54.1 F
Davis

Davis, California

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Home Blog Page 1324

Yolo Hospice to offer holiday bereavement workshops

0

Yolo Hospice will offer special bereavement workshops to the local community. The free meetings are designed to help people cope with loss this holiday season.

Workshops are being offered beginning Nov. 16 to provide support during what can be an emotionally sensitive time of year. Participants will receive information about dealing with the holidays and have the opportunity to share personal experiences.

“It is important to recognize that if you have experienced loss in the past, it is likely that emotions will get triggered during the holiday season,” said Denise M. Rose, Yolo Hospice bereavement counselor. “Grief is very lonely, but having the awareness that others are going through it can be very comforting.”

This is the first year in which group grief counseling is being offered specifically for the holiday season.

“It was Denise’s brainchild actually,” said Joseph Lumello, bereavement services manager at Yolo Hospice, “but we all immediately wanted to make it a team effort.

“Grief during the holidays is especially difficult because in many instances it is a family affair. If a family experiences a death, that is likely to impact how the holidays are celebrated and it won’t be the same. That is something we help people deal with.”

Yolo Hospice has divided the four workshops into specific areas. “Dealing with Holiday details” is on Nov. 16, “Confronting Holiday Overload” is on Nov. 30, “Grappling With Holiday Needs vs. Holiday Desires” is on Dec. 14 and “Bringing Light into Darkness After the Holidays” is on Jan. 11.

All workshops require advance registration due to space availability and will be offered in two sessions from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. and from 6:30 p.m. to 8 p.m. on the scheduled day of the workshop.

“We’re a nonprofit organization. We’re doing this because we have a responsibility to the community,” Rose said. “Acknowledge that hesitation to coming to a group session is normal, but it can bring the individual so much relief.”

The holiday workshops are open to all ages and are designed to be a standalone bereavement service or a gateway to other counseling services offered by Yolo Hospice.

“College students are absolutely welcome,” said Mary Odbert, public relations manager of Yolo Hospice. “Dealing with grief during the holidays as a full time student can be especially tough. We are here to help everyone.”

Participants have the opportunity to attend all four upcoming workshops. Bereavement counselors will try to pinpoint the needs of each person within the group and offer individualized advice on how to balance grief and loss during the holidays.

“I try to help the individual become empowered,” Lumello said when asked about his approach to counseling. “The holiday season brings out the best and worst in the family. You have a right to choose how you want to go through the holidays.”

Rose emphasized adapting past traditions.

“We want people to understand they may feel fatigued [and] tired, not like holidays past. I encourage people to modify what they may normally take on during the holidays,” Rose said. “In light of loss everything changes and they need to select what they can handle.”

Yolo Hospice is located at 1909 Galileo Court, in South Davis.

CARLY HAASE can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

New center provides accessible technology for people with disabilities

0

UC Davis now has a place on campus where anyone can use assistive technology to help them with school and research.

The grand opening of the Center for Accessible Technology (CAT) took place last week in honor of October being National Disability Awareness Month. The center includes several electronic and ergonomic resources that assist disabled students, staff and faculty.

“(CAT) offers more information about people with disabilities and how they use their products with computers, as well as give (them) access to what everyone already has access to on campus,” said Joshua Hori, co-chair of the Student Disability Center’s Electronic Accessibility Leadership Team.

Dave Ritz, a counselor with Disability Management Services, emphasized that the center is not just for disabled students.

“We tried to make a lab where everybody could go. There is no distinction if you’re faculty, staff or student. You can use the technology on this campus to do your homework or research,” Ritz said.

CAT is located in Shields Library room 163 next to the reserves desk. It is staffed Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

“We have a room that is really accessible to everyone,” said Alyssa Ng, a junior managerial economics major who works in the center. “We have a lot of software as well.”

Software programs available in the center include Job Access With Speech (JAWS), a text-to-voice software that assists visually disabled people with navigating the computer, and Dragon Naturally Speaking, a software that converts spoken words into written text.

In addition to the learning programs, the center provides large-screen adjustable monitors, adjustable tables and chairs and various styles of keyboards and mice. The variety of resources allows people with disabilities the opportunity to readily access the technology that is available for everyone on campus.

“It’s a spot where, even if you have no disability, you can learn to use some of this stuff because it’s pretty amazing,” Ritz said.

