54.5 F
Davis

Davis, California

Sunday, January 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 1317

Though funny and unique, Gallathea leaves audience mystified

0

Gallathea, a thoroughly thought-provoking play, evokes lots of laughs, a few sighs and a couple of yawns. Although funny and unique, some scenes are dated, and the overall effect of the play is brought down by actors who are inaudible or ineffective.

John Lyly’s Elizabethan-era play has been revamped by the theater and dance department. Directed by Peter Lichtenfels, Gallathea profiles the love, the hunt and the sacrifice of an English countryside village. It opened to a largely empty auditorium last Thursday night.

In an English village, the loveliest virgin is sacrificed every five years, and Tyterus, the father of the most chaste and beautiful daughter, Gallathea, disguises her and sends her off into the forest to save her from death. From the start of the show the conflict within Gallathea is masterfully portrayed by Gia Battista, as she thinks it’s her duty to the country to be the one sacrificed. On the other side of town Melebeus (Will Klundt) hatches the same plan for his daughter Phillida (Venessa E. Archuleta), who, unlike bold and daring Gallathea, is rather mousey, and more willing to be sent away.

Inside the forest, the nymphs of Diana and Venus’s puckish son Cupid have their own chase and conflict as the chaste nymphs try to deflect Cupid’s devilish advances in vain.

Ting Jung Lee as Cupid is truly the breakout star. She plays the male Cupid with artistic bravado that is oddly reminiscent of most Ken Jeong characters. Lee’s performance as the secondary character Haebe, the not so beautiful virgin pawned off in the sacrifice to Neptune, had the auditorium roaring with laughter.

As those scenes unfold, the completely unrelated side story of the adventurous trio of brothers opens up; sadly only Matthew Canty’s Raffe gets stage time. At the end of the play when the three brothers reunite, it is almost confusing as to who the other two are.

When Gallathea and Phillida meet, brought together by Diana (Alison Sundstrom) they fall in love in exactly three scenes. In so little time the actresses bring enough emotional power to the characters that the audience starts to sympathize with the awestruck lovers even if they are both girls pretending to be boys.

The final scene of the show, where the big reveal is imminent, is the best part of the show. The gods bicker like children, the townspeople are dismayed, and the lovers are exposed. The cast plays it up with the outmost of energy and it seems like a fitting conclusion to a play that sheds light on many modern problems in society.

The town, the forest, and all other scenes are all played on the same set, which in the simplest terms is a giant jungle gym with a floating set of stairs put off to the side and some bushes meant to be the forest. The stage has no curtains or side stages, actors have full reign of the stage and sometimes they even climb into the audience. The choreography is done in such a way that at most times it seems oddly appropriate for the characters, who unabashedly act like children, to be happily hanging and sliding down the set.

There is no soundtrack. The set and the actors clomping around on stage provide all background noise. Video projections both frame and shed light onto the play, which is meant to be raw and not hide anything.

Walking into the theater and seeing the stage crew cleaning up the set and actors milling about getting ready for the performance took some mysticism out of watching the play. It felt more like being at the dress rehearsal rather than opening night, even though this was part of the play.

The audience is asked to leave their cell phones on and text and capture the play in any way that they wish, but it didn’t seem like much of the audience understood or made use of the concept.

Overall the play provides a nice way to spend a weekend night, even if at times there are lulls on stage and actors are hard to understand.

The cast of Gallathea will give its final performances tonight through Saturday at 8 p.m. and Sunday at 2 p.m. at Wright Hall’s Main Theater. Tickets are $12 to 14 for students.

ANASTASIA ZHURAVLEVA can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

Column: Smile for the camera

2

At the height of their fame, Jon and Kate Gosselin and their eight kids were one of America’s favorite families. But celebrity came at a price.

Their TLC reality show, “Jon and Kate Plus 8,” documented the everyday struggles and triumphs of raising six-year-old twins and two-year-old sextuplets. Episodes gave an up close-and-personal peek at their lives in suburban Pennsylvania – including theme park outings, bedtime routines, temper tantrums and everything in between.

Now, thanks to Jon and Kate’s ugly divorce in 2009 and recent reports that two of the sextuplets have been expelled from school, audiences and child psychology experts have once again fired up one of the most heated debates of the last decade: Should kids be filmed for reality TV programs?

Jon and Kate are hardly the only parents to allow cameras to capture their kids’ every move. The Duggar family of Arkansas has been the subject of countless specials and series, most recently “19 Kids and Counting” (guess why they got their own show), and kids are featured in popular shows from “Run’s House” to “Keeping Up With the Kardashians.” Americans are simply fascinated by famous families and their children.

Still, the legality of such programs is questionable. Children who appear on reality TV shows aren’t subject to the same child labor regulations as child actors or performers because they are “participants,” not “employees.” This means that children on reality shows, like the Gosselin and Duggar kids, could be filmed for long hours or for days on end. The studio is under no legal obligation to adhere to commonly accepted child labor practices and limitations.

An investigation by the Los Angeles Times in June found that 11 shows currently filming, including “19 Kids and Counting,” the “Real Housewives” franchise and “Raising Sextuplets,” had not filed paperwork to hire minors.

