59 F
Davis

Davis, California

Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 1065

Education for Sustainable Living Program hosts TEDx speaker

Last Wednesday, conservationist photographer and former TEDx speaker Garth Lenz came to UC Davis to give his talk entitled “The True Cost of Oil” which explores the destruction of Canadian wildlife and oil sand mining.

Bituminous sands, which are a type of unconventional petroleum deposit and have only in recent years been considered part of the world’s oil reserves, are being extracted in an enormous mining and fracking-equivalent effort in Canada’s Boreal forest. The Boreal is the largest forest ecosystem on the planet, covering nearly 60 percent of the countries’ land and is being cut down and polluted by the mining efforts.

“Our prime minister had said that this is an incredible enterprise on the size of building the Great Wall of China or the pyramids,” Lenz said. “It’s wreaking a level of destruction we just haven’t seen before.”

The Boreal is home to some of nature’s largest wonders. It is home to nearly 400,000 caribou and an intricate network of rivers, contains half the migratory birds in North America, has the world’s largest freshwater delta and is considered the planet’s greatest terrestrial carbon dioxide sink.

The recent popularity of oil sands is due to the rising cost of traditional oil extraction.

“The price of oil has to get around $80 a barrel in order to get any profit,” Lenz said.

The numerous petroleum companies that are involved in the extraction effort are using two different methods to get to the tar-like oil trapped in the sands below the soil.

The first method is a simple mining effort that is so large that the trucks used for transporting the bitumen are 3,000 square feet, the size of a large house.

The second method is similar to hydro-fracking, which liquefies the bitumen so that it is easier to extract. This technique leaves huge non-lined pools of toxic waste as a byproduct.

Both approaches to extract the bitumen produce two times as much carbon as traditional oil extraction does. Per day, 250,000 tons of bitumen sand is processed.

“This is considered the world’s dirtiest oil,” Lenz said.

The oil extraction is having immediate consequences on the local first-nation populations which depend on the Boreal for their livelihood. Being so isolated, the cost of food is extremely high. As the forest is quickly cut down, many of the indigenous populations’ hunting and fishing grounds disappear.

Another consequence of the mining includes highly carcinogenic chemicals present in the toxic ponds that continue to show up in natural rivers in the Boreal. Cancer rates for very unusual and rare types of cancer are soaring in some communities.

“Oil companies plan on industrializing an area the size of Florida by 2030,” Lenz said.

Other projects that are being planned are an industrial highway and pipeline that would stretch from northern Alaska to oil refineries in and around Louisiana.

After his talk, Lenz answered questions from the audience.

“The Boreal and the Amazon are the lungs of the planet,” Lenz said.

TEDx talks are independently organized TED events. Lenz’s lecture was not part of TEDx, though UC Davis hosted a TEDx talk on May 19 that was titled “The Power of Perspective.”

MAX GARRITY RUSSER can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Aggies place 12th at NCAA Regional

0

The Aggies earned a berth into the NCAA Regional with a tremendous performance at the Big West Conference tournament, but didn’t have enough magic in them to advance to the NCAA final round.

The upset-minded UC Davis men’s golf team entered Stanford as the 13th seed in a field that consisted of some of the top teams in the nation. A finish in the top five would have allowed UC Davis to advance, but overcoming so many of the nation’s top schools that was a tall order.

“I think we competed really well and I’m happy with them, but we just weren’t as good as the top five teams,” said coach Cy Williams. “This is a very talented team and I’m very proud of the guys.”

UC Davis brought what Williams guessed to be one of the youngest teams in the NCAA tournament. Three sophomores and two freshmen made up the Aggie lineup and only sophomore Matt Hansen had previous NCAA Regional experience.

A tough first round all but destroyed the Aggies chances of placing in the top five and advancing to the NCAA championship as their 293 had them in last place in the 13 team field.

UC Davis was led by sophomore Jonny Baxter, whose one-over 211 total tied him for 27th place in the field. Baxter followed his even first round with a two-under in the second round that featured five birdies and ten pars.

Baxter’s round led the Aggies to their best single day of the tournament as they shot an even 280 on Friday. Sophomore Matt Hansen shot an even 70 followed by 71’s from sophomore Matt Seramin and freshman Luke Vivolo.

“The last rounds were solid and everyone contributed, they competed hard and I’m proud,” Williams said. “Your goal is to minimize the bad round and that’s what put us out of the running.”

Hansen placed 41st overall and freshman Mike Brockington led the Aggies with a 68 on the final day for his best round of the tournament.

