47.9 F
Davis

Davis, California

Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Home Blog Page 991

UC Online aims to increase number of courses offered online

1

Joining the growing number of other nationally ranked universities that offer online courses, the UC system is beginning to offer online courses to UC students through UC Online Education (UCOE).

In its first year, UCOE enrolled over 1,700 students.

In 2011-12 UC campuses offered over 2,500 online courses, with more than 90,000 enrolled students, according to an online item of discussion at the Tuesday UC Board of Regents meeting.

Other universities, such as Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have also implemented online courses, known as massive open online courses (MOOCs). Although MOOCs are free, they provide no course credit. UCOE differs in that all the courses offer credits to both UC and non-UC students.

UCOE is free for students who are already attending a UC; non-UC students, however, must pay a fee.

“One of the things we hope is that it will be another source of funding to the university,” said Keith Williams, UCOE interim director.

Williams also added that it will be useful for high school students or community college students who are looking for courses they can get credit for.

Some are skeptical of the lack of information about how exactly the system will receive additional funding.

UC Student Regent Jonathan Stein said he sees the merits of implementing online courses, but would like to see an improved plan of how it will help the UC make money.

“We don’t know how online classes for UC students will save us money and we have no idea how potential classes for non-UC students will make us money,” Stein said.

James Carey, professor and director in the department of entomology who will have an online course this spring, explains the UCOE to be “online done right.”

“It is not about putting a camera in front of a podium and saying that’s an online course,” he said.

Carey says that one of the many benefits is that online courses are helpful for non-native English speakers, students with learning disabilities or students who merely want to review the material again. Also, since everything is done online, instructors are able to see how long a student is taking on a particular problem and evaluate how the class is doing.

Currently, there is no easy way for cross-campus enrollment between the different online courses, but UCOE is developing a system that would provide students with this option.

“UC online focus is really on UC students, better access to classes and more flexibility,” said UC media specialist Shelly Meron.

Moreover, Carey explains that the online courses are not only beneficial to students, but that the instructors also have much to gain from online instruction.

“The preparation, the thinking more deeply about how the content is delivered online — how you assess content and so forth, makes you a better instructor,” Carey said.

Carey said he is sure that in the future, online courses will appeal to all students.

“Every student at the University of California, and in the country, is going to experience online courses. This is absolutely the future, there is no question,” he said.

Ten campuses have currently completed plans or are in the process of developing plans for online education.

SASHA COTTERELL can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Explosion at Russell Park leads to criminal investigation

The UC Davis Police Department is conducting a criminal investigation into a chemical explosion that took place in an apartment in Russell Park during the early morning hours last Thursday.

The resident of the apartment, David Snyder, who was temporarily working as junior researcher at UC Davis, was injured during the explosion and was taken to a nearby hospital. Snyder was arrested and booked into the Yolo County Jail on Sunday.

Snyder is currently charged with possession of an explosive, possession of materials with an intent to make explosives and two counts of possession of a firearm on campus, with the potential of more charges. It took 20 hours for the Yolo County Bomb Squad to make the apartment safe. There is no information to suggest that Snyder was plotting any act of terrorism on campus.

According to UC Davis Chief of Police Matthew Carmichael, five buildings were evacuated at Russell Park, with a total of 40 units and 74 persons being displaced. Tandem Properties and UC Davis Student Affairs provided housing and food to those individuals.

“Experts on the scene decided that some substances were not safe to transport a long distance, so bomb technicians found a safe space, off of Orchard Park, where they could destroy the substances safely,” Carmichael said.

At a press conference held on Saturday evening, Commander Nick Concolino of the Yolo County Bomb Squad said that many improvised or homemade explosives can be made by using readily available materials, which is part of the ongoing investigation to determine where the materials came from.

“Living at Russell Park for the past two years has not made me feel unsafe. But since the incident of the explosives, it makes me wonder how many other grad students are experimenting with their lab work in a residential environment,” said Ayda Soltani, a third-year civil engineering student and resident at Russell Park apartments. “I hope his intentions were not to harm anyone, but he should’ve [taken] into account that he was risking residents’ lives and a lot of children who attend the daycare on the complex. I guess even a PhD degree won’t get you common sense.”

In addition to the Yolo County Bomb Squad, teams that were involved at rendering the apartment safe included the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF); Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); California Highway Patrol and Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department.

“I was shocked that something like this could happen in Russell Park,” said Imaan Taghavi, a second-year civil engineering major and resident at Russell Park apartments. “It is such a benign complex — there are never parties or cops for anything here. I am glad that the police were able to control the situation, as there was a potential for it to be a lot worse than it was.”

Snyder’s bail is set at $2 million. Snyder received a bachelor’s degree and PhD in Chemistry from UC Davis in 2004 and 2011, respectively. His temporary position as a chemistry researcher was set to expire at the end of January.

