57 F
Davis

Davis, California

Monday, December 22, 2025
Home Blog Page 1623

Campus wises up to the Smartsite

0

With a name like Smartsite, you’d think everyone would be using UC Davis’ course management system as a personal study buddy.

In reality, the cutting edge courseware technology is still young and developing, and faces a number of common misconceptions that keep students and professors from realizing the full “smartness” of its potential.

First implemented in the fall of 2007, what students know as “Smartsite” is actually UC Davis’ personally customized version of an internationally used courseware technology called “Sakai.”

So what is Sakai? According to its website, the Sakai Collaboration and Learning Environment is an online application which brings together over 160 worldwide educational institutions to develop an online support network for course instruction, research and project collaboration.

Andy Jones, a lecturer in the University Writing Program and program coordinator at the Teaching Resources Center, describes Smartsite in terms of Facebook applications, as a collaborative website which brings students and teachers together and provides an “open source” for computer programmers to create new courseware applications that best fit each user’s needs.

“New updated versions of Smartsite come out regularly, at least quarterly,” Jones said. “What this means is new tools that have been created by other universities come up all the time. So we’ve got this huge braintrust to draw from [which includes] all the universities that work together to benefit Smartsite as a whole.”

Since it began beta-testing at UC Davis in 2006, faculty members who use the site have heralded it with mixed, but largely positive reviews, as many express that the biggest obstacle is simply the time commitment to overcoming the technological learning curve.

“The variety of tools it offers can be pretty daunting, but if you narrow it down to the tools you feel more comfortable with, you’ll surely be able to find some way to increase the effectiveness of your teaching with the technology,” said Donald Meisenheimer, a lecturer in the University Writing Program, and longtime supporter of the application. “I have personally been able to switch to a paperless classroom because of Smartsite’s Assignment and Drop Box tools. Students turn in their essays through the site, I add comments to their documents, grade them and return them through the site.”

Still, despite its many admirable qualities, many students express frustration in the occasionally counter-intuitive organization of the site, where classes from past quarters are displayed actively on the tab bar, syllabi are hidden in the “resources” or “assignments” tab and empty links leave students stranded on the island of “there is currently nothing in this location.”

As with many new technologies, many professors are still battling with learning how to use the site correctly, leaving their confused students skeptical of its actual effectiveness.

“I feel like it’s just not user friendly,” said Joe Garibaldi, a senior managerial economics major who has used the site in several of his classes. “Part of that might be the professors’ fault because they file things under the wrong categories and don’t know how to use it, but if they’re going to make us use it for class it should at least be better organized so you can find what you need.”

To assist those still struggling with overcoming its technical idiosyncrasies, both students and professors have a large support network of those who have made the most of what Sakai technology has to offer.

“We try hard to be very straight and upfront about where we are with this project and what it can and cannot do,” said Steve Faith, the technology training coordinator for UC Davis’ Academic Technology Services in an e-mail interview. “The workshops and trainings that we offer are a big part of easing the transition and helping professors understand how Smartsite can be a valuable and timesaving tool both in and out of the classroom.”

 

MICHELLE IMMEL can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

King Hall Law School construction put on hold

0

An empty state piggy bank leaves King Hall School of Law expansion and renovation at a standstill.

Due to a tight state budget, the California Pooled Money Investment Board halted payments for state-funded capital projects on Dec. 17. On Jan. 9 the campus suspended the King Hall project for 90 days. Contractor K.O.O. Construction will maintain the area during this period.

The board consists of the state treasurer as chairperson, the state controller and the director of finance and manages taxpayersmoney and uses funding resources for state agencies and projects, like King Hall.

The project will incorporate 30,000 square feet of expansion space and renovate 22,000 square feet of existing space in King Hall. The project budget is $21.8 million$17.9 million of which are state funds and $3.9 million are donations.

If the state is able to renew funding within the 90-day timeframe the campus can lift the suspension. At the end of 90 days there are several possibilities. For example, the contract can be terminated, with which there are associated costs, or an extension with the contractor can be negotiated.

“We are hopeful that things will get resolved prior to that,said Karl Mohr, assistant vice chancellor for Resource Management and Planning.

Construction is about 15 percent along with a completed foundation for the expansion sector of the building. There has been no vertical construction. Once the expansion part of the project is finished construction will move on to the renovation of the old building.

“The additional instructional and office space this project affords is of great importance to our students and faculty in the school of law and their plans for the future,said Enrique Lavernia, provost and executive vice chancellor.However, the ability of the state to provide funding for this and other affected capital projects requires a resolution of the state’s budget issues that credit markets will find credible as a basis for lending money.

In a Jan. 13 letter to the law school community, law school dean Kevin Johnson wrote,We hope that this halt in construction is a mere hiccup. Indeed, at this point, we are not certain that the suspension will substantially delay completion of the project.

The board’s decision affects other campus state-funded projects as well.

Work on the Surgery and Emergency Services Pavilion at the UC Davis Medical Center will continue because the building is near completion and the cost of stopping construction would surpass funds saved.