All told, the Aggies can take several positives from their 17-over 857 overall team score.

“Familiarity helped a little, but we were just a way better team than we were then,” Williams said. “As young as they are, we were ready because athletes get better with experience.”

As far as experience goes, the future looks bright for UC Davis, who closes the 2012 campaign ready to tee off next year. The Aggies have all their starters returning and will have red-shirt senior Tyler Raber back.

“This season was a success since it was supposed to be a rebuilding year,” Williams said. “For these guys to come out and deal with all the things that happened and to win the Big West was a huge success.”

Matthew Yuen can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Campus art museum to open in 2016

After a 10 million dollar gift over the holidays from the Jan Shrem, a friend of Margrit Mondavi, UC Davis is now planning to add a new art museum near the Mondavi Center.

“The museum will be a resource for students, faculty, staff and members of the community to experience art in the broadest sense of the word. We imagine that students will have the chance to work directly with objects through classes and to visit the museum often to look at exhibitions of works of art, both from the UC Davis Fine Arts Collection and from other museums and private collections,” said Dean Jessie Ann Owens, division of humanities, arts and cultural studies, College of Letters and Science.

A consultant hired by the university, Lindsay Martin, of Lord Cultural Resources, has been speaking with faculty, staff and students about what they would like to see in an art museum.  A focus group was held on last Wednesday in the Student Community Center in order to get more student insight.

“I was surprised that we don’t already have a [major] art museum on campus,” said Kayla Rouse, a senior biological science major.

Options that are currently available for students include the Basement Gallery, Gorman Museum, Design Museum and the Nelson Gallery. These current galleries are all connected to campus departments.

Some students attended merely because they were interested in what the art museum was.

“I drove by the Mondavi Center and saw a sign for an art museum, then received an email. I was curious about what was going on,” said Carolina Pina, a junior human development major.

There is currently no preconception of what the museum at UC Davis should be like. According to Owens, the hope is that it will be a place that students visit often.

“We are still figuring it out. I am hired to help understand what types of spaces the University wants in their art museum,” Martin said.

The museum is projected to open in 2016.

DANIELLE HUDDLESTUN can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Column: The reaping

0

I hardly hesitate before agreeing to a product’s terms and conditions anymore. I can barely keep up with the reading in my own classes, let alone spare the time and energy to read a 6,500-word essay written in legalese.

But I’m trying to understand what it means to have good privacy hygiene — to know where my data is going and how it is being put to use. The amount of information that sites legally collect from you on a daily basis may come as a surprise.

For the most part, these collection processes are automated and done discreetly. Sites and mobile apps are said to be “harvesting” your data — in other words, fetching personal information from your browser or phone and using that information to tailor their services to you.

If you use Facebook, Twitter or nearly any Google product, you can be sure that data harvesting applies to you. We use these sites and their products for free and we pay the price by offering information about ourselves. But is it worth it?

Last Thursday, Twitter wrote a blog post about a new “experiment” they are conducting, which slyly hints at the very practice of data harvesting without ever explicitly explaining it. When you visit a site with a “Tweet This” button, Twitter not only knows you visited that site, but also how frequently you visit that site. Considering the ubiquity of the Twitter share button, Twitter essentially sees your browsing history and uses it to better suggest the kind of Twitter users you might like to follow. Influential tech blogger, Dustin Curtis called it “wrong” and “a violation of privacy and trust,” which is true, but also begs the question —  just how valuable is your web browsing history?

The average Joe probably cares about his fantasy baseball team a little too much and checks his Yahoo stats four, five, maybe forty-five times a day. So Twitter suggests he follow @YahooSports. Not too bad, right? But what if your web browsing history wasn’t used to better social media connections? What if it was sold to, say, advertisers? How would you feel then?

Twitter points out that LinkedIn, Facebook and YouTube already engage in this practice, which is hardly reassuring. What’s even more disturbing is that data harvesting isn’t just limited to our computers — our phones are vulnerable as well.

Path, a mobile-based social networking app for smartphones, came under fire when a hacker discovered that the application was uploading their users’ address books to the company’s servers and recommending those users to add as contacts to their Path networks — all without their consent. The outrage revealed the lack of protections iPhones have over address books — an all-too-common loophole iOS developers use to mine data. Location and camera roll have far stronger security settings in iOS, while address book had virtually none. Both Apple and Path eventually changed their policy on the issue, but still left users unnerved about the security of the personal information they store on their phones.

