48.7 F
Davis

Davis, California

Saturday, December 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 1664

Israeli-American journalist Yaakov Katz to speak tonight

0

UC Davis prides itself on being a politically aware and active campus, but how many students actually question what they read in the American news media?

Yaakov Katz will offer students a different view on the international news in a presentation today at 7 p.m. at Hillel of Davis and Sacramento at 328 A St., across from Toomey Field.

As the Israel correspondent for USA Today and the military correspondent and defense analyst for The Jerusalem Post, Katz will discuss American and Israeli journalistic perspectives and the portrayal of Israel in the media.

Katz will discuss the different perspectives of each news source and the ways perspective can and does affect ongoing Israeli policy and security development.

He will also speak about ongoing developments in Israel and how media coverage can affect the situation in Israel, according to the Hillel House website.

“Katz will be able to bring his unique perspectives regarding the difference between American and Israeli journalistic perspectives,said Aaron Sherman, sophomore international relations major and intern at the Hillel of Davis and Sacramento.

“He is writing for two different audiences,Sherman said.While most students are used to reading American coverage, this is a fantastic opportunity to learn about the Israeli coverage of Israel for and by Israelis, not just for Americans.

Katz has worked as the chief correspondent during the Gaza strip disengagement in the summer of 2005 and has covered the police beat, settler affairs, Israel Defense Forces operations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and the army’s relationship with numerous sectors of Israeli society.

“I don’t think UC Davis students are exposed to hearing speakers with his kind of experience,said Yonatan Barkan, Israel Programs Coordinator for Hillel of Davis and Sacramento.A lot of people are interested in understanding how media works and [how it] covers these conflicts and he can explain how these decisions are made.

Katz will speak about how to read news articles since bias may be unintentionally exhibited by news sources, especially when covering controversial topics.

“UC Davis students who are interested in current events and world development will be given an opportunity to discover a different way of looking at mainstream news articles, ” said Sherman.

Hillel House of Davis and Sacramento is a chapter of Hillel, the largest Jewish campus association in the world, according to its website.

 

KELLY KRAG-ARNOLD can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

Daily Calendar

0

TODAY

Reducing residential energy demands

Noon

3201 Hart

Yael Parag, from the University of Oxford, will speak on how government policies can cared good energy citizens.

 

The New Deal Now

5 p.m.

University Club

Pulitzer Prize winner David M. Kennedy will speak, along with Andrew W. Cohen and Sarah T. Philips. This event is sponsored by the Center for History, Society and Culture and the Institute of Governmental Affairs. A reception will follow the talk.

 

Peace Corps information meeting

5:15 p.m.

MU Garrison Room

Go to this meeting to speak to returned Peace Corps volunteers and learn how you can make a difference in both your own life and the lives of others.

Thursday Trivia Nights

6 to 7:30 p.m.

Silo Union

Test your knowledge of random facts and potentially win fabulous prizes along the way!

 

Poetry Slam Try-Out competition

7 to 9:30 p.m.

Griffin Lounge, MU

Go try out for the nationally renowned UC Davis slam team.

 

FRIDAY

Dan Barker talk

6 to 10 p.m.

123 Sciences Lecture Hall

Dan Barker, a minister of 19 years, left Christianity to become an atheist activist. Hear about his experience as he discusses his books Losing Faith in Faith and Godless. There will be a presentation, question-and-answer session and book signing.

 

Women’s volleyball vs. Cal State Fullerton

7 p.m.

The Pavilion

Go to this game and see a special performance from hip-hop dance group Boogie Monstarz.

 

Theatre Rice

7:30 to 9:30 p.m.

1100 Social Science

This improv group form UC Berkeley is well known for its comedy show. Tickets are on sale at Freeborn Hall; presale is $8 and $10 at the door. The event is sponsored by the Asian American Association.

 

The Frozen Causeway Classic

8 p.m.

Vacaville Ice Sports

Go watch the UC Davis ice hockey team battle rival Sac State!

 

Song and Dance Ensemble of West Africa

Jackson Hall, Mondavi Center

8 p.m.

This group combines traditional rhythms, instruments, folklore and mythology to describe West African life. Tickets cost from $12.50 to $45.

 

G.L.O.W. party

9:30 p.m.

Silo Union

This charity party will benefit Camp Concord and the Solar Electric Light Fund.

 

SUNDAY

The Velveteen Rabbit

Jackson Hall, Mondavi Center

3 p.m.

ODC/San Francisco, a dance ensemble, brings Margery William’s 1922 children’s book to life as a musical. Tickets cost from $10 to $30.

 

MONDAY

Project Compost

6 p.m.

Project Compost Office, MU Basement

Learn about radical composting on campus and how to get involved.

 

Texas HoldEm Poker Tournament

6 to 8 p.m.

Griffin Lounge, MU

Get there early; seats fill up quickly. Must be there by 6 p.m. If you’re one of the top 30 players, you could end up in the tournament of champions!

 

Throne of Blood

Studio Theatre, Mondavi Center

6:30 p.m.

As part of the Shakespeare in Cinema series, Akira Kurosawa’s 1957 film will be presented in Japanese with English subtitles. Tickets cost from $5 to $10.

 

 

To receive placement in the AGGIE DAILY CALENDAR, e-mail dailycal@theaggie.org or stop by 25 Lower Freeborn by noon the day prior to your event. Due to space constraints, all event descriptions are subject to editing, and priority will be given to events that are free of charge and geared toward the campus community. 