The psychological impact of a life led in front of TV cameras is also cause for concern. The Gosselin kids’ recent expulsion from school certainly raises doubts about the quality of life a child can have when his or her existence is broadcast on TV for the world to see.

Hilary Levey, sociologist and post-doctoral fellow at Harvard University, said in an op-ed for USA Today that the cameras force kids to perform constantly, even as they are supposedly “being themselves.”

“Unlike, say, Miley Cyrus, who played the role of Hannah Montana, reality TV parents essentially consent for their children to “play” themselves,” Levey said. “Children’s personalities are dissected by viewers, and any embarrassing activities, like potty training, are preserved on the Internet – or in syndication.”

While participating in a reality show could have its benefits, the cons far outweigh the pros. Kate Gosselin often defends her decision to continue her show by citing all the opportunities her children have been given, such as going on fancy trips and getting free stuff like custom-built playhouses. But at what point does the money cease to pay kids back for their lack of privacy or quiet family time that most children take for granted?

Would the Gosselin kids, if given the chance, trade their action-packed Hawaiian birthday vacation (filmed for the show, of course) for the normal life they had before “Jon and Kate?”

Unfortunately, the kids are never able to speak out until they’re adults and by then it’s too late. I have a sneaking suspicion that in 20 years the Gosselin kids will publish a tell-all book, and we’ll all be ashamed that we simply sat and watched as their young lives fell apart before our eyes.

“Jon and Kate Plus 8” used to be one of ROBIN MIGDOL’s favorite shows. Now it just makes her sad. Tell her what you think at arts@theaggie.org.

CD review: RJD2

0

Artist: RJD2

Album: The Colossus

Label: RJ’s Electrical Connections

Rating: 4

Scheduled to set the Freeborn stage on fire (literally, maybe?) on January 27th of this upcoming year, RJD2 gives Davis audiences something exciting to look forward to with his fourth solo album.

RJD2 retains some of the classic techniques that made his sounds so mesmerizing. Guitar solos, piano and synthesizers mixed with smooth beats used in previous tracks such as “Ghostwriter” and “Here and Now” make their usual appearances in The Colossus.

Of course, great vocal collaborations are expected. Phonte Coleman offers a smooth, soulful voice embraced in fluttering piano.

Although some might not like it, RJD2 captures a very raw sound as heard in “A Spaceship for Now” where the drum sounds very un-produced and digitally un-altered. It’s a rare find these days.

Give these tracks a listen: “Tin Flower,” “The Shining Path (featuring Phonte Coleman)”

For fans of: Ratatat, Blockhead, Soul Position

– Uyen Cao

CD review: Rihanna

0

Artist: Rihanna

Album: Loud

Label: The Island Def Jam Music Group

Rating: 4

Rihanna is back and she’s louder than ever.

Following the release of the dark and tough Hard last summer, full of Rihanna’s pain from her very public fallout with Chris Brown, the pop princess has released an album full of fun club jams without a trace of sadness left.

Rihanna’s lyrics this time around are strong and playful, with kinky songs such as “S&M.” Her second single with Drake, “What’s My Name?” is sure to be a radio hit.

Although this is mainly a fun album, Rihanna has never been one to shy away from ballads and Loud is no exception. She is stronger on songs that still have an up-tempo beat, such as the reggae-infused “Man Down,” but there is a beautiful piano version of her hit with Eminem, “Love the Way You Lie.” It proves that Rihanna can do more than club tracks, and will give you chills.

Loud is exactly what the title promises. It’s fun, fresh and sure to put the Barbados siren back on top.

Give these tracks a listen: “S&M,” “Man Down,” “Love the Way You Lie (Piano Version)”

For Fans of: Beyonce, Katy Perry, Keri Hilson

– Anneta Konstantinides

CD review: Kid Cudi

0

Artist: Kid Cudi

Album: Man on the Moon II: The Legend of Mr. Rager

Label: Universal Motown

Rating: 3

Kid Cudi produces a dark sophomoric album that not only doesn’t satisfy fans, but also deeply confuses them. Man on the Moon II not only has very little to do with Man on the Moon I, but it also shows a whole different side of the emo rapper.

There is no doubt that Cudi is a groundbreaker in his genre, and everything from his style to his tone is solid, or at least it was on his first album. It’s a hit-and-miss album. The opening track “Scott Mescudi Vs. The World” in which Cudi sticks to rapping and Cee Lo sings the chorus, has a nice traditional flow yet sounds fresh and innovative. “Mojo So Dope” drips darkness as pop culture’s loneliest stoner reflects on reality and fantasy. “REVOFEV” and “We Aite” start out great but seem to go nowhere and never pick up.

In Man on the Moon II, Mr. Rager, Cudi’s self-destructive and unstoppable alter ego, aims to sound soulful and insightful. Instead, he falls flat as he tries to create meaning.

Give these tracks a listen: “MANIAC,” “Mr. Rager”

For fans of: Kanye West, The Roots

– Anastasia Zhuravleva

Artsweek

0

MUSIC

Myx Presents: Loaded

Tonight, 6:30 p.m., $10

Freeborn Hall

Over half a dozen YouTube music sensations will come together for one night at Freeborn Hall in this Entertainment Council-sponsored event. Performers will include Andrew Garcia, Erika David, Summerbreeze and Michelle Martinez, among others. It’s a rare opportunity to see your favorite Internet talents live and in person – not in a four-inch-wide video.