“It can be fun to learn about assistive technology and learn about things that people do to operate differently in an electronic environment,” said Cathy Kudlick, history professor who chairs the Electronic Accessibility Committee.

The Electronic Accessibility Committee brought about the initiative to create a more accessible computing center. The committee aimed to share resources from different departments and make them available in one location.

Departments that contributed to the center include the Student Disabilities Center, Academic Technology and Services Department, Shields Library, Human Resources and Environmental Health and Safety.

The technology available in the center is fairly limited and not a lot of people know about it. The center brings all these different resources together and teaches people what’s out there, Kudlick said.

More information about the center is available at cat.ucdavis.edu.

MICHELLE MURPHY can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

University staff encouraged to attend program to develop leadership skills

0

Approximately 134 university administrators and supervisors participated in a two-day leadership challenge development program this fall, designed to hone skills key in increasing leadership effectiveness.

Participants listened to keynote speakers and received a copy of The Leadership Challenge by Jim Kouzes and Barry Posner.

“Developing leadership in an organization is crucial to its health and wellness,” Carina Moore, director of Staff Development and Professional Services, said.

The cost of the program totaled slightly more than $1,000 per individual. Staff Development and Professional Services funded approximately half of the cost for each participant, while the remaining investment came from the participants’ departments.

With the current financial state of the university, this seems like an inappropriate way to spend money, said an anonymous participant of The Leadership Challenge.

“The university needs to be made more transparent,” the source said. “I would like to know where each dollar is going.”

The money used to fund the leadership program is not coming from the same pot of money used for student services, Moore said. Staff Development and Professional Services is diligent in reserving funds for programs that they feel will genuinely benefit staff.

Individuals dedicated to applying the skills developed during The Leadership Challenge will strengthen the education at the university and the institution as a whole, Moore said.

One of the best aspects of the program is receiving feedback from one’s staff and co-workers, said Robin Tapia, human resources management analyst for the College of Letters and Sciences. It is important to know how well one is communicating and inspiring others.

“UC Davis is known within the University of California as having one of the most robust staff development programs,” Moore said.

Sonoma Leadership Systems, a private company, which focuses on leadership development, training and coaching for organizations and individuals, hosted the program. UC Davis is the only educational institution that uses Sonoma Leadership Systems, whose clients include, Apple, Chevron, Oakland Police and several banks.

It feels wrong to spend money on this kind of program when people are losing their jobs, said an anonymous source.

“Most of the information about being a better leader was common sense,” the source said. “We could have just read the book they gave us and learned the same techniques for being a better leader without having to pay someone thousands of dollars.”

Not every individual is a right match for the program, Moore said. Some people find it difficult to hear constructive criticism of their work performance. However, feedback was generally positive.

While program attendance was optional, department managers were able to recommend the program to any staff members they felt would benefit from the experience.

When Tapia heard two more sessions were being organized later this month, she recommended the program to a number of individuals in her department.

“We need to continue investing in the staff here and attracting talented individuals for the future,” Moore said.

KATIE LEVERONI can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Q&A with career expert Tom Dezell

0

Tom Dezell, author of Networking for the Novice, Nervous or Naïve Job Seeker, recommends that college students begin searching for internships this winter. The Aggie had a chance to speak with Dezell and hear his advice about networking.

Can you tell me more about looking for winter internships?

It’s very important to have some practical field experience on your resumes when you get out there. Reach out, find some firms or companies that are in the field that you’re hoping to get your degree in and see if over winter break, you can come in and do an internship. Just research some firms you’re interested in and check and see if they’ve got internships programs. Find some people, maybe some alumni at your school, and see if they work in companies that would tend to need people in your major and see if they could recommend you as an intern. Talk to friends of your parents. Talk to parents of your friends who are in fields you’re interested in and see if they could give you insight about their companies and if they need interns. It’s very important in addition to your degree, when you get out in the labor market, to have some type of practical experiences.

Why would a company want to hire someone for only three weeks?

People like to mentor young candidates and help them along. Often over winter break they’ve got people taking leave and vacations so they’ve probably got some extra stuff to be done. It also gives them the opportunity to maybe check out potential people for if they might have openings later on. It could be a real win-win situation. It gives them a chance to see how you do, how you interact, how quickly you pick things up. 

How exactly do you network into a winter internship?

