55.9 F
Davis

Davis, California

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Home Blog Page 1730

Makers of the lost Shields treasure

Peter J. Shields, the instrumental force in UC Davis’ founding, buried mysterious items somewhere on campus? One Shields Avenue is a fictitious address? Shields and Robert Arneson, famed art professor and creator of the eggheads, belonged to a secret society called BESSY? The enigmatic eggheads are in fact clues to Shields’ long-lost secret?

Not quite, but that’s exactly what a group of Davis Honors Challenge students have convinced a couple hundred others to believe.

The students’ tall tale can be read in full on the “Where in the World is One Shields Avenue?” facebook.com group, which now boasts over 200 members.

The story is the product of a class assignment to create – and spread – a conspiracy theory about UC Davis.

“We were looking for things on campus that people really know about,” said Ankita Mylatore, a first-year psychology major.

With a mix of the eggheads, a world-famous artist, secret societies, and the upcoming campus centennial – “Conspiracy theories that are old are really believable,” Mylatore said – the story was ready to roll.

 

Peter J. Shields: The man, the address

Shields, a Sacramento judge, advocated an applied farming school for the University of California. As a result of his efforts, he is given substantial credit for the passage of the Mar. 18, 1905 law that authorized the creation of the University Farm.

The university rewarded Shields’ efforts by naming its library in his honor in 1973, as the DHC story recounts.

At the time, the university had no central address. But the claim that One Shields Avenue is “fictitious” is inaccurate, as the university created the address a decade ago to meet postal standards.

In 1997, Janet C. Hamilton, then the vice chancellor of administration, issued a directive creating the One Shields Avenue address. Without a street address, UC Davis’ mail was delayed by as much as a day, and postal rates were higher, the directive said.

Though the address is not particular to a street or building, it was created to recognize Shields’ contribution to the campus’ founding.

Shields died in 1962 at the age of 100, which happens to be the year in which Arneson joined the UC Davis faculty.

 

The enigmatic eggheads

On a map of the campus, the eggheads form an arrow pointing to the supposed location of Shields’ loot – or so the DHC tale goes. Of course, the class’ story doesn’t mention that the eggheads have been moved since Arneson completed them just before his death in 1992.

Renny Pritikin, director of the Nelson Gallery and official caretaker of the eggheads, said Arneson was a beloved professor whose artistic prowess with ceramics made him world famous.

Most UC Davis students, faculty, and staff are intimately familiar with Arneson’s work via the ubiquitous eggheads.

“You could say that they’re satirical. Arneson was known as kind of an iconoclast with strong opinions and a great sense of humor,” Pritikin said.

The eggheads served as Arneson’s farewell to a university where he had spent his life, Pritikin said.

“They’re 50 percent sentimental, but they’re also 50 percent teasing the university,” he said. The name ‘egghead’ is itself “generally considered a negative term for an academic,” Pritikin said.

So, about those eggheads holding clues to the Shields’ conspiracy?

“Not true,” Pritikin responded after a brief pause.

 

A semi-secret society

While the eggheads may not guard any treasure after all, the first letters of their names – Bookhead, Eye on Mark (Fatal Laff), See No Evil Hear No Evil, Stargazer, and Yin and Yang – do spell “BESSY.”

The claim that Shields and Arneson were members of a secret society called BESSY may be the most compelling element of the conspiracy theory, as Mylatore said she has overheard discussion of the topic.

In fact, there is no secret society called BESSY at UC Davis, but there is one called the Order of Sword and Sandals.

The Order of Sword and Sandals, primarily a student organization, was founded on December 6, 1921, by students Elmer Hughes and Clark Burnham, according to an official orientation guide procured by The California Aggie.

Sword and Sandals includes student members, alumni, administrators and other members of the “power elite,” said Jay Mechling, an American studies professor and folklore expert.

However, Sword and Sandals may well be considered only a semi-secret society, as information about it is readily available online.

According to the orientation guide – last updated February 1999 – the purpose of the organization is to “provide a forum for discussing the University of California, and its concerns, utilizing the best possible representation from the major constituencies of the campus: students, faculty, administration, staff, and alumni, [and for] the betterment of…UC Davis.”

The guide makes no reference to either Arneson or Shields.

 

Just a good story

Consider the whole Arneson-Shields conspiracy theory debunked, but doesn’t it sound just a little bit familiar? Say, out of a certain series of Nicholas Cage or Harrison Ford movies?

“It’s not a coincidence,” said Mylatore, smiling. “National Treasure is really cool to watch.”

Indeed, people have noted conspiracy theories “for hundreds of years,” said UC Davis history professor and resident conspiracy theory expert Kathy Olmsted.

Conspiracy theories date back to the middle ages, when Christians believed Jews would drink the blood of their children, Olmsted said. The tradition of conspiracies has continued in the United States since the nation’s founding, she said.

Their popularity remains, as some 200 individuals in the “Where in the World is One Shields Avenue?” facebook.com group could attest. But why?

“Conspiracy theories serve the function of entertainment,” Olmsted said. “People like to read about them because they’re entertained by them; they find the premise amusing.”

As millions of people flock to see the latest Indiana Jones movie this month, perhaps the popularity of conspiracy theories isn’t so surprising after all.

 

PATRICK McCARTNEY can be reached at campus@californiaaggie.com.

Living in dairy land

Tercero residents: If you think you think you’ve got it bad when it comes to the cow smell, try living among the cows in the UC Davis Dairy Teaching and Research Facility.

That’s what UC Davis students Sina Weisemann and Katie Almand are doing. They are two of four students currently residing in the facility located on campus across the street from the older Tercero dorms.

The dairy provides students the chance to learn more about the veterinary and managerial side of the dairy business.

According to the UC Davis department of animal science website, it also provides researchers use of the facility and about 220 cows for conducting dairy and animal science tests.

Neither student had much experience with cows or dairy facilities prior to attending UC Davis.

Weisemann, a sophomore animal science major, says she had never worked with cows and considered herself more of a horse person.

“I’ve never really even seen cows up close before coming to Davis,” Weisemann said. “I know they’re there, I know they give milk, but that was the extent of my knowledge.”

Weisemann took Animal Science 49 during her first quarter at UC Davis, which introduced her to the dairy. She enjoyed working with the cows, so she began interning during winter quarter.