Early Music Ensemble

Sunday, 3 p.m., suggested donation $6

St. Martin’s Episcopal Church, 640 Hawthorne Ln.

Did you know UC Davis had an Early Music Ensemble? Well, now you do, so you might want to check out its concert this Sunday. Details about the ensemble’s repertoire or concert program are hard to come by on the music department website, so you’ll just have to go and be surprised.

Student Chamber Ensembles

Tuesday, noon, free

Music 115

Come see your fellow Aggies perform in small groups in this free combined concert. These musicians sure know their stuff, and it’s always inspiring to watch someone play an instrument really well, isn’t it? It is for me, at least.

AT THE MOVIES

Tous les Matins du Monde

Tonight, 7 p.m., $5

Mondavi Center, Vanderhoef Studio Theater

This 1991 French film (with English subtitles) is based on the true story of 17th-century composer Marin Marais, who looks back on his experiences as a musician and lover. The film stars Gerard Depardieu as Marais and features acclaimed viola da gamba player Jordi Savall, who plays all of Marais’s original compositions. It’s the perfect blend of film and classical music.

THEATER/MONDAVI

Gallathea

Tonight through Saturday at 8 p.m., Sunday at 2 p.m., $14

Wright Hall, Main Theater

It’s your last chance to see Peter Lichtenfeld’s modern take on the Elizabethan classic Gallathea at Wright Hall’s Main Theater. The play deals with cross-dressing, unrequited love affairs, deception and more, and features costumes by designer Liz Galindo. It also incorporates video, text messaging and other multi-media elements to create a truly unique 21st-century theater experience.

6 Degrees

Friday through Saturday, 8 p.m., free

UC Davis University Club, Old Davis Rd.

Six different experimental dance performers unite for this traveling show, which promises to provide a unique viewing experience at every performance. UC Davis alumni and others who inspire them will be among the performers. The first half of the performance will feature five-minute solo routines by each of the performers, and in the second half all will unite for one piece, choreographed by Dandelion Dancetheater co-director Eric Kupers. See preview in today’s Muse.

Ornette Coleman

Saturday, 8 p.m., $17.50

Mondavi Center, Jackson Hall

Ornette Coleman is a jazz music legend, and if being an award-winning saxophonist and composer isn’t enough, he’s also credited with inventing “free jazz,” his own unique style of playing. In 2007, he also was the first person to ever win a Pulitzer Prize for completely improvised music.

Jeanine De Bique, soprano

Saturday at 8 p.m. and Sunday at 2 p.m., $17.50

Mondavi Center, Vanderhoef Studio Theater

A native of Trinidad, Jeanine De Bique has performed with the Basel Opera in Switzerland, the New York Philharmonic and the Young Concert Artists Series in New York and Washington. She is one of the most promising young singers of today, so don’t miss this opportunity to hear her live.

ART/GALLERY

Wayne Thiebaud in Conversation with Kenneth Baker

Today, 4:30 p.m., free

Buehler Alumni and Visitors’ Center

San Francisco Chronicle art critic Kenneth Baker will interview famed UC Davis artist Wayne Thiebaud in this free lecture at the Visitors’ Center. Both are famous around the country for their expertise and accomplishments in the art world, so their conversation is sure to be exciting and informative for any art lover.

Poetry Reading

Tonight, 7:30 p.m., free

Logos Books, 513 Second St.

The works of late, local poet Quinton Duval will be read by Duval’s close friend Sarah Phelan and Lynne Knight, who will also read some of her own works. This is the first in a series of three poetry readings at Logos Books.

Birds of a Feather

Tuesday, Dec. 23, free

Pence Gallery, 212 D St.

You see birds everywhere, but have you ever considered them to be art? Well, in this new exhibit at the Pence Gallery, that’s exactly what they are. Each piece in the exhibit is inspired by birds of all species and in all forms.

ROBIN MIGDOL can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

Performing artists collaborate on multi-disciplinary production

0

Musicians, choreographers and dancers don’t often take the stage at the same time. But in a new show called 6 Degrees, that’s exactly what they’ll do.

Dandelion Dancetheater, an experimental theater company, will present 6 Degrees at 8 p.m. on Friday and Saturday at UC Davis University Club on Old Davis Road.

The show will be divided into two parts. The first half will feature five-minute pieces created by the participants, while the second half will feature all the artists performing in a piece directed by Eric Kupers, co-director of Dandelion Dancetheater and UC Davis theatre and dance alumnus. Kupers’ interdisciplinary piece will feature many forms, styles and approaches to performance-making.

Julia Hollas, Dandelion Dancetheater’s administrative coordinator, said that the project largely represents Dandelion’s ideals. A “radically inclusive” company, Dandelion welcomes the work of people from various walks of life and multiple artistic disciplines. Their intermeshing of disciplines means that a hip-hop dancer might teach a dance routine to a musician, while an actor and modern dancer might work on a duet.