UC Davis is also proceeding with the 70 percent complete physical sciences expansion building for the department of geology, which draws from campus and state funding. But the university will have to employ campus funds earlier than expected. Pending on when state funds will be restored, Mohr said there is some exposure there.

“It is unknown how future state funding is going to work in relation to the current financing problem,Mohr said.It’s really a state cash flow problem right now.

Other campus projects currently in planning stages, like the new Vet Med 3B building, will pause until funding resumes.

These projects have already been approved. The Vet Med building is in the current year’s budget and is approved in legislature. Mohr called the situationunprecedented.

“Under normal circumstances we would be getting ready to bid on that project, but without cash to make that happen we can’t,Mohr said.There are projects that are in various states of funding and we have to adjust based on availability of funding. It’s an uncertainty that we have to deal with right now.

The new Graduate School of Management building and the conference center near the Mondavi Center for the Performing Arts are not affected because they do not rely on state funding.

The expansion phase of King Hall was scheduled for completion at the end of this year, and the renovation phase in December of 2010.

“This delay means less days that we will get to spend in a brand new King Hall that we had to put up with all the construction during finals,said second-year law student Sajjad Khan.

Khan said he could hear sledgehammers, tractors and walls breaking down while in class, especially during the period before finals.

“I would be sitting in the library studying, and it’s just ridiculous. It’s two in the morning, the whole building is shaking and I had to leave. They were working around the clock,he said.

 

POOJA KUMAR can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

 

Campus Judicial Report

0

Multiple personalities

A student was referred for having a friend answer questions in his name using an RFclicker. The student admitted to receiving unauthorized assistance on course work and agreed to Disciplinary Probation and 10 hours of community service. If a student is found in violation of any university policy while on disciplinary probation, he or she is likely to be removed from the university.

Cheating on an exam

During a chemistry exam, a student referred to notes that she had under her desk, which an instructor witnessed and confiscated. The student accepted the disciplinary sanctions of Deferred Separation and 20 hours of community service. A student on Deferred Separation waives the right to a formal hearing in future disciplinary action, and will be removed from the university by either Suspension or Dismissal if he or she is again found in violation of any university policy.

Wandering eyes

 

A student was foundnot in violationof cheating during a test. The student was referred because two teaching assistants believed that they had witnessed the student looking at the exam of the person next to him. Through the informal process, the judicial officer determined that the situation was a misunderstanding, not a violation of the Code of Academic Conduct. However, the student did receive an Administrative Notice, warning him that wandering eyes creates the appearance of dishonesty and is therefore prohibited by university policy.

 

The Campus Judicial Report is compiled by student members of the Campus Judicial Board. Additional information about SJA and the Campus Judicial Board may be found at sja.ucdavis.edu.

 

Letter to the editor

0

Last Thursday, the ASUCD Senate passed Senate Resolution 16 unanimously, urging the administration and faculty to take necessary steps to curtail Peter J Shields Library’s national ranking decline. Shields library once prided itself as one of the top one-third of research libraries in North America, but within 15 years due to a negligent chancellorship, an incompetent and corrupt university administration, and an irresponsible faculty, Shield’s ranking toppled to an all new low of 64th. What a mighty fall for a campus institution that once epitomized the greatness of UC Daviscommitment to scholarship.

The library’s budget woes adversely affect the library’s operational hours, the number of librarians employed to help students and researchers, and limits the materials available to scholars, compromising UC Davisacademic quality.

I praise the ASUCD Senate for passing the Senate Resolution 16; yet impel the Senators to not consign the library’s future to a passive statement, but rather pursue this issue to the fullest.

Although this Resolution comes during a tough budget climate, investment in our library is long overdue. Let us restore this vital campus resource to its proper place.

Joemar Clemente

Junior

Political Science Major

Letter to the editor

0

It’s about time UC Davis passes a T.G.I.F. initiative, but the language of this particular initiative may not be worth the YES vote. The success of this program at other UC’s has shown the things students can accomplish when given the funds. Senator Bianchi’s claim that this fee doesn’t benefit all students is very odd given the many programs that ASUCD funds that only affects some students. Besides, if students don’t find it worthwhile, or find it too expensive, they have the ability to vote nay.

 

The structure provided by this particular initiative is worrisome though. Most questionable is the fact that the Co-op and Domes have the power to choose the undergraduate representative (in addition to RHAB). While both cooperative living communities are known for their sustainability, they in no way legitimately represent the undergraduates of UC Davis. Having the ASUCD Senate or the Environmental Policy and Planning Commission weigh in would make much more sense.

 

Dan Xie

Women’s water polo lives up to preseason ranking in opening weekend

0

The Aggies won the games they were supposed to win, but not exactly in the fashion that everyone expected.

Saturday proved that the young and inexperienced Aggies had great depth, with 11 different players scoring in the two-game split.