 

Pants Optional

0

Admit it, you’re guilty of procrastination. Most of us are. If you really, truly aren’t, then you must be one of those sick people who has a planner that they carry around everywhere with little neon-colored Post-Its sticking out of the edges, detailing your life from the moment you step outside of your front door to the time you say your last Hail Mary and hop into bed. You start drafting your papers a week before they’re due and you can always be counted on to have done the readings before class.

Congratulations.

For the rest of us, procrastination is a way of life. It’s not your fault. You’ve got better things to do, like clip your toenails, check your hair for split ends, stalk the cute boy from the Coho (he’ll respond to your Facebook messages eventually, he’s just been really busy lately. For the past eight months), and pick out new ringtones for everyone in your phone. Even that chick you had to call for notes that one time last quarter.

You’ve always got a great excuse. My personal favorite is the infamous claim,But I work better under pressure!” Before college, this was my excuse when my mother nagged me to do my homework. It’s true, though: unless I know that I’m truly screwed because my essay is due in six hours, I’m likely to not give a rat’s ass.

It’s funny how far some of us will go to avoid doing something that we know we should be doing. In fact, know that as this column was written, its author had not begun studying for the midterm she had in less than 8 hours. Some of us will resort to such tasks as cleaning because we dread having to delve into that scholarly journal or whatever tasty assignment is waiting. I could probably attribute most of my laundry being done to my academic obligations. Imagine that.

I could argue that there are cases in which procrastination is beneficial. Take for example the fact that until recently, Iforgotto go to Navin’s to pick up my readers at the beginning of every quarter. It wasn’t until I realized that I actually needed it that I would begrudgingly haul my ass over there and stroll right up to the counter to let those kindly folks know what I was looking for.

One of my professors this quarter is an awesome dude, but I’m not going to lie: He’s a bit intimidating. I heard the wordspop quizandreadingmentioned in the same sentence on the first day of class. This got me thinking that perhaps I should purchase the reader at the beginning of the quarter like the normal kids do. So I went on over to Navin’s and realized that there was a huge line. Then I decided to go to class and come back later. After six, there was still a huge line. Apparently Navin’s is crowded at the beginning of the quarter. This is reasonable. It makes sense. It just never occurred to me because I never had to deal with it. My procrastination kept me ignorant. Hey, don’t they say that ignorance is bliss?

When it comes to homework, I have to blame my procrastination on the fact that I’m ridiculously distracted. There are so many shiny objects out there in the world that sometimes I just don’t know which one to stare at first. They must be there for a reason. And you know that it’s secretly a little thrilling when you write a paper last-minute and get a higher grade than your goody two-shoes friend who put real time and effort into it. It makes you feel wise, powerful and all-knowing.

It’s not that I’m really irresponsible. I know, deep down, that I’m only hurting myself and that doing the study thing is only beneficial to me if I want to go ahead andfinish in fourand live that grand old American dream with a white picket fence, 2.5 kids and a Corvette or two.

But I still believe that we procrastinators are just a group of misunderstood individuals. We’re not out for self-sabotage. We just like to have our fun. Maybe it’s just the way we roll. Sometimes procrastination works out for the best. Someday the rest of the world will see.

But until that day, we must stand and unite. Tomorrow.

 

MICHELLE RICK procrastinated on writing her sign-off here, so her editor wrote it for her. Reach her at marick@ucdavis.edu.

A death and a birth

0

In many ways, Senator Barack Obama’s recent triumph radically altered much of the political and electoral landscape. Most importantly, it signals the passing of a prominent school of thought, displaced by another.

There are two major strands of thought in Western philosophy about individual choice and the government’s role. One champions freedom. This ideal indicates that through hard work, talent and motivation, an individual can ascend to the top of the social hierarchy, the master of his own destiny. Here, the government plays only a small role in the individual’s private life.

While the thought’s approach evolved over timebe it Darwinism, exceptionalism, capitalismthe fundamentals persisted. It forms the basis of modern conservative thought.

The second school emphasizes interdependence. Accordingly, we are social products, the consequence of a vast network of interrelated relationships. In this framework, fulfilling our ambitions by simply asserting our will isn’t that simple. There are constraints preventing us from doing that.

That constraint is the surroundings that shape us: society. Here, social upbringing predicts mobility. For instance, one living in certain conditions presumably often identifies with and adapts from his surroundings.

In turn, the individual reacts to the broader society with this internalization. When he meets someone who differs a lot, however, the very nature of the differences reduces opportunities for meaningful interaction. The cycle perpetuates, the behavior locking him in that societal structure.

Thus, even before birth, individuals have their future directions predetermined by the communal constructs they will inhabit. For a large segment of this group, especially the impoverished, the lack of proper education is a disadvantage.

Some believe that the solution to this is through direct assistance, advocating government programs for self-sufficiency. They also believe that upward mobility for this group doesn’t just lie in helping them, but in changing the overall system. They advocate progressivism, populism, socialism, radicalism. The focus is on the collective.

For the past two decades, the first school of thought often prevailed, despite economic research suggesting the equally vital role of stable societal conditions and institutions, created through government presence (or absence in others). Critical to the first school’s success was its transformational leaderReaganwho, through the power of his personality and message, won over certain segments of the electorate.

In the last eight years, however, the governing party deviated radically from, and practiced the extreme versions of, the conservative-Reagan principles. Indeed, the tremendous tax breaks for corporations and the affluent, and the market deregulations are a testament to this extremism.

