70.7 F
Davis

Davis, California

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Title

090827_ar_basterds.c

Headline: An Inglourious movie

Layercake: Director Tarantinos latest release lacks consistency, fun

By LAURA KROEGER

Aggie Arts Writer

Quentin Tarantino, director darling of critics and fan boys alike, created a real mess of a movie. Inglourious Basterds is his seventh film in 22 years, and after spending more than a decade working on the script, hes been publicly touting this one as his masterpiece. Unfortunately, his lengthy involvement in the project caused him to lose touch with what audiences find cohesive or entertaining.

Austrian actor Christoph Waltz plagues the films protagonists as the charismatic (and often strangely likable) Nazi Colonel Hans Landa. NicknamedThe Jew Hunter, he and his men are known for seeking out and killing Jews in World War IIs Nazi-occupied France, including the family of young Shosanna (Mélanie Laurent).

Years after her escape from Landa, Shosanna lives under a new name and runs a small cinema. A young and influential German soldier (Daniel Brühl) takes a liking to Shosanna, and in a misguided attempt to woo her, arranges for a Nazi propaganda film to premiere at her theater. Shosanna plots to take down the prominent Nazi guests in a fire, but unbeknownst to her the Basterds and the British army are hatching a similar plan.

The film that the previews portray as an action-revenge film in the vein of Tarantinos epic Kill Bill is actually saturated with useless, redundant dialogue. If youve seen the trailers, youve likely seen the most exciting parts of the film.

Though the film is named after the Basterds, their screen time is small, their influence arguable and their presence unassertive. They have as much depth as the guns they carry. In fact, viewers meet the less celebrated characters long before encountering the Basterds.

Inglourious Basterds is devoid of the energy that typically makes his films entertaining. Tarantino tends to either leap into violence with unyielding vigor, à la Kill Bill, or builds tension in the scene until the room seems ready to crack, like in Reservoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction.

Here the film neither delights nor shocks with its violence. It instead shows only gunfire and some gross-out scalpings that take up little time and leave little impact. Most of the scenes in Inglourious Basterds are so long and overdrawn that by the time theres a violent payoff (if there is one at all), the results are disappointing and expected.

Quirky Tarantino trademarks are inserted so impulsively that they become a sloppy patchwork for the films shortcomings. Instead of a consistent visual style, Tarantino includes one instance of Shaft-style superimposed text, a montage set to David BowiesCat People (Putting Out Fire), an all too brief scene of violence with a baseball bat and a voice-over by Samuel Jackson that condescends audiences intelligence.

However, the film has its moments. The camera found a way to truly inhabit the setting – depth, angles, framing and movement create memorable places you can mentally wander around in long after viewing the film. Actress Laurent is clearly talented and brings a great air of mystery to Shosanna. The eel-like Waltz easily steals the show.

Tarantinos exceptional knowledge of film allows him to innovate, but just because a film is unique doesnt guarantee quality. He took what should have been two or three decent movies and shoved them together into two and a half hours of unrecognizable mediocrity.

LAURA KROEGER can be reached at arts@theaggie.org. XXX

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here