“All artists perform in both their specialty and forms they aren’t entirely familiar with,” Kupers said. “Watching a Dandelion show is about seeing the energy created when vastly different people come together to create. 6 Degrees creates a matrix of artists, some of who know each other and others who will be meeting for the first time.”

Founded in 1996 by Kimiko Guthrie and Eric Kupers, Dandelion Dancetheater performs in various collaborative events and festivals throughout the Bay Area in addition to holding an annual home season in San Francisco.

Their shows aim to dismantle the barrier between artist and viewer, enabling the viewer to see himself reflected in the performance. Both the creator and the means of creation are determining factors in the significance behind Dandelion Dancetheater’s art.

Dana De Guzman, administrative assistant and performer in 6 Degrees, has learned and benefited from 6 Degrees’ interdisciplinary approach. De Guzman said she had seen herself as more of a musician before joining Dandelion, where she immersed into a new world of artistic expression.

“I have learned many styles of dance and movement as well as many new perspectives on musical approaches,” De Guzman said. “Everyone is at some level a student or a teacher of specific talents. This has ultimately opened my interest in further expanding my definition of ‘performer.'”

“What comes out is pure energy, a display of the magic or making performance,” Hollas said. “Davis students should expect to see some great and varied performances, but also to be immersed in an experience.  In more ways than one, they will be drawn in!”

For more information, go to dandeliondancetheater.org

ELENI STEPHANIDES can be reached at arts@theaggie.org

Men’s Basketball Preview

0

Teams: UC Davis vs. UC Santa Cruz

Records: Aggies, 0-3; Banana Slugs, 0-1

Where: The Pavilion

When: Wednesday at 7 p.m.

Who to watch: Guard Mark Payne surpassed his 1000th career point as an Aggie on Sunday in the team’s season-opening tournament.

However, Payne is a pass-first player, says coach Gary Stewart, making this feat a significant achievement.

“Scoring is something we pushed [Payne] to do because he has that type of ability,” Stewart said. “But his natural instinct is to get others involved and to pass the basketball.”

The senior from St. Mary’s High School in Stockton has dished out seven assists, while leading the Aggies with 14.7 points per game.

Did you know? The Aggies are shooting 73.5 percent from the line on the year, good for second in the Big West Conference.

In its season opener, UC Davis shot 81 percent from the foul line, including a perfect 13-for-13 performance by Payne.

Preview: Concentration is the game.

Wednesday’s home opener has nothing to do with the fact that UC Santa Cruz will be coming off a loss to William Jessup University – a Division II program.

It has nothing to do with the Banana Slugs at all.

Stewart’s main focus, is focus itself.

“Concentration is one of those things that can determine a player’s ability,” Stewart said. “If your concentration ebbs and flows, your game is going to ebb and flow. Conversely, if your concentration is at a high level, then you have the potential to be extremely efficient.”

Stewart believes this team is focusing only on what it will take to get into the win column.

“For us, it’s about UC Davis right now,” Stewart said. “We certainly understand that UC Santa Cruz is going to come here with the intention of beating us.

“But we’re going to have to be sound defensively, we’re going to have to value the ball, we have to screen well and take great shots. That stuff doesn’t change, no matter what opponent we’re playing.”

One thing that can change is the impact of a home crowd.

What does Stewart want out of the 2010 home opener?

“7,600 Aggie faithfuls screaming at the top of their lungs.”

As much as Stewart desires a loud Pavilion, he wants something else a little bit more.

“A win,” Stewart added. “We want to build. We want to play better basketball than we played this past weekend. We want to continue to get better and better.”

– Grace Sprague

Inside the game with…

0

Defense has been the focal point of the men’s water polo team all season.

Goalie Kevin Peat has been a big reason why the Aggies are 16-8 overall and 13-1 in Western Water Polo Association play.

The Walnut Creek, Calif. native has been a rock for UC Davis in front of the net, surrendering only 6.9 goals per game. Peat has 203 saves on the season and is third all time in blocks for UC Davis.

Peat took a break from preparing for the start of the WWPA Championships to sit down with Aggie Sports Writer Matt Wang to discuss the upcoming tournament, his time at UC Davis and the team’s chemistry.

Loyola Marymount University has won seven of the last nine WWPA championships. They are the team to beat at the event. How do you think the Aggies match up against them?

We’re a very fast team. Our attackers, especially Colin Hicks, Anders MacCarthy and Cory Lyle are very fast and can counter attack. Some of those guys swim their freestyle in 46 seconds and are lightning fast. They’ll be a big advantage for us.

UC Davis is entering the tournament as the two seed so it should be very thrilling. What has been the most memorable game of the season thus far?

Any game against a rival team. The Santa Clara games and UC San Diego games are always in the back of my head. We executed very well in those games, especially against UCSD. We knew who their top players were and effectively took them out of the game. We made others step up into roles they weren’t ready to play. It showed a lot of mental awareness.

Do you get nervous before a game?

I like to call it excitement more than nervousness. Any athlete will tell you that a little bit of “nerves” will make you sharp. It keeps you good. It means that there is something riding on the game. A little bit of pressure doesn’t hurt you. It’s like midterms. Too much pressure and it’s just when you start panicking and think “Oh my god I’m playing Stanford!” It’s just another water polo team. You just have to calm it down a little bit.