Her next step was living at the dairy’s residence area during her sophomore year.

“It was the weirdest, most surreal experience ever because I didn’t think I’d be coming to college and milking cows,” Weisemann said.

For Almand, a junior animal science major, the experience was almost the same. Coming from Southern California, she had very little livestock experience. Almand took the Animal Science 49 class and interned at the dairy as well.

Almand found out about the residence program during her first year, when she lived on the agriculture-themed floor of her dorm. In her sophomore year, she knew a couple of friends who had applied to live at the dairy. She decided to try it out in her junior year.

“It’s interesting to look at the managing side and not just the veterinarian side,” Almand said.

The dairy offers undergraduate students more than just experience in their chosen field.

“You work eight hours a week, and the room is free,” Weisemann said. “You don’t have to pay electricity or water or anything. And anything over eight hours you get paid for.”

In addition, transportation to and from class is simple for the girls, since their residences are located on campus.

Students are allowed to stay for a maximum of two years at one animal facility. After that, they either have to leave or transfer to a different facility.

Almand will continue living at the dairy during her senior year, while Weisemann plans on living with her boyfriend during the next school year when he moves to Davis.

Nevertheless, living at the dairy also has its pitfalls. The residences lack some of the luxuries of an average Davis apartment.

“We’re a bit more isolated without neighbors.… And our kitchen is really small,” Almand said.

Other disadvantages come from the active duties required of the residences.

Weisemann has had her share of hazards and misfortune – including walking through a thick layer of manure and urine with a hole in her boot, crashing tractors and doing dirty early-morning shifts.

“A typical day depends on what shift you’re working,” Weisemann said. “If the day sucks, you have the morning feeding, which is at 3:30 in the morning…. The first thing you do is go check pen six, which are all the cows which are due within the next two weeks, to see if anybody is giving birth or has given birth. Then you feed the younger calves…. Then shoveling, some grunt work and then … all the pens have to be raked.”

And of course, there’s always that eau de cow to think about.

“You get really used to it,” Almand said. “You do worry sometimes about how you smell.”

Weisemann learned that the smell took some time to get used to.

“I wasn’t ever really out in the pen [when I took the class],” Weisemann said. “But when I started interning and got out into the pens, my initial reaction was ‘ick’. You look out and it was like, ‘ick, ick.’ I think you kind of get desensitized to it.”

Both Weisemann and Almand agree that the valuable hands-on experience and free housing outweigh the disadvantages.

“The best thing is just the experience,” Weisemann said. “Who gets to live with cows?”

 

APPLE LOVELESS can be reached at features@californiaaggie.com.XXX

 

 

Daily Calendar

TODAY

 

Health fair

10 a.m. to 2 p.m.

West Quad

There will be activities and demonstrations from health services on campus, as well as giveaways.

 

Early voting

10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Memorial Union

Cast your official ballot in the California primary and city council elections.

 

Plant sale

11 a.m. to 2 p.m.

The Quad

Get basil, cilantro, shiso, okra, eggplant and more! This plant sale benefits the Environmental Horticulture Club.

 

Farmers Market

11 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.

East Quad

Get fresh fruits, veggies and snacks at this convenient farmers market.

 

Free Tibet rally

Noon to 1 p.m.

Memorial Union Patio

Listen to speakers and performers to raise awareness about Tibet.

 

Career advising for women

Noon to 1 p.m.

104 North Hall

Still trying to figure out what to do with your major, career or life in general? Drop in and talk with an Internship and Career Center counselor.

 

English lecture

12:10 to 2 p.m.

126 Voorhies

Professor Ian Baucom, professor of English and department chair at

Duke University, will give a lecture titled “The Disasters of War: On Inimical Life.”

 

Senior recital

3:30 p.m.

115 Music

Mary King will give a free oboe recital.

 

English lecture

4:10 p.m.

126 Voorhies

Professor Ian Baucom, professor of English and department chair at

Duke University, will give a lecture titled “Cicero’s Ghost: The Atlantic, the Enemy, and the Laws of War.”

 

Pre-dental Society meeting

8 p.m.

206 Olson

The last meeting of the quarter will include tacos, free food, a T-shirt design contest and surveys about next year!

 

UC Davis Jazz Band concert

8 to 10 p.m.

Studio Theatre, Mondavi Center

This concert will include big band and jazz improv. Tickets are $12 for adults, $6 for students and children.

 

Texas Hold’em tournament

5:30 to 9 p.m.

Silo Café & Pub

Tournament starts at 6 p.m. Seats fill up quickly, so come early! Be one of the top 30 players and be invited to play in the Tournament of Champions!

 

Food Addicts in Recovery Anonymous meeting

7 to 8:30 p.m.

United Methodist Church, 1620 Anderson Road

Program for individuals recovering from addictive eating, bulimia and under-eating based on the 12 steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. There are no dues, fees or weigh-ins. For more information, go to foodaddicts.org.

 

THURSDAY

 

Early voting

10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Memorial Union

Cast your official ballot in the California primary and city council elections.

 

Free car wash

10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Anderson Plaza, 1900 Anderson Road

Support the Prytanean Women’s Honor Society in raising money for the Angelina Rose Malfitano Memorial Scholarship Fund. Donations will be accepted and encouraged.

 

Lecture recital

3:10 to 5 p.m.

115 Music

Mihoko Watanabe will give a free Japanese flute recital.

 

Trivia night

5:30 to 7:30 p.m.

Silo Café & Pub

Show off your knowledge of random factoids!

 

Math Café

6 to 8 p.m.

Scholar’s Center Study Room, Surge IV

Get a good serving of mathematics at this weekly tutoring session with the Women’s Resources and Research Center. Women and men are both welcome.

 

March of Dimes

7 to 9 p.m.

1002 Giedt

Three speakers will speak about prematurity, birth defects and infant mortality. All are welcome; food is provided.

 

Hermanos Macehual meeting

8 p.m.

1 Wellman

Check out this community service organization that offers academic and social support to students at UC Davis. For more info, visit macehual.com or e-mail us at hermanos@ucdavis.edu. New folks always welcome!

 

 

FRIDAY

 

Early voting

10 a.m. to 4 p.m.

Memorial Union

Cast your official ballot in the California primary and city council elections.