Android users are not excluded, unfortunately, which was recently proven by security researcher Paul Brodeur who designed an app just to see how much data it could extract without permission from the Android phone’s owner. As it turns out, quite a bit. Brodeur’s app was able to procure photos stored on external SD cards and launch the phone’s browser to upload those photos to a server. And yes, the app did it all without consent.

It’s important, then, to reconcile how much your privacy means to you — and modify settings on all of your devices and social media accounts to reflect those concerns. It also stresses the significance of hackers in revealing such security breaches, and scaring companies away from data harvesting. Anybody can become a hacker by learning computer programming language – knowledge that I think is increasingly important in understanding this digitized world — but I’ll save that debate for another Monday.

NICOLE NGUYEN is wondering whether or not you people got a piece of the $14 billion Facebook pie. If you sold your soul and bought shares, e-mail niknguyen@ucdavis.edu.

UC Regents meet in the capital

The UC Regents meeting was held last Wednesday in Sacramento for the first time since 1993. Usually organized at campus locations, the meeting was transferred to the Sacramento Convention Center in order to rally government support for the financially debilitated university system.

Among other issues, the Regents discussed an impending six percent tuition increase for all students if voters reject Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed tax initiative.

Annual costs for an in-state UC student have doubled to around $30,000 since 2007 and a six percent fee increase would add $732 to that total. UC would need $125 million of state funding to prevent recourse to another round of fee hikes and university officials urged legislators to consider this alternative.

“There has been some interest by the governor’s office in buying out the tuition increase,” said Daniel Dooley, UC senior vice president for external relations. “We’re going to fight like crazy for that.”

Californians will be able to vote on Gov. Brown’s tax initiative this November when the proposal goes on the ballot.

The Regents also confirmed the appointment of UC San Diego’s new chancellor, Pradeep K. Khosla. Khosla, who will replace Marye Anne Fox on Aug. 1, was the former Dean of Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.

Controversy surrounds Khosla’s $411,084 salary, which represents a 4.8 percent increase from his predecessor’s pay. The UC administration is facing criticism for raising executive salaries amid continued budget cuts.

Only Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and Student Regent Alfredo Mireles, Jr. voted against the compensation package for the new chancellor.

“What we are asking for is a crackdown on the mismanagement itself in the form of high executive pays, in the form of increasing and relentless tuition hikes,” said Cheryl Deutsch, a UCLA graduate student speaking during the public comments period.

The meeting was interrupted by a more theatrical expression of protest as a group of approximately twenty students dressed as inmates marched and chanted during the morning session.

“That’s the sound of the students working on the chain gang,” protesters chanted.

Dressed in luminescent orange costumes, these students represented condemned inmates “sentenced to debt” by the recent fee hikes.

Similar disruptions in the past were met with police response to remove the protestors from the meeting. This time, however, the protesters were allowed to continue chanting while the regents adjourned the open session and retreated to the closed segment of the meeting, away from the public.

The Regents’ next meeting will take place from July 17 to 19 at UC San Francisco, Mission Bay.

JUSTIN ABRAHAM can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Column: From the top

0

Change is looming over UC Davis athletics, and a variety of paths the University could choose to take.

Last week Chancellor Linda PB Katehi and Vice Chancellor Fred Wood announced the four finalists for UC Davis’ new Director of Athletics.

The candidates vary greatly in experience and outlook.

They feature experience in large and small schools, private schools and public schools, schools with massive budgets and schools that have had to take serious budget cuts.

Now UC Davis has to pick just one, and whatever decision is ultimately made could drastically change the future of UC Davis athletics for over a decade.

Over the next few weeks the candidates will be hosting open forums to answer questions from the public — after which the University will accept feedback. This is a chance for the students of UC Davis to make their voices heard and you should all take full advantage.

During the fall the Recruitment Advisory Committee (the group tasked with helping cut down the list of candidates) held four town-hall meetings that were intended to facilitate feedback. While the meetings were highly opinionated and did indeed opened the floor to all comers, one group was largely under-represented at the meetings: the student body.

The speakers at the town-hall meetings came almost exclusively from three groups: alumni, faculty and student athletes, but the general student body was nowhere to be found.

The upcoming decision will have untold effects on the UC Davis athletics department and any student who has an opinion regarding the current state of Aggie athletics should do their part to make their voice heard.

After all, UC Davis athletics are funded primarily by student fees, which means that, if given the opportunity, students should be more than willing to give their opinion.

Of course you will be able to follow the latest updates from the athletics director search in The California Aggie and on our twitter page, but before the meetings start, here are some basic strengths and weaknesses of each candidate.