NATASHA QABAZARD can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

News in Brief: UC President Mark Yudof announces resignation

0

On Friday, Mark Yudof, UC president of five years, announced his plans to discontinue his tenure, effective Aug. 31.

Yudof cited his reason for resignation to be “taxing health issues” and because he believed it to be “an apt time for the University to bring in fresh leadership.”

The announcement came one day after the UC Board of Regents meeting.

“UC remains the premier public university system in the world, and I was both honored and humbled to serve as its president for what has been nearly five years now. I will miss my daily interactions across the system with so many dedicated, capable, and intellectually stimulating people,” his announcement stated.

Yudof also said that he, along with members of the entire UC community, have succeeded in preserving the quality of academics, research and healthcare, despite obstacles.

He said that the UC was made more accessible to low- and middle-income students through various initiatives such as the Blue and Gold Financial Aid program and the Project You Can Scholarship Program.

Most recently Yudof was named one of the Most Influential Forces in Higher Education by The Huffington Post for his handling of challenges during his term, including state funding cuts, tuition increases and public criticism. Yudof’s salary in 2011 was $601,356.

Prior to his appointment as UC president, Yudof was chancellor of the University of Texas system. In his announcement, he said he will move to teaching law at UC Berkeley.

— Muna Sadek

Editorial: Looking forward to a stronger UC

0

On Jan. 18 Mark Yudof, UC president of five years, announced he will step down in August.

He will move to the presumably less-demanding job of teaching law at UC Berkeley.

In his term, Yudof has led 10 campuses, medical centers and laboratories through a slew of hurdles: cuts in state funding, a considerable amount of criticism over the system’s response to student protests and the negative impact the failure of Proposition 30 could have had on the UC system.

We credit Yudof with introducing the privatization of the University and we hope his successor will be able to reverse this.

His written announcement stated that in his term, alongside members of the UC community, the fundamental attributes of the UC remained intact despite this “rough passage.” He also stated that in his term, the UC’s Blue and Gold financial aid program was made available for low- and middle-income students and over $671 million was raised for students through the Project You Can Scholarship Program.

Yudof has also had a large hand in the efforts to increase the quality of administrative excellence through the Working Smarter Initiative and prioritized efforts to increase diversity on UC campuses through the systemwide Campus Climate Survey.

These are notable contributions to the UC system, but they are also things we would expect from any president.

Admittedly, having one of the most powerful positions in the state, and in education in general, is not an easy feat. Heck, it’s impressive the UC system is still standing. However, like much of the other members of the Board of Regents, Yudof has been operating the University like a business. While some may have seen this as necessary given the economic crisis, it did not always lead to the best choices for students.

Hopefully, Yudof’s successor will focus his or her efforts on increasing access, affordability and quality to the UC.

Students struggle with graduate school application costs

0

With its infamously high tuition, attending law school seems like a pricey ambition. Now, with students applying to six to eight schools on average and application fees up to $100 each, even admissions may be pushing financial limitations.

The numbers seem notably high, with students potentially spending $1,000 on applications alone. However, the cost-benefit of applying to law school is affected by other factors as well.

To start, there are several ways to waive application fees. Attaining a certain GPA can also result in free applications to certain schools. Furthermore, many students prepared to pay or take out loans to pay law school tuition are reasonably confident in financial security after receiving his or her degree.

“I think the assumption is if you feel like you can afford law school at all, the $80 to $100 application fee isn’t going to stop you,” said Brian Walters, a UC Davis alumnus and current student at McGeorge Law School. “Over three years, my law school is going to cost $150,000, and that’s about what the average school costs.”

At the UC Davis School of Law, there is a one-time nonrefundable application fee of $75, which is the same as UC Davis’ sister law schools, Hastings, UCLA and UC Berkeley.

“Our application fee is essentially a processing fee,” said Sharon Pinkney, assistant dean of admission and enrollment at the UC Davis School of Law, in an email interview. “It covers the cost of, among other things, application processing in the admissions department. A portion of the fees collection [also] goes to the main UCD campus or UCOP.”

Pinkney stated that this distribution of the application fees is standard practice for pretty much all colleges and universities with admissions application fees. With the convenience of the law school application process, however, it is easy to see how one might be tempted to apply to more schools than one can afford.

“The application for law schools is actually really awesome,” Walters said. “They have this organization called the Law School Admissions Council (LSAC). So you put together all your information in one general application for pretty much all the schools — your cover letters, your letters of recommendation — and you send them to LSAC. Then you can go online and check the boxes for which cover letters you want to go to which school, and they can distribute everything for you.”

Pinkney does not believe that piling up fees prevents students from applying to as many schools as they might wish to, though.