 

Undergraduate Composers concert

4:10 to 5 p.m.

115 Music

Hear from UC Davis undergraduate composers and performers at this free concert.

 

Multimedia Ensemble

7 to 9 p.m.

Technocultural Studies Lobby, Art Annex

Multimedia Ensemble, directed by Sam Nichols, showcases the collaboration between music and technocultural studies students. The show is free!

 

To receive placement in the AGGIE DAILY CALENDAR, e-mail dailycal@californiaaggie.com or stop by 25 Lower Freeborn by noon the day prior to your event. Due to space constraints, all event descriptions are subject to editing, and priority will be given to events that are free of charge and geared toward the campus community. XXX

Corrections

In Tuesday’s article “University bans Epic Quad Battle,Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Fred Wood’s name was misspelled.

There was a layout error which deleted part of Tuesday’s articleA day in the life with an undergraduate fisheries researcher. The full version of the article can be viewed online at californiaaggie.com. The Aggie regrets the errors. 

 

California sues the Environmental Protection Agency

0

In December, the Environmental Protection Agency rejected a waiver submitted by the state of California that would allow stricter emissions standards than those set by the EPA.

Now, California is suing the EPA for a reversal of the decision.

California has been the leader in emissions regulations since before the EPA was created. The state has been granted the waiver over 40 times, and this denial is the first one in 40 years.

According to Stanley Young, a spokesperson for the California Air Resources Board, if California were to be granted the waiver that was rejected in December, the state would work to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions, while the EPA’s focus is on fuel economy.

“[The EPA] wants to increase the number of miles per gallon,” Young said. “[California is] looking at grams of CO2 emitted per mile.”

Young says there is a common misconception that either of these two approaches to car pollution will result in the same beneficial outcome.

“This is a conceptual difference, a paradigm shift,” he said. “These are two completely different ways of looking at a car and one does not subsume the other.”

California is looking to reduce more than just tailpipe emissions. Young said work is being done to limit fuel tank emissions, the impact of air conditioning units and the use of “cool paint” on the interiors of cars in order to keep the temperature down using little to no energy.

All three of the presidential candidates have come out and said that they would grant California the waiver, Young added.

According to the Clean Air Act, California is allowed to set its own vehicle emissions standards as long as it obtains the waiver. The reasoning behind the EPA’s denial of the waiver is that the state must prove that it is in a unique situation and must be treated as a separate entity.

In December, Stephen Johnson, administrator of the EPA, wrote in a letter to Governor Schwarzenegger that “[The] EPA has considered and granted previous waivers to California for standards covering pollutants that predominantly affect local and regional air quality. In contrast, the current waiver request for greenhouse gases is far different; it presents numerous issues that are distinguishable from all prior waiver requests. Unlike other air pollutants covered by previous waivers, greenhouse gases are fundamentally global in nature.

However, Young said California has the most polluted air in the nation.

Last week, Governor Schwarzenegger teamed up with Connecticut’s governor Jodi Rell to write an op-ed piece for The Washington Post.

“It’s bad enough that the federal government has yet to take the threat of global warming seriously, but it borders on malfeasance for it to block the efforts of states such as California and Connecticut that are trying to protect the public’s health and welfare,” Rell and Schwarzenegger wrote.

They continued the call for granted waivers in their article.

“California, Connecticut and 10 other states are poised to enact tailpipe emissions standards – tougher than existing federal requirements – that would cut greenhouse gas emissions from cars, light trucks and sport utility vehicles by 392 million metric tons by the year 2020, the equivalent to taking 74 million of today’s cars off the road for an entire year,” Rell and Schwarzenegger wrote.

For now, California must wait for the EPA’s decision to be reversed.

 

ALI EDNEY can be reached at city@californiaaggie.com.

Sacramento Greyhound terminal to be moved out of downtown

0

The Sacramento City Council approved a project that would relocate the city’s Greyhound terminal outside of downtown Sacramento.

“What stimulates the move now is in December 2006, the city purchased property on Richards Boulevard in the River district, which is where Greyhound will be moving to and is what has made the move possible,” said senior project manager Rachel Hazlewood.

Greyhound’s current location is very congested, which causes difficulties for bus drivers, said Lezlie Frietzche, downtown development manager.

“The location downtown is antiquated and a challenge in terms of getting in and out of the terminal,” Frietzche said. “They have long hoped they can move out of downtown.”

In addition to providing facilities for the buses, the new location will have many new amenities.

“The new facility will be designed [to be] more efficient, a lot more comfortable for passengers who are waiting to be picked up, a lot safer and a lot easier to get in and out of the site,” Hazlewood said.

A large problem with the Greyhound terminal on L Street in the downtown area is the issue with loitering, Hazlewood said.

“[The Greyhound terminal] is an attractive nuisance, which means that it attracts behavior that you don’t necessarily want in that area,” she said. “The problem with the terminal isn’t the people who use Greyhound but rather the people who take advantage of the situation by loitering out front. Businesses are excited because it’ll be clear who has a purpose downtown.”

Aside from the foreseen benefits for Greyhound, the city of Sacramento remains hopeful about what the terminal’s move will do for downtown Sacramento, Frietzche said.

“The owner of the property has plans for the under-utilized prime location for a mixed-use tower that could potentially be residential,” Frietzche said. “If residential, it will liven the downtown by bringing residential activities, property revenues and sales tax revenues to the city.”

The move is expected to be beneficial for business owners and downtown economy, said Keith Kaplan, development director of Westfield LLC at a City Council meeting last week.

“The relocation of the Greyhound terminal is of paramount importance to the rejuvenation of retail activity in the city’s core,” Kaplan said. “Greyhound stations and the issues that go along with it, both perceived and real, have also led retailers to leave the mall, and the same sentiment is shared by most of our shoppers.”

Hazlewood said the move will take a little over a year, but the city will see results with respect to improvements in business sooner. The downtown Sacramento community is also appreciative of the Greyhound terminal’s move.

“Thank you to all of you for your hard work who are finally getting projects like this moving,” said Steve Hanson, a downtown Sacramento resident, at the meeting.

 

ALEX BULLER can be reached at city@californiaaggie.com.

Wine bottle closure wins first place in Big Bang! competition

Tim Keller believes his invention will kill the cork for good.