First think about what types of companies would be good for you to have experience with, depending on what your major is. When you identify them, try to figure out a way to find potential contacts you have that would be at those firms. They could be anything ranging from friends of yours, friends of parents or parents of friends. Check with the career center at your school and see if they know of any graduates that are working in [certain fields] or at certain companies. Go to a social networking site like LinkedIn. Look up a company you’re interested in and see if there are any connections there of people either that you might know or graduates of your school that you could maybe reach out to and ask about possible winter internships.

Can you tell me more about how to create a resume that stands out?

Keep it very concise. Stick to one page. Keep in mind that nowadays, if you’re posting it online, the way it’s going to be searched is by key words. Any of the jobs you’re applying to, just check thoroughly through the requirements for the job and make sure you’ve got strong key word matches toward what they’re requiring for degree, any certification or experience in certain things or any computer software you know. Also quality assurance – make sure your resume is well proofread. Sometimes just one little error or one little grammar mistake will be all that folks need to discard your resume. Have somebody else proofread it. 

What advice would you give to college students in general?

If students are getting ready to graduate, [they should] make sure to check out the career center at school and use all the resources available to them. People are finding jobs. It’s taking a bit longer than in the past. Get tips from the people who are finding success and find out what are the things they’re doing and how are they going about their search. Define what you really want to look for and really work out a strategy where you can articulate what it is you want and how a career in that field is something you’re hoping for. And take advantage of a lot of people willing to offer you expertise. As you graduate you’re going to find plenty of people who come up to you and say, “Hey congratulations. Anything I can do to help you search for a job, let me know.” Take them up on that. That starts allowing you to begin to develop your network skills. Even if something is not in their field, they might know somebody and they can give you some tips about where to look or recommendations about who to contact. Believe me, if you make a good impression, you’ll find out if they’ve got some openings. 

AKSHAYA RAMANUJAM can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Campus Judicial Report

0

Watch your language!

A sophomore student was referred to the office of Student Judicial Affairs (SJA) for sending e-mails containing hostile and abusive language to a university official. After an apparent disagreement over waiving her late registration fee for Summer Session I, the student sent an e-mail to the university employee handling her appeal, which contained abusive language and vague threats against the employee. Using such language in an e-mail to a university employee is a violation of university policy. The student received an administrative notice, which is a formal notice of the rules governing the university. It also serves as a warning, should the student be referred again.

A case of mistaken “identification”

A junior student was referred to SJA for using another student’s ID card to access the Activities and Recreation Center (ARC). This constitutes unauthorized use of university facilities and using another student’s ID card is considered to be a misuse of a university document. When asked about it by the supervisor at the ARC, the student claimed that “everybody was doing it.” The student’s name was kept on file by SJA, which is not technically a disciplinary sanction, but simply a record of the incident to be kept until the student’s graduation.

Wrong form

A sophomore student was referred to SJA for allegedly copying during a pop quiz in his upper-division chemistry class. The quiz was only one question long and the student arrived at an incorrect answer that happened to be the correct answer for a different version of the quiz than the student had received. This led the TA to believe that the student had been copying answers and work from another student who had the other version of the quiz. The student eventually admitted wrongdoing and accepted the sanction of disciplinary probation for one full academic year. Disciplinary probation means that, should the student be found in violation again, he or she would likely be suspended or dismissed from the university.

CAMPUS JUDICIAL REPORTS are compiled by student members of Student Judicial Affairs.

Guest Opinion: Prop. 25 could be answer to higher education funding problems

0

In recent weeks, college students across California have been inundated with TV, radio, and Internet ads in the governor’s race. Young people have come to understand how their votes on Nov. 2 will influence higher education funding and whether California will properly prepare their generation for the new global economy. But what they might not realize is the significance of one ballot proposition that may very well have a larger impact on education than the result of the governor’s race: Proposition 25 is actually the most important vote for students.

The most frustrating aspect of the debate over higher education funding in California is that cuts continue to be made while the overwhelming majority of Californians are opposed to the cuts. A poll conducted by the non-partisan Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) in Nov. 2009 showed that 89 percent of Californians are concerned about increasing fees and 70 percent oppose cutting higher education. Perhaps even more interestingly, a majority of California legislators are also opposed to cuts. In the 2009 budget negotiations, when California eventually made the massive cuts to higher education that caused the 32 percent UC student fee increase, the Democratic majority in the Legislature originally proposed a budget that would have avoided these massive cuts by implementing an oil extraction tax to raise revenues. Why then were the cuts implemented when a clear majority of Californians and a clear majority of the elected legislators opposed them?