“Almost every school has in place some sort of fee waiver option,” Pinkney said. “The LSAC provides need-based fee waivers. [At] the UC Davis Admission office our application fee is automatically waived for anyone who has been granted an LSAC fee waiver.”

The UC Davis School of Law also waives the application fee for anyone who’s been involved in Teach for America, the Peace Corps or other select organizations, provided that they participated within one year of their application.

“We also provide some merit-based fee waivers to encourage students with excellent academic records to apply,” Pinkney said.

Walters is an example of this, in fact, having received many offers to apply to law schools for free.

“For a while, I was getting [an offer] every two weeks — for schools that I had absolutely no desire of going to, but it was nice, and I only had a 3.5 GPA,” Walters said.

Walters said he applied to 11 schools, and on average the application fees were about $80 each.

The issue of application fees is not limited to law schools alone. Medical schools have a similar application process with the American Medical College Application Service (AMCAS).

“Medical school applicants apply to one facility, so they fill out an AMCAS application, [which is] an application service that most medical schools subscribe to,” said Joanna Garcia, UC Davis School of Medicine admissions coordinator. “They fill that out and then choose which schools they would like it to go to. Then that service sends it out to the different medical schools.”

After the AMCAS application has been submitted, applicants may be invited to submit secondary applications to particular schools. Right now, the UC Davis School of Medicine secondary application fee is $80, and like the law school, there are no immediate plans to lower it.

Despite these fees now, and of course tuition later, Walters, who has been interested in politics since middle school and has shadowed lawyers and studied international law since, said that he thinks law school is worth the price.

“The higher pay over my lifetime will be generally worth it,” Walters said. “And it’s worth doing what I want to do. There are so many different kinds of law to go into, and in most you can make pretty good money. So while at first it’s going to be a little restrictive, after a few years I’ll have by debts paid and I’ll be on my way to financial security. If you’re willing to be in that kind of debt, I don’t think an $80 application fee is going to stop you.”

NAOMI NISHIHARA can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

Davis implements coyote coexistence plan

3

The City of Davis is set to launch a Coyote Management and Coexistence Plan following incidents of human and animal endangerment last year.

In 2012, a U.S. Department of Agriculture specialist killed five coyotes that were found near Wildhorse Golf Course in July after receiving complaints from local residents. In addition, a house cat was captured and killed by a coyote in December in East Davis.

After these events, the new plan will call for conditioning of the wild coyotes to fear and stay away from human residents and their pets. The plan considers the coyotes to be urban predators, and in the case of an attack, the Davis Police are authorized to kill them or notify the California Department of Fish and Game.

“The city’s strategy for managing coyotes is based on balancing respect and protection for wildlife and their habitats without compromising public safety,” the Coyote Management and Coexistence Plan stated. “The main strategy is comprised of a three-pronged approach consisting of public education designed around coexistence with coyotes; investigating coyote sightings and implementing hazing as needed; and ensuring public safety by implementing appropriate responses to an aggressive interaction or attack by a coyote on a human.”

Some students have said they feel as if the plan is a bit too extreme, stating that it is unnecessary to harm the animals.

“I feel like there should be some regulation to a certain degree where we can keep people safe, but I don’t think we should go to a point where we should kill them [the coyotes],” said first-year pharmaceutical chemistry major Tiffany Le. “That would hinder the food chain.”

Other students have said that they recognize the importance of Davis’ coexistence plan.

“Well, I’ve read that coyotes are naturally afraid of humans, and usually only come near to forage for food. So I wouldn’t think they’d be too large a problem in a city like Davis, but they must be if the city is implementing a policy,” said third-year environmental science and management major Meghan Call.

Community members and students have said that they do not advocate killing the coyotes that attack people, but also acknowledged the need for safety in the community.

“While I do not think shooting them on site is a good idea ecologically, depending on the population statistics, I understand the imperative need to protect citizens of Davis,” Call said.

While they comprehend the danger that coyotes present, they have also said that the safety of the animals also matters.

“I understand that in extreme cases they [the city] might need to euthanize an extremely aggressive animal. But I would hope that the city of Davis would take all steps possible to save the animal,” said first-year mathematics major Heather LaFever. “I would much prefer tranquilization and relocation to euthanasia.”

The plan was placed on on the city’s consent calendar last week for approval.

WENDY CHAO can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

Column: Protect yourself: The Sequel

0

Sex Ed

If you asked the majority of college students what constitutes protection during sex, most would say condoms and birth-control pills. And even those who didn’t could probably identify those items in a line-up.

But what about the insertive condom, IUD or vaginal ring? While people may have heard the names of these methods, they may not have heard much else. So today, we are going to have a mini-primer on some of the lesser known forms of contraception.

