53.3 F
Davis

Davis, California

Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 1068

ASUCD senators examine 2012-13 budget

This past weekend, ASUCD senators discussed the $11.1 million budget for the 2012-13 year. The budget hearings lasted three days, and senators made decisions about the funding of the different ASUCD units.

Writers from The California Aggie attended the three-day meeting and compiled a summary of events.

Friday

Friday’s meeting was called to order at 5:16 p.m. The senate first discussed Unitrans.

“It’s going to be a very solid budget,” said ASUCD President Rebecca Sterling.

Unitrans has a $4.5 million budget, half of which comes from student fees, with the other coming from external sources.

Unitrans General Manager Anthony Palmere said that they are working on some big projects, including remodeling the Memorial Union (MU) bus terminal, adding a new west gate to control traffic and reconstructing the east side of Hutchinson Drive to have two lanes instead of one lane for buses to go through.

“We’re in excellent shape,” Palmere said. “The longer we can go without drawing from our fee reserve, the longer we can go without a fee increase.”

The ASUCD Coffee House, including the South Cafe and the CoHo to Go, was discussed next. The budget passed without major changes.

“The cafe is doing very well; we’re very happy with the daily traffic,” said Darin Schluep, front-of-the-house manager of the CoHo. “Sales have been good.”

However, there was a long discussion about the role of Creative Media in promoting the CoHo.
ASUCD previously decided that each unit would allocate a certain percentage of their advertising dollars to Creative Media. However, the CoHo was not one of the units to do so. After going back and forth, it was decided that Coulson and the rest of the CoHo managing team would have more time to decide, since it was rude to put them on the spot to make a decision then and there. Some senators argued that the CoHo doesn’t need to advertise since it’s so well-known, but others argued that it would help to build a stronger social media platform to promote deals and specials for students.
Next, the meeting moved to discuss the Aggie ReStore. The Aggie ReStore, a new unit created earlier in the year, was allocated $1,140 more for next year so they could create the job of Donations Manager.

“We strongly believe that this unit can break even,” said undergraduate Creative Director Loni Coelho.

The senate then moved on to discuss the Creative Media budget. For next year, Creative Media added new graphic artist positions and computer programming positions, which increased their salary total from $88,203 to $121,088 for the 2012-13 year. Sheehan suggested that they increase the amount of graphic designers further, but the motion did not pass in a 6-5-1 vote.

The table then opened the Cal Aggie Camp budget. The transportation line item was increased from $16,000 to $18,000 for the upcoming year. The budget was ultimately increased from last year, going from $67,262 to $69,212.

The table ended Friday night with a discussion of The Pantry’s budget. Most notably, The Pantry’s budget received an increase in the telephone and computer budget, because the unit previously did not have either. The budget closed at an approved $7,354.

The Campus Center for the Environment budget was opened and closed without any changes.

Project Compost’s budget was then opened. It closed with an expense total of $12,135.

The City/County Affairs budget was discussed.

Next, the Post Office budget was opened. The biggest change made was that the salary for assistant director was cut from $2,961 to $1,449, because they will not be having the assistant director work over the summer.

The Post Office budget was closed and the meeting was adjourned at 10:24 p.m.

Saturday

Budget hearings were called to order on Saturday morning at 11:15 a.m.

Budget hearings began on Saturday with a discussion of the Refrigerator Services budget.

The senate discussed the successes and importance of the unit. The biggest change was that the services rendered line item was increased from $5,000 to $7,750 for the upcoming year.
The budget closed with an expense total of $33,099.
The senate then moved on to discuss the AggieTV budget. No drastic changes were made from last year.
The KDVS budget was then opened. The senators had some issues with specific line items, but could not change them because the KDVS budget is approved by the Campus Media Board. After some discussion the budget was closed. According to multiple senators, this budget will likely be reopened at the senate meeting this Thursday, where it will probably be rejected and sent back to the Media Board.
Then, the Experimental College was discussed. In a reduction from last year’s budget of $128,888, the budget was closed at $110,876.

The director of Bike Barn explained that their spending would decrease after they digitize their workflow through Creative Media. They announced that with the start of Fall Quarter 2012, incoming students can buy and customize bicycles online.

The budget closed with an expense total of $515,066.

The California Aggie’s budget was then discussed. The California Aggie’s budget did not change much from the 2011-12 budget, and was closed quickly.

Senators then moved on to discuss the Entertainment Council.

The CoHo shows were cancelled due to the odd venue capacity.

A Cellphone Recharge line item was introduced as well, because the Entertainment Council no longer has phones. This way, students can use their cellphones to do Entertainment Council work, and be reimbursed.

Senate also voted to increase the Assistant Director’s salary to $2,600 in a 9-2-1 vote.

Entertainment Council’s expense budget was ultimately reduced in comparison to the 2011-12 year, decreasing from $71,148 to $66,982.

The STS/Tipsy Taxi budget was opened and closed without much discussion. The budget did not change drastically from the 2011-12 year.

The senate then moved on to discuss the budget of Aggie Threads. Aggie Threads, a new unit this year, will now have its own budget and no longer be connected to Campus Copies/Classical notes.

“Aggie Threads has been wildly successful,” said ASUCD Controller Melanie Maemura.

Once again, there was discussion about the role that Creative Media would play in regard to publicity for the unit. Goss added a Creative Media Recharge line item to the budget, which would be adjusted when decisions about Creative Media were made in the future.

The Aggie Threads budget closed with an expense total of $40,325.

Next, the table discussed the Campus Copies/Classical Notes budget. The expense budget was reduced from $124,431 in the 2011-12 year to $86,176 for next year. Ryan Hagens, the director of Campus Copies/Classical Notes, said that part of the reason for the reduction is that they are moving many of their services online. He also said that it was important that ASUCD considered the fact that Campus Copies/Classical Notes was no longer mainly a money-making unit, and it was turning into more of a service unit. Hagens said the reason for this is because more and more professors are podcasting and there is a change in students’ needs.

The Campus Copies/Classical Notes budget also had a Creative Media Recharge line item added.

The senate then discussed the budget for Picnic Day.

Unit director Jennifer Mappus said that each Picnic Day director is different when it comes to deciding which line items to take money from for different purchases.

Overall, the Picnic Day expense budget was increased from the 2011-12 year, from $33,573 to $37,316. However, they also proposed a $3,000 increase in income. Mappus said that she thought the Picnic Day glasses would sell well next year, and she projected an increase in income because Mappus knows Picnic Day can do it.

The table also discussed staff development, and Goss said he doesn’t like the fact that staff development in many units gets so much money. Mappus explained that staff development is very important for Picnic Day, and it really does matter if volunteers and employees get along with the people they are working with.

The senate closed the Picnic Day budget and opened the Lobby Corps budget.

For next year, Lobby Corps cut two positions and added a new one titled Field Director.

There was some confusion about the new position, because originally City/County Affairs had said they would pay for half of their salary, but then they decided they didn’t need the position.

The budget for transportation was also increased from the 2011-12 year, so Lobby Corps could afford to send more students to the capitol to lobby.

After closing the Lobby Corps budget, the senators moved on to discuss the Whole Earth Festival (WEF) budget.

