts to welfare and pensions and give the money
directly to the school chancellors for allocation.

Whitman said
she is pro-death penalty, pro-three strikes and will be tough on crime,
which she will enforce by appointing conservative judges to the bench.

Whitman repeatedly attacked Jerry Brown’s ties to labor unions, saying
he would be beholden to the interest groups that have supported him for
the past 40 years.

Later on in the debate, she emphasized the
importance of the immigration laws. After spending a day at the border,
Whitman said she realized how little support and resources the U.S.
Border Patrol has. She said she does not support a path to legalization
and would like to hold employers responsible if they hire undocumented
workers by funding inspections. These would be paid for with the
economic gain of eliminating the illegal workforce.

Since
mid-September, Whitman has spent $119 million of her own money on the
campaign. When asked if she was buying voters, Whitman said Californians
are smart enough to see past that and that her personal investments
give her the independence to stay true to her convictions.

The
final question addressed water policy in California. Whitman, who was
born and raised in New York state and currently lives in Atherton, CA,
said she supports stronger laws on conservation.

Turning our backs on water is turning our backs on jobs, Whitman said.

“I refuse to believe this state, our beautiful state, cannot be better than it is.”

BROWN EMPHASIZES EXPERIENCE, DERIDES OPPONENTS’ BILLIONAIRE STATUS

At age 72, Jerry Brown is twice as old as when he was first elected governor in 1974.

Brown said his age, experience and independence can benefit California – more than opponent Meg Whitman’s business background.

“We have to invest in our people. We have to protect our schools,” he said. “And we have to all work together, with those who are the most powerful sacrificing first.”

Currently the state’s attorney general, Brown has also served as Secretary of State, Chairman of the California Democratic Party and Mayor of Oakland. He unsuccessfully ran for President three times and once for Senate.

At last night’s debate, Brown emphasized his support of education while attacking Whitman’s billionaire status.

“I want to invest in our schools, I want to protect our schools,” he said. “I don’t want to further enrich the billionaires and millionaires – that’s what we’ve been doing pretty well these past few years.”

Regarding higher education, Brown said he would try to hold down student fees but it will be tough with the budget.

“I’d love to roll back the fees, I’d love to have a freeze,” he said. “But that would require the university to become a lot more efficient than it is or have the state find billions of dollars it doesn’t yet have.”

Whitman argued that while Brown presents himself as a proponent of education, schools suffered under his time as mayor in Oakland. Brown said that mayors cannot control the public school system; rather, he succeeded in his push for more charter schools.

To create jobs, Brown said he’d invest in green energy and support AB 32, The Global Warming Solutions Act – a bill Whitman plans to abandon. He cited the creation of one million green jobs over a 30-year period back when he was governor as proof of green energy’s potential for job creation.

Brown said he consistently carries out the law regarding executions, despite his general stance against the death penalty. When Whitman suggested that Brown is liberal on crime, Brown stated that police chief associations across the state almost unanimously endorsed him.

Brown said Whitman’s funding of her own campaign as well as her business tactics will not bode well for California, as evidenced by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s legacy.

“[Schwarzenegger] was putting his own money into the campaign and that he was the guy who’d run the state like a business,” Brown said. “Well, it didn’t work out that way.”

JEREMY OGUL contributed to this article. BECKY PETERSON can be reached at city@theaggie.org. JANELLE BITKER can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Successful homecoming for the Aggies

0

For thousands of students, coming back to UC Davis gives a great feeling.

The women’s soccer team can relate.

After playing six of seven games on the road, the Aggies hosted San Francisco and Montana last weekend and bested both teams to improve their record to 5-3-1.

UC Davis 1, San Francisco 0

The Aggies and Dons squared off in a highly contested battle on Friday. No team was able to establish dominance, as it was a struggle the entire match.

The Dons continued to put pressure on the Aggie defense in the first half, resulting in four corner kicks. But the women’s squad responded and cleared each one.