On Sunday, junior Ashley Chandler and a true freshman Kaylee Miller each scored three goals on the day to lead the Aggies to another 1-1 day of surprising action.

“I was overall happy with the way we played,said coach Jamey Wright.But for everyone who has not been at our practices, I am sure our team was filled with surprises. The freshmen played with a lot of confidence and returners that did not have much experience did not show it.

 

SaturdayNo. 9 UC Davis 11, Pacific 6

The Aggies started their season off right, coming out with a dominating victory over Pacific.

Sophomore Lauren Seidemann, who only played in 19 games last season, scored two goals to lead the Aggies against a struggling Tigers team.

“I am really happily surprised,Wright said.Everybody came to play this weekend.

 

SaturdayNo. 4 Hawaii 11, No. 9 UC Davis 7

Hawaii came out strong in Saturday’s nightcap, opening the first quarter with a 3-1 lead.

Sophomore Dakotah Mohr had an impressive weekend creating 6-on-5 opportunities for the Aggies, averaging five a game. She had a career-high six ejections drawn against Hawaii, giving the Aggies a number of opportunities to catch up to the Rainbow Wahine.

“Dakotah is by far our most physical player.Wright said.She knows how to use her body to get ejections and that is really going to help us this year.

The Aggies could not score enough to erase the two-goal deficit, and fell to Hawaii 11-7.

 

SundayNo. 9 UC Davis 10, No. 10 San Jose State 9

The Aggies looked to a familiar foe for their first game on Sunday.

The Spartans, who defeated the strong Aggies team twice last season, only graduated one player and promised a challenging game for the still-forming Aggies.

UC Davis dominated the first half, gaining a lead of 5-3 at the halftime break. But the team had a tough third quarter, as the Spartans outscored them 4-1 to take a one-goal advantage.

The Aggies took the fourth quarter with some great saves by junior goalkeeper Casey Hines, who tallied a total of nine saves on the game, helping a young UC Davis team to victory.

“I put in four freshman and two returners at the beginning of the fourth,Wright said.They were the group that was playing the best so we went with them, and it gave us the lead back.

Ashley Chandler had two goals to lead the team, while eight other Aggies added one apiece to help give them the one-goal victory.

“This was a big win for us,Wright said.They are a really good team.

 

SundayNo. 5 California 9, No. 9 UC Davis 7

After only playing one minute in the San Jose State game, true freshman Carey Faber led the Aggies with two impressive goals to give the Golden Bears all that they could handle.

“The crowd was just in awe,Wright said.This girl can shoot the ball hard and accurate with a quick release.

A fellow freshman, Kaylee Miller added two strikes to give her three goals on the day.

The Aggies came out playing great in the last game of the tournament against a high-quality opponent in the Golden Bears. Although UC Davis took the lead twice in the first quarter, the score remained even through one period of play.

The Bears came out roaring in the second quarter, scoring four consecutive goals in the eight minutes of play to push the lead to 7-3. The California attack forced Wright into a change in the net, as he put senior Diana Pivacek between the pipes in the second half. Pivacek had three saves and allowed two goals.

“I am really happy about how both our goalies played this weekend,Wright said.

The Aggies fought back in the second half to cut the lead to two, but their two-for-eight performance on man-up opportunities was too much to overcome, as they fell for the second straight time in the nightcap, 9-7.

The Aggies return to action on Saturday at the Triton Invitational in San Diego.

 

SAMMY BRASCH can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Aggies beat the Beavers at home, fall to Titans on the road

0

UC Davis took on a pair of conference foes this weekend, defeating Oregon State 22-12 Friday night at the Pavilion before falling to Cal State Fullerton 22-12 on Sunday afternoon.

After splitting their weekend duals, the Aggies stand at 3-3 in Pacific-10 Conference action and 7-5 overall.

UC Davis has been plagued by injuries in their last two duals, as they were forced to forfeit in two classes and use inexperienced wrestlers in three other classes.

It’s tough when you’re missing five out of your 10 varsity wrestlers,coach Lennie Zalesky said.We were hoping to have all 10 wrestlers back by this weekend.

The banged-up Aggies had most of their team back for Oregon State, allowing them to pick up an impressive conference win, but weren’t healthy enough to get past the Titans.

 

FridayUC Davis 22, Oregon State 12

The stage was set: Zalesky vs. Zalesky.

On one side was older brother Lennie and the UC Davis Aggies, and on the other sat younger brother Jim and the Oregon State Beavers.

At the end of the day, it was the Aggies that beat the Beavers 22-12, but Lennie saw the win as more than just a victory over his brother.

“I don’t know if I enjoy beating my brother as much as I enjoy beating a program like Oregon State,Zalesky said.They’ve got a history of national champions. It feels good to beat big programs like that.

The story wasn’t about the sibling rivalry as much as it was about the team effort put forth by the Aggies and their tenacity to keep pushing even through injuries.

“It was an outstanding performance. Some of our best performances of the year,Zalesky said.Those guys in there, even though they’re not 100 percent, they fought.