Ray Purpur — Strengths: Purpur has solid experience with several years as Deputy Director of Athletics at Stanford which gave him a chance to work at not only an academically prestigious institution, but one with a wide array of sports programs, similar to the UC Davis Athletics Department.

Weaknesses: While Stanford has an impressive athletics department, it is also very well funded. This means that Purpur does not have experience working with the type of cramped budget that he would face as Athletic Director at UC Davis.

Desiree Reed-Francois — Strengths: As Senior Associate Athletics Director at Tennessee, Reed-Francois has experience working at a state institution  with high profile athletics. She also has experience academically, serving as a law professor.

Weaknesses: Lacks experience in a program of the academic caliber seen at UC Davis as well as the local markets in Northern California.

Terrance Tumey — Strengths: Tumey has served at Dominican University of California during the difficult transition from NAIA to a Division II program. Additionally, he has extensive experience in the sport of football — as a former member of several NFL organizations including the San Francisco 49ers. This experience could help him select UC Davis next head football coach — the first major decision the incoming AD will make.

Weaknesses: Tumey’s background is highly football-centric which could cause problems as he enters a university with 23 athletics programs.

Foti Millis — Strengths: Millis has solid experience at University of California, Berkeley, during a time where Cal has faced similar budget constraints to the ones he’d encounter at UC Davis. Additionally, Millis is a UC Davis alumnus, which should get him some added points from some of the other alumni.

Weaknesses: Cal came close to permanently cutting sports during Millis’ tenure, which will likely make some in and around the athletic department uneasy, especially following the sports-cutting debate sparked by the Dempsey Report.

TREVOR CRAMER can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Column: Snot funny

1

Last week I told a story about my mother and it has come to my attention that we will not still be in school over Father’s Day and that this is unfair to my male parent. So I will tell an equally flattering story.

When I was little and a budding comedian I used to make jokes in which I would rib my pops (giving each other a hard time is basically a Hempstead family tradition), to which he would invariably reply, “That’s snot funny! It’s snot, it’s snot, it’s snot.” Upon which the aforementioned snot would fly out of my nose as I cackled uncontrollably in the passenger seat of his truck at what was definitely the funniest joke ever made. My dad is great.

Funniness is subjective. I’m into comedy in a big way and the thing is you can never tell exactly what will make someone laugh. In fact, you can’t even really tell what will make you laugh. It’s not like you’re sitting in front of an Apatow movie, saying to yourself, “that gentleman just referenced the act of coitus! How droll, I believe I shall laugh now. Hah! Hah!” It would be a very different kind of world if we thought that way.

So if you can never predict what people will find funny, how do you be funny on purpose? Don’t look at me, I don’t have a freaking clue.

Ok fiiiine, I’ll look into it.

Here’s something interesting. Did you know that your average baby laughs 15 times more per day that an adult? Which makes me question just what the duck is so funny that our babies are cracking up all day? What are these infants seeing that we’re not? Have we become so jaded to the wonderful funniness of the world that we’ve lost our ability to laugh? Or maybe their standards for what’s funny are just way lower than ours because babies are dumb. Either way.

Time for a science party! When you laugh, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex lights up, which is the part that squirts out endorphins. But from the ridiculously tiny bit of research I’ve read on the subject, it’s not totally clear to me which happens first. That is to say, do you observe something, laugh at it and then receive a big endorphin boost, or are the endorphins the cause of the laughter? Does happiness make you laugh or does laughter make you happy? There’s probably an answer somewhere that I don’t know because I’m basically as dumb as a dumb, stupid baby.

So I did something in that last paragraph that comedy people term a “callback.” That’s when you reference something that happened earlier, funny or not, in the hopes that your audience will remember it and giggle. Callbacks are satisfying to hear because — even if they’re as cheap as mine just was — you feel smart for catching on. Which, of course, you are. You’re also very good looking and have perfect hands. Please keep reading my column?

Another thing comedy nerds talk about is the rule of three, in which you set up the premise for a joke, repeat it in a slightly different permutation and then defy the expectation you’ve just set up. I sort of did it when I was complimenting you. I called you smart (established that you are being complimented), called you pretty (a natural successor to “smart” that creates a pattern of flattery) and then said you have perfect hands, which was probably borderline creepy. Rule of three, bro.

Hey, here’s something I’ve been thinking about. Folklorists in a couple countries have demonstrated the existence of what they’re calling “joke cycles.” These are the kinds of jokes we all know and eye-roll at, dead baby jokes or dumb blonde jokes or those annoying “blank that blank people say” videos that have fortunately gone away.