The Aggies capitalized on a San Francisco mistake as senior Samantha Faber scored on a penalty kick in the 38th minute. Faber’s point would turn out to be the decisive goal in the match.

“Sam’s shot is absolutely wicked,” said women’s coach Maryclaire Robinson. “We’re trying to get her back to being a mid-range trouble maker.”

The second period brought an offensive frenzy from the Aggies. UC Davis controlled the tempo and took 10 shots while limiting the Dons to just one shot on goal. Despite the 10 shots, however, the Aggies couldn’t break through with a goal.

“I am very proud of how we fought,” Robinson said. “This was not one of our better outings. The pace wasn’t what I hoped. [San Francisco] did a great job of pressing and that pushed us a little bit.”

UC Davis 3, Montana 0

On a hot day, the Grizzlies seemed to wilt away in the heat.

The Aggies seemed to be constantly on attack with their offense. It was an easy day on defense for UC Davis as it outshot its counterparts 29-3.

In the fourth minute, Lisa Kemp passed a ball to the right side of the field to Kiele Argente, who promptly buried the ball in the left corner of the net.

“Lisa is very deceptive,” Robinson said. “She creates a lot [of opportunities] and she’s very difficult to defend.”

Although the Aggies couldn’t convert on any more opportunities in the first half, they came out blazing in the second and blew the game wide open.

“In order for the game to open up we needed early ball movement [to take] good angles,” Robinson said. “We had great energy and a great work rate.”

Right off the bat, sophomore Allison Kelly sent a shot that nicked the crossbar and bounced in for her team leading fifth score of the year.

Outstanding footwork by Argente allowed her to hit an open Annacy Wilson, which led to Kemp’s second goal of the afternoon and gave the Aggies a commanding 3-0 lead.

The lopsided score allowed Robinson to develop some of her second string and rest some of her starters.

“[Our players] were coming in and off the bench,” Robinson said. “We maintained fresh legs and they raised the level of play. It was fantastic.”

These wins are the first two home wins for the Aggies. For Robinson, it was a great feeling to come back home and win.

“It’s great to be back,” Robinson said. “This was our first Sunday home game. Students are back, and campus is now repopulated. It’s a great place to be.”

The Aggies homestand will be short-lived however. UC Davis will travel to Southern California for its next three games. The Aggies play Cal State Northridge on Friday at 7 p.m.

MATT WANG can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Aggies stay perfect conference play

0

Perfection isn’t easy.

If the men’s water polo team wanted to stay perfect in conference play, the Aggies needed to beat Santa Clara and Redlands during the Aggie Shootout last weekend at Schaal Aquatic Center. No. 3 California was also scheduled on the weekend, which didn’t make things any easier.

Saturday – UC Davis 5, Santa Clara 4

The beginning of the Aggie Shootout did not go smoothly for UC Davis, as it seemed to sleepwalk through the half against the Broncos. Early in the game, the Broncos took a commanding 3-0 lead on three quick goals. So poor was the performance that men’s water polo coach Steve Doten called on the bench to go out and fix it.

“[The first unit] came out slow,” Doten said. “The second line of guys did a great job.”

The second unit held off the blitz, and then it was the Bronco’s turn to face the heat as the Aggies pushed the tempo before the end of the half.

Matt Richardson and Colin Hicks were simultaneously in the zone as Hicks scored two goals and Richardson garnered two assists in less than 30 seconds.

In the second half, Aggie center Aaron Salit muscled his way in and put back a missed shot. Halfway into the third quarter, Ryan Hagens scored the go ahead goal.

Though the Broncos tied the game with a shot of their own, it was Hicks again who took advantage of an opportunity and fed an open Cory Lyle for the winning shot.

Saturday – California 13, UC Davis 8

The Aggies also came out slow against Cal again in this rematch of UC Davis’ first game in Berkeley.

After allowing easy goals to Cal, Doten called a timeout and sent in his second unit with the exception of goalie Kevin Peat.