His wine bottle-cap liner, designed to regulate the amount of air allowed into the bottle, won first place at the annual Big Bang! Business Plan Competition put on by the UC Davis Graduate School of Management.

Keller, a Master of Business Administration student who has been a winemaker for 10 years, designed the liner because he said the current methods to seal wine bottles are not up to par.

“If we prove that this works, there will be no reason to use a cork screw ever again,” said Keller, a UC Davis viticulture and enology alumnus. “I will be the guy who killed the cork.”

Keller’s design is a modification of screw-on cap liners. His liner sits under the screw cap, controlling the amount of oxygen that will be allowed to enter.

“Our liner will let a specific amount of oxygen into the wine bottle according to what the wine maker wants,” Keller said.

“The liner is made out of multiple layers of metal, such as aluminum or tin. [The composition is] variable depending on what wine we are trying to make a liner for,” he said, adding that cabernet needs a high amount of oxygen, while pinot noir needs less.

Wines in general need a specific amount of oxygen. If too little is let in, reduction can occur, and the wine can start smelling like burnt rubber or rotten eggs, Keller said. If too much is let in, the wine will be oxidized.

“As wines age, they consume oxygen. [The liner] will give wine makers control on how their wine ages in the bottle, something that they’ve never had before,” he said.

Screw caps generally let in too much oxygen, and wooden corks don’t always let in enough, Keller said.

Wooden corks have other problems. Though they let in less oxygen than screw caps, they are also less reliable, Keller said.

Also, a fungus that can grow inside the pores of a cork can create a chemical called TCA.

“This chemical ruins about one in 20 bottles of wine,” Keller said.

“Our closure has the oxygen permeability characteristic of cork, and the reliability of a screw cap,” Keller said.

Keller, the originator of the idea, worked with a team to prepare the idea for the competition. Keller and the other team members, Kevin Chartrand, a UC Davis MBA candidate and Diana Mejia, a food engineering graduate student, took home $15,000 as the winning team and will go on to compete in today’s Draper Fisher Jurvetson Venture Challenge in Palo Alto, Calif.

The Big Bang! competition was founded in 2000 by MBA students to reward innovation at UC Davis.

Anyone affiliated with UC Davis (students, alumni, staff) can enter, said Liz Collett, UC Davis MBA student and co-chair of the contest in an e-mail interview. Each team must have at least one valid UC Davis relationship, she said.

“This year’s competition reached the level of success that students, area financiers and sponsors eight years ago envisioned,” said Tim Akin, marketing director of the graduate school of management in an e-mail interview.

“[The contest creates an] entrepreneurial culture that has produced a field of entries and finalist teams in which business students and campus researchers have collaborated on viable business plans designed to push promising technologies off the lab bench and into the market,” he said.

The Big Bang! competition has awarded a total of $143,000 to 24 student projects since the contest started eight years ago.

 

ANNA OPALKA can be reached at campus@californiaaggie.com.

 

Campus judicial report

Theft

A student of senior standing was referred to Student Judicial Affairs for attempting to purchase a new book from the UC Davis Bookstore with a used sticker. A security guard received a phone call about a suspicious customer from the lead cashier. Surveillance footage caught the student placing a used sticker on a new textbook. She then attempted to negotiate a deal with the supervisor because she wanted to avoid repercussions. The student agreed to pay a fine, received deferred separation and was allowed to continue taking classes unless referred for another violation.

 

Theft

A junior was referred to SJA for shoplifting three textbooks from the bookstore. The student admitted to stealing the textbooks from the bookstore after being questioned by the store supervisor. The student acknowledged that she was wrong and accepted responsibility for her violation. The matter was resolved informally, and the student was placed on disciplinary probation until her graduation.

 

Unauthorized collaboration

A first-year student was referred to SJA for allegedly collaborating during an exam. The teaching assistant observed that the accused student had her Scantron angled in such a way that another student could view it with ease. Additionally, both of the exams contained uniquely incorrect answers. Upon meeting with a judicial officer, the student denied the charge of unauthorized collaboration and was not found to be in violation. Although the university granted her the benefit of the doubt, it was noted that while certain acts such as wandering eyes, talking and visible notes during an exam might be innocent acts, they are prohibited during an exam. Consequently, the student received an administrative notice, in which any further referrals would result in disciplinary probation.

 

The Campus Judicial Report is compiled by student members of the Campus Judicial Board. Additional information about SJA and the Campus Judicial Board may be found at sja.ucdavis.edu.

 

UCDMC at forefront of breast cancer treatment, research

The Breast Imaging Center at the UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento was recently named a Breast Imaging Center of Excellence by the American College of Radiology.

UC Davis’ facility is the only one in the Sacramento area to earn the title and is the only center in all of Northern California to be accredited in all areas of breast imaging: mammography, ultrasound and stereotactic biopsy.

Supervisor Pam Phelps recognized the contributions of her colleagues.

“I think everyone involved deserves credit for our success, the mammography radiologists, and especially the pathologists that make sure their images are to the highest standard,” she said.

All mammography centers must be accredited by the American College of Radiology – but ultrasound and stereotactic biopsy facilities are not required to have such a certification.

The Breast Imaging Center earned its accreditation in these areas by sending images to the American College of Radiology for approval, and filing documentation and paperwork, said Phelps.

“It’s not required, but we’ve really taken the extra step to have collected this information, and to be the only one in Northern California with all three technologies accredited is great,” she said. “I think everyone should strive for accreditation, because it shows that you’re a top-notch facility.”

Many of the facilities in Sacramento are accredited for breast ultrasound as well as the required mammography, but most are not certified with stereotactic biopsy or with breast ultrasound guided biopsy.

Phelps detailed the procedural importance of their three accredited technologies.

“Mammograms are recommended yearly for women over 40, and then if we see anything that is a mass then we’ll call them back for additional viewing and 90 percent of the time that is followed up with an ultrasound,” she said.

An ultrasound lets them know whether it is a fluid cyst or a solid mass, which would then require a biopsy.

“If the women need one, they’ll get [the procedure] done as a stereotactic biopsy as they lay on the prone table and we use computer-assisted guidance to perform the procedure,” she said.

“Then the findings of each biopsy go to pathology to determine whether it’s benign or cancer,” she explained before emphasizing the convenience of having three accredited technologies in the same place.