WEF Director Anne Litak said that Whole Earth always needs more money, but they have come to accept that they have to go to outside sources to get it.

Litak said that she was in talks with people to start re-doing the long-range plan for WEF so they could reorganize the way money was spent and make it more efficient.

After the Whole Earth Festival budget was closed, the senate then moved on to open University Affairs. For the 2012-13 year there was a decrease in the expenses of the unit, from $2,629 for the 2011-12 year, to $1,104. This was due to the fact that the voter registration line item was moved to City/County Affairs. Goss increased the projected income to $1,200, as he said it was possible that they would be receiving that much money from CalPIRG for rent space.

University Affairs was closed and the senators continued on to talk about the Vice President’s budget.

Vice President Yena Bae was very passionate about her Campus Safety line item, and said she would be using it to increase different kinds of campus safety, including holding a campus safety forum.

Student Led Education (SLED) was cut, because Bae said that no one used that money last year. The senate chose to cut $125 from the Campus Safety line item, as they felt that the line item was almost never used every year.

The senate closed the Vice President’s budget at $10,713.

The meeting adjourned at 10:31 p.m.

Sunday
Sunday’s meeting was called to order at 11:11 a.m.

The senators began Sunday with a discussion of the President’s budget.

Debate arose from the special projects budget.

Senator Goss defended the idea that the budget of $3,000 was too high for special projects, and that this money was “supercharged” by money taken away from cutting units and positions which he felt are the more important aspect of ASUCD. He proposed a $2,300 budget which he felt was a fair compromise.

Sterling argued that she wanted the President’s office to be a hub for action and should have the means to get things done, but Goss furthered his argument with “money does not translate into action.”

After an hour-long discussion, the senate made a motion for a $2,600 budget with the $400 going to Lobby Corps, which was passed.
The General Administration budget was opened and closed without much discussion.

The Elections Committee line item was cut from $6,500 to $6,000 and the extra $500 was split between the Ethnic and Cultural Affairs Commission (ECAC) and the Gender and Sexualities Commission (GASC).

The Aggie Public Arts Committee budget was reduced to $0, and senators decided that the committee should come to the senate for funding for specific projects.

The Student Police Relations Chair salary was cut from $49/week to $42/week in a 9-1-1 vote.

The senate then re-opened the Picnic Day budget. Some senators said they were concerned that they were being “over-cautious” with the budget for Picnic Day. Sheehan said that his goal was to cut $500 from Picnic Day so that they could give money to other units who needed it.

After the Picnic Day budget was closed, the senate opened the General Programs budget.

At this point, Maemura announced a surplus of $1,812, which she attributed to Aggie Threads.

The senate then discussed the Aggie Pack budget, which was set to suffer cuts. Anguiano argued that Aggie Pack was only facing cuts when it came to material goods such as T-shirts and tube socks. Furthermore, she said that they had misappropriated money in the past.

Senator Kabir Kapur also argued that Aggie pride should be about spirit and not free things.

However, Han argued that Aggie Pack puts on homecoming, and would be able to have a better homecoming week if they didn’t have to deal with the $1,000 cut to the homecoming line item. Padgett said that material goods have intrinsic value.

After a long discussion, the budget was not changed.

The table then opened the Grants budget, and began to discuss the Safe Boats line items.

Goss said that Safe Boats can be privately funded, that Houseboats is a special interest only benefiting a select few students and that Houseboats is not an educational experience. Kapur said he would like to see a reduction in funding to give Safe Boats a transitional period toward financial independence.

A representative from Student Health and Wellness said that they do not want to associate ASUCD with that type of activity.

Han said that they must provide safety for students regardless of what they do.

Gilbert said that ASUCD in principle does the same thing to “subsidize dangerous activity” when they provide condoms to students. He said that student safety must come first.

The Safe Boats discussion continued.

“I don’t think I should be funding temporary insurance for other students. I don’t think it’s my responsibility to fund that,” said a member of the audience.

Sterling said that the matter of Safe Boats funding isn’t about “owing” the greek system anything.

“The goal is to have a diverse budget and to reach out to everyone in our student budget in every way,” Sterling said.

Senator Paul Min said that he did not support funding Safe Boats.

“If we really do care about student safety we should be discouraging this practice.  Funding Safe Boats is encouraging this practice,” Min said.

Many audience members were concerned about the idea that Houseboats was very exclusive, and mainly for the greek system.

“My money is not going to pay for students’ exclusive notions of safety,”  said former ASUCD senator Miguel Espinoza.

Senator Bottoms said that he supported funding Safe Boats.

“I might not be a member of this event and I might not necessarily agree with it, but [I want to ensure their safety],” he said.

Multiple audience members said they believed that Houseboats promotes an environment of homophobia, racism, sexism and discrimination.

Ultimately Safe Boats funding was reduced to $370 for Safe Boats and $130 for Safe Boat education, from the original proposal of $1,120.

The senate then discussed the $500 surplus that they had, and decided to refund GASC and ECAC to their 2011-12 levels of funding.
Internal Affairs Commission chair Sergio Cano asked for a line item for an archiving job, so ASUCD could keep track of what happens in the association and be able to refer back to former years. The Student Government History line item was added for $66.
The table discussed opening the Creative Media budget again, but ultimately decided to wait to discuss it at Thursday’s senate meeting.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:56 p.m.

THE CAMPUS NEWS DESK can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Student fees pay for different aspects of campus

The total amount due of UC Davis undergraduates for student fees during the 2011-2012 school year was $15,123.36 ($5,041.12 per quarter), $11,220 ($3,740 per quarter) of which is for tuition. Fees increased by 15.6 percent since last fall.
With the exception of the tuition (educational fee), $3,903.36 annually ($1,301.12 per quarter) is used for services such as Unitrans ($6/quarter), student health ($44/quarter), facilities safety ($22/quarter) and ASUCD ($35/quarter).
In 1940, though student fees were significantly lower, it was difficult to find exactly what the fees were paying for when the first study on incidental fees occurred. During that year, fees also increased from $13.50 to $20. It was suspected that the money went to library enhancement, sports facilities and health services.
The UC Council on Student Fees (CSF) is organized to address systemwide matters about student registration and service fees and is an advocate for UC students and the services provided to them through student fees. CSF represents the Student Services and Fees Administrative Advisory Committee (SSFAAC).

SSFAAC is responsible for creating and directing sums of money that comprise the Student Service Fee (Registration Fee) which every student must pay each quarter, so that it is of the greatest benefit to students.

“The Committee may make recommendations to the Vice Chancellor — Student Affairs on Registration Fee funded units both within and outside of Student Affairs,” the Procedures of the SSFAAC stated.

Student Service Fee

Vice Chancellor’s Representative at the SSAAFC Nancy Flagg explained that the Student Service Fee ($324 per quarter) garnered a projected $25,300,000 this year, $1,800,000 of which is restricted for student mental health services.