“To play the No. 3 team in the nation is hard enough,” Doten said. “To come out mentally unprepared, it got really bad really fast. If [the first string] doesn’t want to play, I’ll find [players] who do.”

The Aggies stabilized and struck back.

Richardson found the back of the net at 3:53 left to go in the first period and then fed Salit for a score as the quarter ended.

The second period saw the Aggie offense outmaneuver the Bears as UC Davis outscored Cal 5-3. Salit and Lyle each scored twice in the second period with Richardson adding one more. At the end of the first half the score was deadlocked at 7-7, the upset seemingly within reach.

“[Salit] has been huge for us, and he’ll continue to be huge for us,” Doten said. “He’s such a threat out there and he causes problems for other teams.”

However, the Bears would ratchet up the intensity and take control of the game in the second half. Cal center Zach White would establish dominance in the five-meter and two-meter zones, scoring twice. Luka Saponjic would also add two and the Bears would outscore the Aggies 6-1 after the break.

“Our biggest problem defensively was their center,” Doten said. “[Cal] Zach White can make teams look bad. I think he made us look bad today.”

Sunday – UC Davis 14, Redlands 12

At the time of the contest, the Aggies were 10-4 overall, and 9-0 against conference opponents.

Though they had previously started slow against Santa Clara and Cal, they maintained a high offensive pace as they scored the first four goals against the Bulldogs. So dominant was their performance that at the half, the Aggies led 8-3 and prompted Doten to develop the second string.

Though the Bulldogs pushed for a comeback, the offense kept scoring with Lyle, Bernie Rodgers, and Richardson finding the net and putting the game out of reach.

UC Davis is now 11-4 overall and a perfect 10-0 in conference play. The Aggies will travel to Stockton, Calif. to play Pacific on Oct. 8.

MATT WANG can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Aggies lose two close games

0

The Aggies have had a difficult start to the year.

“It’s been a rough season so far,” said coach Dwayne Shaffer. “We’ve played well in stretches, but we haven’t put everything together.”

Things didn’t get any better for UC Davis on their most recent road trip to Washington.

Friday – No. 24 Portland 2, UC Davis 1 (OT)

The Aggies faced a difficult task in their first game in Seattle, Wash.

UC Davis was pitted against a solid Portland team and the Pilots started hot right out of the gate.

Portland took the early lead on a shot by Steven Evens that made it past diving keeper Ryan McGowan.

The Aggies leveled the game a few minutes before halftime, when two of their younger players linked up to score.

Freshman Alex Aguilar took a pass from fellow first-year student Kevin Schulte and pushed the ball to the left of the keeper and into the net.

The Aggies’ have counted on contributions like this from their freshmen all season.

“Our freshmen have played really well,” Shaffer said. “We’ve had great contributions from several of them.”

Despite the play from the young guns, UC Davis was unable to score for the rest of regulation, and the game went into overtime tied at one.

It did not take long for the Pilots to strike in the extra period.

Portland’s Jaren VanShaik put the ball into the right side of the net less than two minutes into overtime to hand the Aggies a 2-1 loss.

UC Davis finished the game with 11 shots on goal, six of which came from junior Lance Patterson.

Sunday – Washington 1, UC Davis 0

UC Davis tried to turn things around against the Huskies, but once again the Aggies fell behind early.

Washington scored in the 23rd minute when Husky Zach Portillos found himself wide open in front of the net and chipped the ball over McGowan.

UC Davis found itself chasing yet another game.

“We continued to put ourselves in a hole early,” Shaffer said. “When you go down 1-0 tactically everything changes. The game gets a little more hectic and you have to fight to get out of it.”

The Aggies had just one shot on goal in the entire game and were unable find the net.

In the end, UC Davis was stuck with another close loss.

The defeat put the Aggies at the record of 2-6-0 overall and 0-6-0 on the road.

“We’ve got a great supporting crowd,” Shaffer said, “and it’s a lot easier playing at home, but we’ve got a veteran team. There’s no excuse to not win just because we’re on the road.”

UC Davis knows they will need to improve to be successful this season.