Jenny Arietta, co-president of the American Cancer Society’s UC Davis chapter of Colleges Against Cancer was pleased to hear that the treatment was covered.

“One of the big things we’ve been trying to do is get more of testing paid for by insurance, because the state is trying to cut that out, so it is good to hear that is not an issue at this certified center,” she said.

UC Davis’ chapter has been named the American Cancer Society’s national chapter of the year the past two years.

“Our goal on campus is to increase education and make people more aware of cancer prevention and the resources that the American Cancer Society has,” she said. “We have things like self-breast exams, but it is very helpful to be able to recommend people to such an excellent place nearby should they need testing or treatment.”

Phelps said it is hard to predict whether the rise in patients is because of the accreditation or because of the center’s increasing recognition as the premier facility in Northern California.

“We’ve also just in the last year switched over to digital mammography, and I think that has increased our patient load just as much as becoming accredited for all of these modalities,” she said.

 

MIKE DORSEY can be reached at campus@californiaaggie.com.

Love and basketball

0

On Kevin Nosek’s court, there lie two sets of boundaries.

One is clearly visible to all – a distinct outline formed by a coat of Yale blue paint that frames Hamilton Court like a portrait.

The other is invisible and less obvious – a border between his life on and off the court.

On the court, he is “Coach Nosek” – an assistant coach for the UC Davis men’s basketball team and a program from which he himself graduated. Away from the blue and gold hardwood, he is a son, a brother, an uncle, a nephew and as of Saturday, a husband.

“I really do make a conscious effort to separate them,” said Kevin Nosek, 31, who graduated from UC Davis in 1999 with a degree in organizational studies.

His wife Nicole Nosek attends most of the games at the Pavilion, something he appreciates but doesn’t expect of her.

“The fact that she does go to the games is awesome, fun, supporting and I feel good about it,” said Kevin Nosek, who won the NCAA Division II National Championship as a player with the Aggies in 1998. “But if she never went to a game because she wasn’t into basketball, I’d be OK with that. It is a lot of basketball.

“And if you don’t like basketball, well, it’s a lot of basketball.”

While the two try to keep basketball out of their personal lives as much as possible, sometimes the ball is simply out of their hands. To most people, May is just another month to get married. For Kevin and Nicole Nosek, it is one of the few months to get married.

“When coaches ask me when I’m getting married and I say May, they tell me, ‘Oh, great month to get married,'” Kevin recalled two weeks before the big day. “I mean, I’ve heard that 15 to 20 times. Great month to get married, because it’s our dead month.”

“Not everybody quite understands that we have to plan around basketball,” said Nicole Nosek, 29, who graduated from UC Davis in 2001 with a degree in exercise science. She is currently a physical therapist at Physical Edge on Lake Boulevard. “But it is part of our life and what we plan everything around.

“That’s why we’re getting married on May 24 – there’s no game!”

 

First dribbles

“I never thought I was going to go to UC Davis,” Kevin Nosek admitted.

In June of 1979, Stan and Ronnie Nosek moved from New York to Davis. The day after Christmas that year, Kevin Nosek came into the world.

After finishing his first three levels of schooling in Davis – North Davis Elementary, Holmes Junior High, Davis High – Kevin Nosek set his sights on San Luis Obispo.

“I was always going to go to Cal Poly,” he said.

“I had an opinion on it,” said Stan Nosek, the UC Davis vice chancellor of administration – better known as the man who signs all campus employees’ paychecks, including his son’s. “But I had no say.”

Then, the chance to stay home and play both basketball and water polo at UC Davis fell into his lap. Current UC Santa Barbara men’s basketball head coach Bob Williams, then at the helm of the Aggies, told Kevin Nosek he was going to make the team. And he could also play club water polo.

“It was a no-brainer,” Kevin Nosek said.

Meanwhile, Nicole Raveret, daughter of native Wisconsinites Jim and Mary Kay Raveret, was finishing up her sophomore year of high school down in the Central Valley town of Atwater.

“We grew up on a farm right outside of town,” Jim Raveret said. “Once she and her two sisters reached high school, their social lives were being impaired, so we finally moved into town.”

Two years later, Nicole Nosek enrolled at UC Irvine. By the end of her freshman year, she sought a return to the California heartland.

“Nicole has always been a social person, and Irvine is a commuter campus,” Jim Raveret said. “Most people lived in the dorms because it was convenient, but they lived elsewhere in Los Angeles and were gone on the weekends. And that didn’t fit her.”

Nicole Nosek transferred her sophomore year to UC Davis, where she would meet her future husband two years later.

 

Courtship

One night in March of 2001, after he had finished his second year of coaching at UC Davis, Kevin Nosek decided to unwind at Café Bernardo on D Street.

The team trainer at the time, Suzie Souza, was good friends with Kevin Nosek and also worked together with Nicole Nosek at Bernardo and in the training room, where Nicole Nosek was a student trainer.

“I remember Kevin inquiring about Nicole, and I thought they would be really good together,” Suzie said.

“Suzie kind of facilitated it,” said her husband Rich Souza, who was the team trainer the year before. “But on a campus like UC Davis, they would’ve found each other eventually.”

Nicole Nosek finally approached Kevin Nosek that night, having figured out who he was. Kevin Nosek asked her if she wanted to go out for dinner sometime and gave her his number.

She finished up her final exams that Saturday – St. Patrick’s Day – and called Kevin Nosek the next day. On Monday, they had their first official date – dinner at Soga’s and ice cream at Baskin-Robbins.

“He knew he really liked her, and that first date was really important for him because he really wanted that second date,” Jim Raveret recalled. “He knew right away that she was someone special.”

Five years of dating later, Kevin Nosek found himself open for the biggest shot of his life.

 

Spotting Up

An admittedly reserved person, Kevin Nosek doesn’t get emotional much.

On Christmas Eve, 2006, he let himself go for just once.

After his mother had given a toast as party host to a couple dozen family and friends, Kevin Nosek began to give his own.

“He started the toast and then I saw the hand go into the pocket,” Ronnie recalled. “And I just thought, ‘Oh my gosh.'”

Meanwhile, something else caught Nicole Nosek’s attention.