We can basically break contraceptives into two categories: barrier methods and hormonal methods. On the barrier side, we have the big three: male condoms, insertive condoms and dental dams. Dental dams protect from STIs, and the two condoms protect from STIs and pregnancy. Since male condoms are the most well-known, I’m going to skip them. I’m also going to pass on the dental dam for now, but I can guarantee that we’ll discuss those brightly colored, latex beauties in a later column.

That leaves us with the insertive (a.k.a. female) condom, which is often dismissed as the difficult and inferior cousin of the male condom. This is not so. This slick little number is made of polyurethane and thus has two major benefits. First, there are no worries about latex allergies. Second, many people find that this material increases sensitivity during sex, and the way in which it interacts with skin creates a warming sensation that some people find very pleasing. As an added bonus, you can insert it up to eight hours before use, so if you’re not sure if sexy times are imminent you can slip it in just to be safe.

Switching to the hormonal end of the spectrum, let’s discuss the IUD and the ring, since they are both commonly used items that the average college student may not know much about. But before any of that, I’d like to remind you of one major thing: Hormonal contraceptives are meant to prevent pregnancy. They are NOT going to protect you from STI transmission, so you need to use them in tandem with one of the barrier methods in order to be safe.

Let’s begin with the IUD. This small, T-shaped device is inserted into the uterus (by a doctor) and acts as a spermicide. Worldwide, it is more popular than birth control pills. However, in the U.S., only two percent of the uterus-having population utilizes it. This strikes me as odd because the IUD is not only safe and effective, but it lasts from five to 10 years depending on the variety. So if baby making is not in your foreseeable future, it may be a good investment.

Continuing the theme of insertion (well, this is a sex column), let’s discuss the vaginal ring, a.k.a. NuvaRing. This is a flexible, plastic ring that is inserted into the vagina once a month, left in for three weeks, and then removed for a fourth week. A benefit of the ring is that, like the IUD, it’s put in and stays in. So, if you’re worried about your ability to remember to take a pill every day, it’s a good option.

There is a myth that the ring interferes with sex because your partner can feel it during intercourse. Although this is almost never the case, you can remove the ring for three hours to prevent discomfort during sex. But that time limit is strict, so remember to replace it when those three hours are up.

A final word of advice on the methods we’ve discussed, as well as the rest of the options out there: do not make decisions about contraception, particularly the hormonal kind, based solely on advice columns in college newspapers. Yes, I have done my research. But I am not a doctor.

If you are considering a new form of contraception, make an appointment to talk with a professional about your options. The type of relationship you’re in, your financial status, other medical issues and your own concerns and desires are all things you might want to discuss before making a decision.

It’s also helpful to do a little research of your own before the visit. I recommend the Student Health and Counseling Center’s contraception website, as well as Planned Parenthood’s “My Method” tool. Just remember that, as with so many aspects of sex, the more knowledge you have, the happier you’ll be.

SAM WALL wants you to send your sex questions, comments and concerns to sewall@ucdavis.edu.

Column: Sports revolution

0

Oh the world of sports.

Lance Armstrong, the man who has created a movement based on the statement “LiveStrong,” has admitted to doping. Apparently he was taking the “strong” part very seriously.

I think I, as an eighth grader, had the right idea. I wore a yellow Livestrong band to be cool. I wore it so much it tore, and I stapled it back together. Then it tore again and I stapled it. This continued until the yellow band just said “Live,” and the only way I could take it off was by cutting it.

I never wanted to believe it when reports surfaced that one athlete after another had done the ‘roids. When the Mitchell Report came out, I downloaded and saved it on my computer saved as “LIES” (yes, all caps), with every intention of reading it and ripping apart George Mitchell for his demonic act of ruining baseball. Then I saw it was 409 pages. To this day, it’s only been opened a couple of times, those times when I’m feeling particularly vindictive.

Still, I always want to believe in athletes. News reports came out that Lance Armstrong was “considering admitting doping.” What does that even mean? Honestly there’s not much more you can reveal if you say that you’re thinking about telling people you used performance-enhancing drugs.

It is pretty sad that my default assumption for players who are having breakout years and are playing well is that they must have taken something. It didn’t use to be like this. But so many have fallen.

Except Derek Jeter. Jeter is the man. Everyone can say what they want, but the Captain is truly a role model for all athletes, in terms of work ethic, integrity and responsibility.

But I don’t have to convince anyone of anything. What I really think we can do is figure out some sports where steroids are encouraged, and therefore the only way juicers would be considered cheating is if they didn’t use any PEDs. In which case they would just be getting destroyed.

I can’t really imagine football being any more manly than it already is. It’ll stay as is.

In order to get back to our roots, we should make stone-cycling. Create tandem bikes carved out of boulders that two riders will ride. They can juice up all they want and pump in a whole bunch of extra adult red blood cells but it’s going to take some serious effort and strength to succeed.

This course will also be up in the Sierra Nevadas through a grueling trail over the mountains. Good luck.

