59.1 F

Davis, California

Saturday, May 18, 2024

Supreme Court may challenge state immigrant tuition policy

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering challenging California’s policy of granting in-state tuition to qualified undocumented students.

Though the state’s AB 540 allows for these students to pay in-state tuition, the bill AB 131 would allow these students to be granted financial aid.

On May 27, the State Assembly passed the legislation by a vote of 46-25 and now goes to the State Senate for a vote.

Gil Cedillo (D-Los Angeles) authored the bill, which allows “students provided in-state tuition under AB 540 to also participate in financial aid programs,” said Scott Lay, president and CEO of the Community College League of California, in an e-mail interview.

The bill would exempt a student who has graduated or attended a California high school for three or more years from paying nonresident tuition at public colleges in California.

“California law provides in-state tuition to a limited groups of students who graduate from California high school but aren’t citizens,” Lay said.

Antonio R. Flores, president and CEO of the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HAUC), said the importance of AB 131 is that it would provide undocumented students with financial aid.

“We recognize that AB 540 allowed many of these students some access to higher education,” Flores said in an e-mail interview. “But unless financial aid is a possibility, most of these students are unable to afford completing a degree, particularly at four-year colleges.”

The federal Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, (DREAM Act) was created in 2011 to enact changes in our nation’s citizenship law. Although the federal DREAM Act did not pass this year, people are still advocating for the changes.

HAUC is more of an advocate of the federal DREAM Act.

“[It] would not only clear up the right of states to provide in-state tuition and financial aid, but would also create a pathway to citizenship, and allow these students to become full participants in the economy,” Flores said.

The National Immigration Law Center (NILC)’s DREAM Act Summary states two major changes.

The first is to allow some undocumented students “who have grown up in the U.S. to apply for temporary legal status and to eventually obtain permanent legal status and become eligible for U.S. citizenship if they go to college or serve in the U.S. military.”

The second goal would be to “eliminate a federal provision that penalizes states that provide in-state tuition without regard to immigration status.”

Furthermore, most undocumented students that come to American are “brought here as children, who have grown up here, who have gone to our schools” said Joshua Bernstein, the immigration director of the Service Employees International Union, in C-Span’s “Washington Journal” on May 21.

Bernstein said it is not the undocumented students’ fault for being brought to America. However, the majority of callers to the program believe that undocumented students should not obtain citizenship; rather they should be deported or given some kind of punishment.

Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin also offer financial aid for undocumented students.

The U.S. Supreme Court has not yet decided if they will challenge California’s law.

KIMBERLY LAW can be reached city@theaggie.org. 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here