They find these formulaic jokes everywhere and my hypothesis on why they’re so popular is that they’re both comfortable and rich with possibility. When someone says “why did Helen Keller’s dog run away” you know exactly what you’re about to get — namely something tasteless about an American hero. The jokes are simultaneously old and new, a gently surprising twist on a familiar recipe, transgressive but not too transgressive. And to our weird mammal brains, that feels nice.

It’s okay if you didn’t find this column funny, neither did KATELYN HEMPSTEAD, who can be reached at khempstead@ucdavis.edu.

Senate briefs

ASUCD Senate meetings are scheduled to begin Thursdays at 6:10 p.m. Times listed are according to the clock at the May 17 meeting location, the Memorial Union’s Mee Room. The ASUCD president is not required to attend senate meetings.

Meeting called to order at 11:50 p.m.
6:10 p.m. to 11:49 p.m. was the continuation of budget hearings.

Rebecca Sterling, ASUCD president, absent
Yena Bae, ASUCD vice president, present
Kabir Kapur, ASUCD senator, present
Jared Crisologo-Smith, ASUCD senator, present
Bradley Bottoms, ASUCD senator, present
Justin Goss, ASUCD senator, present
Anni Kimball, ASUCD senator, present
Paul Min, ASUCD senator, present
Don Gilbert, ASUCD senator, present
Joyce Han, ASUCD senator, present
Erica Padgett, ASUCD senator, present
Beatriz Anguiano, ASUCD senator, present
Patrick Sheehan, ASUCD senator, present
Yara Zokaie, ASUCD senator, present

Consideration of old legislation
Senate resolution 26, authored and introduced by Crisologo-Smith, co-authored by Torres, to condemn discriminatory marriage laws in the State of California. The resolution was tabled.

Senate resolution 27, authored by chief of staff, to the president, Sabrina Dias, co-authored and introduced by Kapur, to support the recommendations given by the Reynoso Task Force. The resolution was tabled.

Senate resolution 28, authored by Dias, co-authored and introduced by Kapur, to commend and appreciate members of the Reynoso Task Force, passed unanimously.

Senate resolution 29, authored and introduced by Goss, co-authored by Bottoms, Kimball, Sheehan and Padgett, opposing the compulsory purchase of Aggie Cash by incoming UC Davis first-year students, passed unanimously.

Senate bill 106, authored by Internal Affairs Commission chair, Sergio Cano, co-authored by Dias and introduced by Min, to allocate $490.25 from Senate reserves to purchase ASUCD graduation stoles for the class of 2012, passed 8-1-3.

Senate bill 109, authored and introduced by Goss, to allocate $126.00 for Aggies @ the Pub: Trivia Night, passed 11-0-1.

Consideration of urgent legislation
An urgent senate bill, authored and introduced by the External Affairs Commission, co-authored by Hawe and Miller, to award the ASUCD Lobby Corps Legislator of the Year Award to Speaker John A. Pérez, for his commitment to higher education, passed unanimously.

Meeting adjourned at 1:45 a.m.

Open positions within ASUCD can be found at vacancy.ucdavis.edu. ROHIT RAVIKUMAR compiled the senate briefs. He can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

East Davis standoff required extra level of caution

While Davis is generally considered a relatively safe and crime-free area, there are times that require extra caution. On Monday, May 7 a Davis man wanted for a weapons charge allegedly barricaded himself in a house on Adrain Drive and kept the police occupied for over five hours before surrendering.

According to Lt. Paul Doroshov of the Davis Police Department the suspect, 26-year-old David Manuel Cervantes, was arrested on a gun charge and his case is still under investigation. The police were called to the scene to serve a restraining order.

“This type of incident is rare in Davis, we normally don’t get these type of crimes,” Doroshov said.

The standoff required the evacuation of many houses on Adrian Drive and the surrounding blocks. Additionally, SWAT teams and crisis negotiation teams had to set up posts around the neighborhood.

For hours Cervantes allegedly would not open the door or answer telephones to speak with the officers at the scene, according to a Press Release from the City of Davis Police Department. Because of the suspect’s history of weapons possession the police took a cautious approach.

After many hours of negotiation Cervantes finally surrendered to the police at 7 p.m. and was arrested for the warrant and taken to Yolo County Jail. Nobody was injured. No weapons were found and it was a peaceful surrender.

A resident of Adrian Drive, Elizabeth Lacey told the Davis Enterprise that she hasn’t noticed anything suspicious in that house before but this incident makes her concerned about safety in the neighborhood.

Doroshov stated that the case in being investigated further and a report will be submitted to the Yolo County District Attorney’s office. After this the DA will decide if he will be charged for further crimes.