No one fought harder than senior Dustin Noack.

The injured 165-pound wrestler battled one of the Pac-10s toughest in Keegan Davis. At one point, Davis picked Noack up and dropped him on his head in what could have been perceived as a potentially dangerous move, meaning the referee could have stopped the dual.

Instead, the Noack-Davis match continued, as Noack refused to stop wrestling and picked up a 6-5 decision in overtime, giving the Aggies all the momentum they’d need to finish off the Beavers.

He showed some mental toughness for sure. A lot of mental courage,Zalesky said of Noack.Him coming back and winning against a kid who’s ranked 14ththat’s a big, big win.

The Aggies rallied around Noack, and despite all the injuries, were able to come up with a big win against one of the nation’s toughest teams.

 

SundayCal State Fullerton 22, UC Davis 12

UC Davis seemed to have all the momentum going into Sunday’s dual with the Titans after beating Oregon State, but injuries took their toll on the Aggies once again.

UC Davis was forced to forfeit at 165 pounds and was without starting heavyweight wrestler Ricky Alcala, which proved too much for the Aggies to overcome as they fell to the Titans in Fullerton.

One bright spot for the Aggies was sophomore Barrett Abel, who pushed his dual record to 11-1 on the year. The 11 dual victories put him in a tie for 10th place on the Aggies single season list.

UC Davis hopes to return to full health before they travel to Idaho to dual with Pac-10 frontrunner and No. 11 Boise State Saturday night.

 

KYLE HYLAND can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Aggies fall to Cal State Fullerton on road

0

Although they posted a season-high 191.300 against Cal State Fullerton on Sunday, the disappointment in coach John Lavallee’s voice was at once palpable.

We came down to the end,said Lavallee following the loss to the Titans, who scored a 193.125.We had some trouble on beam; we had to count two falls on beam. We were pretty close to putting up a really good score.

His disappointment receded, though, once talk turned to junior Kendall McCann, who competed in the all-around for the first time in her collegiate career.

She did a great job for us,said Lavallee.She wasn’t supposed to compete in beam today, but we had an injury and she ended up filling in at the very last second. She did an excellent job.

McCann scored in all four events for the Aggies. Her top finish came in the beam, where her 9.600 was good enough to tie for fourth.

Additionally, McCann’s debut all-around score of 38.075 placed her second.

I was really excited,said McCann.It was a goal of mine to make all-around at least once before I graduated, so it was exciting for me to do.

“I didn’t expect itI kind of got thrown in at the last minute on beam to help Tanya (Ho). I had a good beam routine. I’m happy. Really happy.

McCann added that she would like another chance to do all-around if the opportunity presents itself.

It depends on the team,she said.I only want to do it if I’m really in the top six. I wouldn’t want to be put in it just to do all-around. The team comes first, so whatever helps the team, I want to do that.

Another standout performance was put forth by junior Michelle Bobonski, who set season highs in both vault (9.775) and beam (9.675). Her score on beam made her the day’s only Aggie winner, and her vault put her in a tie for second.

It felt good,said Bobonski.It was a surprise to win beam, since I’ve never really been on the top on beam before. It felt really good. My vaults have been a little shaky since the beginning of the season, so this felt like how it should be. It felt good to be back on how I normally vault.

Just .025 back of Bobonski on beam was sophomore Stacey Nicolini, who tied for second on the apparatus. Additionally, she scored on vault and bars, posting 9.575s on both. All three scores were season-highs.

I think doing three events is challenging,said Nicolini,but I think it’s good because it keeps me moving throughout the meet so I can contribute as much as I can do. I was last up on beam, just keeping my confidence up and knowing that I had made it in practice. I was trying to do the same thing that I had done before.

The strongest event for the Aggies was floor, which saw a season-high 48.475. Senior co-captain Andi Dolinsky led the event with a season-high 9.775. She’s improved by .025 in each meet this season.

UC Davis also had the third and fourth placers in the event in freshmen Erika Van Dyke (9.750) and Jen Mueller (9.675).

Overall, I think we did really well,said McCann.I think we worked really hard and fought really hard to keep as many people on the equipment as possible. Beam was a bit rougher than normal, but that happens. I think our team has a lot of potential this year, so I’m ready to hopefully make it to regionals.

 

ALEX WOLF-ROOT can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Aggie Digest

0

Men’s tennis

The UC Davis men’s tennis team opened its 2009 season by going 1-2 at the Louisiana-Pacific Tennis Center in Portland, Ore. over the weekend.

The Aggies were defeated by Portland, 6-1, in their season opener Friday. The Pilots took two of three doubles matches for the first point of the day before winning five more times in singles. Nick Lopez claimed a singles win at No. 2 for UC Davis, while Josh Albert teamed with Kevin Liang for a win at No. 3 doubles.

The clinching doubles match came down to No. 1, where Evan Schleining and Filip Zivkovic outlasted Nic Amaroli and Michael Reiser, 8-6, to claim the point for Portland.