Baseball. Because America’s favorite pasttime is also my favorite sport to watch, I really don’t like it when reports surface about failed drug tests.

So, the only failed drug test in our neo-baseball will be one in which they don’t test positive for performance-enhancing drugs.

Here, we’ll change the dimensions of the field. It’s always so odd to me that a typical center-field wall is about 400 feet, which is a long way to hit a baseball. When I think about it, though, you could golf a pitching wedge over that.

So in the new and improved version of baseball, why don’t we stick the outfield fence at about 40,000 yards, your typical par-four-length hole (instead of 400 feet, we’re going to have 120,000 feet).

Before you start thinking this is insane, I’ll have you know that we are going to make a bat out of vibranium (thank you, Captain America) and make the ball out of whatever material it is that makes Thor’s hammer so heavy. I guess it’d be whoever is fit to hold it or something like that, but using a different definition of fit than they intended, I’m pretty sure any athlete on steroids will be fit enough.

This super-powered baseball would require some omnioculars from the Harry Potter universe because unfortunately fans can’t take steroids to help their eyesight. With a 40,000-yard field, we’re going to have ourselves quite a game.

All of this sounded like a good idea in my head, but now that I’ve written it down, it doesn’t sound so great. But that’s usually how it is for all my ideas.

I guess all of this is an attempt to keep sports pure by quarantining off all the rest into a whole new sport. But it seems like we’re so inherently competitive that, even with the other sport, you’re going to have new ways to enhance performance show up.

It makes you really appreciate the players that achieved these feats without any sort of performance-enhancers that we know of. Here’s to them, whose records are falling, whose names are being knocked down in the record books, who put in the hours to foster their talent and skills.

MATTHEW YUEN has been staying up all night watching the Australian Open this past week. Send him a wake-up call at sports@theaggie.org.

Senate Briefs

0

ASUCD Senate meetings are scheduled to begin Thursdays at 6:10 p.m. Times listed are according to the clock at the Jan. 17 meeting location, the Memorial Union’s Mee Room. The ASUCD president is not required to attend senate meetings.

Meeting called to order at 6:10 p.m.

Rebecca Sterling, ASUCD president, present
Yena Bae, ASUCD vice president, present
Beatriz Anguiano, ASUCD senator, present
Bradley Bottoms, ASUCD senator, present
Liam Burke, ASUCD senator, present
Armando Figueroa, ASUCD senator, present
Don Gilbert, ASUCD senator, absent
Joyce Han, ASUCD senator, present
Maxwell Kappes, ASUCD senator, present
Kabir Kapur, ASUCD senator, pro tempore, present
Paul Min, ASUCD senator, present
Felicia Ong, ASUCD senator, present
Alyson Sagala, ASUCD senator, present
Tal Topf, ASUCD senator, present

Presentations
Karl Mohr spoke about Chancellor Katehi’s 20/20 initiative that is focused on more aid to international students, enrollment and facilities and infrastructural needs.

Sterling updated the table on a trip that she and Controller Melanie Maemura went on for the MU renewal project. The project would remodel the MU and has not been finalized yet.

CalPIRG Chair Donna Farvard spoke about the organization’s recruitment drive and energy-efficiency campaign.

Appointments and confirmations
Alex Deng was confirmed as a Gender and Sexuality Commission commissioner.

Robert Hsu and Phi Nguyen were confirmed to the Entrepreneurship Fund.

Peter Neeley was confirmed to a manager position at the Experimental College.

Consideration of old legislation
Senate Bill 35, authored by Spencer McManus, to change the procedure for interviewing re-applicants, passed in a 10-2-0 vote.

Senate Bill 38, authored by Aaron Hsu, to create more efficiency in the election process, failed to pass in a 6-7-0 vote.

Senate Bill 41, authored by McManus, to change a section of the ASUCD Bylaws so it more accurately reflects the Senate agenda. The bill passed unanimously.

Senate Bill 42, authored by Eric Renslo, to suspend a bylaw about voting procedures, passed 7-5-0.

Meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m.

Open positions within ASUCD can be found at vacancy.ucdavis.edu. SASHA COTTERELL compiled this senate brief. She can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Get paid to do it

0

Editor’s note: The Environmental Policy and Planning Commission (EPPC) is an ASUCD commission responsible for researching environmental issues affecting the campus and its surrounding area, and providing recommendations for improvement.

Ever have an idea about something that could make Davis an even greener and more sustainable place? Do you need some extra cash to make it happen?

As UC Davis looks toward the future, there are now more ways than ever to get funding to turn your green ideas into a reality. If you have some sort of environmental idea, project, event, business plan, etc. that could make Davis a greener place, there is money available across campus targeted at empowering students to take up green initiatives.