As a consequence, corporations thrived, especially at the very top. Union bargaining power weakened, executive pay skyrocketed, middle-class pay stagnated. To be a CEO in America at this time was a dream come true.

The problem wouldn’t have been so severe if corporations earned their profits well and distributed them appropriately. Instead, some, especially Wall Street financial companies, gambled massively. Sensing opportunity, they hedged bets in financial derivativesa financial asset whose underlying value is dependent upon the performance of a different assetleading to unchecked sales of subprime mortgages to borrowers with questionable credit histories.

Moreover, some companies, under pressure to meet industry expectations, inflated earnings. This led to distrust in corporate accountability. Companies ripped consumers. But the government, the upholder of laws, disappeared too.

This situation is why Obama’s triumph is so interesting. With a massive congressional mandate, he can fundamentally alter the direction of the nation for the next decade. Should he fulfill his promise and resolve the most pressing problems, he could realign the center-right paradigm.

The first school of thought is under assault and in peril. The second one could dominate the next few generations. It has finally earned its due.

 

Support the second school of thought to ZACH HAN at zklhan@ucdavis.edu.

PhiLOLsophy

0

Are you male? Do you watch porn? If your answers to these questions areyesandfuck yesrespectively, you are more likely to objectify women. I am not assuming you do, but the likelihood is strong. The likelihood is correlated with how frequently you watch porn and how frequently your viewings are followed by an orgasm.

Porn usually consists of nude people (actors/actresses) engaging in a sexual act. What you don’t see is the girlsand/or guyspersonalities, needs, wants and desires. With enough exposure and orgasm reinforcements you may confuse porn with reality. This is unfair to the women or men who don’t want to be objectified. This may be the cause of dissonance between today’s intimate relationships.

Are porn viewers the only ones who are to blame for such a dissonance? I say that chick flicks are far worse than porn in this sense. Those sappy romance flicks give females a delusional notion of what romance is in reality. Some females who have been romantically desensitized by Disney films growing up won’t settle for anybody less than Prince Charming. Those same females grow up to watch other flicks like The Notebook and Titanic. They enter the dating world thinking a man will sweep them off their feet without realizing their fat ass isn’t going anywhere.

It would be outrageous to limit romance to only a mature audience, but completely acceptable to do so for porn. Romantic flicks have fewer stigmas than porn, but in reality, they are no less dangerous. This mental porn can have damaging effects on young women entering the dating scene. They will be victims of uneventful and disappointing relationships; they will be numb to their boyfriendsmeager attempts at being romantic. In turn, men are left to wallow in their own deficiencies, dumbfounded as to why they can’t turn their women on anymore.

Women at least have the luxury of knowing how to fulfill a porn fanatic’s fantasies; they have to look no further than his hard drive to seek out the answer. Men, however, can’t just mimic Hugh Grant’s mannerisms and hope for the best, romance doesn’t work that way. Romance is a function of unpredictability; therefore, women can never tell men exactly what to do in order to be romantic, because then it ceases to be romantic! Moreover, one romantic act may work for one woman, but not for another, complicating things further. The last thing Joe the Boyfriend needs is for women to raise the romantic benchmark and chick flicks aren’t helping.

I don’t believe porn is better than chick flicks, I think they are equal, and therefore should be treated equally. Society doesn’t stigmatize women for having unrealistic expectations for a man’s romantic abilities. Chick flicks portray the romantic males in a positive light, endowing them with attributes men aspire to have. In porn, women are treated in a way most women don’t want to be treated. This would probably explain why chick flicks have gotten a free ride for so long.

Unfortunately, this double standard won’t end any time soon in our sexually immature society; perhaps sex will never be as mainstream as romance. It’s a shame the two don’t merged to make the ultimate movie genre: Pornomance. Couples will never again argue over what movie to watch, ever. Meanwhile, here is my fleeting advice: If you ever have your girlfriend drag you into chick flicks saying,Hey, maybe you can learn a thing or two!” You equally have the right to invite her to see Dildo Desires 7, and say,Hey, maybe you can learn a thing or two!” And don’t forget to tell her to bring a notepad.

 

LIOR GOTESMAN would rather watch 2 hours of static than a cliché chick flick. Share your dismay at liorgott@gmail.com.

Are liberal professors the number 1 threat?

0

Several recent studies have shown that university students may not be as vulnerable to liberal indoctrination as some would have you believe.

In the politicized atmosphere of the recent elections, some have raised concern that liberalism in universities has caused discrimination against conservative professors and ideas and created a disproportionately liberal student body.

David Horowitz, one of the biggest proponents of depoliticizing universities, has gone so far as to call for an Academic Bill of Rights. In response, several studies examined the validity of such claims and found that professors do not have very much influence over studentspolitical ideology.

“Students remain as conservative as they’ve ever been,said A. Lee Fritschler, a professor of public policy at George Mason University.So the accusations that liberal professors are indoctrinating students don’t hold up.

Fritschler, along with co-authors Bruce L. R. Smith and Jeremy D. Mayer, recently published the book Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology in American Universities.

In their study, the three political scientists conducted a major survey of university faculty. They used the same question from a similar study conducted 35 years ago, adjusted them to fit current issues, then compared the results.

Fritschler said the results found a liberal tilt in faculty, especially in specific departments like the social sciences. The political bias was skewed the other direction in other departments like business. Despite shifts in professor bias, the political make-up of students did not change significantly.

He also said faculty surveyed, even conservative faculty, don’t feel they are being discriminated against.