All of the singles matches were decided in straight sets. Lopez was the lone Aggie winner, as he defeated Thorp, 6-2, 6-2.

The Aggies picked up their first win of the season the following afternoon, blanking Portland State, 7-0.

In doubles, Amaroli and Reiser were 8-6 winners over Kyle Erickson and Chris Rice. Hunter Lee and Lopez teamed at No. 2 to defeat Jeff Cero and Alex VanDerschelden, 8-5. In addition, Liang and Albert picked up a victory at No. 3 for the Aggies.

All but two of the singles wins came in straight sets. Lee and Aria did just that at No. 2 and No. 3, respectively. The same was true for victories by Liang and Amaroli at No. 4 and No. 5.

Lopez prevailed at No. 1 with a three-set win over Rice, and Keanen McCarthy won a super-tiebreaker at No. 6 after splitting the first two sets with Alex Hart.

UC Davis closed out its road trip Sunday when it was defeated by Idaho, 4-3.

The Vandals swept doubles for the first point before winning three more times in singles. The loss drops UC Davis to 1-2 on the season, as the Aggies concluded a three-match trip in Portland.

The first doubles match to finish was at No. 1, where Alexandru Joitoiu and Artem Kuznetsov defeated Amaroli and Reiser, 8-6. Shortly after, Idaho clinched the point when Stanislav Gluhov and Timothy Huynh posted an 8-6 victory over Alberts and Liang at No. 3.

The Aggies evened the score at 1-1, as Reiser had no problem getting past Kuznetsov at No. 1, 6-1, 6-1. At No. 3, Joitoiu defeated Lee, 6-3, 6-2, to give Idaho a 2-1 lead. The Vandals would win the next two matches at No. 2 and No. 4 to clinch the win and take a 4-1 lead. Tyler Lee and Liang added wins at No. 5 and No. 6, respectively, to account for the final score.

UC Davis is next in action on Saturday at Fresno State. It hosts Pacific in its home opener the following day at 1 p.m.

 

Aggie Digest is compiled by the California Aggie sports staff with briefs from the UC Davis athletics website, ucdavisaggies.com.

Editorial: Activities fee

0

The UC Davis physical education department is in talks with Campus Recreation to implement participation fees for some of its classes.

 

Students currently have unlimited access to P.E. courses, which are paid for through registration fees. However, certain courses offered under the P.E. department use facilities operated by Campus Recreation, which is where the department is looking to apply an activities fee.

 

The fee will likely be administered in fall 2009 and will only be applied to classes taught in the group exercise room and on the rock wall in the Activities and Recreation Center. Actual costs and method of collection have yet to be determined.

 

Charging a participation fee for some P.E. classes is something that should have been implemented when the ARC opened in 2004.

 

As a facility that does not receive any state funding, the ARC is completely funded by student fees and was not intended to operate academic courses, said Campus Recreation Director John Campbell. Classes offered at the ARC through the Fitness and Wellness Center already require a student fee; it makes sense that P.E. courses that use this same equipment would also charge students.

 

However, Campus Recreation and the P.E. department need to be clearer as to why these fees will be implemented and where they will be applied, such as whether the money will be used strictly toward operating costs, or whether the decision to charge an activities fee was made just to create a consistent payment policy for all students.

 

Another issue the P.E. department needs to consider is the impact that a fee implementation will have on course registration. P.E. classes like rock climbing, which often fills to maximum capacity by Pass 1 registration, are already in high demand. Once fees are applied, it is likely that more students will instead choose to register for the classes offered without charge. The department should compensate by offering more free classes.

The man who signs the checks

0

If you work at UC Davis, chances are you know Stan Nosekor at least his signature on your paycheck.

“I don’t actually sign each individual check,Nosek said.I [computerized] that one about 7 years ago. But whenever people ask me that, I always say,yes, I saw yours, and I’m going to do something about it!'”

Nosek is the Vice Chancellor of Administration and he oversees every UC Davis unit. For example, he makes sure professors have enough pencils and janitors are receiving adequate compensation. When the Special Olympics come to Davis this summer, Nosek will have already arranged a fleet of services guests will be able to utilize.

At all other universities, he would be a businessman; a boss. But at UC Davis, he’s a team player, said his son, Kevin Nosek, assistant basketball coach at UC Davis.

“He’s a lot of people’s boss, but he never looks at it that way,Kevin said.He’ll always say,so and so works with me, notso and so works for me.That has been the story in our household and at work too.

Nosekworks withapproximately seven major units within UC Davis: Accounting and financial services, business services, the fire department, the police department, human resource, safety services and campus veterinary services. Each unit has anywhere from five to 27 subunits with up to hundreds of employees.

Nosek played a key role in reorganizing the infrastructure he oversees last year when he and John Meyer of the Office of Resource Management and Planning (ORMP) grouped more units into the ORMP. Faculties Management and Architects and Engineers moved into the care of ORMP in July of 2008, in order to group together units with the same interest.