One of the newest green funding opportunities on campus is the ASUCD Entrepreneurship Fund. The fund gives $1,500 in grants to aid students with business proposals that address a consumer problem and demonstrate potential for social entrepreneurship. The next round of applications is due Feb. 11 and ASUCD encourages everyone with ideas to apply! To do so, check out their website: asucd.ucdavis.edu/efund.

Another great way to get green funds on campus is through UC Davis Dining Services’ Go Green Grant Program. These grants provide funding for individuals or groups of UC Davis students, staff and faculty to research, develop, implement and design solutions to campus sustainability challenges.

This year’s recipients include the Education for Sustainable Living Program, the ASUCD Bike Barn Tire Recycling Project, the Red Cup Cleanup and Wild Campus. Dining Services looks forward to continuing to support sustainability initiatives across campus and holds two application cycles per year, each offering up to $3,000 in grants.

Visit dining.ucdavis.edu/sus-green.html for more information.

ASUCD’s Environmental Policy and Planning Commission (EPPC) also wants to support your green ideas on campus. EPPC can allocate $300 per quarter from its budget for funding environmental projects and events on campus. Additionally, this commission can serve as a base for volunteers and can help get the word out about your event, group or project. If you would like to acquire a grant from EPPC, please contact the chairperson, Tanzi Jackson, at tpjackson@ucdavis.edu, to submit your proposal.

In addition to these, there are many other funding sources to help you do it green — such as scholarships and other grant opportunities. So the next time you have an idea about how UC Davis can do it green, keep these opportunities in mind!

Police Briefs

0

THURSDAY
Don’t cry over spilt alc
A female was crying at the bus stop, sitting next to a broken bottle of alcohol and an alcohol puddle on Fifth Street.

Bye bye baby
Someone stayed at Days Inn on Chiles Road with his girlfriend and when he awoke, his girlfriend was gone and so were his keys, wallet and car.

SATURDAY
Subtle landscaping
A male was watching somebody while pretending to prune a tree on Trawler Place.

The bifurcated bandit
Someone was sleeping while an unknown male tried to break into their apartment through an unlocked window. The male’s only identifier is black pants, as the person awoke when the bandit had one leg through the window on Mesquite Drive.

But it’s free …
An unknown subject went into somebody’s unlocked vehicle and took their wallet and their library card on Burnett Place.

SUNDAY
Bungee dumping
There were people on the roof launching stuff with a large bungee apparatus on Radcliffe Drive.

Police briefs are compiled from the City of Davis daily crime bulletins. Contact EINAT GILBOA at city@theaggie.org.

UC Davis alumnus competes in ‘The Amazing Race’

0

Learning a synchronized swim routine with the Russian synchronized swimming Olympic team is not something that most tourists traveling to Moscow book a tour for. When most people dream of traveling the world, racing doesn’t come to mind either.

But for UC Davis alum Ryan Danz, competition ruled the world as he made a mad dash through six countries across the globe as a contestant on the 21st season of “The Amazing Race,” which aired from September to December 2012.

“I had watched the show off and on since its inception,” Danz said. “It’s one of those things to me that anybody would do in a second if given the chance.”

“The Amazing Race” first aired in 2001 and now has over 10 million viewers per week. It is a reality television show in which 11 contestant pairs advance through nations across the world by gathering clues and performing challenges relevant to life in the featured countries.

Danz, who graduated from UC Davis in the winter of 1999 as an economics major, competed in the show with his girlfriend Abbie Ginsberg.

“Ryan was a great partner to have — he’s very driven, strong and determined,” Ginsberg said. “He was high in intensity, but I could rely on him as a partner.”

The couple traveled through China, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Turkey, Russia and Amsterdam, and were eliminated on the ninth episode, which aired on Nov. 25.

“We accomplished one of the best records of all time,” Danz said. “We won several rounds, including the first round, and we also placed within the top four on many others.”

Since the couple won the first leg of the race traveling from Los Angeles to Shanghai, the prize money eligible to them alone was doubled, increasing their incentive of winning to $2 million.

Although both contestants’ families were aware of the couple’s participation in the race, Danz’s mother Marilyn Pallister watched the show without any idea of the final outcome.

“I was going back and forth for two months,” Pallister said. “Everyone would say to me, ‘You know the ending!’ And I would tell them that ‘what you see is what I see.’”

Before competing on the show and having received a notable amount of fame nationwide, Danz lived and worked in San Diego, Calif.

“In 2011, Abbie and I were watching a previous season and we decided we would work on an audition tape,” Danz said. “There’s thousands of people who apply, and it’s one of those things that you think, ‘Why would they pick me?’”

Ginsberg said that Danz’s persistence, enthusiasm and follow-through on creating an audition tape were what allowed them to get to where they are now.