The answer rests with California’s two-thirds vote requirement to pass a budget and raise revenues. California is one of only three states that require a two-thirds majority to pass a budget, and the only state that requires a supermajority to both pass a budget and raise revenues. This two-thirds rule has caused the decades of gridlock in Sacramento that have coincided with decades of state disinvestment in higher education. This rule has given disproportionate power to a minority of legislators who have stubbornly opposed making the investments in higher education that are supported by the public. The fundamental problem with public higher education funding in California is therefore not a lack of political will among the public or the officials that they elect. The problem is the structural dysfunction of our political system. Democracy in California is broken and students are bearing the cost.

Thankfully, voters have an opportunity to begin to fix this dysfunctional system on Nov. 2. Proposition 25, the Majority Vote Budget Initiative, would lower the two-thirds requirement to a simple majority necessary to pass a budget. This structural change would put the majority of legislators who support higher education funding back in charge of the budget process. Proposition 25 would also prevent legislators from receiving pay or benefits for each day that the state budget is late. Both of these changes would ensure that future budgets are passed on time, which would save hundreds of millions of dollars that otherwise would have been wasted on the cost of late budgets and instead could be invested in higher education.

When students head to the polls on Nov. 2, they must consider the important differences between the gubernatorial candidates and the impact that Schwarzenegger’s successor will have on student issues. But they should also keep in mind that the budget proposals made by any governor have to make their way through the legislature, and that’s where the current system is stacked against higher education. Electing a pro-student governor would improve the state of higher education for a few years, but reforming the budget process would have a positive impact for decades.

Ultimately, the solution for restoring funding to public higher education would be to lower the two-thirds requirement for raising state revenues, which would allow for the large scale investments needed to revitalize our college and universities. However, restoring majority rule for passing budgets is an important first step that will put California back on a path to good governance and will benefit college students for years to come. Sometimes the least sexy reforms are the most important.

IAN MAGRUDER is a junior at UC Berkeley and president of the California College Democrats, the statewide organization representing more than 30 College Democrats chapters across California.

News-in-Brief: UAW negotiations to resume in two weeks

0

Representatives with United Auto Workers 285 were scheduled to meet with the UC bargaining committee on Oct. 27 in Los Angeles. However, UC representatives did not attend in any official capacity, said Molly Ball, UAW representative at UC Davis.

Steve Montiel, UC spokesperson, said he could not confirm nor deny Ball’s claims as to how official the meeting was. The university extended UAW’s contract deadlines again to Nov. 15 and plan to hold another day of bargaining on Nov. 9.

“We remain optimistic as to the prospect of a contract, but there are still standing issues,” he said.

Ball said that UC representatives came to the meeting, but without any contract proposals.

The union, which represents over 12,000 Academic Student Employees such as teaching assistants, tutors and readers throughout the UC system, and the university have been involved in contract negotiations since May.

– Janelle Bitker

News-in-Brief: WarnMe test on Nov. 4

0

UC Davis’ WarnMe emergency alerting service will be put to the test on Thursday just before noon.

Emergency officials urge faculty, staff and students to update their contact information with WarnMe at warnme.ucdavis.edu. They will be sending out test messages to over 87,000 work and personal e-mail addresses, 26,500 SMS text devices and roughly 1,000 pagers.

In an actual emergency, messages would inform recipients of the nature of the emergency and provide further instructions.

– Janelle Bitker

Field Hockey: Inside the Game with…

0

They say big things come in small packages.

This is certainly true of UC Davis forward Nadia Namdari.

The 5’2″ sophomore leads the Aggies with seven goals this season and is tied for the team lead with six assists.

Namdari took time after her team’s Halloween-themed costume practice to talk to California Aggie sports writer Trevor Cramer about the team’s emotional bond, her ability to crack through defenses, and the way the UC Davis field hockey program has grown over the past year.

I see the team all dressed up for Halloween. How do events like tonight’s costume practice help keep the team loose?

Things tend to get pretty serious, especially now toward the end of the season. Practices like this are just a reminder that we’re out here to have fun. We get the chance to goof around, but we’re still working hard with our teammates.

It seems having fun together has helped your team build strong chemistry. Do you guys maintain this bond off the field as well?