“Stan Nosek has the great advantage of long-time service to the campus,said chancellor of UC Davis Larry Vanderhoef in an e-mail interview.He knows all of UC Davis well. During the past two years he has worked hard on a reorganization plan that he thought was best for the campus, even though it diminished his purview.

Nosek has also devoted much of his work and executive largesse toward campus sustainability. He led the way for the establishment of the Sustainability Advisory Committee, which has proposed to award approximately $54,000 in initiative spending.

“Sustainability is something easy you get people on board for,Nosek said.People generally want to do help reduce their carbon footprint.

In addition, he said he has made sure his staff hasput their money where their mouth is,by ensuring that facilities are run more efficiently. For example, UC Davismain cooling system is run by a series of underground pipes that transportcooling water,throughout buildings. In the last few years, Nosek has overseen the replacement of these pipes with a more efficient system. This not only reduced emissions by five to six percent, but also saved the university up to $1.24 million in utilities bills.

He oversaw UC Daviscomplete switch to power from the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), which though not completelygreen,has lowered power costs, and may soon be considered a sustainable source for power.

It’s clear that sustainability is one of Nosek’s more prominent issues, and something that he feels passionate about. However he attributes this passion to the UC Davis students, whom he feels had led the green movement to begin with.

“Our students kept saying,this is what we need to do,and they did it in a coherent and collaborative manner,Nosek said.We didn’t see them out there screaming and protesting, they talked to the regents, they talked to the chancellors, they talked to their professors. They get full credit for the progress that has been made so far.

Nosek’s relationship with the student body also drives his career. He started working at UC Davis for Student Affairs almost 33 years ago, dealing mostly with issues of student housing and campus unions. He credits this position with his ability to connect to the student population.

“When I started working with Student Affairs, I wanted to be a part of helping students to compliment their classroom education with high-quality student development programs and opportunities,Nosek said.Out of the classroom learning has so much value on the development of the whole person. Even though my current position provides for minimal regular contact with students, I always enjoy those opportunities.

Before Nosek worked at Student Affairs, he served as the director of the Campus Events and Information Office, as well as assistant director of resident life and assistant business manager of student housing.

But through and above all of his UC Davis careers, Nosek is a father of three childrenone of which alsoworks withhim. Nosek signs his check every payday, which he says is a lot like giving him allowance.

“He hates it and keeps encouraging me to retire!” said the older Nosek.

Joking aside, Kevin admires the work ethic of his father. Nosek applies many of the values with which he raised his children to his work on campus.

“Both my parents were so supportive of my brother and sister and I,said Kevin.They made tremendous sacrifices for us and were always so gratifying when we did well. In the same way, [Nosek] relishes in otherssuccess and development here at Davis. He’s a very selfless man.

 

LAUREN STEUSSY can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

Dining In Davis: Little Prague Restaurant

0

Little Prague Restaurant

330 G St.

Hours: Open daily, see littleprague.com for more info

Price: $$ to $$$ out of $$$$

Ambience: 3 ½ stars

Food: 3 ½ stars

Service: 3 ½ stars

 

Walking in to Little Prague Restaurant for someauthentic Bohemian cuisine,I had one overwhelming question: What the hell is Czech food?

Most of us are familiar with Italian and maybe French edibles, but as far as east-central European, I couldn’t think of anything beyond bratwurst and beer.

The physical setting was definitely old world like a small Alpine cottage in the middle of downtown Davis (and next to a Jack-in-the Box).

Outside, there was a patio area with a brick fireplace and water fountain, segregated from the sidewalk and traffic on G Street by some decorative bushes and small trees. Inside, it was like a beefed up version of my grandma’s house, decorated with wooden furniture, lace curtains, porcelain plates on the wall, and knick-knacks. Overall, comfortable and familiar, with a pinch of European sophistication.

So back to the question: What the hell is Czech food? Well, it’s nothing unfamiliar the menu includes stroganoff (a popular dish, my waitress told me), Prague potato pancakes, and a variety of items that generally include meat and potatoes. Nothing too exotic, and very suitable to the American palate. Little Prague has a big selection, too, with a full brunch, lunch, dinner and dessert menu.

Personally, my friends and I went for a Sunday birthday brunch (one of them just turned twenty), and I ordered the Chicken Schnitzel. Essentially, it’s a lean slice of chicken breast breaded and fried golden, with a slice of lemonfor some zip,as the menu says. It also came with a small scoop of potato salad and some greens. I ordered Czech fried potatoes (basically home-fried potatoes) on the side.

Honestly, (and I don’t say this often) it was just like mom used to make. The portions were generous but not overwhelming. The chicken was crispy on the outside, moist on the inside, and tender.

Everything else was tasty too, with that indescribable quality where you felt like the food on your plate was made homemade special just for you, with an attention to detail you don’t expect.

My friend ordered the Classic Eggs Benedict the best she said she ever had. Another friend tried the Prague Potato Pancakes with sour cream and apple sauce an acquired taste, but delectable nonetheless. I’ve had them before at a friend’s Passover Seder dinner back home in L.A., and as far as my expert knowledge of potato pancakes are concerned, they were pretty good.