Against which teams were you the most nervous?

When we were playing California or a game against the bigger conference teams, I get really nervous. I played well against Stanford, mostly on adrenaline. I think that’s because I came up through the Golden Bears water polo pipeline. Stanford was go time, you play or you get pulled out. I grew up idolizing Cal and bigger Mountain Pacific Sports Federation opponents, LMU and UCSD. It was nerve racking, and sometimes I felt the adverse effects of anxiety.

You’ve been swimming since you were four. How did that start?

My parents gave me swim lessons and put me in the pool. I learned by sink or swim [laughs].

You’ve seemed to be able to swim a lot more than you sink. How long have you been playing water polo?

I started in the sixth grade, but I’ve been a swimmer since I was four. A couple of my friends’ older brothers played water polo at the high school I would attend. I was pretty tall for my age and they asked me to swim. Soccer was my first sport and there are a lot of similarities between the two in terms of strategy and structuring. I was a field player for three years, going up and down the pool trying to score goals.

You seem to have transitioned from offense to goalie seamlessly. How did you go from trying to score goals as an attacker to denying the other team from scoring as a goalie?

My coach told me to come to a [Junior Olympic] tournament one weekend. I didn’t really know what was going on. He asked me to jump out of the water to see how high I could get up. I jumped out of the water, and then he asked me to spread my arms. He said to me, “You’ll do fine, go play goal.” [Laughs] That’s how that started.

You’re an impressive athlete, but you’re also a student too. Could you describe some of your time at UC Davis?

Well, I came in undeclared but declared international relations in 2008 in my sophomore year. I got excited about the 2008 presidential election. I was going down the path of exercise biology. Organic chemistry put up a pretty big roadblock [laughs]. The election, politics, international interdependence and how the world really works got me excited and so I switched.

What has been your favorite class thus far?

Other than the electives? [Laughs] I’m taking the standard electives as Nutrition 10: Discoveries and Concepts in Nutrition and Human Development 12: Human Sexuality. My favorite is Political Science 123: The Politics of Interdependence. It’s really interesting to see the different games states can play with each other and how they act. I’m also a psychology minor. Any psychology class is interesting for me.

MATT WANG can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Science of the week

The system that produces stress-managing hormones in young rats is easily disrupted with binge doses of alcohol, finds a new study from Loyola University of Chicago. In rats, too much booze caused hormone disruptions and led to “behavioral and/or mood disorders in adulthood,” stated the report.

Rat research doesn’t correspond directly to humans, but the researchers’ goal was to learn how adolescent drinkers become depressed adults.

“Exposing young people to alcohol could permanently disrupt normal connections in the brain that need to be made to ensure healthy adult brain function,” Toni Pak, the study’s senior author, told Science Daily.

To study the long-term effects of binge drinking, the Loyola team put the adolescent rats through an eight-day binge cycle, then repeated the cycle one month later when the rats were young adults.

The stress of binge doses of alcohol six days out of eight wasn’t healthy. When they became adults, the rats that had stayed sober produced a normal amount of the stress hormone corticosterone. But the hard-partying rats had a huge spike in corticosterone when alcohol hit their bloodstreams. The rats’ brains had fundamentally changed to release more hormones.

For humans, the equivalent hormone is cortisol. When it hits the bloodstream, cortisol helps give an energy burst for fight-or-flight response. When cortisol floods the brain for an extended time, it seems to trigger depression and contribute to weight gain, Cushing’s syndrome, fibromyalgia and other nasty conditions.

If the study’s findings translate to humans, young adults who binge drink are altering their still-forming brains and risking mood disorders and stress-related conditions later in life. At the very least, the study discourages sharing drinks with underage rats.

– Emily Goyins

Column: Butt-ugly science

U-G-L-Y? Science can fix that.

I’m looking down the beauty aisle at Rite Aid. They’ve got facial scrubs with “sea algae enzymes” and wrinkle creams with “high potency plant stem cells.” They’ve got an Olay anti-wrinkle cream with “a touch of precious marine proteins” and “intracellular fortifiers.”

Terms so scientific, even a nerd like me is dazzled.

There’s a product out there called Valmont Cellular DNA Complex, made from “specially treated” salmon egg DNA. Wow, if only my body could absorb fish DNA. I’ve always wished for gills.

These products use science as a selling point. The companies irresponsibly use scientific jargon to impress me – without ever defining the über-technical terms.

Just because it sounds like science doesn’t make it true.

“What they’re claiming could be totally bogus, but we have no idea,” said Daniel Eisen, director of aesthetic dermatology for the UC Davis dermatology department.

In his years in the field, Eisen has read no scientific literature supporting the topical use of marine proteins or those ever-popular antioxidants.

Eisen, who is also co-director of dermatologic surgery at UC Davis, said the real problem with scientific claims made by cosmetic companies is a lack of scientific evidence. Usually, scientists publish research in journals, and they provide enough information for others to repeat the trials. Sometimes findings are confirmed and sometimes they’re rejected – it’s a transparent system that turns hypothesis into fact.

But cosmetic companies don’t do that.