“If there are changes, it’s the UC Regents who make that decision and we’re not aware of any changes at this time,” Flagg said.
The fee was broken into sums of varying values, including $3,960,000 for the Dutton Hall debt service, Memorial Union (MU) and student facility maintenance, $372,000 for Administration & Resource Management, $30,000 for the Campus Community Relations (Hate Free Initiative), $6,000 for peer advising, $260,000 for the Mondavi Center, $311,000 for University Relations (commencement, publications), $156,000 for ASUCD, $2,004,000 for campus athletics, $746,000 for campus recreation, $266,000 for Student Judicial Affairs,  $206,000 for Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Resource Center (LGBTRC) and $147,000 for the Women’s Resource & Research Center (WRRC).
Other services that are covered in the Student Service Fee are MU fees, Student Health and Counseling, Center for Child and Family Studies (CAES),  the College of Engineering (Livermore Student Services), UC Sacramento Center, Graduate Student Association (GSA), Information Education Technology (IET), student activities and tutoring at the School of Law, Cross Cultural Center (CCC), Internship & Career Center, Student Academic Success Center, Registrar and Office of Technology, Student Disability Center, SSFAAC and Health Benefits and Retirement System.
“Student fees are critical for providing new student facilities and programs.  State general funds cannot be used for student facilities and the Student Service Fee is not enough to finance major new initiatives or facilities,” Flagg said.
Campus Expansion Initiative

According to Flagg $15,300,000 is expected to be collected in the 2012-2013 school year for the Campus Expansion Initiative (CEI). The CEI fee is projected to increase 1.62 percent ($2.87 increase per quarter.) The new quarterly fee will break up $179.88 per student to cover athletic scholarships, the Coffee House (CoHo) expansion, Unitrans, Intramural activities, the Student Community Center (SCC), Student Health Center and Return-to-Aid.

“Without the students having chosen to assess themselves the fees, there would be no Student Community Center, Student Recruitment & Retention Center, ARC or new Student Health Center,” Flagg said.

The Facilities and Campus Enhancements Initiative and the Legal Education Enhancement and Access Program

The Facilities and Campus Enhancements (FACE) Initiative and the Legal Education Enhancement and Access Program (LEEAP) Initiative are projected to collect about $13,000,000 in 2012-2013. FACE and LEEAP fees are specifically intended to improve student activities, intercollegiate athletics and recreation.

These fees are used to pay for the multi-use stadium debt, Schaal Aquatic Center, Activities & Recreation Center (ARC), Equestrian Center, The Pavilion, Intramurals/Sports Clubs, the Student Recruitment and Retention Center (SRRC) and Return-to-Aid fees. For the FACE fee, $134.83 per student is allocated per quarter and $163.41 per semester is allocated for the LEEAP fee. In 2004, it was decided that a portion of funds that were allocated for the ARC would be redirected to the multi-use stadium. The initiatives have not been subjected to fee increases and are reviewed by SSFAAC before they are finalized.

“SSFAAC is a great opportunity for students to understand where their student fees are being used and to have an influence on the use of fees,” said Katrina Forrest, an Undergraduate SSFAAC Committee Chair. “It allows the committee members, made of undergraduates, graduates, law students, staff, and faculty, to view various departments and assess their budgets. We are a diverse group of individuals that collectively voice the student body as a whole.”

Student Activities and Services Initiative Fee

Enacted in 1995, the Student Activities and Services Initiative Fee (SASI) is used for the same services as the FACE and LEEAP fees but is subject to a 2.60 percent increase ($2.82 increase per quarter) in 2012-2013. The fee is $111.61 per quarter and is expected to collect $8,700,000 in the new school year.

Forrest said that it requires two quarters to review all the information and table members must then vote on proposed fee increases.
“Our decisions and advice are taken into account by the Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs, Fred Wood. In the past he has always listened and followed our recommendations,” she said.
According to the 2011-2012 Student Fees Fact Sheet, most grants will pay for student fees for those who qualify. Middle-income grants will cover all or a portion of any fee increases.
MUNA SADEK can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Putting Mad Cow Disease in perspective

A cow in central California was recently discovered to have a rare degenerative neurological disease. Tests showed that the cow had a “sporadic” form of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The discovery caused concern after the initial, unconfirmed tests were reported because there is a “classical” form of BSE, which has killed over 200 people worldwide since 1996. No human deaths have ever been linked to the sporadic form of BSE.

Both forms of BSE are also called “Mad Cow Disease” by the general public, since cows that contract the disease lose normal neural functioning.

Sporadic BSE occurs seemingly at random, possibly by genetic mutation, but does not transmit between animals.

“It’s a single animal and they [the sporadic cases] happen in different places around the world in random events,” said James Cullor, who is a professor in the department of population health and reproduction in the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine.

Classical BSE is unique in that it is not transmitted by viruses or bacteria, but rather by proteins called “prions.”

“The normal form of the protein in the brain loses its structural integrity and begins to take on a different shape. This leads to changes in the brain and causes lesions,” said Terry Lehenbauer, the director of the UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, which is located in Tulare, Calif.

Veterinarians have concluded that prions are transmitted between cows when cows eat cow brains or cow spinal cord tissue — a type of cannibalistic feeding method which was banned in the United Kingdom in 1996 and in the U.S. in 1997.

When BSE crosses over to the human species, it becomes known as “variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease” (vCJD). There is also a sporadic form in humans (sCJD), which typically only occurs in older people and is often mistaken for Alzheimer’s disease.

“[Sporadic CJD] occurs spontaneously in about one out of 1 million people around the world,” said John Maas, an extension veterinarian in the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine. On average, 37 people in California contract the sporadic form of CJD every year. Two reported cases received widespread media attention recently in Marin County.

During the prior international human epidemic of vCJD starting in 1996, BSE was typically transmitted to humans by the consumption of beef sausage or processed meats that included cow brain or cow spinal cord material. Those who ate unprocessed cow flesh or drank milk were never at risk since BSE cannot be transmitted through muscle or milk.

Most of the human deaths caused by vCJD have occurred in the UK, where the public health problem was first discovered in 1996, with other deaths occurring elsewhere in Europe, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Canada and the U.S.

Of the three U.S. deaths, none were likely due to the consumption of U.S. beef. All three had most likely contracted the disease while living overseas.

Strict regulatory controls have been instituted in the U.S. and other countries since the discovery of the variant form of CJD in 1996. The short average lifespan of U.S. beef cattle is another reason that BSE is not spread in the U.S.

“Most cattle consumed in the U.S. are less than two years of age and the prions in cattle with BSE take at least 30 months to develop,” Maas said.

Because of regulatory controls and the fact that BSE has never entered the U.S. food supply, Cullor stresses that there is less than one chance in one billion of getting the disease here.

“One part per billion is 1 inch on the circumference of the earth, so if you parachuted down and landed on the equator, what’s your chance of landing on that particular inch of the equator?” Cullor asked.

BRIAN RILEY can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

EDITOR’S NOTE: The print edition of this story said that Creutzfeldt-Jakob was discovered in 1996. This article has been updated to say that it is a variant that was discovered in 1996. The Aggie regrets the error.

Five-million-dollar project lends Jewish students a new home

0
Fifteen years of designing and 14 months of construction later, the sprawling 9,700-square-foot Davis Hillel House recently opened its doors to the community.