Definitely. We’re like a family. We all live close together in Davis and we’re all from California so we are able to visit each other on breaks.

Being like a family, is there one person who takes control as a leader of the team?

Well we have our three captains: Lindsey [Valadez], Casey [Wollbrink], and Kristen [Lopez]. We look up to all of them, but the great part of this team is that we’re basically all the same age so we can all take control and say something if we want to.

That leadership must have played a role in the way you responded to two overtime NorPac Conference losses at home to California and Stanford. How did the team feel after those two close games?

It was stressful because we’d been right there and we knew we could do it. At the same time though, we could look at the scores and see how close we’d come to beating some really good teams. It showed us that it is doable.

After those two overtime losses, what was it like to go to overtime in a third straight home game against Pacific?

Well, no one ever likes overtime, because it’s a big field when you’re down to seven players, but we felt confident. We just knew the sooner we scored the sooner we could get off the field.

How did it feel to get the first NorPac victory in school history in that game?

It felt amazing to finally get that win in our third overtime game at home. We’d been working really hard on our overtime play and it showed.

That victory showed the team’s huge improvements over the last year. What has been the key to the team’s growth this season?

It all started in the offseason. We did great work in the spring and the winter. It was big because we were almost all freshmen last year and going against all of these juniors and seniors, we were a little shocked. I feel like this year we’ve learned to manage things better and get into our groove.

Part of your team’s progress has been your improvement over the past year. What has been the most important part of your growth over this season?

Mainly it’s a confidence thing. As a freshman I think I was a little shell-shocked by the way the other teams played. During the spring I worked on a lot of my skills and I think that’s really helped me this year.

Coach Vianney Campos has said if the Aggies need a goal, you’re the go-to person. How does it feel to hold that responsibility?

I like being the one everyone looks to when we need to score. It’s a good feeling. It’s a lot of pressure, but it’s nice to know that my teammates trust me to put the ball in the cage and at the same time, I trust them to tip it in if I miss a shot.

You seem to be able to get behind defenses at will. How are you able to do that so easily?

I like to think that I’m sneaky, [laughs] but [Campos] would probably say it’s because I’m cherry-picking and not getting back on defense all the time, which is true sometimes.

With the way you and your team have both improved this year, the future is looking bright. Where do you think you’ll be as a team by the time you’re a senior?

By that point our team will be mostly all seniors. With all of that experience and the skill we have on our team I think that we will be really good.

TREVOR CRAMER can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Student guide to preventing the common cold

0

The weather has gotten colder, classes are getting busier and it’s the time of year when it feels like every other person is sneezing and coughing all over you. Cold season is upon Davis once again, and with a few preventative measures, it’s possible to make it through without a single sneeze.

According to the Centers for Disease Control’s web site (CDC), symptoms of the common cold include sneezing, a stuffy or runny nose, sore throat and coughing. The common cold generally lasts 10 days and there is nothing that can make it go away faster.

Preventing a cold is difficult, as students are exposed nearly everywhere from grocery stores to class. There is no shot or medication that will prevent the common cold, so avoiding it is a matter of changing your behavior.

Maureen Greenhagen, the patient care services manager at the UC Davis Student Health and Wellness Center, recommends washing your hands frequently as a method to prevent the spread of germs.

“Washing hands is by far the number one way to prevent a cold,” Greenhagen said. “It is also important to not share glasses or utensils, and to get plenty of sleep. Be well-rested and well-fed, and have an adequate fluid intake.”

Khanhtram, a Rite Aid pharmacist, agrees that washing your hands is crucial and suggests taking vitamin supplements before catching the cold.

“[Make sure you] wash your hands to prevent the spread of the cold, and take lots of vitamin C. Be sure to take vitamin C or products like Airborne early. If you have a cold already, it won’t help,” she said.

However, even by taking preventative measures it is still possible to get sick.

“You can practice all of these healthy habits, and still get a cold,” Greenhagen said.

If preventative measures fail to work, it is important to prevent spreading the cold to anyone else. The CDC recommends taking over-the-counter decongestants to relieve symptoms, while still practicing good hygiene.

Greenhagen emphasized the importance of being well rested.

“The best thing is to get plenty of rest as soon as you feel [a cold] coming. Stay hydrated, take Tylenol and Advil and use saline gargles to relieve sore throats,” she said.

