53.2 F
Davis

Davis, California

Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 923

The Aggie Arcade

In this week’s Aggie Arcade video I explore the world of Fez, a 2012 puzzle platformer that came out for the PC earlier this month. The visuals are vibrant and inviting, but the ominous music foreshadows Fez‘s many hidden secrets. Only by shifting the world and collecting cubes can I uncover the mysteries that truly define the Fez experience.

Xbox One’s unknown audience

Last week Microsoft finally unveiled its upcoming console — the Xbox One. The company mentioned how the system will be consumers’ one main living room device in order to justify the name, but let’s all just agree Xbox One is a silly name. Far more concerning are the details regarding the successor to the Xbox 360.

My Aggie Arcade column a couple of weeks ago outlined a short wishlist for Microsoft’s big reveal of the Xbox One. The main things I wanted to see were plenty of games, a small emphasis on Kinect and an explanation of the system’s always-on requirements. Well, it turns out that Microsoft didn’t feel like doing any of that during the event.

Instead, the company showed no live demos, revealed that Kinect will be bundled with the system and only created more confusion regarding internet connection requirements. In fact, I’d say “confusing” is the one word that best sums up the event.

The biggest source of confusion stems from that fact that I don’t know what kind of audience Microsoft is targeting with the Xbox One. A large portion of the video game community thought Microsoft’s event was a disaster, myself included. Instead of emphasizing the Xbox One’s prowess as a video game console, the company focused on television services, easier-to-navigate menus and other categories that speak to a far broader audience.

Perhaps Microsoft intends to take Nintendo’s approach with the Wii and market the Xbox One as a system for families and more casual audiences. The fact that Kinect is now required seems to support that particular viewpoint. But when I think back to last week’s event, I remember Microsoft did not fully commit to such a vision.

Microsoft still teased 15 exclusive games in the first year, though only one was actually shown (Forza Motorsport 5). The company also mentioned how next month’s E3 will be a bigger showcase for the system’s upcoming library of games, which always proves to be true. But how many of those exclusive titles will be Kinect-based? And how many of them will feel like rehashes of past releases with prettier visuals?

Even worse are the reports regarding restrictions on used games. It’s a controversial issue that doesn’t necessarily apply to me since I don’t purchase used games, but if you want a subject that will rile up the video game community, then this is it.

Xbox One owners will be required to install game discs to their hard drives. At that point the disc is no longer required, but that doesn’t mean friends can then borrow the game free of charge. Once a game has been tied to an Xbox Live account, subsequent users will have to pay a fee to gain access to the disc. That fee will likely be the full price of the game.

What does that mean for retailers like GameStop or services like GameFly? Well, I can’t see them surviving with those kinds of systems in place. It’s like a big middle finger to companies that rely on used games sales. Microsoft has said it does still have plans for used games, but here we are a week later with no actual details.

I can’t help but feel cynical after the reveal event. It seems like Microsoft is trying to be everything to everyone, but no video game company has ever truly succeeded with that kind of mentality. Some people have said we can’t truly judge the system until we see Microsoft’s E3 conference in June — I sure hope they’re right.

ANTHONY LABELLA can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

‘Anonymous’ tells stories of women

The Department of Theatre and Dance presents Anonymous, a multimedia collaboration inspired by real stories of real women.

The show will feature videos, text, participatory sculpture and dance. The stories are inspired by the lives of the collaborators, who all bring their experiences to the table.

“These are stories about being women,” said Jarrell Chua, an MFA candidate in dramatic arts and the director of Anonymous. “These are our struggles, our joys and our experiences.”

Anonymous came to be while Chua was working with a group of women last year.

“I was trying to do a different piece and it wasn’t cohering very well. I thought, ‘What do they all have in common?’ and the only thing I could come up with was that they were all women,” Chua said.

The project was made possible by a grant from the Puffin Foundation, a group from Teaneck, N.J. that, according to Chua, specializes in funding projects that don’t normally get funded.

“I found the Puffin Foundation while researching grants for a class I was taking. I actually wrote them for this grant as the final project for that class. I wasn’t expecting to get this grant, and now I am doing this show when my thesis is due,” Chua said.

Chua was influenced by Anna Halprin’s “Life/Art Process,” which was developed in the 1970s and is discussed in Chua’s thesis.

“It involves taking personal life material and developing it into art, as well as recognizing the interchange between life and art and how art can influence people’s lives,” Chua said.

For this piece, Chua asked her collaborators to think of a personal experience that was very strongly related to womanhood.

“We drew pictures of these experiences in order to extract it. Then we wrote it to extract it more, and then we danced for it. That’s how we came up with the material for this collection,” Chua said.

Maribel Lopez, a fourth-year psychology and dance double major, is one of the contributors and collaborators on Anonymous. Lopez shares how she contributed to the piece by drawing from her personal life.

“My contribution to this piece was a lot of my own stories, sharing and reflecting as a woman and the woman I’ve become.

Personally, it was a way of reflecting on my relationships with my parents and how they have molded who I am and reflect who I want to be,” Lopez said.