According to Bob Huckfeldt, professor of political science at UC Davis, university students generally get information from a variety of sources. This allows them to filter the information as they see fit and come to their own conclusions.

“I think a lot of students today are sophisticated enough to be exposed to a diversity of messages,Huckfeldt said.And I think students are really good at ignoring professors, he said, laughing.

Another study published in the peer-reviewed journal PS: Political Science & Politics came to a similar conclusion. The study,Indoctrination U.? Faculty Ideology and Changes in Student Political Orientation, was conducted by Mack D. Mariani of Xavier University and Gordon J. Hewitt of Hamilton College in response to Horowitz’s book Indoctrination U.

By using data from the CIRP Freshman Survey, the College Student Survey and the Higher Education Research Institute Faculty Survey, the study examines the effect of professor ideology on students over a four-year period. The study found a shift in student ideology for some but attributes the change to other sources.

“Student political orientation does not change for a majority of students while in college, and for those that do change there is evidence that other factors have an effect on that change, such as gender and socioeconomic status,the study states.Based on the data presented in this study, college students appear to be more firm in their political beliefs than conventional wisdom suggests.

Fritschler said the proposals of Horowitz and similarly minded conservatives would do more harm than good if accepted. He said that passing a “bill of rightswould be a lawyers dream.

“It would give students the right to sue their university if they felt a professor was overly political in a class,he said.Of course if a student failed or got a grade they didn’t like they could sue. These things can’t be translated into law.

While the studies show that liberal professors are not systematically changing the political ideologies of their students, the political scientists do not assert that the university system is without problems.

Fritschler said their study concluded that there is not too much politics in universities, but too little.

“Universities want people who are kind of middle of the road and won’t embarrass the institution,he said.We think there is not enough civic discussion.

Fritschler said political discussion can lead to controversy, so many institutions and professors avoid it. As a result, many university students graduate without basic knowledge of American culture and politics. He said that legislation like Horowitz is endorsing would therefore make the problem worse.

“If you’re going to have people on you from the outside, the safest road is to keep your head down and avoid controversy,he said.

Huckfeldt also said there should be more political discussion, but professors should present many points of view. He also said that from his experience, the image of an entirely liberal faculty is not correct.

“I know my department is not like that,he said.It’s not quite as homogenously liberal as people seem to think.

 

ELYSSA THOME can be reached at city@theaggie.org. 

Gas prices continue to plummet

0

The average price in California for regular gasoline has fallen to $2.33, which is 44.8 cents lower than two weeks ago and over $2 lower than California’s all-time high set in June of this year at $4.588, according to the California Energy Commission.

Over the last month prices have sunk 92 cents in California and $1.00 nationally to an average of $2.20, according to a survey released Tuesday by the motorist group AAA.

Despite falling gas prices, demand has continued to slip. The number of credit card swipes at gas stations across the country decreased by 3.9 percent compared with last year’s numbers, as reported by a weekly Mastercard survey.

The main reason for these decreases is that crude oil prices, as determined by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, have decreased significantly.

Basket price, which is a weighted average of oil blends from various OPEC countries, has dropped $70 over the last six months, according to a weekly OPEC survey.

As a result OPEC decided to remove 1.5 million barrels per day from world oil markets beginning this November by applying output allocations to member countries, according to a recent Platts survey.

The reduction will be divided among 11 of OPEC’s 12 members, excluding Iraq, and will be implemented over the coming months. OPEC next meets Dec. 17 to discuss the effects of their efforts.

OPEC’s decision to reduce output of crude oil is a reaction to the downward trend in consumption, said Platts director of oil John Kingston in an e-mail.

“It should stop the fall in prices, but only if demand does not retreat further,he said. “[The decreased output] was implemented by OPEC simply to try and balance supply and demand in a market where demand has been falling far more rapidly than anticipated.

Though the goal in reducing output was to keep prices from falling even further, it is difficult to predict how prices will be affected, Kingston said.

“The decline in demand is essentially in charge of the market now, and it in turn is a function of the troubled global economy,he said.How much demand will fall is a key issue.

While difficult to speculate, OPEC’s behavior should suggest more low prices at the gas pump for consumers, at least through the winter, said California Energy Commission spokesperson Susanne Garfield.

“Demand has been on a downward trend and supplies are good,she said.When you have ample supply the price can stabilize.

In addition, the seasons generally play a role in fluctuating gas prices. During the winter, oil refineries use less of the costlier blending components commonly used in summer blends to keep burning temperatures lower, Garfield said.

“Winter is a lower demand season,Garfield said.As we move into the spring prices will probably move back up.

Another factor which determines gas prices in California, which are usually more expensive than elsewhere in the United States, is the specific blend of gasoline used and produced in California, she said.

In fact, California imports only about 10 percent of its supply, which is used as blending components, while the rest comes from local refineries, Garfield added.

“There are just 13 refineries in California which produce the California Air Resources Board certified oxygenate blending gasoline, which is more costly to produce,she said.

While prices have been on a downward shift, consumers are still encouraged to shop around for the best bargains, Garfield said.

“Continue to do the same things you did when it was $4.50 a gallon,she said.All the usual tips; keep your tires inflated properly, don’t carry extra weight and keep under the speed limit because you lose a lot of efficiency the faster you go.

 

AARON BRUNER can be reached at city@theaggie.org. 

UC Davis urges President-elect to give science adviser cabinet rank

0

At the end of October, almost 180 science, education and business groupsincluding UC Davis – sent a letter to Senators Barack Obama and John McCain urging them to appoint a science adviser with a cabinet rank by Inauguration Day on Jan. 20.