“It’s one thing to say, ‘Yeah, lets do it,’ but to actually say, ‘Let’s put a tape in’ is a whole different thing,” she said. “That’s the cool thing about Ryan. When he gets an idea in his head, he is on it the next day.”

The couple found out they would be contestants in April of last year, and filmed in May and June.

“I thought it was going to be a perfect venue for them to share their relationship in,” Pallister said. “It’s almost like someone is paying you to travel around the world and experience different cultures and different foods.”

The experience for the contestants may look like fun and games, but Danz described some parts as frustrating.

“In the beginning, it was a lot more stressful than we predicted and planned for,” Danz said. “Abbie and I had our tiffs during training, so when the race started we had gotten some of our stuff out of the way.”

It was evident to both Danz and Ginsberg that the pair was getting stronger as a team and as a couple as days passed.

“Where my strengths are, he might not be so strong, and he is better than me at a lot of things too,” Ginsberg said. “We balanced each other out as a couple really well.”

Although viewers see the contestants moving from one country to the next every week, contestants were traveling every two to three days.

“There was so much adrenaline in every moment that travel didn’t exhaust us,” Danz said. “Travel was time to sleep, eat and re-energize. To slow down and get back to normalcy.”

Overall, even with the rough physical and mental challenges the duo had to face, along with the hardship of losing, Danz said that he enjoyed his time on the show.

“Even though we couldn’t win, we got to travel to places that we would have never imagined,” Ginsberg said. “You aren’t seeing the tourist areas. It’s a one-of-a-kind tour of the world.”

Danz said he learned many life lessons along the way.

“Watching the show back, I got to see myself in a different light, how competitive I am,” Danz said. “The pro to this is that it’s an important quality to have if you want to be successful. The con is that it was also abrasive.”

As the show progressed, both America and the other competitors viewed the pair as an alpha couple — ones who would do anything to win, something that Danz didn’t think was portrayed accurately.

“It’s like when you realize that maybe Santa Claus isn’t real, and seeing your parents putting the presents under the tree,” Danz said. “Having been such big fans, it was a reality check that it is a TV show first and then an actual race, which was kind of disappointing.”

A clip of Danz mentioning being a UC Davis graduate did air on the show.

“Every experience that he had at UC Davis has become a part of who he is now,” Pallister said. “[UC Davis] really is a shining bright star in the whole valley.”

Danz was recently contacted by a publisher and asked to write a book about his passions for practicing law and the Brazilian martial art form Jiu Jitsu, to be titled Jiu Jitsu Jurisprudence.

As advice to college students both in Davis and across the world, Danz said that it is important to take steps every day toward a goal.

“For me, I always try to do something every day to open a door, to advance myself,” he said. “My goal right now is to sell as many copies as possible. You can’t skip from A to Z. You have to go through B to Y.”

RITIKA IYER can be reached at features@theaggie.org.

UC Davis develops Global Ambassadors Mentorship Program

0

Students from UC Davis and all around the world are coming together to form Global Ambassadors, a new mentorship program for international students set up by UC Davis Services for International Students and Scholars (SISS).

The Global Ambassadors consist of undergraduate students, many of whom have personal experiences with cross-cultural interactions. They serve as mentors to international students, helping them acclimate to their new academic and social lives at Davis.

“I once was an international student and will never forget the challenges as well as the incredible experiences,” said Moira Delgado, the outreach coordinator for Global Ambassadors, in an email interview. “UC Davis is very de-centralized and it can be daunting to navigate the various academic departments as well as student services. Both language and cultural differences can pose barriers and the Global Ambassadors have both the empathy and skills to assist international students.”

The motivation to help current international students comes from personal experience for many of the mentors.

“When I first came to Davis last year as an international student, I was really confused about the college school system in America,” said Jen Jung Hyun Park, a third-year economics major, international student from South Korea and current mentor with Global Ambassadors. “I always thought it would be really useful to have a mentorship program.”

Other members in the program, who are not international students, have had traveling experiences that inspired them to become mentors.

“I’ve spent a lot of time overseas and I’ve spent a lot of time looking at things from a different perspective,” said Global Ambassador and fourth-year neurobiology, physiology, and behavior major Sean Scott. “I’m very familiar with the way [the international students] feel.”

Global Ambassador Bianca Johnson first learned about the opportunity to be a part of Global Ambassadors while she was studying abroad.

“The idea of being a mentor was really exciting to me. My experience abroad gave me some familiarity with being unfamiliar in a strange new place and I wanted to be able to help others in that same position,” Johnson said in an email interview.

Mentors and mentees keep in touch every week and there are frequent activities for the international students to help them feel like Davis is their home away from home. Mentors are trained to use what they know to help the international students with any questions they may have about academics or life in Davis, in general.