The CDC suggests different methods for relieving symptoms. Using clean humidifiers can help sore throats and coughs. A moist cloth placed over the nose and forehead can help relieve sinus pressure, or when placed over an ear, can reduce ear pain. Drinking plenty of fluids and getting enough rest are both at the top of all symptom relief lists.

Michelle Ahronovitz, a sophomore psychology major, recently fell ill and agreed that getting enough sleep is crucial.

“I never get enough sleep, so that’s probably why I have colds for way longer than I should,” she said. “When I do get sick I take lots of Sudafed, and try to eat soup or tea, or both.”

“It’s impossible to avoid getting a cold around school, though,” Ahronovitz said. “I’m in a 500-person lecture hall, and the person before me could have sneezed everywhere.”

Aside from practicing proper hygiene and sleeping well, another option to prevent sickness is getting a flu vaccination. The CDC recommends that vaccinations begin in September and go through January.

“In Davis, get vaccinated anywhere from mid-August to October,” Khanhtram said.

The UC Davis Student Health and Wellness Center also provides flu vaccination clinics. According to the Student Health web site, the next flu vaccination clinic is today from 12:30 to 2:30 p.m. in Griffin Lounge. No appointment is necessary and the injectable vaccine will be offered on a first-come, first-serve basis.

If the vaccine is not an option for students, Greenhagen continues to stress practicing proper hygiene.

“If you’re sick, make sure you cough or sneeze into your elbow and not your hands,” she said. “And protect people around you by always washing your hands.”

The CDC recommends regularly washing your hands with warm, soapy water for about 15 seconds. If water is not available, you should wash with alcohol-based products made for washing hands.

To learn more information about the common cold and its prevention, students can visit the Student Health and Wellness Center’s web site or the Centers for Disease Control at cdc.gov. For more self help information, students can call the advice nurse at the Wellness Center at 752-9649 during normal hours of operation.

JENNIFER SCOFIELD can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

News-in-Brief: UPTE union contract reached

0

UC officials announced yesterday that they’ve reached an agreement with the University Professional and Technical Employees union (UPTE) on a new labor contract.

UPTE is comprised of roughly 2,800 health care professional employees. Negotiations began in May 2009, and a tentative agreement was reached on Sept. 29, 2010.

Highlights of the agreement include wage step increases of approximately 2 percent, continued medical benefits with UPTE contributions to monthly premiums and increased employee contributions of 1.5 percent to the UC Retirement Plan starting July 1, 2011. The contract is extended through Dec. 31, 2011.

– Janelle Bitker

Q&A with the new Vice Chancellor of Research

0

UC Davis alumnus Harris Lewin is returning to campus as the new Vice Chancellor of Research. Lewin finished his doctorate at UC Davis in 1984 and went on to become a researcher and faculty member at the University of Illinois for the past 26 years. Lewin’s annual base salary will be $370,000, compared to previous Vice Chancellor Barry Klein’s salary of $237,400.

What factors were taken into consideration in making your decision to come to UC Davis and taking on this new position as Vice Chancellor?

First, the position offered me the opportunity to do big things and move the institution forward on many levels, especially in interdisciplinary research and technology transfer. The second thing was that I firmly believe in Chancellor Linda Katehi’s leadership and her commitment to really raise the profile of the University of California, Davis. Also, I am an alum and I care deeply about the university. I would like to see every graduate student have the opportunities that I had when I completed my degree in 1984.

What is your vision for the future of research at Davis and how do you plan to achieve these goals?

I believe Davis should be in the top five public universities and in the top 10 in research funding. The vision is really to bring Davis to super elite status among the public universities, and to do that you have to have the resources to invest in the best and the brightest faculty and students and to enhance the research info structure. That means having the highest research capabilities in terms of research laboratories, as well as Internet connectivity and all other aspects of the research info structure that will allow faculty to achieve those goals.

In the last year Davis has changed some of its faculty while increasing their pay. Meanwhile, student fees are on the rise. What do you think of the expected fee hike and the protests that may follow?

I am sorry to see that is happening, both the raising of student fees and protests that will likely follow. However, with the state reducing its funding to the university and the university facing skyrocketing costs, the university has no choice but to raise fees to cover those costs. The students certainly do have the right to protest and their voices should be heard. The campus administration needs to do everything possible to keep the university affordable for Californians. I know a lot of discussion is going on at the campus level. I am sure the university will do everything it can to provide scholarships for those most in need.