The letter notes that many issueshealth care, energy, economic competitiveness, climate changerequire sound scientific advice, making itcritical that the next president seek out and rely upon sound scientific and technological advice early and often in the new administration.

President Bush appointed his science adviser, John H. Marburger III, several months into the administration, and neither the Bush nor the Clinton administration gave their science advisers cabinet rank.

The letter urges the President-elect to appoint an adviser to the cabinet with the title Assistant to the President for Science and Technology sothis individual can participate immediately in coordinating relevant policy and personnel decisions relating to science and technology.

The letter was sent to both candidates on Oct. 30although now Obama is the relevant recipient.

The effort was spearheaded by The American Association for the Advancement of Science and The Association of American Universities.

“The letter is about appointing a science adviser early and raising the status of the science adviser in the White House,said Barry Toiv, spokesperson for AAU.During the campaign, Senator Obama said he plans to do both of these things, so we hope that will be the case.

UC Davis is a member of the 62 public and private research universities of the AAU, a nonprofit organization that addresses issues between research universities and the federal government.

UC Davis was notified of the letter when the AAU sent out one of its periodic alerts for members to consider. Karl Engelbach, director of federal government relations at UC Davis, received the request and after reviewing it made a recommendation to Chancellor Larry Vanderhoef, who agreed to endorse it.

“Because science is so important to our nationcritical to economic development and to maintain competitivenessscience will play a critical role in the future,Engelbach said.Because of that I thought it was important for the president to include a cabinet position.

UC Davis receives federal research funding as well as federal financial aid.

“Federal research dollars are really critical to campusoverall [the campus] receives almost $300 million per year for federal funding or research activities on our campus,Engelbach said.

AAU and AAAS have been working together since early in the presidential election with other members of the scientific community to ensure that issues related to science were taken up in the campaign.

The decision to draft a letter was a complement to other efforts to elevate science-related issues higher on the candidatesagendas. While it did not achieve its original goal of having a debate between Obama and McCain solely on science issues, the Science Debate 2008 organization did successfully manage to raise the profile of science issues in the campaign, Toiv said.

“Senator Obama did not make a commitment on cabinet rank but he did indicate that the science adviser would have higher status in the White House,Toiv said.

The AAU has prepared and submitted a list of potential candidates for the position to the administrative transition team, Toiv said.

“We are hoping right now to get the attention of transition teams once they are formed and get response about their intent,said director of the Center for Science Technology Congress at the AAAS Joanne Carney.The President-elect in the past stated [he would] nominate a science adviser soon, so we’re hoping to get that narrowed down by the time of inauguration.

Carney said since the letter was sent so close to the Election Day they were not expecting an immediate response.

“[The position] allows them to participate in cabinet meetings, given the fact that there are so many national issues that intersect with energy science and technology security,Carney said.These are issues discussed in cabinet meetings.

 

POOJA KUMAR can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

 

Pulitzer Prize winner to discuss ‘The New Deal Now’

0

During an economic crisis that evokes comparisons to the Great Depression, many historians are arguing that the New Deal has never been more relevant.

The Center for History, Society and Culture is sponsoringThe New Deal Now, a two-hour public forum that will feature three historians from three different universities. The event will begin today at 5 p.m. at the University Club, located in the Arboretum just across from Mrak Hall and next to Wyatt Pavilion.

The panel includes David Kennedy, a professor emeritus of history from Stanford and Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945.

Andrew Cohen and Sarah Phillips, history professors and New Deal scholars from Syracuse and Columbia Universities, respectively, will join Kennedy.

As many historians have drawn parallels between the elections of and economic crises facing Obama and Roosevelt, the New Deal has once again been up for debate, Cohen said.

“It seems the recent election has made the history of the 1930s a charged political topic, so it’s especially important we understand the subject,Cohen said in an e-mail interview.

Cohen, the author of The Racketeer’s Progress: Chicago and the Struggle for the Modern American Economy, 1900-1940, said he will discuss several aspects of the New Deal.

“First, I’ll discuss the scholarship describing the New Deal’s impact on seemingly unrelated areas of American life, such as criminal justice, the environment [and] gender roles,Cohen said.

“Second, I’ll talk about research into the New Deal’s impact on understudied populations, like Southerners, Westerners and the lower middle class. Third, I’ll argue that historians need to re-consider traditional explanations for why the New Deal happened in the 1930s,Cohen said.

Phillips, a scholar of the New Deal’s conservation and agricultural policy, said she will discuss how historiansinterpretations have evolved over time.

“Now there seems to be a very hopeful convergence between scholarly assessments of New Deal liberalism and all the current talk of the need and opportunity for another New Deal now,Phillips said.

Phillips said she will argue how the New Deal’s conservation and agricultural policy is a helpful model given the United Statescurrent long-term investment in green energy, jobs and food.

Kennedy, who could not be reached for an interview by press time, is noted for hisintegration of economic and cultural analysis with social and political history,according to his Stanford University faculty page. He has taught history at Stanford since 1967.

The forum is being sponsored by the Institute of Governmental Affairs and the Center for History, Society and Culture, whichfosters research across social science boundaries,said its director, Eric Rauchway.

Rauchway, a professor of history at UC Davis and New Deal scholar himself, said the CHSC will host seven more events this year, all of which will be targeted to general audiences.