Located at 328 A St. in Downtown Davis, the Hillel House has been dedicated to leading donor Sam Len, who passed away in January.

The house offers students a convenient stop of comfort close to campus.

“It is exactly as I envisioned it to be,” said Capital Campaign Manager Raphael Moore.  “It’s a home for students who need a warm place, a listening ear and a warm meal.”

Three levels are fully equipped with the only kosher kitchen in Yolo County, a café with wireless internet, a solar electric system, 14 toilets, an underground ballroom, religious spaces, meeting areas, elevators (making it wheelchair accessible), a den and a dumbwaiter.

“It really is a home away from home for students,” Moore said.

The café provides whiteboards, tables, chairs and a developing student-run bakery.

“The café is definitely my favorite room,” Moore said. “Café Hillel is a wonderful place for students; it’s a combination of everything: a place to eat, meet, chat and relax.”

As a UC Davis student 25 years ago, Moore was an involved member of Hillel when it used to be a 1,100-square-foot bungalow with a single bathroom.

“I didn’t feel like it was a very good Jewish home; it didn’t meet the students’ needs that it had promised,” Moore said.

In an effort to revamp the house into a place where both Jewish students and non-Jewish students could interact, study and relax, Moore joined the board of directors 10 years later.
“After 15 years of designing what I dreamed to be the perfect house, I know where every outlet, every light switch and door should be,” Moore said.
The house was designed to be eco-friendly and is one of the first “green” Hillel buildings in the country.
“It is up to LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) standards in terms of green technology and green building,” said Hillel’s Programming Director, Maiya Chard-Yaron.
The facility provides spaces that can be rented out to the community for a myriad of events.
“The 625-square-foot commercial kosher kitchen allows us to host Bar and Bat Mitzvahs, weddings, graduation parties, anything you want,” said Hunter Launer, one of four student members on the board of directors and a senior neurology, physiology and biology major at UCD.
“Because the Dining Commons are not kosher, this kitchen also accommodates religious students thinking about coming to Davis,” Launer said.
In an effort to provide students with the option of using their swipes at the new kosher kitchen, the board of directors is working with the university to develop a plausible system.
The house already provides what they claim to be their “famous kosher Tuesday lunches,” which are lunches free to any student of any faith.
“We have students from various religious backgrounds who attend our programs or help plan programs here,” Chard-Yaron said. “We do like to partner up with other organizations on campus as well.”
And for those who do not have a place to go, Hillel is free to students of any religious background. No membership is required and their doors are open 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday.
“Obviously, there are a lot of Jewish-oriented events. You do not have to be Jewish to get involved,” Launer said. “Some of our most active members are not Jewish, such as Chris Brown – not the singer – a fourth-year student, who runs our bakery.”
“My goal here is to offer opportunities to students and to work with them on planning events and creating community,” Chard-Yaron said.
The Hillel House also offers students a paid internship program, and they are currently taking applications. The deadline is Friday.

“My hope for the future is that it will be used the way it was built to be used,” Moore said.

ANI UCAR can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

Engineers Without Borders work to make a difference in international communities

The Engineers Without Borders (EWB) chapter at UC Davis is stepping up to make a difference in the lives of communities worldwide.

EWB is a nonprofit organization renowned for helping developing communities around the world with their engineering needs. The UC Davis EWB chapter offers students the unique chance to use their skills to do engineering design work abroad before graduation.

“EWB is community-driven. We work with communities on every aspect of a project, including training during construction and after something is built. There is bound to be local knowledge that is shared with the students and the students share some engineering knowledge. So we trade skills back and forth,” said EWB UC Davis Chapter President  Amelia Holmes.

The UC Davis EWB chapter is currently working on three projects in Uganda, Bolivia and Guatemala.  In the summer, students will travel to Uganda and Bolivia to implement their designs.

The project in Uganda is in its final stages, where students have built a public latrine system and rainwater catcher system. In Bolivia, students will partake in an assessment trip to create a distribution system to deliver water to a water-scarce community. The newest project in Guatemala is just starting out, but is potentially a huge project for students as students will work with a community to deal with water management in terms of sanitation and waste management, Holmes said.

First-year civil engineering major and undergraduate liaison for the UC Davis EWB chapter Imann Taghavi plans to work on the Guatemala project with the prospects of being able to see the project from start to finish.

“It inspired me, this opportunity, to actually get hands-on experience and see the real world, especially so early in my college career. It’s really valuable,” he said.

With an emphasis on community, students not only are given the chance to use their engineering knowledge, but also become immersed in different cultures around the world.

“We are going to a different country, so the culture will be greatly different. There is a cultural divide, so bridging that difference and gaining that other perspective is valuable as well,” Taghavi said.

The EWB chapter at UC Davis is throwing its first annual Wine into Water silent auction and wine-tasting event to support its international community projects. The fundraiser is on Saturday from 3 to 7 p.m. at the Davis Buehler Alumni Center Moss Patio.

“All the proceeds are going to be going to funding projects for EWB. It’s the first annual, and we’re hoping to make it something that perpetuates all of us here,” said UC Davis EWB chapter vice president and environmental engineer graduate student Taylor Warren.

Tickets are $20 for 10 tastes and available online at brownpapertickets.com/event/244667.

The next general meeting for EWB is Monday, May 21 in the third-floor conference room of Ghausi Hall, and all majors are welcome to attend.

“The projects have so many different aspects to their completion. A whole variety of expertise is required for it, not just engineering. There are so many facets to getting the project done, so non-engineering majors are highly valued as well,” Taghavi said.

For more information about EWB or the event, visit the UC Davis Engineers Without Borders Facebook page.

MICHELLE MURPHY can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

CSU students end nine-day hunger strike, faculty authorizes strikes

Beginning May 2, a dozen California State University (CSU) students held a hunger strike across six campuses, vowing to continue fasting until their demands for a five-year tuition moratorium, cutbacks on executive and administration pay and more freedom of expression on campuses were met. After nine days, the students called it quits after negotiations came to naught.

The hunger strike was organized by Students for Quality Education (SQE), taking place at the Dominguez Hills, Fullerton, Long Beach, Northridge, Sacramento and San Bernardino campuses. Assisted by the California Faculty Association (CFA), SQE is a student organization built upon upholding educational rights in public higher education.

CSU Chancellor Charles Reed spoke with the hunger strikers on the topic of their demands on May 4.

CSU Media Relations Specialist Erik Fallis said they were deeply concerned about the fasting students.

“As the CSU, we have expressed deep concern about the health of the students and the academic welfare of the students participating in the hunger strike because frankly, if you’re not taking in nourishment, and you have to go in and take a test or write a paper, that is not going to be good for you academically,” Fallis said.

Fallis said the CSU urges students to express themselves in a way that doesn’t invite harm and risk to their healths and academics.

On May 2, the CFA, a faculty union representing 23,000 CSU faculty members across all 23 CSU campuses, voted in favor of rolling two-day strikes beginning Fall 2012. These strikes will initiate if the CFA and CSU fail to meet a labor agreement.

“In terms of the faculty staff, we’ve been in negotiations for two years now on a contract for CSU faculty,” said CFA spokesperson Brian Ferguson. “The management in the CSUs has demanded some pretty hefty concessions from faculty in terms of class sizes, working conditions and even pay.”