He further stated that these types of crimes are rare and students are normally affected by crimes involving property theft, alcohol, etc. and it is important to always take safety precautions involving these.

PAAYAL ZAVERI can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

News-in-brief: Annual Celebrate Davis! is today

0

There will be a free community-wide festival organized by the Davis Chamber of Commerce from 4:30 to 9 p.m. at the Community Park located at 1405 F Street.

Celebrate Davis! is part picnic, part music festival and part business expo. Businesses and organizations will have booths. Davis City Council candidates Lucas Frerichs, Sue Greenwald and Dan Wolk will also have booths.

There will also be dinner options, live music and fireworks at 9 p.m.

— ANGELA SWARTZ

Class Schedule and Registration Guide discontinued

For years, students at UC Davis have used the Class Schedule and Registration Guide (CSRG) to plan out their schedules. However, starting in Fall 2012, the CSRG will no longer be printed, and a new Class Search Tool will take its place.

The primary reasoning behind the discontinuation of the CSRG was obsolescence. As class information regularly changes up until the time of registration, the CSRG often became erroneous right after it was printed.

The decision was also motivated by an environmentalist ideal, with the CSRG being useful only for the few weeks around registration. This was not considered worth the 100+ pages per booklet that were being printed.

Students did not directly participate in the decision to discontinue the CSRG, but careful attention was paid to student trends in the decision.

“Students simply did not seem to want to use the CSRG as much as they had in the past,” said student assistant Brian Bauer. “Students were ‘voting with their dollars.’”

As an alternative to the CSRG, an online tool called the Class Search Tool has been created.

“This has been available since Fall 2010 and has been received very well with increasing usage each term,” said Senior Associate Registrar Barbara Noble.

The Class Search Tool contains many useful settings and options to streamline the process of registering for classes that were not available with the CSRG.

“There are a bunch of options and settings that you can use to really narrow down the size of your search and refine it,” Bauer said. “Three big pieces of advice would be: use the ‘Open Only’ Tool, use the ‘Saved Courses’ feature and have SISWEB open at the same time to cross-reference courses.”

Though officials are optimistic that the Class Search Tool will significantly improve the process of class registration, they are open to possible modifications.

“Occasionally we will get excellent suggestions for how to improve the Class Search Tool and we take those very seriously. Several of these suggestions have been implemented in order to make the tool more user-friendly,” Noble said.

In order to smooth the adjustment from the CSRG to the Class Search Tool, an electronic version of the Fall 2012 CSRG is available online. However, this may be discontinued in the future.
Both the online CSRG and the Class Search Tool can be found at registrar.ucdavis.edu.

ROHIT RAVIKUMAR can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

University of California to consolidate shared services at UC Riverside

The University of California (UC) has announced that it will be consolidating shared services, including routine payroll, benefits, leave management and workforce administration, at UC Riverside as part of its Working Smarter Initiative. Each campus currently operates these functions independently.

This new center called UCPath (Payroll, Academic, Personnel, Timekeeping and HR), will begin by serving five locations in July 2013: UCLA, UCLA Medical Center, UC Santa Cruz, UC Merced and UC Office of the President (UCOP). All campuses will make the switch by October 2014 — stated the press release from UCOP.

With the new center will come a new payroll and human resources information system to replace the previous one, now 30 years old.

“Right now about 6,000 people in the system have some part of the payroll and benefits function as part of their job and they are operating with about 11 different technology systems,” said Kris Lovekin, Director of Media Relations at UC Riverside, in e-mail. “Instead we will have one center of about 600 employees and one technology system.”

The new system is supposed to increase efficiency and allow UC to more effectively conduct and plan for its workforce needs — stated the website of the UC Working Smarter Initiative.

Merging the system will mean the transfer of individuals who currently work in some aspect of human resources on the campus level. UC Riverside accessibility to the majority of the other UC campuses made it the best choice for the merge — according to the press release.

“The main reason is its proximity to a number of other UC campuses, giving it the ability to attract a wide pool of UC talent, providing job opportunities for UC employees,” said Brooke Converse, media specialist for UCOP, in an e-mail.

Other reasons Converse mentioned were labor costs, availability and condition of shared service center space, local housing, cost of living, public transportation and other quality-of-life considerations, as well as local buy-in and support.

Six other campuses submitted proposals to host the new center, including UC Davis. Workers of shared services at UC Davis now face a somewhat uncertain future.