What would your advice be to a student interested in progressing in the field of research?

Being a researcher to me is the most intellectually rewarding profession. Researchers are the most respected members of our society. To be a researcher is a privilege. Students interested in research should definitely do an undergraduate research project. I know that Davis has many programs to support undergraduate research. Every student interested in research should take advantage of that while at Davis. This is what distinguishes a major research university from a four-year liberal arts college where there are no such opportunities for undergraduate students. So, do everything you can to get yourself into a lab and be helpful. Never give up if research if your passion. Discovery is the basis for innovation and innovation is necessary for creating new economic opportunity and a better world.

JASPREET BAHIA can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Campus showdown: LEAD vs. BOLD

0

With ASUCD senatorial elections beginning Nov. 9, a new campus slate has emerged to compete against LEAD and the independents: BOLD.

Comprised of current senators, former LEAD members and fresh faces, BOLD’s mission is to better serve the interests of the UC Davis campus than the senate has done in the past.

“The reason we created BOLD was because we were really frustrated at the lack of results at the table, specifically at the senate table,” said Adam Thongsavat, a senior history major, former independent senator and BOLD pioneer. “If I were to graduate today, there would be little that the senate table has done to make student life better.”

BOLD hopes to improve the campus by implementing more long-term bills that will also benefit future students and support the business units, Thongsavat said.

“I would rather tackle a big issue and plant the seed for a future student than run on some bullshit thing like more staplers in the computer labs,” Thongsavat said. “BOLD’s message is really simple: let’s do things that matter, let’s do things that will have a real impact.”

He also said that, unlike the structure of LEAD, BOLD has a clear and unified stance on the issues the members want to address.

“LEAD is just a body; it doesn’t stand for anything anymore. It’s just for getting people elected,” Thongsavat said. “When we talk about BOLD … it’s much more cohesive. I think it’s going to work much better.”

Rudy Ornelas, a junior sociology major and director of legislation and policy, explained that the purpose of LEAD’s slate is to be comprised of individualistic minds.

“The point of LEAD is to have a forum for individuals to come together and work on individual ideas,” Ornelas said. “That’s the way LEAD has always been.”

He also said that LEAD candidates are better suited to serve the student body, and historically have proven themselves to do so in the 10 years that LEAD has existed on campus.

“LEAD has shown results, whereas former LEAD or now BOLD hasn’t actually proven themselves,” Ornelas said. “They can claim to be new, but they’ve all been in the association and they haven’t proven results before. How can we trust them to show results now?”

Additionally, the executive office under LEAD management has created 200 new jobs in the association and has generated more funds toward campus units this year, Ornelas said. Thus, he does not understand why the slate is sometimes heavily criticized.

Ornelas also said he is upset about an online video that was released by AggieTV introducing BOLD as a new campus slate. In the past, AggieTV has created videos for individual candidates, but business units are prohibited from endorsing a specific slate, Ornelas said.

In response, Megan Frantz, a senior American and technocultural studies double major and incoming director of AggieTV, said in e-mail interview that both candidates and slates have always been invited to create a video, and the purpose of the videos is just to encourage students to vote.

AggieTV was not endorsing BOLD by creating that video, Frantz said.

Will Quinn, a senior environmental policy and planning major and chair of the Environmental Policy and Planning Commission, created a Facebook group called “Defeat LEAD (again).” However, Quinn said that he is against the concept of slates, rather than just LEAD specifically.

He said a slate that has been around for 10 years starts to rely on its name as a kind of brand recognition, and the candidates running under that name may not recognize the original goal of the slate anymore.

“LEAD has almost become synonymous with ASUCD,” Quinn said. “If the symbol is stronger than the message, then you’re no longer electing people, you’re just electing a brand name. Obviously BOLD could become that just as easily if they came into power and I don’t think that’s any better.”

Quinn also said that he would like to see a mix of representatives at the senate table.

“Just like a democracy, there should be a mix” Quinn said. “I get concerned when you get that one brand name taking over the system and nobody is questioning it anymore.”

Both Thongsavat and Ornelas state that the candidates of their respective slates are the most qualified and the most committed to serving the student body. However, it is the voters’ responsibility to research all of the candidates, including the independents, and decide for themselves.

MARTHA GEORGIS can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Editorial: Harming primates is unethical

0

Animal testing is often justified through utilitarianism, which states that the suffering of the few is worth the gain of the many. This is the stance taken by the California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC), and it is ethically unjustified.