Some advice: GET THE DESSERT. We ordered a warm apple strudel with a scoop of ice cream, and chocolate raspberry mousse. I could go on and on describing the fresh-baked apple chunks with cinnamon wrapped in a perfect flaky crust, or how the chocolate raspberry mousse just melts in your mouth, but let me just say this we were ridiculously full from the main course, and the dessert still disappeared in under five minutes.

Like I said: GET THE DESSERT. Anything pastry or sweets-related at Little Prague is definitely worth a try.

I completed my Czech experience thoroughly pleased. The atmosphere was great, the food was fantastic and our waitress, Zoe, was among the friendliest people I ever met. She brought the apple strudel out on the house with a birthday candle for the occasion.

Some members of our party were visiting from nearby Sebastopol, and halfway through our brunch-lunch, we decided by popular acclamation we were definitely coming back soon, next time for dinner.

There are plenty of items under $10. Brunch is cheaper than lunch, and some dinner items run as high as around $20. The establishment hosts daily specials, and specials for holidays like Valentine’s Day coming up (hint!).

Oh, andCzechout the website, littleprague.com.

You can preview the menu, view upcoming events, check out pictures of the outdoor and indoor areas of the restaurant and read some genuinely interesting articles, likeCzech fun facts,” “How Does Czech Food Taste?” and theAre You Bohemian?” Test. I got an 89.

 

ANDRE LEE can be reached at features@theaggie.org. 

Daily Calendar

0

TODAY

URC Abstract Workshop

11 a.m. to noon

Mee Room, MU

Learn how to write and submit your abstract for participation in the UCD Undergraduate Research Conference.

For more details see urc.ucdavis.edu.

 

Students for a Free Tibet meeting

6 p.m.

1322 Storer

Go to this meeting and view the award-winning documentary about Tibet, Cry of the Snow Lion.

 

Colleges Against Cancer meeting

8:30 p.m.

103 Wellman

Go learn and how you can join the fight against cancer.

 

WEDNESDAY

URC Abstract Workshop

1 to 2 p.m.

Mee Room, MU

Learn how to write and submit your abstract for participation in the UCD Undergraduate Research Conference.

For more details see urc.ucdavis.edu.

 

Campus Judicial Board info night

4 to 5 p.m.

Fielder Room, MU

The Campus Judicial Board is now accepting applications for the 2009-10 academic year. Go to this info night to learn more, or feel free to stop by SJA in Dutton Hall to pick up an application!

 

UC Davis Autism Awareness Association meeting

7:15 p.m.

103 Wellman

Go to the AAA’s next general meeting and hear Dr. Ann Mastergeorge speak. Dr. Mastergeorge holds a position at the UC Davis MIND Institute and teaches undergraduates in the human development department.

 

Kodo

Jackson Hall, Mondavi Center

8 p.m.

Kodo, a Mondavi Center favorite, explores the possibilities of Japanese Taiko drumming.

 

THURSDAY

Muslim Student association talk

7:30 p.m.

234 Wellman

Speaker Imam Khalid Latif discusses “Diseases of the Tongue” in this talk.

 

Project Compost

6 p.m.

43 Memorial Union, MU Basement

Learn about radical composting on campus and how to get involved.

 

Thursday Trivia Nights

6 to 7:30 p.m.

Silo Union

Test your knowledge of random facts and potentially win fabulous prizes along the way!

 

Zero screening

7 p.m.

100 Hunt Hall

Campus Greens is sponsoring a film screening of Zero. This film is an investigation into 9/11 with one thesis – the official story is bogus.

 

FRIDAY

Sickspits Spoken Word collective

7 to 11 p.m.

TCS Art Annex

Go to “The Movement II – the Four Corners of Hip Hop” this Friday night! For more information, contact elyssa101@yahoo.com.

 

Cinderella

Jackson Hall, Mondavi Center

8 p.m.

The State Ballet Theatre of Russia, with the Sacramento Philharmonic Orchestra, work together to bring the timeless fairy tale of Cinderella to life.

 

The Spokes performance!

8 p.m.

Freeborn Hall

Go to Hella Capella, a Nor Cal a cappella extravaganza hosted by The Spokes! Tickets are available at Freeborn Hall; presale they are $5 for students and $7 for non-students. At the door, tickets are $7 for students and $10 for non-students.

 

MONDAY

Campus Judicial Board recruitment

2 to 3 p.m.

Garrison Room, MU

Check out this informational session for all students wishing to join the 2009-2010 Campus Judicial Board.

 

To receive placement in the AGGIE DAILY CALENDAR, e-mail dailycal@theaggie.org or stop by 25 Lower Freeborn by noon the day prior to your event. Due to space constraints, all event descriptions are subject to editing, and priority will be given to events that are free of charge and geared toward the campus community.