“At the moment, the details behind the work associated with payroll and HR transactional activities in the UC Path project do not have enough specificity to fully understand what work will remain on campus in local shared services, departments or central units,” said Karen Hull, Associate Vice Chancellor of Human Resources at UC Davis. “This clarity will be forthcoming over the next several months.”

The impact of UCPath on UC Davis workers and shared services will remain unclear until Davis migrates to UCPath. It has yet to be decided if UC Davis will migrate during Phase II or III of implementation, set to take place in 2013 and 2014, respectively.

That being said, the UC press release stated UC would be doing its best to keep layoffs to a minimum.

“Our goal is to minimize involuntary layoffs through attrition, re-training and re-aligning of responsibilities,” said UC Executive Vice President Nathan Bostrom in the press release.

Lovekin said the future of shared services workers could take multiple paths though not all necessarily that of UCPath.

“Some people will retire, some will be retrained and take on other duties on their own campuses,” Lovekin said in the e-mail. “Some will decide to relocate to the Riverside area.”

Whatever happens, one thing is for sure: UC staff and faculty who utilize shared services will be receiving less face time.

“For staff and faculty who use the services there will be more phone and web contact for certain things and less face-to-face contact,” Lovekin said in the e-mail.

But for students, Lovekin added, the impact will probably be minimal.

“I’m not sure that students will notice much difference,” Lovekin added in the e-mail. “But it’s always good news if the administration can do something that saves money that can be ploughed back into the classroom.”

EINAT GILBOA can be reached city@theaggie.org.

Editorial: Rain, rain, please come

0

If you’ve noticed the number of sniffles and sneezes increase exponentially over the past few weeks, do not panic. Avian flu hasn’t reached UC Davis and a new super-cold hasn’t started within the bodies of us college students. The culprit of the extra classroom sounds is allergies.

Davis lies in the fertile Central Valley of California. Because of this, come springtime, flowers, trees and grasses bloom and release an explosion of pollen into the air. This, combined with the vicious Central Valley winds, creates a vacuum of allergens that leads to sneezes and sniffles galore. And because of the dry winter and spring, this season has been worse than ones in the past.

Unfortunately for us allergy sufferers, there isn’t an all encompassing answer to solving this problem. We buy Claritin, rush through boxes of tissues and run the air purifier 24/7. Still, despite these preventive measures, we continuously sneeze and itch our teary eyes.

There are a couple natural solutions that can help mitigate the amount of pollen filling up the nostrils of college students. The easiest one is rain. The one thing that we loathed most about Winter Quarter and couldn’t wait to leave come Spring is exactly what we need now. Rain will literally wash away all the pollen floating around in the air, providing relief to everyone.

Unfortunately, rain won’t be coming anytime soon. The closer we get to June, the less likely those sweet clouds of alleviation appear and release their almighty water on the sun-scorched earth. So, it’s time for the bright minds of UC Davis to come up with another solution — a rain machine.

UC Davis boasts one of the top atmospheric science departments in the nation. It’s time for the future weather-people of the world to develop an artificial cloud that can dump buckets of rain and clear out all the evil pollen floating around in the air. The obvious issue is where the water will come from. Well, if they pull the water from a local reservoir, there will be no water lost as it will fall and then drain into the same body it came from. This is clearly a win-win situation.

The only other reasonable option to limit sneezing and sniffling is to cut down the trees and plants that release the allergens into the air. So, if the UC Davis think-tank can’t come up with this rain machine, they’d better get their clippers and saws ready to go. We allergy sufferers aren’t going to take it anymore.

This may all be an overreaction. Allergies are probably the most annoying thing in the world. There is no simple relief, and unlike a cold, we don’t know when or if they will go away. So allergies, please and respectfully fuck off.

Thirsty (for knowledge) Thursday

Applying for Grad School

Thinking about applying for graduate school? Whatever your interests are, the decision to go to graduate school is a very serious one, so be sure to think long and hard before committing yourself to a program. Nationally, at least half of all students who begin graduate degree programs fail to finish.  On the other hand, a graduate degree may open up many more career options and increase your salary level quite significantly.

If you have decided that graduate school is the right choice for you, there are a number of great resources to help you prepare, polish your resume and tell you what to expect during the interview. On the UC Davis campus, the Pre-Graduate Advising Center, the Internship and Career Center (ICC) and the Undergraduate Research Center are all wonderful places to start. Our campus also has numerous advising departments for specific fields of graduate study, such as the health professions and business.