“He was getting a little emotional, and he’s usually not a super-emotional guy, so I just thought, ‘Aww, that’s sweet,'” she said. “There was just a change in his voice – a break in it, and it wasn’t like a halftime, this-is-what-we’re-doing kind of pep talk.”

Upon finishing his holiday address to the room, Kevin turned to Nicole.

“He told me that he loved me, and that ever since we’d moved back to Davis together, it had grown more,” said Nicole Nosek, who had been advancing her physical therapy career while Kevin returned to UC Davis from head coaching at Menlo College. “He said he wanted to spend the rest of his life with me.”

Kevin got down on one knee and asked for the best birthday present a man could ever ask for – the love of his life to marry him.

She said yes.

“It was just incredibly touching,” Ronnie said. “The champagne just started popping – what a wonderful night.”

“I guess he had a ring in his pocket all day and wasn’t quite sure when he was going to do it,” Nicole Nosek said. “He just saw the opportunity, and it was in front of all those people.”

“Coaches like an audience,” Kevin Nosek joked. “I threw a zillion different ideas around in my head, but that Christmas Eve dinner was special to our family in particular. I just felt like that would be a pretty memorable time to do it and that it’d be a good place to do it.

“And we were ready. We were ready to get married.”

 

The Big Dance

On May 24, 17 months after Kevin asked for Nicole’s hand in marriage, the two finally walked arm in arm up to the altar at St. James Church.

Outside, the skies were a dismal, overcast gray, but as Father Dan Looney put it to begin the ceremony, “A few drops of rain can in no way constrain your joy today.”

Kevin, who wore a sharp-looking, Yankee-inspired pinstripe suit, and Nicole, adorning a lavish, long white gown, turned to face each other at the end of the ceremony and exchanged their vows. In the audience, over 200 friends and family members looked on with proud faces and glowing smiles.

Father Looney concluded the services with an invaluable piece of advice to Kevin: “Always keep Nicole on your team, because she is a marvelous physical therapist, and everyone needs good therapy.”

Afterward, the celebration moved to Freeborn Hall, where the wedding reception took place. With Eva Cassidy’s “Songbird” playing in the background, the newly pronounced husband and wife took the floor and pulled each other close for the ceremonial first dance.

“It’s everything we could have ever wanted,” Nicole Nosek said.

“I think just like before any game, you get the butterflies, anxiety and excitement,” Kevin Nosek said. “But it’s a little different, because you’ve already won.”

 

RAY LIN can be reached at sports@californiaaggie.com.

UC Davis club cycling team places fourth at Nationals

0

On May 9, UC Davis club cycling pedaled into Fort Collins, Colo. as underdogs once again, looking for a little respect.

And the Aggies certainly earned it.

At the U.S.A. Cycling Collegiate Road National Championships, UC Davis finished in fourth place overall in Division I after finishing in second and first the previous two years, respectively.

“We’re always coming in as the underdogs even though we’ve been on the podium for three years in a row,said Tyler Dibble, club president and treasurer.Hopefully now we’ve earned a little bit more respect.

After winning the first event, the team time trial (TTT), the Aggies were in a position to earn more than respect, they had a shot at the title.

“For me personally,Dibble said,I’ve wanted to win the event (TTT) since I joined the team four years ago. I’m a big fan of that event because it’s all about working well together.

The men posted a time of 23:18.490 on the final day to take home the D-I crown in the 21-team TTT. The four Aggie riders Dibble, Paul Mach, Philip Mooney and Shawn Rosenthal – averaged 32 mph, which is just 1 mph slower than the speed professional riders clock in at, Dibble said.

The Aggie women finished in fourth place overall in the TTT after clocking in at 28:48.280, but with both scores combined, the UC Davis cycling team finished way ahead of the competition with 158 team points after the first day.

Finishing in a distant second was Fort Lewis College with 139 points, and Stanford checked in at third with 132.

In the next event, the Road Race, the Aggie men were second to Fort Lewis College while the Aggie women placed seventh.

The finishes put UC Davis in contention for the title heading into the third and final leg of the Omnium, the criterium.

It was then that the Aggieshopes of earning their second national championship in three years took a fall.

“Half of our men’s team crashed on the final day,Dibble said.Yeah, we were a little upset about that.

The Aggie men only managed nine points in the criterium, giving them a 22nd place finish, while the women struggled through some crashes of their own but finished in eighth place to help salvage the overall team placement.

The rough finish at the criterium dropped UC Davis three spots to fourth place, behind Lees-McRae College (first place), Fort Lewis College (second), and Colorado State University (third).

This was the final race for seniors Rosenthal, Amy Encalada, Marisa McAlder and Dibble, who have been with the club for four straight years and have actively served as officers throughout the cycling team’s accomplishments.

Unlike the Aggie cycling team, the top three teams at Nationals are all funded by their respective schools and provide scholarships to their cyclists.

Scholarships or not, the cycling team always finds a way to be competitive at the national level, not to mention ride around in those snazzy blue and yellow bike uniforms.

The cycling team is always interested in new members and for any interested mountain bike, road, or track riders, contact Dibble at todibble@ucdavis.edu or visit the team website at http://sportclubs.ucdavis.edu/cycling/index.php.

 

MATT MILLER can be reached at sports@californiaaggie.com.

THEY’RE IN!

0

The Aggies knew they had put together a strong résumé.

In their first year as Division I members, they compiled a winning record against both conference and Top 25 teams. The program also posted its best overall record in four years.

This past weekend, UC Davis made one final push to reach the postseason, winning its final Big West series against Cal State Northridge.

“We wanted to try and get three wins to help our regional selection,” head coach Rex Peters said. “But anytime you can go on the road and get a Big West series victory, you’ve got to be pleased. It was a successful weekend.”

On Monday, it was announced that the Aggies had earned an at-large bid to the 2008 NCAA Division I Baseball Tournament, joining conference-mates No. 11 UC Irvine and Big West co-champions No. 8 Cal State Fullerton and No. 22 Long Beach State.

“I thought we had a really good season and a strong résumé for the selection committee,” Peters said. “Our players have really moved our program a long way in our first season in Division I.”

 

Friday – UC Davis 4, Cal State Northridge 3

Rex Peters has said that the Big West is so competitive that games are often decided by a single play.

Though he wasn’t in the dugout Friday due to a league-mandated suspension stemming from the previous weekend’s outburst at Dobbins Stadium, his words resonated just as loud.