“Most of the time these [cosmetic] studies are done in-house,” Eisen said.

Makeup companies don’t reveal the set-up of the experiment. Who knows if they used the appropriate concentrations of effective chemicals? Who knows if they tested products on real people or in vitro skin samples (skin from dead people)?

If companies want to use medical lingo to sell products, they should play by the clinical trial rules.

Here’s how a real study would go: Mary Kay (a cosmetics giant) would provide their special face cream and cream without the active ingredient (vitamin C, fruit acids, etc.). Then they’d measure the difference in results between the two. This is called a controlled experiment, and it’s the same process we use to test the efficacy of medicine like Tylenol or Lipitor or Preparation H.

But Mary Kay doesn’t do that. They know customers just need claims to sound science-y. They don’t need the data.

However, claims on packaging aren’t all made up. They’re often the truth with a twist. Eisen said that fruit acids, like glycolic acid, can help cells turn over faster. Unfortunately, the high concentration of acid needed to reduce wrinkles can also irritate skin.

In his recent book, Bad Science, physician Ben Goldacre points out that cosmetic companies often include ingredients in “talismanic concentrations.” They include only a little fruit acid – not enough to hurt, but not enough to help either.

“Companies still name them on the label, wallowing in the glory of their efficacy at higher potencies,” Goldacre writes.

All companies exaggerate the power of their products in order in make money. This food shrinks your waistline/That car gets you babes.

But cosmetic companies abuse our respect for science. We know that there is special medical jargon, so when Olay uses phrases like “amino-peptide and B3 complexes” on their packaging, we feel like we are part of the medical world. The product is more than just gunk to make a girl look nice – it’s a miracle cure!

Judging by product ads, cosmetic companies use scientific language to target older women. On one side of the aisle are the beauty products: mascara and eye shadow advertised by glamorous Hayden Panettiere. On the other side are the anti-aging products. These creams and masks don’t have spokespeople – they have technical charts of hydrated cells and diagrams of smoothed-out wrinkles.

To younger women they sell sex; to older women they sell science.

It’s not just feminist nerds like me who should be upset. When cosmetic company quacks run around in lab coats, it damages the credibility of real doctors and researchers.

MADELINE McCURRY-SCHMIDT has actually never wished to have gills. She’s too scared of sharks to swim in open water. E-mail her about your own galeophoblia or selachophobia at memschmidt@ucdavis.edu.

Genes and political orientation

Never known why you were so inclined to liking those red state Republicans or those blue state Democrats? Well, the answer could be in your genes.

UC San Diego researchers recently analyzed the social lives and genetics of college-aged students. They found that people might be pre-disposed to being liberal as a result of DRD4 – a gene associated with dopamine reception.

Lead researcher James Fowler, professor of political science and genetics at UCSD and Jaime Settle, a graduate student at UCSD, used a 2,574 person sample collected by the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to see how political ideology might be affected by genetics and social environment. They looked at the number of friendships a person had and that person’s political point of view.

The project was a way to bring social science and genetics together. The UCSD team compared the data on friendships to the presence of DRD4. They found that people who had this certain variant of the DRD4 gene, along with an active social life, were more prone to be liberal.

The researchers looked at political ideology on a scale from very conservative to very liberal. People who had exposure to this “liberal gene” variant, were 40 percent more likely to move into a more liberal category – if you are a moderate liberal who has the alleles, you could be moved as much as 40 percent closer to the liberal side of the scale.

The recently published study states that the gene alone cannot be single-handedly responsible for determining a person’s political orientation. Political orientation is heavily influenced by the number of friendships a person has, thus proving how essential friendships are when it comes to a social context.

“This study reminds us that people should try to be more tolerant and agreeing about understanding other peoples’ views on politics,” Settle said. “We need to understand where the other person is coming from – that their ideology is a combination of genes and their environment.”

Some are skeptical of the team’s early results.

Dean Keith Simonton, a distinguished professor of political psychology, states that there is no “liberal gene,” but there are other factors that influence political orientation.

“There are a number of cognitive and personality traits that are associated with liberal political beliefs,” Simonton said.

Simonton acknowledged that while personality traits do seem heritable, there is no question that environmental factors also play a role in political orientation.

“Certain experiences at home and school will increase or decrease any tendencies toward conservative or liberal viewpoints. Where a person stands politically will thus be a joint function of both nature and nurture,” Simonton said.

Simonton said people often become more liberal during college as they begin to associate with new people with different viewpoints; meanwhile people who are more conservative often continue associating with their close network of like-minded friends from high school.

Mark Bahl, president of the Davis College Republicans, said he is very skeptical of any “liberal” gene. He believes upbringing is the major influence in a person’s political orientation.

“If that [liberal gene] was the case, then individuals wouldn’t change over time – such as my dad’s friend, who was very liberal growing up, and is now very conservative,” Bahl said. “I feel that people are raised and adopt beliefs of their own.”

ERIC C. LIPSKY can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

Collider smashes apart a “particle soup”

In new experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland, researchers work to recreate the first microseconds after the Big Bang. They want to see how the energy of particles are distributed around the universe. These particles make all matter we see – from the solar system to deli sandwiches.