Ferguson said the CSU’s demands would negatively impact the faculty’s ability to provide education in the classrooms and provide students the ability to get the kind of education they came to the CSUs to pursue.

Fallis said a bargaining meeting with CFA took place on May 5. CFA walked out amid unresolved issues.

“The thing that is frustrating for us is that we have heard from the CFA at the bargaining table, and their positions have been very different than what they’ve stated publicly and to students,” Fallis said. “We have come to an agreement on some level of other issues.”

Ferguson said the bargaining discussion breakdown was a reflection of one-sided thinking that the deal was in one place, and the other side having a different idea on that.

“We think communication breakdown is partially to blame for how we got to this point so far,” Ferguson said. “But we’re remaining hopeful we can get the deal done.”

May 17 is the set date for the next bargaining meeting. Ferguson said most of the faculty issues are low-cost or no-cost, although the CFA understands the economy and fiscal implications that are affecting the CSUs.

“From our perspective, the quality education issues are the main thrust at the moment,” Ferguson said. “We think that at a time when student fees continue to rise year after year, when faculty and staff are laid off, every dollar that’s coming into our institution is valuable and should be focused in the classroom. Students aren’t here to fund executives, they aren’t here to be an ATM.”

Fallis said the CSU is looking at other options to avoid an additional tuition increase. He said some of the options were drastic – the closing of a campus – but they wanted to to be able to lay out all conceivable options to deal with their additional $2 million cut.

“For the CSU, our funding from all outside resources is coming to about equal to state funds,” Fallis said. “When the state cut out a third of our state funding, that essentially meant they were cutting the floor out from our entire budget.”

Fallis said the CSU agrees with the students concerned about executive compensation.

“Anyone who has been in the executive position since 2007, or started in that position afterwards, has not gotten an increase from their starting salary,” he said. “When majority of our employees furloughed, so did our president and our chancellor. So the executives took the same 10 percent cut that was asked of others in the university.”

According to Fallis, the executive compensation policy states any new hires cannot receive higher salaries than their predecessors in state or tuition funds.

“If the Board of Trustees or a campus decides they want to pick a candidate that would require more funds to bring into the university, the only way they can do that is through private dollars, which would be raised for that purpose,” Fallis said. “Ten percent would be an absolute limit on private dollars.”

Ferguson said the CFA hopes negotiations between the CSU and CFA can eventually reach an agreement.

“If negotiations continue to go poorly, there’s a very real possibility that the school may not reopen in the fall for 400,000 students,” Ferguson said. “We understand [students] are upset with how the chancellor and campus presidents have treated them poorly, and refused to honor many of their requests they’ve made to meet.”

CLAIRE TAN can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

Column: Attached at the hip

0

Once we no longer have to study or go to class or do any of that boring stuff, our time is freed up to date and have some good, old-fashioned, red-blooded sex. Our limited experiences from college aren’t a good representation of all the lovin’ that’s out there waiting for us. We don’t really know what our favorite kind of ice cream is until we’ve tried a bunch of different flavors. I hear the metaphor. I’m not implying that we turn into slutty whores but we really don’t know what we’re looking for until we’ve realized what it is we don’t want. Also, sex is fun as hell and completely natural so engage away!

One-night stands still have a negative connotation, but society views casual sex with a less discerning eye. Plus, denying feeding the beast every once in a while is a crime! Something we do need to deny, however, is heading home with a boning-buddy when we’re too inebriated. And trust me grads-to-be, I know we’re all well-versed in being completely shit-faced and doing bad things. Don’t. We’re guaranteed to make dumb sexual mistakes like going downtown or condom-less groin-bumping without proper questions being asked. You don’t want to wake up the next morning with herp on your lower derp.

If the sex is good but both parties don’t want anything serious, avoid the “friends with benefits” route. That doesn’t exist regardless of what Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis try to tell us. Getting the chance to knock your socks off without the pressure of appealing to their relationship needs? Sign me up! Too bad someone is guaranteed to grow feelings whether they admit it or not. We’ll come to see that everyone’s heart really lives in their penis or vagina.

At some point, we’ll tire of the hookups and seek something more substantial. Buy some courage and ask that person out for a cup of coffee instead of a dinner at a fancy restaurant. At night our inhibitions are lowered, there’s dim lighting and candlelit meals, alcohol is prevalent and sex is rampantly on the brain. With these out of the way, getting to know the other person will be easier. We’ll learn a lot more about others when our minds are only partially littered with thoughts of ripping each other’s clothes off.

Make sure to be as honest as possible during those first encounters but leave the crazy at home. We’ve all got our weird quirks and traits but don’t let them be the first things a date learns about you. They’re more inclined to think our neuroses are cute within the full context of our personality. Without the complete picture, we just come off as bat-shit crazy.

We have to remember to prioritize the importance of our flings in respect to our professional lives. If we’re fledgling and not settled financially, a new love interest can easily throw us off our game. Birds and butterflies and Taylor Swift songs will be flying around our heads pulling our focus from our work. Not to mention dating means a higher frequency of haircuts, manicures and paying for dinners. If rent looks like a problem this month, dating will make it worse.

Don’t be afraid to go out of your comfort zone, either. Date older people for a change. They’re typically smarter, more mature and over the hard partying, making them a nice respite from our friends who drag us out every weekend. Explore other ethnicities or people on different career paths. Dating those who are just like us is boring as hell. All the fun should come from learning about people with different life experiences and dissimilar histories than our own.

It’s time to make dating a serious sporting event. If you want more than the usual suspects, surround yourself with better suitors. Make sure the guy or girl you’re falling for has goals that line up with yours. Want years of traveling before having a couple of kids with your mate? Dating a med student about to start their surgical residency may not be ideal regardless of how perfect they are. There’s nothing wrong with bars and clubs for meeting people, either, but utilize dating sites with good success rates where we’re more likely to find people with corresponding goals. Dating and sex is a means to open the door to people we want to share our lives with. Better make sure they’re a good fit (I hear the pun).

JAZZ TRICE is single! Step one: Message him at jazztrice526@gmail.com or twitter.com/Jazz_Trice. Step two: Go on a coffee date with him.

Proposal suggests local control for UC campuses

With the continuing decrease in state funding to the University of California (UC) schools and subsequent tuition increases, several people have come up with alternative ways of generating revenue and controlling costs.

One such example is a proposal from the Center for Studies in Higher Education that states that the UC Regents delegate some responsibilities to the campus boards. The proposal was written by C. Judson King, director at the center, and UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert Birgeneau.

The publication of this proposal is provoking debate and it is clear that not all support it.

“With State funding now down to 10 percent of total revenue for the campuses, UC needs to generate funding from other (non-state) sources. Such money has to be generated at the level of individual campuses not at the all-university level,” King said.

He said this is the only way to preserve the UC’s public mission.

“These other sources include partnerships of various sorts, issue-specific giving, increased competitiveness to win grants and contracts, and entrepreneurial activities of various sorts including online education, all of which are highly specific to the individual campuses,” Birgeneau told The L.A. Times. “What the campuses would gain from creation of campus boards by the Regents is the flexibility, agility, and dedicated and specific knowledge of the campus that will enable generating those other sources in ways that are best for both the campus and the public mission.”