 

PATRICK McCARTNEY can be reached at campus@theaggie.org

Chancellor to visit Iranian universities

0

In his last year as chancellor of UC Davis, Larry Vanderhoef is in no way taking it easy. The long-serving chancellor embarks on his second trip to Iran tomorrow.

Chancellor Vanderhoef will make the visit along with five other American university leaders as part of a delegation sponsored by the American Association of Universities. On the seven-day trip, the group will visit several Iranian universities in the interest of strengthening scientific and educational ties between the two countries.

“The belief is that strong academic ties can really be the basis for greater exchange and understanding between our two countries,Chancellor Vanderhoef said.I think everybody believes that this is a small step in opening the doors that seem right now to be almost closed.

The AAU organized the trip in response to an invitation from the Sharif University of Technology. Other attendees include the presidents of Cornell, Carnegie Mellon and Rice Universities.

“Most of the presidents and chancellors who were invited have either themselves or their institutions participated in exchanges with Iran,said Barry Toiv, spokesperson for the AAU.Chancellor Vanderhoef visited Iran in 2004 and was a logical candidate for the trip.

Vanderhoef’s 2004 visit was reported to be the first high-level university visit to Iran since the country’s 1979 revolution. While his decision to make the trip drew considerable criticism given the political climate of the time, Vanderhoef maintained the gesture was not political.

“We’re simply one university wanting to talk to another university about ways in which we can work together,Vanderhoef wrote in an online journal during the trip.And, perhaps in the process, one small step can be taken toward a return to normalcy in the Middle East.

Vanderhoef said he was left with a very positive impression of Iran’s system of higher education after his trip. He also noted that prior to the 1979 revolution, Iran sent more students to U.S. universities than any other country.

“We ran into alum after alum and they all have a very strong positive feeling about the U.S. and want their children to have the same opportunity they had to come here for education.

Vice Provost of Outreach and International Programs William Lacy accompanied Vanderhoef in 2004 along with several other UC Davis administrators.

“We visit four universities and they all had some University of California educated faculty,Lacy said.I would encourage the chancellor to connect with some of the hundreds of UC Davis alumni who live in Iran and to continue to explore ways to collaborate.

As a follow-up to the trip, Graduate School of Management Dean Nicole Biggert visited Iran in 2006 to establish ties and meet candidates for an exchange program. As a result, two Iranian MBA students studied at Davis in 2007 and two more in 2008.

“There was the potential for quite a lot more,Vanderhoef said.When we went, Khatami was president and that changed right after. They got a more conservative president and he seems not as open to those kinds of exchanges.

However the problem stems from both sides, as it’s often difficult, if not impossible, to get an entry visa from either country, he said.

“It’s getting better but the further back you go and the closer you get to 9/11 the more difficulties we’ve had,he said.

Vanderhoef said that with this upcoming trip it seems both countries have realized the way to improve their relationship might be through universities.

“These visits themselves are indications that Iran is opening up,he said.And the State Department is very aware of this tripthey know and approve.

The State Department will sponsor subsequent visits to the U.S. by presidents of Iranian universities following the AAU visit, Vanderhoef said.

“I’m very hopeful about this,he said.Universities have a role to play at this level and this is an indication that they are.

 

ALYSOUN BONDE can be reached at campus@theaggie.org

Bike Church evicted from Domes property

0

It’s time to say a little prayer for the Bike Church, parishioners.

The non-profit bicycle co-op has offered do-it-yourself training workshops and used bike parts for the Davis community for nearly five years. However, due to several breaches in university regulations, Student Housing has evicted the church from its location next to the domes sustainable living area.

“I was really shocked and disappointed,said co-founder of the church, Chris Congleton.We were working for three months with the university to improve [our property] and now they just want us to disappear.

The eviction notice was given to the ministers of the Bike Church last month after members sought to renovate their property in order to comply with university regulations. Student Housing was scheduled to conduct a walk-through inspection on Oct. 1 to decide if those efforts were adequate.

When Student Housing was notified that the church’s property did not meet the campus fire code, they canceled the inspection. When the Bike Church questioned the progress of the inspection, Student Housing sent the eviction notice.

In the notice Chuck Huneke, assistant director of residential education for Student Housing, sited various reasons for the eviction. He wrote that the church did not gain approval from the campus for their main structure, their property contained hazardous materials that made the university liable for any injuries, members used tools without signing waivers and they did not set up an appropriate account for their donations.

“Ultimately, as the Bike Church grew and developed into its own independent entity separate from the Domes, there was not much Student Housing or the Bike Church members could do to keep it on Student Housing property,Huneke said in an e-mail interview.If anyone were to get injured or file a lawsuit against the Bike Church, Student Housing would assume the risk. This is not something we are willing to do.

In response to the eviction, members of the church were offended and even mystified at Student Housing’s decision. Many felt that despite their greatest efforts to be beneficial to the campus, the university was unsupportive.

“We’ve made a lot of sacrifices and put in a lot of work to improve the Bike Church and make it so that there were no hazards on the property,said Darach Miller, a sophomore biological sciences major and minister at the Bike Church.I don’t even know what else we could have done to prevent this.

However, Huneke insists that Student Housing put forth their best efforts to work with the church. At the beginning of the summer, Student Housing sent the Bike Church a list of improvements they needed to make before an Oct. 1 inspection. The real issue, as both Huneke and ministers have said, was in the communication between Student Housing and the church.

“The problem we encountered frequently was that there was no one person or leadership group for Student Housing to contact as issues arose,Huneke said.