UC Davis professors Daniel Cebra and Manuel Calderon de la Barca Sánchez from the Heavy Ion Group in the UC Davis physics department will be taking part in experiments to collide lead ions and create an extremely hot “particle soup.”

Until recently the LHC had been accelerating small particles called protons in hopes of finding the elusive Higgs Boson particle, which physicists theorize is the particle that gives matter mass. While the Higgs Boson particle remains unconfirmed, experiments conducted with Cebra and Calderon will smash together lead ions at energies higher than ever used before at the LHC.

The lead ion will reveal different results than the previous collisions of smaller particles.

In order to conduct the experiments, large particles have to be broken down into their smaller ingredients. Lead ions are made of a lot of protons and neutrons. Protons and neutrons belong to a group called nucleons. Protons are positively charged and made of smaller particles called quarks and gluons.

“The lead ion collisions have so much energy that the nucleons which make up the lead nuclei are completely vaporized,” Cebra said. “These collisions create a hot dense plasma of quarks and gluons.”

Cebra hopes to find out the mechanism for energy loss as the plasma cools; physicists predict that the plasma loses energy. This is similar to the loss of energy seen when a light bulb radiates light.

Calderon’s experiments will also focus on the quark-gluon plasma and how the strong nuclear force affects these particles. The strong nuclear force is the force that keeps protons and neutrons attached in nuclei.

“Without [the strong nuclear force], protons, neutrons and the nuclei that make up all the matter we are familiar with would not exist,” Calderon said on his UC Davis website.

Running the LHC with positively charged lead ions is different than with protons, but the transition has so far gone smoothly.

“It’s been very impressive to see how well the LHC has adapted to lead ions,” said Spokesperson Jürgen Schukraft, in a press release for the LHC facility.

The LHC consists of a 27 kilometers long ring of highly efficient magnets. Charged particles are forced into a stream by the magnets and accelerated over several revolutions around the ring until a stream starts in the opposite direction. The particles collide and highly sensitive equipment detects the particles that emerge.

The LHC experiments are working to validate The Standard Model of Particles and Forces. The Standard Model states that everything in the universe is made of 12 basic particles and four fundamental forces. Physicists have conducted experiments over the past century that show how the Standard Model is the best explanation of how the Universe works. Cebra and Calderon’s project could help expand on the behavior of forces around us.

“We experimentalists always want to push the limits to find the region where the model no longer works,” Cebra said.

However, gaps still remain in our understanding of the Standard Model. The model predicts that four forces keep the Universe together: gravity, electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force. These forces are all related somehow. The problem is that no one has yet figured out how gravity is related to the other three forces.

Another issue is that the Standard Model also predicts the presence of the mysterious Higgs Boson particle that gives matter the property of mass. Such a particle has yet to be found.

Physicists at the LHC have studied protons for the past two years, but they hope that the new round of lead ion experiments will give new knowledge into the model of forces and particles. They want to understand why our universe looks the way it does.

AMY STEWART can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

Column: L Street eats and beyond

0

There are some secret L Street eats that aren’t easy to find, and sometimes they aren’t easy to get to either.

L Street stretches from Covell Boulevard down to Second Street. It’s one of those streets so inconveniently out of the way that most people don’t bother with it. Here, you can find great eats such as Taqueria Davis, Fat Face and Let Them Eat Cake.

Davis Taqueria, as it is sometimes affectionately known, is owned by a husband and wife team who are the nicest people you will ever meet. My friend EmDub is a loyal customer and introduced me to the place a few months back. She’s always greeted by a “Hey, hon” from the wife, and talks about her life with the owners. It is EmDub’s regular hang out, and she will never love another taqueria as much as she loves this one. Here, you’ll find your tacos and burritos made with care, so check this place out.

Fat Face and Let Them Eat Cake are located in an area where you will never find convenient parking – the clump of buildings on L Street between Third and Fourth Streets. My only advice is to look for signs. Just a warning: be prepared to walk at least a block and around the corner. Also, both places only accept cash, so be sure you have your ones and fives before you walk inside.

Fat Face is open Wednesday through Friday at different hours, so be sure to catch them when they’re open. Also, if you want to know their menu for the day, look at their website for a list of all their popsicles ($2.50), soups, drinks ($1.50 to 2.50) and “sammiches” ($7) for the day.

Let Them Eat Cake, opened last year by a mom and her two daughters who attend UCD, sells the best cupcakes you will ever eat. I (and I really shouldn’t say this) hate cake and cupcakes. I can’t stand them. How did I even survive all those birthday cakes when I was growing up? It was a miracle. Anyway, I went with my friend Aubrey a couple months back to Let Them Eat Cake, and it was the best cupcake I think I have had and will ever have to date. Their rotating weekly menu has cupcakes selling for $2.75 apiece.

And for all of you vegans out there, they have an option just for you so you won’t have to worry about dairy products. Lucky you.

Now for the food tip of the week!

Having trouble deciding if the better deal is at Save Mart or Safeway? I don’t blame you. The two have very similar prices that might differ from 10 to 50 cents, but their prices go back and forth all the time. So what do you look for when you try to find the best deal?