Sophomore Matadors shortstop Jason Dabbs airmailed a throw to first that would have ended the eighth, instead resulting in two Aggie runs that decided the series-opening contest, 4-3.

“They gave us a game with their defense on Friday and we felt like we gave them a game on Sunday with our defense,” Peters said. “So it kind of evens out.”

Trailing 3-2 in the top of the eighth, UC Davis began its rally with a single by junior catcher Jake Jefferies and a walk by sophomore outfielder Kyle Mihaylo. The two eventually advanced into scoring position on a passed ball by junior Matador catcher John Parham, then scored on Dabbs’ error.

“All you can really ask of the team there is to have a chance to win late in the game,” Peters said.

Senior UC Davis right-hander Eddie Gamboa didn’t factor into the game’s decision, but turned in an excellent start. He allowed just three runs on four hits while striking out six in 6 1/3 innings of work.

Sophomore left-hander Andy Suiter worked two scoreless innings and struck out four to improve to 6-1.

“We certainly wouldn’t be where we’re at if we didn’t have Andy coming in for that setup role there in the seventh and eighth,” Peters said. “He’s given us great innings all year in those situations and helping us get to Fitzy (junior closer Justin Fitzgerald).”

 

Saturday – UC Davis 7, Cal State Northridge 2

The Aggies came to Matador Field this weekend looking for a series win to stay alive in the playoff hunt, and that’s exactly what they found Saturday.

Junior right-hander Brad McAtee was brilliant in his last regular season start. He struck out a game-high eight batters in a one-run fashion, carrying the Aggies to a pivotal 7-2, series-clinching win.

UC Davis gave its starter an early cushion thanks to a five-run first inning highlighted by two-run doubles from junior outfielder Ryan Scoma and senior shortstop Matt Dempsey. The two combined to go 6-for-9 with four RBI and two runs scored.

“We got to a pretty good pitcher early and got five runs for Brad to work with,” Peters said. “That helped him relax and pitch his game. He wasn’t pressured to nibble on the corners – he could go after hitters. And that’s what he does best.”

The five runs were the most in a single inning over the entire weekend. Cal State Northridge held UC Davis scoreless over the next five innings while plating two runs itself, but the Aggies finally added a pair of their own in the eighth to put the game out of reach.

 

Sunday – Cal State Northridge 6, UC Davis 5

With possibly the biggest swing of his young college career, Ryan Pineda crushed the Aggies’ hopes of a series sweep.

The freshman Matadors third baseman erased the Aggies’ dramatic 2-run comeback in the ninth with a walk-off home run in the bottom half off Suiter to salvage the series with a 6-5 victory.

“Andy [Suiter] just made one mistake to a good, young hitter,” Peters said. “He got it and just hit it out of the ballpark.

“It wasn’t a home run that beat us, it was our defense in the short game that beat us. We had a few outs that they were basically giving us and we didn’t play catch, so that opened things up for the three-run inning (in the eighth).”

UC Davis committed just one error in the game, a throwing miscue by junior right-hander Bryan Evans, which allowed the tying run to reach and eventually score.

The Aggies will begin their postseason run Friday at 5 p.m. when they travel down to Sunken Diamond at Stanford for the Palo Alto Regional with Stanford, Arkansas and Pepperdine.

“It’s a place we’ve played at before and where we’ve had some success this season,” Peters said. “It’s a place we’re comfortable with.”

 

RAY LIN can be reached at sports@californiaaggie.com.

Accountability lost

0

Those of you who were fortunate enough to read my column last week have already been informed of the blatant irresponsibility that plagued the May 16 to 18 ASUCD budget hearings, as well as my prediction that no disciplinary action would result for the senator in question. However, anyone who showed enough interest in the matter, and continued on to Tuesday’s opinion page, would know that I was almost immediately proven wrong, or at least that was how things seemed.

On Tuesday I claimed that Senator Jesse Rosales would almost certainlyface no repercussions for his actionsat the budget hearings andcontinue to neglect his obligations to better serve the UC Davis community.I then went on to say thatthis lack of accountability within our student government represents a great injustice being done to UC Davis students, as well as tarnishes the office of ASUCD senator.

At the time of writing last week’s column, I firmly believed that our elected officials would do nothing in response to Rosalesdereliction of duty. However, it appeared at first that I had severely underestimated the accountability present within the ASUCD Senate.

The first signs of my underestimation came with a letter to the editor featured in Tuesday’s Aggie, stating the ASUCD Senate’s intention to place apersonae censureon Senator Rosales, in order to show thesenates disapprovalof Rosales earlier behavior. While an official reprimandsuch as a personae censure seemed a rather soft punishment, it was disciplinary action nonetheless and seemed to prove my previous judgments that ASUCD lacked any and all accountability completely wrong.

While this strongly worded letter to the editor gave me hope that I will someday be free of the burden of being perpetually proven right, the ASUCD Senate’s actions have shown that my streak of correctness is nowhere near an end. Thursday’s senate meeting demonstrated the complete lack of accountability within our student government, as the ASUCD Senate failed to place Rosales under any form of censure. Who possibly could have predicted that our elected student officials wouldn’t view an offense such as allocating student money while intoxicated as an offense worthy of some form of punishment?

Last week, I stated that it was the intent of my column to highlight and eradicate such irresponsible behavior from ASUCD, hoping that my bringing these issues to light would force our student government to handle these issues in a responsible and just manner.

However, it has become clear that ASUCD is incapable of holding its officials accountable. Such a lack of accountability begs the question as to why student senators would be so opposed to the idea of punishing unethical or irresponsible behavior. Perhaps this failure to punish one individual is indicative of a more widespread irresponsibility throughout the organization. Or maybe our elected officials have lost sight of their true purpose – the service of the student body – and have instead become too self-important to even entertain the idea that they should face consequences for their actions.

 

JAMES NOONAN does not enjoy attacking ASUCD sometimes they just make it too easy. Feel free to contact him at jjnoonan@ucdavis.edu.

Bright way forward

0

With the overwhelming decision of the UC regents May 15 to slap over 220,000 students with another 7 percent increase in systemwide fees, our officials have come up with two programs that not only address monetary shortage but also aim to boost the UC’s reputation.