An application of this philosophy leads to the intentional harm of non-human primates by human researchers and their undue suffering for potential medical breakthroughs.

When put in the context of medicine, it is easy to appeal to emotions for an answer. There is not one of us who has not directly or indirectly benefited from modern medicine. But to justify animal testing exclusively by what it does for humanity means taking a hierarchical stance on suffering and valuing one life form over another.

To start, we have to stop judging the value of a life based on intelligence. Too often it is thought that respect only applies to rational beings. It would not be accepted for an insane adult to be used for testing against their will, even if they too lack the ability to reason.

It would not be accepted because they would still experience suffering, much like non-human primates and any other animal with nerves.

Additionally, the results of animal testing can never accurately tell us how certain drugs or diseases will act in humans. Any results gained are nothing more than a flashy ‘maybe’, or at best, an arrow in the right direction. This means much of the animal suffering is for naught.

Outside of UC Davis, this is shown in the quest to cure AIDS, where chimpanzees are the animals of choice. No non-human animals contract AIDS in nature and primates are the only animals whose immune system can be infected with something similar, SIV.

Despite our similarities, there are enough physiological differences between us that human terminal illnesses are rarely contracted by or fatal to chimps. The information gained is fallible.

This is not to say that animal testing has not led to amazing things. The reason the topic is controversial is that rare successes have left a large impact on mankind. It is also not advisable to reject the knowledge we’ve gained on a basis of morality.

However, we are at a point where we can continue to make advancements in medicine without using animal-specimens. This is especially true at an institution like UC Davis, where research is renowned and well funded.

Instead of ignoring critics, CNPRC should take into consideration the ethical issues behind testing. Researchers should focus their energies on expanding the non-animal tools available, like cell cultures and computer simulators. This is the best path toward making animal testing obsolete and ending unnecessary suffering.

– Becky Peterson, Janelle Bitker, Robin Migdol

Editorial: Animal research

0

Two weeks ago, during National Primate Liberation Week, activists on the quad protested against the use of non-human primates at the California National Primate Research Center (CNPRC) on the UC Davis campus. This shows ignorance of the medical research process. While the CNPRC tries to minimize research on primates, the anatomy of the human body means that sometimes non-human primates are the only option.

Humans are a species of primate, so with some diseases, such as malaria and AIDS, studying primates is necessary. Unlike lab rats or guinea pigs, monkeys used by the CNPRC have a physiology, drug metabolism and fetal development similar to humans.

The CNPRC studies many human diseases that co-evolved with primates. The parasite that causes malaria is a protozoan specially adapted to life in the human body. Testing strains of malaria in primates like rhesus monkeys is an effective alternative to running unethical experimental research on humans.

The CNPRC also conducts research on SAIDS (Simian AIDS), the closest disease to human AIDS. Researchers use infected macaque monkeys to study the prevention of HIV (and Simian IV) infection and the body’s immune response to the disease. This research gets results: the center recently found that a drug called tenofovir could be used in a gel to reduce HIV transmission in humans.

Protesters have some legitimate arguments against the CNPRC. In 2004, a USDA report showed that several monkeys were kept in enclosures where the temperature reached 115 degrees Fahrenheit. But the CNPRC paid a penalty and temperature hasn’t been a problem since then. Last year, a researcher at the center caught a respiratory infection from a group of infected primates. No other humans caught the disease, and the researcher recovered. The CNPRC is open about the incident, and the researchers know the risks.

Research on primates is not perfect – many infected animals die. But the CNPRC works hard to keep the process humane; the USDA regularly inspects the facility, and all primate research must be approved by two committees on campus plus the federal funding agencies. The university also has a policy of never conducting classified research, and CNPRC studies are regularly published in scientific journals.

Opponents of primate research call for more transparency in research facilities, but militant protesters keep scientists from working more openly. Scientists from the CNPRC are reluctant to speak to the press after some researchers receive death-threats and mail containing razor blades.

When one looks into a monkey’s face, one naturally feels compassion. Sadly, the genes that make other primates our closest relatives also make them good test subjects. The research is worth it. Despite the protests and threats, primate researchers know that monkeys are the best option if we want to save human lives.

– Madeline McCurry-Schmidt, Max Rosenblum, Mark Ling, Jeff Perry, Nick Markwith