Most grad schools require some sort of graduate entrance examination (GRE, MCAT, LSAT, etc.), which will likely take some serious preparation and maybe a few separate attempts on your part. Thus, it is very helpful to look into schools you are interested in very early on and begin preparing yourself for those tests. Be sure to leave yourself enough time to retake the test in case you are not happy with your first score. You can purchase materials to help you study and even take classes to improve your scores.  Be sure to keep an eye out for the many free practice tests and classes offered on campus!

While each school is unique, most graduate school applications require transcripts, letters of recommendation, test scores and a personal statement. The personal statement is most often the key to your invitation for an interview and is thus worth revising over and over again. Depending on the prompt, the questions may be rather vague or difficult to answer, so it is not a bad idea to look for sample essays written by students admitted to your target program.  Be sure to keep your personal statement realistic and true to yourself because it is often the source of many interview questions.

Letters of recommendation are also a major part of the process of applying to graduate school and you should start thinking about these very early on. When considering who to approach for letters of recommendation, keep in mind that the person writing your letters will need to explain why you are an incredible candidate for the graduate program to which you are applying. In most cases, it is very helpful if he or she can cite a significant relationship or experience with you to exemplify your stellar qualities. Approach everyone that you are thinking about asking early so that they will not feel pressed to simply get out any old letter and so that you will have time to find other options should someone say “no.”

Get started early and good luck on that application!

Solano and Orchard Parks Apartment Complexes to close in the near future

Family and graduate student housing apartment complexes Orchard and Solano Parks will be closing in 2014 and 2016, respectively.

This separation of closure is to facilitate a transition for existing graduate students living on campus. These complexes are managed by UC Davis Student Housing and will be redeveloped.

This means that properties will be closed, demolished and replaced by a new building to serve a similar purpose, said Ramona Hernandez, director for business services in Student Housing.

 “Orchard and Solano are old, antiquated buildings,” Hernandez said in an e-mail. “They are in need of many improvements due to life cycle, such as: structural improvements due to dry rot, waste water plumbing line replacement, water supply line replacement, window replacement, roof replacement, appliance replacement, furnace replacement and electrical upgrades.”

Solano Park will be redeveloped and returned to the campus for other use.

In lieu of the closing complexes Student Housing is currently looking for a third-party developer to build, own and manage an apartment complex for families and single graduate students at the Castilian residence halls, which were closed in June 2011, according to Hernandez.

The Castilian Redevelopment project will open up with 250 spaces for graduate students in time for the closure of Orchard Park in 2014.

Solano Park is located at the southeast corner of campus and Orchard Park is located at the northwest corner. Both complexes have at least 200 unfurnished buildings with amenities that include laundry and storage space facilities, an office and a community center.

According to the Student Housing website, Solano Park has a deposit of $150. A two-bedroom costs about $838 per month and a one-bedroom costs about $716 a month. At Orchard Park, the cost of a two-bedroom is also $838 per month and there is no one-bedroom apartments. These costs are expected to rise next year from $838 to $850 per month.

The Orchard Park and Solano Park apartment complexes are popular among families and graduate students because of their affordability, close proximity to campus and safe environments.

“I think the most attractive aspects of Solano Park would be the location, price and community feeling,” said Daniel Moglen, a linguistics graduate student who showed interest in living at Solano Park. “I’ve looked at the Davis rental market quite a bit, and haven’t found anything that matches the value of the Parks.”

Because of these amenities there typically is a long waiting list. Priority is given to students with children first, married/domestic couples second, graduate students sans children third and undergraduate students sans children last.

Moglen is a part of a focus group that met up with Yackzan Group, Inc., a potential developer for the Castilian project, last week to discuss the necessities of graduate students who will be living at Castilian.

Yackzan is a local land development and property management company and the other company that could potentially develop Castilian is a huge billion dollar enterprise, said Moglen.

“We currently manage over 300 residential units across Davis and Sacramento communities,” the Yackzan website stated. “Our goal is to provide excellent service and to take the time necessary to understand the unique needs of our clients.”

“The needs that we [grad students] have are different from those of undergrads in terms of housing,” Moglen said. “It is not uncommon for grad students to have spouses and/or children, and we are older too, so our needs are different.”

Discussions of the layout of the proposed apartment, rent, car/bike parking and other amenities were brought to the table in which Yackzan was attentive of, Moglen said.

Affordable housing is a prominent issue among many students and the closing of these affordable housing units raises some concern on the future existence of more affordable homes.

“Davis needs more affordable housing, and the University should be on the forefront of providing and advocating affordable housing opportunities to students,” Moglen said. “With the attempted closure of the Domes and the construction of West Village, this has not been apparent.”

MEE YANG can be reached at city@theaggie.org