Since the campuses will still have to follow the broad UC guidelines, the applications and admissions rates to the various campuses should remain unchanged.

There is a further concern on how this proposal will affect tuition rates for in-state versus out-of-state tuition. King states that in-state tuition would stay within the limits set by the regents. However, if out-of-state and graduate and professional tuitions are delegated to the campuses that may result in higher fees at some and lower fees at other campuses because each campus would set the tuition to meet their goals and needs.

“We stated clearly in our article that, upon recommendation of the president, the regents would establish ‘tuition or allowable ranges (upper and lower limits) of tuition for undergraduates who are CA residents,’” Birgeneau also told The L.A. Times.

As to be expected, not all are in favor of the proposal and the changes it suggests. Robert Anderson, a UC Berkeley professor and the chairman of the statewide faculty senate, is strongly opposed to the proposal.

“Overall, I think it would result in an undesirable fragmentation of the UC system. I see little or no benefit in handling our budget challenges. I do not see how it would raise additional revenue or reduce costs. I fear it would be a vehicle for individual campus boards to directly lobby the governor and state legislature on behalf of their campuses and that this would harm the overall funding for the UC system,” Anderson said.

He further states that it is hard to predict the impact on individual campuses, but it might happen that the younger, less established campuses would benefit less. This is due to some benefit more established campuses would see by directly lobbying the governor and the legislature.

Conversely, King states that the proposal will be beneficial because it would be the first time that students were directly involved in the governance of their campus.

“It is not yet a matter of for or against. Our paper indicates that the goal is to start a discussion, and I believe that is happening,” King said.

“We are pleased that our efforts have begun a critical dialogue and discourse on these important issues that will impact California both now and decades into the future,” Birgeneau said in his interview with The L.A. Times.

PAAYAL ZAVERI can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

Column: Criminal mindless

0

First, some responses to questions by my devoted readers. No, I haven’t spoken with a New York City accent since sixth grade. Yes, “Hey Arnold!” is an accurate representation of my childhood, or at least the part about going to a public school known solely by a three-digit number. Yes, they’re real, and they’re spectacular! Now back to the show.

My favorite thing to read in The Aggie — besides my own column, which I read aloud to myself every night while gazing into a mirror — are the Campus Judicial Affairs reports. They’re fascinating! Part of it might be the same pleasure one gets from watching any of the dozens of crime procedural dramas on TV. The other is marveling at the lengths some people will go to to cheat. The audacity! The unoriginality! The utter stupidity!

Let’s get one thing straight: There is no way you can cheat that the teachers and TAs of this campus haven’t seen before or been trained to deal with. You name it, it’s been done. Countermeasures have been deployed. We know all your tricks. We know all your secrets. All your grades belong to us. You have no chance to pass this exam, take your time. Ha Ha Ha.

Most importantly, we know what the internet is. Wikipedia isn’t some secret website that only people below the drinking age are aware of. If you copy your essay text from an online resource, or even a previous year’s paper, rest assured that we will notice. How? Simple. Two types of students engage in plagiarism: Those too dumb to write a good essay on their own, and those unfamiliar with what does and does not constitute “plagiarism,” with the latter group often including foreign students from nations where copying and memorization is prized over independent thought and intellectual property rights. Both groups also tend to have bad grammar, weak writing styles and/or poor command of the English language, all of which will be reflected in the general shittiness of their essay … except the one paragraph that is unusually well-written and not made of Fail. Dead giveaway. Don’t try copying an entire essay, either. Learning and making improvement is possible; gaining fluency in a language you could barely speak a week ago is not.

While not all plagiarism is intentional, guilt in cases of exam cheating is less ambiguous. Copying someone else’s answers, getting someone to take your exam for you or using an illegal answer key is universally wrong. A countermeasure for this is having two versions of an exam during the same day and writing new exams each year. Making exams takes time and is a huge pain, which is why those students privileged enough to have access to test banks are dicks. I’m talking to you, frat boys. Bros. Broskis? Bronies? That sounds right. We know you have copies of our past exams, Brohans, because it’s the only explanation for you actually graduating with degrees in anything other than political science. I’m not saying you won’t get away with using them, but it’s definitely not cool, Brolaf. Broseph. Broammar Broddafi. Where was I?

Along with public speaking and doing your own laundry, essay crafting is one of the three skills you should not graduate college without having mastered. Alas, most students enter college woefully unprepared. I may be a stickler for grammar (every time the editors delete my serial commas as per AP Stylebook rules, I die a little inside), but I’m not complaining. Bad essays are bad, but the horrible ones are entertainment gold! Like surgeons who joke about dying patients to relieve stress, teachers joke about dim pupils. My advisor collects the worst sentences from student papers in a file that grows every year. It’s great fun to read, though there’s always the Damoclean fear that my words may end up there, too.

Aw, who am I kidding? If my grammar was bad, I wouldn’t be an Aggie columnist, right? Right, Brody? Broseidon? Brosophila brolanogaster? I’ll stop now.

MATAN SHELOMI has never actually seen “Hey Arnold!” but can be reached at mshelomi@ucdavis.edu.

Editorial: Some helpful ideas

0

The Memorial Union (MU) will be renovated some time in the near future, with plans including a remodeling of the East Wing, additional lounge space, an area for live entertainment and a pub.

The timeline for these renovations is still vague, as ASUCD is seeking input from students in various organizations.

The MU is a central place for students to eat, study and just mill about before classes, so a renovation could be a successful way to model the MU in students’ image. UC Davis has already seen this success with the ASUCD Coffee House (CoHo); a simple redesign and decent food and drink options has made it very popular with students.

Starting with simple solutions could be the best move. In the main halls of the MU, a good coat of paint would improve the now-blank expanses of wall. Matching this with a continuation of the CoHo theme and color scheme, or perhaps even a mural, could liven up the appearance of the MU immensely.

Another possible improvement would be the addition of a group study space. Griffin Lounge is a great quiet place to study, but a room in which to discuss moral relativism or assignments like group projects would prevent students from having to go all the way to Shields Library.

However, simple solutions are no fun. Let’s design our dream MU. The MU is somewhat naturally lit by the sun coming through the clear glass doors, but a skylight would brighten up the building better than that.

We just need to make sure we keep the skylight away from the nap room containing beds and hammocks. We’ve heard ideas for a dedicated nap room before, but something always seems to come up to keep it from happening. Building codes? Fire hazards? Come on, we’re college students; we don’t let anything keep us from having a good nap.

The nap room could present a problem, however. Imagine you wake up, groggy and disoriented. You check your phone for the time and realize that your bus is going to leave in 30 seconds! Well, that’s no problem if we install those moving walkways that you see at the airport from the MU doors to the Unitrans bus stop. Sleepy college students need only stumble out the door and let the walkway do the rest. The only problem with such a perfect scenario is that obesity rates on campus could rise, but it’s worth it.