 

Editorial: Auto emissions

0

In one of his first actions in office, President Barack Obama made good on a promise to reverse an Environmental Protection Agency decision that blocked California from implementing stricter pollution standards on vehicles sold in the state.

The EPA under President George W. Bush denied Californias request, saying that regulating vehicle emissions was the job of the federal government. The claim was that allowing different states to have different standards would create an unenforceable tangled web of rules.

Automakers also opposed Californias proposal, saying that it would be too difficult to manufacture different kinds of cars for different states.

The claim that this will create an untenable patchwork of regulations in different states is false. California has a special status under the Clean Air Act that allows it to set its own regulations as long as they are more strict than the federal standard. Other states are allowed to adopt Californias standard, or they can stick with the federal standard.

Thirteen other states have said they will adopt Californias standards. Thats nearly half of the population of the U.S., a fact that will simplify the enforcement process for the EPA, as well as essentially force automakers to manufacture cars that can be sold in all 50 states.

There are a number of arguments against rules that limit tailpipe emissions, but California lawmakers and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger opted for that approach, and by proxy thats what the people of California want. If Californians decide that this negatively affects them, they can lobby for it to be changed or vote out the lawmakers who made it happen.

Rush Limbaugh and other social conservatives will tell you that this is simply a way for the overzealous tree hugging liberals to control other people’s lives, part of a vast socialist conspiracy intended to take away other peoples liberties.

Yet a basic fact of economics is that some activities or choices have negative externalities, meaning they have an adverse impact on other people. Driving a gas-guzzling car pollutes the air, which is a negative externality.

While we may have the freedom to drive whatever car we want, we dont have the freedom to spew pollutants into the atmosphere that we all share. That is ultimately what these regulations are intended to address, and Obama should be applauded for his swift action to make them possible.

Steal This Column

0

When those around you begin to cling to a rotten lie, reeking of desperation, ignorance, and often times paranoia, the best course of action for a reasonable person to take is a step back and posing the question of,Why?”

A lie whose odor aptly mirrored this description was recently outlined by one of my eloquent, yet irrational peers, who claimed that a belief in the functionality of laissez faire capitalism was,designed to create disaffection with government and ideologically legitimize wealth concentration and economic exploitation in the name ofindividual rights.‘”

Such a skewed view of reality stands in glaring contrast with the fact that laissez faire capitalism is indeed the only economic system in which two people may voluntarily enter into an agreement and exit with both parties satisfied. However, any attempt by a rational person to convey such a truth to the misguided few that cling to these lies, which are based solely on their individual affections and emotional reactions, would indeed prove a difficult task. In order to respond to such watered-down intellects I will once again call upon the wisdom of another.

In the words of Nobel Prize winning economist, Milton Friedman,A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that a group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.In order to understand the origins of Mr. Friedman’s comment, one must first understand the origins of laissez fair capitalism.

The phrase first entered the American sphere of thought through the publication of George Whatley and Benjamin Franklin’s The Principles of Trade and was further expanded by Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. Both of these works came at the height of a philosophical movement that championed liberty, reason, and natural rights, aptly titledThe Enlightenment.Out of this period came a yearning for personal freedom, and a desire to cast aside the controls of monarchy, theocracy, and all other avenues of intervention into a man’s life. Laissez faire capitalism is the economic embodiment of these very principles – the same principles that would serve as the guiding philosophical force at the time of our nation’s birth.

Over time, it would appear as if the drive to spur exterior control in favor of individual freedom had been replaced by a feeling of constant reliance upon overbearing and unnecessary governmentassistancefor its people. These unfortunate citizens, who do not believe themselves to be independently capable of excelling, have bought into the illusion that it is somehow the government’s responsibility to ensure their success.

Whether it be in the field of economics, through costly government bailouts and stimulus packages, medicine, through a state sponsored healthcare plan, or the media, through outrageous plots to extend equal opportunities to opposing viewpoints or censure a private citizen such as Rush Limbaugh, these people have adopted the repulsive battle cry offrom each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

It is this focus on wants and needs that has made laissez fair capitalism a favorite target for these simple-minded citizens. Perhaps they have seen one too many ambitious individuals fail on their first effort, perhaps they themselves have failed before, or perhaps they have yet to try but believe the path through life to be much easier if the agencies of government are made to be their personal keepers. Regardless of the reasoning, once the flawed ideology of intervention has entered into their minds it isn’t long before they find themselves believing that they are entitled to such constant government assistance. In the words of Friedman, they begin to think they,ought to want.

Those of you that remain unswayed and continue to cling to same rotten lie need only realize that it is solely in a free market that citizens may demand the situation to be mutually beneficial before voluntarily entering into an agreement. The second this stops being the case, as it does anytime the government finds its way into the picture, any illusion of freedom ceases to be a part of the equation.

 

Tune in next week when JAMES NOONAN will attack another band of long-haired hippies armed only with a pitchfork, a torch and his own sense of reason. Until then, he can be reached at jjnoonan@ucdavis.edu. Sleep lightly, hippies.