Ministers felt strongly about this issue of communication, saying that Student Housing did not give them a fair chance to improve as well as neglected to provide suggestions on how to fix their liability problems. They also noted some unannounced inspections by the fire department and Student Housing as contributing factors to their dismay.

The Bike Church will not completely disappear after their Dec. 31 scheduled departure from the university property. Though they haven’t found a new location, they are considering coordinating with the city of Davis to find a central location where students and community members can utilize their resources, in addition to solving their liability issues in compliance with the university’s legal obligations.

“We’re working hard to have the university be responsible and help us find a place to serve the community,Congleton said.I feel like that place should be where it is now because the domes are an amazing property geared towards sustainability, which is what the university’s mission is.

Ministers have created a petition for those students and community members who would like to persuade Student Housing to keep the Bike Church on campus. The petition can be accessed at petitiononline.com/SaveDBC1/petition.html.

 

 

LAUREN STEUSSY can be reached at campus@theaggie.org

Campus Judicial Report

0

Submitting another student’s work as one’s own

 

A plant sciences professor referred a student for submitting her friend’s essay as her own. In a prior administration of the class, the friend earned very high marks for a paper on sugarcane growth. Knowing that this year’s essay prompt was identical, the referred student asked to see her friend’s essay for reference, and then copied the essay verbatim, submitting it as her own work. She admitted to wrongdoing and agreed to a one-quarter suspension, counseling with CAPS and a time management workshop with the Learning Skills Center. Because the student had prior violations on file, she was also sanctioned to Deferred Dismissal, meaning a subsequent academic violation would lead to dismissal from the university.

 

Using unauthorized material during an exam

 

A student in an economics class was referred for using cheat sheets during a final exam. The teaching assistant saw the student sitting on a sheet of paper that resembled an answer sheet from prior exams and saw several more sheets under her seat. Another student also witnessed the referred student shuffling papers and making noise, suspecting some misconduct. When confronted by the TA, the referred student denied that the cheat sheets belonged to her although they were in her handwriting. The student eventually admitted that the cheat sheets belonged to her. Having been previously suspended and on Deferred Dismissal status for two prior referrals, the student was dismissed for her third violation of the Academic Code of Conduct.

 

The Campus Judicial Report is compiled by student members of the Campus Judicial Board. Additional information about SJA and the Campus Judicial Board may be found at sja.ucdavis.edu.

 

UCD to train responders in large animal rescue

0

Eight cattle paraded across the highway near Antioch this May causing a traffic jam that lasted close to four and a half hours.

When the fire department arrived, the lights and sounds spooked the cattle into scattering and running for their lives into Interstate 680. Four out of the eight cattle were shot multiple times by the highway patrol officers and the sheriff’s department.

Earlier this March, a trailer holding two adult horses tipped over on Interstate 5 resulting in one horse on top of the other. Highway patrol officers hesitated to open the trailer doors in case the horses became loose on the highway. Ultimately, the bottom horse died due to the prolonged pressure of the horse on top.

Dr. John Madigan, director of the International Animal Welfare Training Institute (IAWTI) at UC Davis, said both of these situations could have been avoided if the officials were educated about animal behavior and simple handling techniques. Madigan created the Emergency Services Protocol this year in response to the mishandling of large animal accidents.

“The purpose of the [Emergency Services Protocol] is to have a coordinated response to accidents on the highway that involve large animals,Madigan said.

Inspired by the British Emergency Services Protocol, this program trains fire departments and veterinarians in large animal technical rescue for instance, the procedure required to extract a horse or cattle from a ditch. The UC Davis program is working with the UC Davis and Sacramento Fire Departments.

Cheryl Ellis, the Veterinary Emergency Response Team student president, conducted the first training session this Monday along with other trainers. The session focused on basic technical skills such as how to make a halter for a horse out of rope, how to roll a down horse and safety techniques.

“We taught everybody how to safely roll a horse keeping in mind the safety zone around the horse, or thekill zone,‘” said Ellis, a third-year UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine student.If you were to walk near a [down horse’s] belly between its legs, that’s called thekill zone‘ [because] if that horse should try to jump up and you’re not expecting it, you could easily get killed.

Trainers also integrated the Incident Command System, a protocol procedure already used by the fire department.

“Say you have five horses all down stuck in the mud, then you would have one incident commander, five operations officers and five safety officersone for each horseand they’re running that particular scene,Ellis said.What often has happened in the past is that if you get people around a rescue situation, you have too many chiefs around the fire and everyone is trying to do it their own way. So, the ICS is a great way to know who’s in charge.

Tracy Stevens, the deputy director of the IAWTI, is in the process of creating amatrixof partnerships with the different emergency response agencies so the program is a multi-agency coordination.

“[The matrix is] so that in the event of a disaster, whether on a small localized or a large scale, all of the animal components are connected such as animal control, the fire department, office of emergency services,Stevens said.

Safety is highly stressed in the training sessions.

“We know that if a horse owner’s there, they’re going to put themselves in danger trying to rescue their own horse,Stevens said.We want to [work] in combination with the fire department, the police and the animal control officers to help rescue that horse, and by doing that, we [also] keep the owners safe.

“One of Dr. Madigan’s goals,Ellis said,is to have the [veterinary students] graduate from this university and then go to wherever [they’re] going to go to make a living and start teaching this sort of rescue training to the local fire department and the local community there and have a snowball effect.

UC Davis is the third largest animal technical rescue group in the country with this type of teaching program.