Well, one dear reader of mine, Joy, wrote to me about her opinion on the value of food, and her words ring true: It’s not only about price, but also about energy and nutritional value. Take this for example: You could spend $6 on a burrito at Chipotle, which would possibly last you one meal. But for a better deal, you could spend about $20 or less (depends where you shop) on an onion, tomatoes, cilantro, tortillas, beans, cheese and rice, and make yourself a veggie burrito (my dear cousin’s creation).

Heat up the tortilla, beans and cheese in a pan, and put all the veggies in afterwards. The ingredients last you more than a week and will give you your needed nutrients. The produce ingredients for the veggie burrito can also be interchangeable for a salad or to bake with lemon-pepper chicken (my dear friend Fifty’s specialty). You’ll get a lot of healthy uses for your $20, whereas $20 at Chipotle won’t last you nearly as long. Fancy that.

JENNIFER RICHWOOD is anticipating the new Harry Potter release as well as her new healthy diet. Tell her how exciting it all is at jcrichwood@ucdavis.edu.

Column: Haters gonna hate

1

A true story of harsh judgment,
and reconsideration:

It
was a brisk fall day. Leaves cascaded down from seasonally ailing trees like the
hair that rains off the back of an overly radiated chimpanzee (most tasteless
metaphor of the year? I tried). Undergrads, with all their degree-less
inadequacies intact, went to and fro, living out their lives with moderate
content. And me and my girl, the radiant Linh Banh, were strolling along Davis’
A Street discussing the various fascinating topics that were so fascinating I
have since forgotten them entirely. It was a pleasant day. Pleasant, that is,
until a green haired bicyclist began passing us by in a flurry of heated
pedaling and heavy breathing.

As
he passed, Linh and I looked on at him as if hypnotized by the irregularity of
his hair, and I found myself thinking with quick negativism that his outlandish
style resembled something toxic, like cartoonish radioactive waste, puke, or
whatever else is definitively terrible in its “greenness.”

My
judgment, however, was fast cut short for the green haired bicyclist, as if
sensing our intrusive gazes, turned to us suddenly and began staring back with
beady, terrible eyes; the eyes of a nonconformist. Oh, those terrible,
terrible, awfully terrible nonconformist eyes!

Looking
into that ghastly face for only a moment was enough to sicken me. It was as if
a wave of repulsion had crashed over me, leaving only a sense of poignant
disgust in its wake; a sense so strong I could hardly maintain my stoic,
mostly-implacable composure. Who is this terrible creature with green hair and
small, haunting eyes, I thought, shaking? What right, I demanded internally, does
he have to such an absurdist appearance? How dare he wear his hair as …  dare I say it, bright green! Oh, the
horror indeed.

Turning
with disgust to Linh with an eagerness for affirmation and the hope of finding
a look of horror equal to my own, I was greeted only by an air of
self-satisfied contentment. Shocked and appalled, I waited for her to speak,
incapable of mustering any words powerful enough to express the dark, dark,
emotional emotions brewing within me. She did not leave me waiting long.

“I’ve
always wanted to dye my hair green,” she broke in with happy disregard.

Quickly,
I worked to suppress the feeling of nausea that welled up suddenly within me. I
succeeded, seeing as how by some incredible force of will I did not vomit in
response.

Then,
as if freed by my own strength of self-control or, perhaps, assisted by divine
intervention from He Himself, words finally came to me. Of course, given the
state I was then in, I do not remember what I said verbatim. But I know I
started ranting about how that sort of self-expression (i.e., dyeing your hair
bright green) is a superficial, and by extension flawed, means of conveying
your personality.

That
is to say people who choose outlandish methods of self-distinction are really
only drawing to themselves negative attention. At least, as it goes for someone
like me, I tend to think that intentionally presenting yourself in a visibly “odd”
manner is more a cry for attention than an effective expressive style. In other
words, I figured (at least at that particular judgmental moment) that dying
your hair green is a type of “false distinction.” That is, you’re not saying to
the world you’re different by dying your hair green necessarily, but only that
you are more desperate to seem different.
So in that sense, I suppose one is different to do
so, but only in that they want
to dye their hair green, for example, more than most
other people.

I
then advocated for a more personality-based means of self-expression. Like
through writing, or humor, and so forth; things that stem from within and
reflect your inner-self un-superficially (perhaps).

 Following my rant, Linh, who disagreed,
proceeded to succinctly counter my argument by suggesting that some people are
too boring, simple or desperate to have those subtle and/or complex means of
self-expression. Some people simply need
visible distinctions to set themselves apart.
Well, at the time, that was a definite “huh” moment for me. Her suggestion was
so obvious, yet so unapparent.

Basically,
in a sentence, she made me feel bad about judging this poor kid who maybe just
wanted to dye his hair green and feel different for lack of a better way. And
that’s okay right? Why should I care? Why should I mind if you want to dye your
hair? Or wear really tight pants? Or pierce your eyebrow? Or whatever. The
weird part is, normally I wouldn’t. But for some reason I did in that moment,
which I’m glad for, because it reminded me to be careful of making easy
judgments.

 

JAMES
O’HARA may have embellished this story a tad, and yes, he did exaggerate his
reaction. Contact him at jpohara@ucdavis.edu.