The first of these two programs is the START program, or the Staff and Academic Reduction in Time, in which employees cut back their working hours voluntarily. However, with the economic uncertainty America is facing right now, I do not buy the idea that such a program would be of enormous help to our existing problem. From 2003 to 2006, the UC implemented a similar time reduction program that provided salary savings of $41.9 million.

But that was during active and prosperous economic years when money was not an issue for many workers. With the current threat of recession, I do not think that UC employees would be able to afford a voluntary time reduction. It is not right to ask our employees to work less hours in this period of financial difficulty to remedy the budget crisis, which is a product of our officials’ fiscal irresponsibility in the first place.

Furthermore, START is mainly intended for hourly-wage employees and those who are on the lower income bracket. How about our well-paid executives and higher administrative officials? Are they willing to give up some of their hefty salaries as well? If they do not want to sacrifice part of their earnings for the sake of our great university system, I do not comprehend why they expect our ordinary workers to earn less in this time of skyrocketing oil and food prices. I will definitely be supporting START if our six-figure salary officials will also participate in this program. Otherwise, they should not be asking our hard-working employees to give up some of their hours while they continue to receive their ridiculously huge paychecks.

The second program “UC The Way Forward,” on the other hand, is a more sensibly and fittingly created initiative that could bolster and reclaim the UC’s standing as the best public university system in the world. According to its website, “UC The Way Forward” is a public information campaign launched this spring to educate Californians about the UC’s extraordinary benefits and worth to their lives. Such a program aspires to create “personal connection” between the UC and the people through the promise of cultivating knowledge.

I think that by reminding the community about the UC’s fulfillment of its promise – creating millions of brilliant minds and forging a sustainable future through research – it would generate financial support from Californians who are determined to continue such a promise. With the efforts to deal with the budget quandary, this educational campaign would not only accentuate the search for funding, but could also rejuvenate the UC’s fading reputation as a leader in higher education by highlighting its past achievements and asserting its capabilities.

As the unstoppable 2008 higher education budget rolls this way, the ramifications are becoming more visible throughout the UC system: reduction of admission rate, departmental and research funds, closure of some facilities and suspension of some community and student-based services. The departure of Robert Dynes, whose presidency will leave a legacy of five tuition fee increases and financial controversies, and the arrival of Mark Yudof, a brilliant leader who publicly spoke against higher tuition fees, might produce some solutions that everyone is looking forward to.

But more than ever, we need to show to the world what California has become because of the University of California and demonstrate that a promising future lies ahead because of such a great institution. I urge everyone to help so that we can see a bright future.

REAGAN F. PARLAN welcomes your comments and suggestions at rfparlan@ucdavis.edu.

Ah, the single life

0

OK, it’s true life’s a little lonely. When my two roommatesboyfriends come to Davis for the weekend, me and my other roommates just sit and eat Goldfishes in front of the TV (“Gossip Girl, how I love thee!) while the two couples make out right next to us. It’s sort of awkward, especially when you’re sandwiched in-between them, but at least they conserve space by sitting on each other’s laps. Sometimes when it gets too crowded, all four of them just stack up on one other. They like to call it theLeaning Tower of Observe-How-You’ll-Die-Alone-Unlike-Us.

But when I’m not crying myself to sleep and lamenting over the fact that no one would ever love a sad bastard like me, I sometimes think the single life’s not all that bad. At least, that’s what I keep telling myself over and over again right before I get up in the morning.

I’m sure there are plenty of people out there who are single and don’t know how good they have it. Actually, I don’t know ifgoodis the right word – maybemildly well-offis a more accurate term. I mean, so what if we have no one to share our lives with? So what if we live out our daily lives isolated and alone? So what if Dean Martin tells you that you’re nobody ’til somebody loves you? We have so many other things going for us, like the fact that

We don’t have to spend a lot of money on going out and buying gifts. I always find it amusing when I get tricked into third-wheelinand when it comes time to opening our wallets, my wallet is filled with so much more cash than the others. It’s like I’m practically made out of money. In fact, I have so much money, I’m at a total loss when it comes to how to spend it.

To help combat this horrible affliction, I sometimes go to the mall and pretend I’m my own boyfriend. I buy agiftfor my girlfriend, wrap it up and then give it to myself two days later. After that, I obviously have to go shopping for my boyfriend and show my appreciation since he just got me a gift.

This endless cycle of wrapping and opening up gifts gives me a profound sense of self-love and endless amount of stiletto heels. But be sure to open these presents alone. I hate it when my sister comes in and ruins my delusions. Especially when she picks up and reads a tag and asks something stupid like,To: Lynn, From: Ramone the Italian Stallion. Who the hell is Ramone? And why are you sitting alone in the dark, crying with all these gifts around you? I’m going to tell mom that you’re making up boyfriends again.

We own 100 percent of our pets as in we don’t have to share ownership with anyone else. (I didn’t mean to imply that non-single people buy pets that are only 36 percentcompleteor something.) Some couples like to symbolize their relationship by buying a puppy or something, and then have no real intentions of taking care of it. It’s amusing to watch them buy a real-life animal on impulse, but it’s even more amusing when the couple breaks up.

Take my co-worker for example. He’s going through this bitter custody battle over a Labrador with his ex-girlfriend. He knows that the only reason why she’s fighting for it is because she’s so bitter. See, this is exactly why both Kanye and I told you to always ask for a prenup. It’s something that you need to havecause when she leaves yoass, she’s gonleave with half. And if you’re not careful, she might just take the legs only. And then eat them.

Lastly, we don’t have to keep up with appearances. After my friend Lisa split up with her boyfriend, she said one thing she won’t miss is the constant shaving she was obliged to do. Every Friday night she had to go shave her legs, as well as her lady garden, because her boyfriend wouldn’t come near her if she didn’t. Of course now she’s taking it a little too far and now she won’t shave or shower for shit. I mean it’s nice to let loose for a while, but it’s embarrassing when she’s out with us and she starts braiding her leg hair whenever things get idle. It gets more awkward for everybody when flies land on her face and she’s too out of it to shoo them off. We just stand there and throw money at her.

 

LYNN LA notes that others may get better looking when they’re single because they have to appear dateable. That’s why her friends who are in relationships are so ugly (and don’t forget poor). E-mail your lies about why you like being single at ldla@ucdavis.edu.