 

 

POOJA DEOPURA can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

VERT training Nov. 10, 2008

Breaking cultural barriers through comedy

0

Undergoing stressful audition processes, dealing with intense criticism left and rightbreaking into the entertainment industry is hard enough. Imagine having to overcome problems of misrepresentation and underrepresentation to boot.

In an attempt to bring attention to Asian Americans in the performing arts, the Asian American Association Film Festival invited UC Berkeley improv/sketch comedy group Theatre Rice to the Davis campus. The event is tomorrow at 7:30 p.m. at 1100 Social Sciences. Pre-sale tickets are $8 and can be purchased at the Freeborn Hall Ticket Office. Tickets will also be sold at the door for $10.

Comedian Vijay Suzuki, a UC Berkeley student, will open the show. UC Davis junior international relations major Zuodi Liao will also take the stage with a rap performance.

Theatre Rice was started in 1998 in Berkeley. Their main focus was to provide an organization that promoted Asian American students to perform in the theatrical arts, said Asian American Association Film Festival co-director Allison Arachea, a senior double majoring in film studies and English. The group donates its proceeds to organizations such as the Asian American Theater Company and Youth for Asian Theatre.

It is also one of the few primarily Asian American performance groups in the Bay Area, added Tiffany Young, who is also a co-director of the AAAFF.

Arachea described comedic style of Theatre Rice to that ofSaturday Night Live.She said that though the group sometimes touches on issues within the Asian American community, its comedy is far from esoteric.

“[Theatre Rice] is very universal because they satirize everything,said Arachea.They’re all over the place.

The group also delves in other areas of performing arts, such as dramas, film and music.

“They’re all-around,said AAAFF financial coordinator Johnny Wu, a senior biological sciences major.They do every type of facet in theatre and performing arts. It’s not just that it’s a bunch of Asians doing comedy for Asians, it’s a bunch of Asians doing comedy in general.

In addition to combating skewed stereotypes afflicting Asians in the mainstream media, Theatre Rice also works to remedy the lack of an Asian American presence in the industry.

In Asian cultures, pursuing things like dramatic arts and theater and comedy are not really encouraged,Arachea said.It’s mostly parents who want their children to pursue more conventional jobs.

Wu attributed this traditional way of thinking to the structure of most Asian American families.

“Most Asian American students are either second or third generation Americans [whose] families came to this country to try to succeed,Wu said.The easiest way to do that was to break the language barrier and go into the field of science or math.

“Going into film or theatre is very hardif it’s hard for white people, it’s even harder for Asian people,he added.

Theatre Rice’s performance is just one of the events in anticipation for the Asian American Association Film Festival. The festival, which will be held in May, is sponsored by the Asian American Association, an organization that was established in 2000.

It exists mainly to provide a support network for Asian American students at Davis and to combat stereotypes and address issues that affect [these] students,Wu said.

 

RACHEL FILIPINAS can be reached at arts@theaggie.org. 

Shakespeare through the director’s lens

0

Every quarter, the Mondavi Center for the Performing Arts chooses a new theme for theirFocus on Filmseries. Upcoming themes for this year include cases of mistaken identity in Alfred Hitchcock movies and movies that inspired the work of director Paul Haggis. This fall’s theme isShakespeare in the Cinema.

“Focus on Filmwas intended to exhibit art house films for students and non-students alike. The seriesnext event will screen Throne of Blood on Nov. 17 at 6:30 p.m. at the Studio Theatre. Tickets are $10 general admission and $5 with a student ID. An informal reception will follow the screening.

There was a specific reason Shakespeare was chosen as this term’s theme, Mondavi executive director Don Roth said in an e-mail interview. The Mondavi Center is hosting aSeason of Shakespeareseries throughout the year, which includes stage performances as well as other exploratory efforts.

Roth said that he felt that the two programs would complement each other well and that the plays of Shakespeare would resonate with students.

“The underlying theme [of the series] is the relevance of Shakespeare to our lives today,Roth said.That’s what makes his plays so great. Despite the centuries that have passed, you will recognize friends, relatives, colleagues, their emotions, their strengths and weaknesses in the characters of Shakespeare’s plays.

So far, this quarter’s series have featured the cinematic adaptation Twelfth Night and the documentary Looking for Richard. Monday’s screening of Akira Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood will be the last film of theShakespeare in the Cinemaseries.

Set in medieval Japan, the 1957 film stands out from the rest of the Shakespearean-inspired films.

“Shakespeare is obviously a master that everyone knows,said Jessica Kelly, Mondavi Center senior writer for public relations.Kurosawa is probably one of the most, if not the most, famous Japanese director. He made several Shakespeare plays into his own masterpieces.

“I think it really is the most authentic take on Macbeth,Kelly added.It really captures the story so well.

UC Davis professor and chair of the East Asian Languages and Cultures department Chia-ning Chang said in an e-mail interview that Kurosawa used aspects of traditional Japanese Noh theater and Noh music in Throne of Blood. Chang said that Kurosawa skillfully changed the original setting of Macbeth to medieval Japan to createhis own drama of ambition, betrayal and human fragility.

Ultimately, the choice of Throne of Blood to anchor the fall series is a testament to the power of Shakespeare’s plays to transcend time, space and creative director.

Roth admitted to being afilm nut,and acknowledged that many students on campus have the potential to be passionate about film as well. He said he hopes that attending theShakespeare in the Cinemaseries will help recruit a few more converts.

“Don’t waste these great movies by seeing them on a home video system,Roth said.Here’s a chance to see the real deal.

 

LAURA KROEGER can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.