“We’re not playing at the quality you need to win in Division I soccer,” Shaffer said. “To be honest nobody expected to be where we are right now record wise. We flat out need to be better.”

Things won’t get any easier for the Aggies in their next game. UC Davis will open Big West Conference play on the road against defending regular season champion UC Santa Barbara on Saturday.

TREVOR CRAMER can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Column: 2009 or 1929?

0

The Republican Party has been stoutest in it criticism of President Obama’s stimulus and the size of government among other things. The Obama administration is belatedly trying to portray the Republicans as the party of “No.” Well, it turns out looking at history, they know a thing or two about how bloated government and spending failed to lift the U.S. from the Great Depression.

The economic stagnation and massive joblessness $800-plus billion later and 18 months into his presidency, has revved up public despair that plays in Republicans’ favor. One name comes to mind: Republican President Herbert Hoover. Too many things happen to, for lack of a better nomenclature, provide the same narrative; only this time perfectly backward.

The year was 1929; then it was Obama in 2009. Forget the 9s. The presidency and both houses on Capitol Hill were Republican-controlled. Hoover was essentially a free market or pro-business guy, a fiscal conservative. He also tried to rule on consensus among business, unions and all stakeholders. Didn’t work. He tried passing laws like the Agricultural Marketing Act, Hawley-Smoot Tariff and asked Congress for $423 million for public works programs to put Americans to work and alleviate the suffering. Does “shovel-ready jobs” come to mind, anybody? Obama in his first stimulus and his recent $50 billion infrastructure proposal touted that.

In Hoover’s case the initial 423 million was too small to affect the economy significantly. By the time the Stock Market crashed and there was a cascading effect on the global economy, Hoover passed his own variation of the modern-day Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) called the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC). It was enormous, budgeting $ 1.5 billion just for public works. Yup, this was another Wall Street-like bail out of the big banks. And again, it was both small and failed to engender the type of recovery that could lift the country out of the Great Depression. And even then it was not all spent. Does any this sound familiar?

This was not the days of cyber globalization and 24-hour news networks, but cynicism was not exactly absent in such dire times of universal despair among Americans. The strength of despair did not need sound bites or edited pictures to pervade the country. It was happening to you and your neighbor. Americans actually starved and queued for food and basic needs. There was little relief and no recovery. People started calling the burgeoning shanty towns “Hoovervilles.” War veterans took their case to Washington in protest of bonus owed them and built a tent city where Hoover could see them from the White House. Hoover charged the D.C. police to evict the eyesore caused by what was labeled the “Bonus Army,” but the veterans resisted. After some violence and continued stalemate the U.S. Army’s Third Calvary under General MacArthur had the onus of doing what most historians think was the final knell on Hoover’s presidency-the violent removal of the vets.

Now, let’s talk Barack Obama and the current crop of Republicans. Again the last digits rhyme. Just like Obama and the Democratic Party face midterms in 2010, Hoover did in 1930. Without prejudice, let me state that history has a nasty habit of repeating itself. On Hoover’s watch, the Democratic Party captured Congress and made significant grabs in the Senate. If polls are crystal balls, you make that call.

If the Republicans take over Congress and almost do so for Senate, it will not be because their “pledge” is a superior agenda for the country. It will be protest votes fuelled by the anti-incumbency wave sweeping the country. I don’t want to sound like I am lavishing credit on some conservative think tank with Carl Rove and others angling themselves strategically enough to capitalize on the ill-fortunes of the Obama presidency.

By just saying no to “big spending, big government,” the Republicans may just have mirrored history to know what works and what doesn’t under the circumstances. Hollering ‘fiscal responsibility’ at a time when HUGE sums of money should be injected into the economy, absent the normal federal bureaucracy, is going to thwart a deficit-ridden government from taking the steps needed to keep us out of this mess. Messaging is simple and their (Republicans) job is cut out for them.