We could also commission the engineering department to make a bunch of robot butlers, so that we could sit outside with our friends while the robot gets everyone’s coffee and burritos. If we make people pay the robot depending on the difficulty of the task, ASUCD could actually see a profit with this idea…

Oh, who are we kidding. A fresh paint job and maybe some student-drawn signs, a mural if we’re feeling fancy, should be enough for the MU.

Editorial board: Show me the green

0

Whole Earth Festival successfully completed its 43rd year this past weekend, once again allowing the people of Davis and our visitors to shamelessly glisten with sweat as we danced barefoot on the grass (glass-free) and freely exchanged cash for goods we could take home without making yet another contribution to the demise of a free society.

Yet, the best benefit Whole Earth bestows upon our campus and the greater Davis community is a glimpse of sustainability at a seemingly unattainable standard fully realized in all its re-usable, re-cyclable and re-plicable glory.

Whole Earth Festival shows us that zero-waste can be a reality, and we hope that the City of Davis will take this message and run with it to the compost bins and the recycling facilities.

Despite our earthy and green reputation given to us by our knack for bicycling and farmers markets, and supported by the University’s commitment to sustainability, there is a lot the city could do yet to actually live up to it.

Let’s start with the basics. No business should still be distributing Styrofoam anymore. Ever. Businesses still using plastic to-go boxes should switch to the paper boxes more and more downtown restaurants have already begun to utilize. Businesses that do use recyclable materials but cannot or do not recycle them should find a way to do so immediately.

More easy steps: Plastic bags need to be phased out. The best way to do that is for everyone to have reusable bags, and if you forget them (it happens) ask for paper instead. There is also no reason for anyone to buy plastic water bottles anymore. You’re wasting your money, and most of the time you’re drinking tap water anyway. You can even combine environmental sustainability and literacy by purchasing a $5 reusable bottle from the Shields Library.

And if businesses or individuals want to go the extra mile, they should look into composting. They can learn more about compost from campus’s Project Compost, whose members offer workshops and voluntarily devote their time to picking up trash around campus and take it to be composted on the Student Farms. Thanks, guys!

Campus is ahead of the city, minimizing the use of plastic bags in the Bookstore and participating in composting in the ASUCD Coffee House. Though there is still a long way to go, campus is already on the track to being waste-free by 2020.

At the rate the City of Davis is going, it will lag far behind campus in achieving the same goal. If Davis businesses need some incentive to catch up, let’s give them some. Encourage those businesses that currently do not use recyclable materials to start, and support those that already do.

It’s time the City of Davis puts their money where their mouth is, and customers should be doing the same.

ICC’s Countdown to Summer!

Welcome to week seven of the ICC’s Countdown to Summer!  Each week the Internship and Career Center (ICC) will highlight a task that will help you be prepared to land a job or internship by summer.  Breaking the process down to weekly tasks will make it less daunting and will yield success. Trust us, people are getting jobs! This week we answer the question “I already use Aggie Job Link (AJL). What more can I do to find a job/internship?”

The methods below provide a way to network with professionals, find organizations that are a good match for you and help you tap into the “hidden job market,” or jobs that are never even advertised.   Many people have landed positions using these methods.  Augment your job/internship search using these strategies.  Be persistent and keep going until you get that job or internship!

Informational Interviews allow you to interview professionals and learn more about their organization and line of work  It can clarify whether a job or firm is right for you and could help you land a job if you play your cards right.  Think of anyone working in a field or company you are interested in and ask them for 10 to 15 minutes of their time to discuss their career.  You can interview a family friend, relative, contact from a campus event or even someone you got connected to through LinkedIn.

Volunteering is a great way to gain experience and narrow down what you want to do, all while developing skills.  It’s okay to think about what skills you want to develop while volunteering.  Volunteers grow while helping others.   In the process you will meet people with shared interests and values, which is an ideal way to develop your network. Visit the Specialty Services button on the ICC webpage to connect to the Community Services Resource Center database of volunteer opportunities.

Company Information Sessions are held on our campus and provide an efficient way to explore professions and learn about organizations that are actively recruiting UC Davis students. Most are very interactive and more informative than a website.  You can interact with current employees about daily tasks, work environment, advancement opportunities or any other questions you have.  You will make a great impression if you show up to an information session having done research about the company, prepared questions to ask the representatives and dressed professionally!  You can treat it like a mini-interview. See the ICC calendar for dates.

Resume Books are a way to get your resume to recruiters without having to do much. Employers contact the ICC routinely asking for student resumes.  Make sure yours is one they see!  Interested? “Opt in” under Resume Book in AJL, or look on the ICC website for instructions.

Even if you learn about a job through the “hidden job market,” be prepared to follow up with a formal application process.  You’ll still need a resume and maybe even pointers on interviewing.  The ICC’s here to help.  Visit us online at icc.ucdavis.edu or come to the second floor of South Hall.  Don’t rely on a single job/internship search strategy.  Keep applying for positions through Aggie Job Link and company websites for posted positions.   Persistence will pay off!

Sungil Fleischman is a senior managerial economics major graduating in June 2012.  He is a Liberal Arts and Business Peer Advisor at the Internship and Career Center and will be pursuing his career at a software company in the Bay Area.

Q & A: MacKenzie Smith

The Aggie: What’s your favorite book?
What is my favorite book? No one has ever asked me that question. I love books and I have read millions of books so that’s going to be a very hard question.

What are you reading right now?
Well, what am I reading now? I’m reading three books at the same time. There’s Michael Nielsen’s book on open science; it’s called Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. And I just finished the new book by a novelist I love named David Mitchell, The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet. Then a dear friend of mine just published a book in LA. He’s written a very interesting non-fiction book on the marijuana industry called The Heart of Darkness.

How do you feel about becoming the new head librarian at UC Davis?
Well, of course I’m delighted to be coming to Davis; it’s a wonderful campus and I see a ton of potential for what we can do there to make the library a real showcase, I think for the digital age and for the UC system. I just can’t wait to get there.

What does your position as head librarian at UC Davis entail?
Well, the head of the library is responsible for the whole library system so it’s mainly administration of that system and making sure that all the different constituents on campus, the students and the faculty and the researchers are getting what they need from the libraries and thinking about how the libraries are organized to do that best and thinking about things like … the physical space in the library. I’m kind of overseeing all of that and plotting a course for the future, strategic planning and fundraising for it so that we’re at where we need to be for the future.

What do you plan on changing at the library?
Well, I wouldn’t be focusing on change so much as the future. What Davis has lacked for a while is a permanent librarian to lead the organization, and because of that certain things haven’t kept up to date with the digital network era. I’m going to be focusing a lot of attention on thinking about the future of scholarly information, books and journals, but also digital data and all sorts of things that the library should be helping students and researchers find and manage and use because our job is to provide you with access to knowledge. The focus will be on how to position the Davis library for that digital future and, as I said before, make it a real showcase for how you can do that but hopefully not deprecating any of the things that the library traditionally did and that people still rely on.

