66.7 F

Davis, California

Friday, April 12, 2024

LGBT town hall draws large crowd

About 400 people gathered Monday night for a town hall meeting organized by the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Resource Center at UC Davis.

The meeting was called after the entrance to the LGBT Resource Center was vandalized Friday with spray-painted epithets and derogatory statements. The UC Davis Police Department is investigating the incident as a hate crime.

Much of the early discussion was about whether the media should be allowed in the room. Four local television news crews had cameras rolling when LGBT Resource Center intern Laura Mitchell took the lectern and said some people were uncomfortable with the media presence.

“The media needs to leave — right now,” Mitchell said. “We’re respectfully asking you to pack up and go.”

A few minutes later, LGBT Resource Center director Sheri Atkinson told the audience that the media had been invited by a press release and that she agreed to do an interview with them in the back. The news cameras then moved into the hallway and interviewed students who were willing to speak.

Another point of contention was the presence of UC Davis administrators. Chancellor Linda Katehi spoke briefly at the beginning of the meeting to condemn the vandalism. More than half a dozen vice chancellors also came to listen and observe.

Sarah Raridon, chair of ASUCD’s Gender and Sexuality Commission, forcefully denounced them.

“I am seethingly angry that there are administrators here now who have never represented my community,” Raridon said.

Former ASUCD Senator Sergio Blanco said administrators were wrong to be reacting to the recent incident of vandalism rather than addressing the underlying issue of homophobia on campus. Blanco noted that BloodSource, a local blood bank, is still allowed to come to campus and run blood drives that explicitly discriminate against men who have had sex with men.

One student, who did not give her name, said it was good that administrators were present to show their support but said they needed to put that into action and provide more funding for the LGBT Resource Center and other resources on campus dedicated to supporting disadvantaged groups.

Several of the speakers — including students, staff, and faculty — said students should be required to take a class on oppression, diversity and hate speech. These calls were mostly met with support from the audience. One speaker, a staff member, said she has been required by various employers to attend diversity training programs that were basically pointless and cautioned against allowing ineffective diversity programs to be implemented at UC Davis.

ASUCD Senator Alison Tanner said it was important for people to act individually as well as collectively. She said people need to speak out when their friends use demeaning language, a point that another speaker expanded on.

“You can draw a direct line from someone saying ‘fag’ to someone vandalizing the center,” said the speaker, who did not give his name. He said that men need to be especially aware of what they are saying and what they are allowing their male friends to say — not just turn the other cheek and pretend it didn’t happen.

UC Davis police have not identified any suspects in the LGBT Resource Center vandalism incident. Anyone with information is asked to call UCDPD at 752-1727.

The LGBT Resource Center will host a workshop called “That’s So Bleep” on Wednesday from 7 to 9 p.m. in the Memorial Union King Lounge. The program is designed to raise awareness of the relationship between hate speech, prejudice and oppression.

JEREMY OGUL can be reached at newmedia@theaggie.org.


  1. Mary, I was at the event (obviously) and I am very certain that Raridon’s remarks were NOT met with overwhelming support from the crowd. They were met with support by about half the room — the other half sat quiet, and there were multiple speakers later who openly disagreed with her and were supported by members of the audience. Moreover, we weren’t able to include this fact in this article, but the LGBTRC has actually had the smallest cuts of any part of the Student Affairs budget: 5 percent.

  2. Sarah’s remarks were actually met with overwhelming support from the crowd. I think this short quote doesn’t capture what she was getting at. The administration representatives were there claiming to be outraged but have never shown that they had any kind of investment in making our campus a more welcoming environment (for lack of a better phrase) for people of nonnormative sexuality/gender/sex identities (for lack of a better word!). Cutting funding for the LGBTRC can be seen as a more subtle act of violence and complicit with the hate crimes. I’d like to refer you to this article put together by four Ph.D candidates at UC Davis: http://queers4publiceducation.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/queers-for-educational-justice/

  3. Denouncement of administrators in attendance–those that may be sympathetic to the cause–is a blissfully ignorant approach to the situation. Rejecting the nature of their statements is one thing, but claiming they ought not be there is a whole ‘nother matter. And, too Ms. Raridon–what do you mean there are administrators that have never represented your community? What do you want–an openly gay dean? Sorry, the hiring process doesn’t work like that.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here