Unfortunately, the Obama administration could have pulled this off had they treated the jobs and the economy or stimulus for that matter as the ONLY item on their laundry list. But stimulus was ticked off, while they went on to health care and a series of other otherwise, debatably, plausible legislation. But who cares? On Main Street it’s job, jobs, jobs. Let’s just say Republicans learned from their mistakes. They wrote the book on stimulus.

FAYIA SELLU can be reached at fmsellu@ucdavis.edu.

Column: The Freshman 15

0

The Freshman 15 wasn’t always a source of anxiety for entering students. What was once known as the “freshman 10” has its origins in letters 19th-century college women sent home to their families to express their successful adjustment to college life. Food, as history professor Margaret Lowe found, was the center of social life for college women until the 1920s, when dieting became the new ethos on college campuses. Fast-forward 90 years and the term itself has gained five pounds, maybe from the weight of its negative connotation. But don’t put down your CoHo pizza slice just yet -there’s mixed evidence for the existence of this phenomenon.

Two professors from Carleton University analyzed 24 studies on the Freshman 15, collecting 3,401 cases to determine whether college freshmen do indeed gain weight. They concluded that there is both fact and fiction to the Freshman 15. While entering students do not, on average, gain the full 15 pounds, they do tend to put on 8.5 pounds through their first year of college.

So how does this happen, and what do we do about it?

“When students enter college and their environment changes, they change,” said Judith Stern, UC Davis nutrition professor and founder of the American Obesity Association.

College introduces change rapidly. We go from living with family to living in a dorm. We eat differently in our buffet-style dining commons. We make new friends, eventually forming a new social circle. We can have breaks between classes for hours. We stay up late, sleep in, and sometimes get no sleep at all.

Some of those changes, of course, are the usual suspects in the world of weight gain. Stress, which gets even the best of us, can cause overeating and even changes in our hormonal balance, leading to shifts in our metabolism and blood flow. Lack of sleep can change our appetite (not to mention, the longer you stay up, the more you eat – think late night runs to AMPM). But there are changes specific to college, too. The DC, which allows you to get however many refills of soda and seconds of food you want, doesn’t help. College students tend to drink more alcohol once they enter college, which leads to extra liquid calories, and arguably poor decision-making for the rest of the night. And then there are the munchies.

Though the changes are big, the fixes are small.

Drink at least 8 cups of water daily. Doing so cuts down on the extra calories, and drinking water helps to promote flexibility, detoxification and metabolism.

Eat a good breakfast. Starting your day hungry, while it seems to cut calories, actually serves to promote weight gain. This is because missing breakfast shifts your body into starvation mode, leading you to eat more later on.

Plan before eating. Every DC at UC Davis showcases their foods near the entrance. The next time you walk up to survey your options, take a second to plan your meal to the plate. Then stick to that one serving of Santa Fe Chicken Salad, two cups of water, and cookie to top things off.

Don’t get obsessed. It’s okay to eat sweets and indulge. Once in a while. As long as you don’t reward healthy eating with junk food, you’ll be building a sustainable habit. Everything in moderation.

Snack more, eat less. Instead of eating three large meals, or two uber-meals in a day (which often come out to more calories than 3 meals), eat 6 smaller-portioned foods throughout the day. Try a small breakfast in your dorm, a quick snack in lecture, a small lunch at the DC, a couple fruits in the library, a light dinner and a final snack to end the day’s eating two hours before you call it a night. The idea is to get neither hungry nor full.

Move. Unlike lots of students, most Aggies spend a fair amount of time biking or walking to class. In addition to this, hit the ARC for an hour. Studies show that physically active students are happier, healthier and do better in school.

A final piece of advice. Once every two weeks, hop on a scale to monitor your weight. If you can, try to separate your self-image from the number that displays. Tracking your weight is probably one of the best ways to keep it down. As Stern puts it, “Before you gain 15 pounds, you gain five.”

RAJIV NARAYAN gained the Freshman Negative 80, but he’s no purist. If you dig Yoloberry as much as he does, let him know when Irish Mint is the day’s flavor at rrnarayan@ucdavis.edu.