“My mentors – Andrea Rivas and Jen Park render me great help. They spend a great deal of efforts on searching all the information of clubs, social events and useful courses for me, and they have even got office hours for their mentees — I truly appreciate it!” said Ka Sing Lee, an international student from Hong Kong majoring in economics, in an email interview.

Many Global Ambassadors feel that the mentor-mentee relationship is a mutually beneficial one.

“I think it is important to understand the mentee-mentor relationship. It really goes both ways and you can each learn from each other,” Johnson said.

Delgado believes that the program, though new, is off to a positive start.

“It is truly amazing to see the passion and compassion of the first cohort of Global Ambassadors and how much they have done so far,” she said.

Information about Global Ambassadors and how to apply to be a mentor next quarter can be found at siss.ucdavis.edu/globalambassadors.htm.

LAUREN MASCARENHAS can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Column: On monopolies

6

Tree of Liberty

As usual, I think it is best to start the discussion of a topic by defining terms:

A “coercive monopoly is a business concern that prohibits competitors from entering the field, with the natural result being that the firm is able to make pricing and production decisions independent of competitive forces.” (Wikipedia)

Historical examples include the British East India Company, which had a monopoly on tea trade (this later helped fuel the American Revolution) and the First Bank of the United States, which had a monopoly on issuing money (now the Fed effectively does the same thing).

Coercive monopolies created by the government still exist today in areas such as mail (USPS), roads and utilities.

It has been suggested, often in order to criticize capitalism, that free markets lead to coercive monopolies. This is false, and can be demonstrated both in principle and historically.

In principle, it is impossible, because in a laissez-faire capitalist society there are no government subsidies or monopolies, and so competition is never truly impossible.

Even if competing with certain businesses might be very difficult, potential competition always exists because even monopolies have limits on how high their prices can be before they lose profits and encourage others to enter the market.

Moreover, goods and services can always be substituted by other goods or services when consumers deem it economically preferable; for instance, if gas makes driving too expensive, people use buses or other forms of transport.

Historically, capitalism never created monopolies. Even in the late 1800s, when Rockefeller controlled almost all of the oil industry in the United States, prices of oil steadily decreased in order to fight competition (with the result that consumers greatly benefited). Similarly, Microsoft, which was accused of being a monopoly a century later, had to sell its products very cheaply to maximize profits and defeat its competitors.

If this is true, why have big businesses been disparaged so often, both in popular media and in the political discourse? And why do we have anti-trust legislation?

There are surely many factors involved. And to the extent that distrust of businesses is due to some businesses having improper political ties, this is justified.

One main reason, though, is that people have almost always rejected the notion that it is moral for people to primarily pursue their profit and self-interest in general. Even today, businesses are primarily thought of as ways to provide jobs for people, not means by which individuals legitimately pursue the goal of creating and acquiring wealth.

We should revise this attitude. In a free society, where businesses do not and cannot rely on subsidies or special government favors, one can only be financially successful by providing products and services that people enjoy and view as worth buying.

Even Microsoft, with all its power, could not make the Zune desirable enough to compete with Apple’s iPod.

There should be no guarantee for smaller businesses to compete successfully against larger businesses — to the extent that larger businesses act irrationally or are unpopular, though, competition will be made easier.

Fear of monopolies in a laissez-faire capitalist society is illogical, historically unfounded and based on unjust evaluations of businesspeople.

It is time that we change our attitudes toward these individuals and view them not as our enemies, but as our liberators.

As Ayn Rand once wrote, “in the short span of a century and a half, [the businessperson] has released men from bondage to their physical needs, has released them from the terrible drudgery of an 18-hour workday of manual labor for their barest subsistence, has released them from famines, from pestilences, from the stagnant hopelessness and terror in which most of mankind had lived in all the pre-capitalist centuries — and in which most of it still lives, in non-capitalist countries.” (For the New Intellectual, 27)

If you want to compete with TRISTAN DE LIÈGE’s monopoly on the use of Ayn Rand quotes, contact him at tflenaerts@ucdavis.edu.

Sacramento dining scene gets a nod

An absolute rarity occurred this weekend — The San Francisco Chronicle went far beyond its typical Bay Area dining coverage and highlighted Sacramento’s restaurants, bars and farms.

In the centerpiece: “Fed by a homegrown generation of chefs and farmers working collaboratively, this formerly beleaguered bastion of blah has blossomed into a vibrant village feasting on fresh, locally grown produce, meat and fish.”

The alliteration doesn’t stop there. Farm-to-table dining — “a civic cause culinaire” —  has put “the capital city on the culinary map.”

Meanwhile, Midtown was praised for its thriving cocktail culture. The Golden Bear, Hook & Ladder Manufacturing Co., The Red Rabbit and The Shady Lady were called out for exceptionally impressive signature drinks.

And even though nothing can compare to the wonder that is the Davis Farmers Market, Sacramento’s got a thumbs up as well.