How do you plan on achieving your goals at the library?
Well, I have to get to know the organization first and see what they’ve already started to do and where we need to put more effort. I need to get to know the research programs at Davis and what the exciting new things are that are happening there that could use more support from the libraries, and I’d also like to get to know the student body better and what their issues and concerns are. So there’s going to be a period of time of just getting to know the place and what the best opportunities are for us to get started, and I’m going to be doing quite a bit of fundraising, I’d suspect as in the budget situation to help get the library up to speed in some of the new things that it needs to be doing.

I saw that you were the digital research manager at Harvard and you also worked at MIT; what were you doing when you were there?
So for pretty much my whole career as a librarian, I’ve been focused on technology, digital libraries and how to make the conversion into this new internet age and take advantage of the World Wide Web and things like that to help people get to information faster and more efficiently. I took that learning from Harvard, where we spent a lot of time digitizing collections and converting them from print to digital format to put it online, and then I went to MIT, which is a very, very technical-focused university, and we really focused on doing research — cutting edge research — in what libraries need to become. So, thinking about how to apply really cool technologies, like the semantic web, to libraries to help researchers and students in teaching and learning. So my focus at MIT was really on that research and building new systems and new platforms to get that library into the digital age, and I’m going to bring all that expertise with me to Davis .

So you’re going to be doing similar things in Davis as you were when you were at MIT and Harvard?
Some of what we did there translates, but you know, there are even more things I think that you could do at a big and very diverse institution like Davis, so I’ll be bringing what I learned from MIT and from Harvard to the UC environment.

Is there any way that the students can help you with what you hope to accomplish besides telling you their concerns?
Well, I’m sure there are, but I can’t be too specific right now because I’m not there yet, but I’m going to be looking at ways to get the students’ input in a variety of different ways. Like, there’s a library committee that I believe has student representation on it, but we may be having some open forums. I’m not sure yet, but looking for ways to both hear what the students need and also to get them to help us … students are some of the most creative and interesting people to have around in the library to help us think about how we can help them better, so I can’t be too specific with you right now, but I’m really looking forward to figuring that out.

Do you have any additional comments?
Well, all I can say is that I’m really looking forward to engaging with the students, and I really want to get to know the student body in some form and what your interests and concerns are right now, because I know that the students rely very much on the library and care a lot about  what happens to it. I’m very interested in how I can engage with the students to figure out where they want the library to go in the future and how we can help make that happen.

LILIANA NAVA OCHOA can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Aggies take two

Senior Eric Johnson hit a walk-off single Friday, and senior pitcher Tom Briner’s complete game shutout Saturday helped UC Davis en route to its series win over second-place California State University, Long Beach State.

The Aggies had to rally from a 5-4 deficit in the ninth on Friday after giving up the lead in the top half of the inning. Johnson went 5-for-7 at the plate in the two victories to lead the offense.

UC Davis moves to 20-27 overall and 8-10 in the Big West Conference.

Friday — UC Davis 6, Long Beach State 5
In a back-and-forth contest, UC Davis jumped on the board in the first with an RBI single from senior Nick Lynch that scored freshman Kevin Barker.

Long Beach State responded with two runs in the next two innings, but Lynch blasted the first pitch he received in the bottom of the third for his fourth home run of the season and tied the game at 2-2.

Senior starter Anthony Kupbens battled the 90-degree heat to pitch seven innings, giving up only three runs, two of which were earned.

LBSU took a one-run lead in the seventh, but again the Aggies responded. Junior Austin Logan drew a walk, senior Ryan Allgrove pinch-ran and moved to second on a wild pitch and freshman Tino Lipson, who originally was trying to sacrifice bunt before the wild pitch, came through with an RBI single to tie the game 3-3.

In the bottom of the eighth, Barker reached first on an error, and then Johnson drove a pitch to the right center-field gap for a double and a 4-3 advantage for UC Davis.

Sophomore Harry Stanwyck relieved freshman Craig Lanza in the ninth, but the Dirtbags rallied and took a 5-4 lead to set up a dramatic finish.

With one out in the bottom of the ninth, senior David Popkins took one for the team after being hit by a pitch. With two outs, senior Paul Politi fought off a two-strike count and singled to right to keep the inning alive.

Barker hit his team-leading 13th double of the season to bring home Popkins and tie the game at 5-5. Up stepped Johnson, and the senior sent the fans home happy with an RBI single to score Politi.

“We don’t give up, we don’t die,” Johnson said of the late-inning drama. “It’s fun. The bats seem to come alive when the pressure is on, and we have our toughest [at bats] then. Coach Vaughn is big on tough ABs when it counts. We grind, especially in the eighth and ninth; we grind it out and find a way.”

Saturday — UC Davis 5, Long Beach State 0
Briner’s third complete game of the season may have been his most impressive yet, throwing just 79 pitches to shut down LBSU and to lead UC Davis to its second-straight series victory.

Briner struck out one batter with no walks and six hits. He faced only three batters over the minimum (27) and 60 of his 79 pitches were strikes.

“To get that outing on this weekend was phenomenal,” said head coach Matt Vaughn. “His attitude when he goes out there every time is to give us a chance to win, and not only did he do that today, but he just took it over.”

At the plate, Johnson followed up his late-inning heroics with another strong performance on offense, going 2-for-3 with a double, his first home run of the season, and scored three of the Aggies’ five runs.

“I’m really proud of Eric,” Vaughn said. “This year did not start the way he wanted it to start, and he battled through a couple of things. He’s never lost sight of it and he’s kept working hard. He’s turning a corner at the plate and, as you can see, it makes us a much more offensive team.”

Johnson’s home run to left in the second inning preceded senior Scott Kalush’s opposite-field home run, his fourth of the season.

This marked the first time since April 30, 2011 that UC Davis hit back-to-back homers. Johnson and Kalush win a 6-0 win against California State Northridge.

Sunday — Long Beach State 4, UC Davis 1
UC Davis managed just three hits off LBSU starter Shawn Stuart as the Dirtbags avoided the sweep.

Kevin Barker recorded two of the Aggie hits while Politi had one. Politi was also hit by a pitch, marking the 79th time this season a player has been hit, and setting a UC Davis record that had stood since 1994.

Senior Brett Morgan scored the lone run for the Aggies after he too was hit by a pitch. He stole second and then advanced to third on a ground out. He scored on a passed ball.

Freshman Spencer Koopmans went five and two-thirds innings in the start, giving up four runs (three earned) while striking out two with no walks. Lanza threw three and one-third scoreless innings in relief.

UC Davis plays its fifth game in five days today, a make-up game against San Jose State University at Blethen Field, first pitch at 1:30 p.m.

RUSSELL EISENMAN can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Police briefs

0

WEDNESDAY
Only in Davis
Someone was using a tractor in their backyard on Bellows Court.

THURSDAY
Classy delinquents
Three teenagers were smoking something from a pipe on Fifth Street.

Rock-a-bike baby
Someone was biking while holding a baby on Research Park Drive.

FRIDAY
A sobering crime
Intoxicated people were attempting to break into their own apartment on J Street.

Gone to pot
Someone was passed out in a garden planter on G Street.

SATURDAY
#WholeEarthproblems

There was an ongoing problem with loud drumming on B Street.

Police briefs are compiled by TRACY HARRIS from the City of Davis daily crime bulletins. Contact TRACY HARRIS at city@theaggie.org.