Another contributor is Kristen Rulifson, a fourth-year neurology, physiology and behavior major.

“My contribution was to share my story and to inspire other women to share theirs. I have tried to incorporate what women can do, the risks they can take and the strengths they have to feel empowered. I think that through this piece, my purpose is to inspire women and men to think about these issues and concerns that women face,” she said.

Rulifson enjoyed working with Chua.

“It’s been an experience, and I have learned so much about myself,” Rulifson said. “We work in a very creative process and in a safe space, so the movement that we generated has been real and novel, a reflection of our sensations that we feel as part of our identity as women.”

Chua felt lucky to have this opportunity.

“It’s been an interesting journey and a real pleasure to work with these women, and they’ve been inspiring both artistically and personally,” Chua said.

JOHN KESLER can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

Inside the Game with Justine Vela

0

Although UC Davis women’s softball did not make it to regionals, sweeping Cal Poly with three big wins allowed the girls to end their season on a positive note.

However, one player that has consistently performed at a high level for the team both this season and last is sophomore Justine Vela.

The Bakersfield, Calif. native has once again been named to All-Big West Conference First team for her second solid year of pitching for the Aggies. She finished off the 2013 season with a 2.03 ERA, the lowest average in the Big West.

With two more years of ball ahead, there are high hopes both for herself and the rest of the team to do big things in the Big West and beyond. She sat down with Aggie Sports Writer Sloan Boettcher to discuss where it all began, her sports hero and her expectations for her next two years wearing Aggie Blue.

The Aggie: How old were you when you first started playing ball?
Vela: I started when I was like four or five playing tee-ball. But I didn’t start playing competitively till I was 10.

Have you always been a pitcher or were you the kind of player that covered every position on the field as a kid?
When I first started out I played third. I guess I had trouble because my parents always said I had bruises on my shins. I started pitching when I was 10 after one of the other players on my team broke her wrist during a game and the coach asked me if I wanted to pitch.

As a freshman, you came in and dominated throughout the season, being named to All-Big West Conference First Team and receiving the honor of Big West Conference Pitcher of the Year. How did it feel coming in so young and establishing yourself as the No. 1 pitcher for the Aggies? Was it intimidating at all or just excited to take on that role?
I was definitely excited. There’s always a little nervousness as a freshman, coming in and playing Division I athletics. My club coaches prepared me for the experience that I was going to go through as a freshman and I knew I was going to be taught a lot here at Davis. I was definitely eager and ready to take on that role.

How has your strength and endurance grown since you came in as a freshman?
I would say I’ve grown a lot since I started as a freshman. It took me a little to adjust from the shorter games we played in travel ball to the over two-hour games here in college, but my endurance has definitely improved. But I know there’s always room for more improvement. I want to be able to throw two or three games in a day and still feel strong.

You’ve once again received top honors being named to First Team this year. How does it feel after an up-and-down season for the team to finish on a high note with both yourself and your short-stop receiving that honor?
I mean, it feels great and I’m so glad our freshman earned that honor — she did amazingly this season. We did have a little trouble this year, but after this season we know where we’re at and that we’re capable of winning the Big West. There is extreme potential for the team we have here.

On a different note, I read that your sports hero is Bethany Hamilton, a well-known female surfer. Obviously she is quite inspirational coming back after losing her arm in a tragic surfing accident, but could you tell me why in particular you chose her as your hero?
I think the reason I chose her was because you have to be strong on the mound. If I let myself show any discouragement it rubs off on the team; being able to lose an arm and still wanting to go out and surf and push yourself to do that is very inspirational. I’ve always wanted to be very calm and not let my emotions show — if I’m off, I can throw the team off. I just know that the team feeds off the energy that I give. I always want to give off positive energy.

And one final question — what are your hopes and expectations for yourself and the team for next year?
Definitely to win conference and make it to regionals. After this year there is no doubt that there’s potential there. The biggest thing is to realize we have this talent and have the potential to win conference and go further than regionals. It’s definitely an obtainable goal.

SLOAN BOETTCHER can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Fallen Aggie soldiers honored at Memorial Day event

On May 23, about 100 people gathered to honor Aggies who lost their lives at war during a Memorial Day event.

The names of the Gold Star Aggies — 135 fallen soldiers from World War I through the Iraq War — were read aloud as part of the ceremony outside the Memorial Union (MU), the building that was originally dedicated to student service members in 1955.

“The department of Campus Recreation and Unions, under leadership of Executive Director John Campbell, has been preparing for the renewal project of the building. Through research into the history of the facility, they felt that bringing the meaning of the Memorial Union back to the attention of the campus was very important,” said Amy Shuman, HR analyst and executive assistant at Campus Recreation and Unions.

Victor Garcia, a veteran of the Iraq War and a transfer/reentry advisor in the Veteran Affairs office, said that the MU is a major part of the campus community, but unfortunately most people do not know the meaning behind it.

“For a lot of students and the community, the MU is such a part of our daily lives, but a lot of them do not understand why it’s important,” Garcia said.

Garcia also added that the Golden Memory Book, a book that lists 134 Aggie casualties (the most recent death has yet to be added), is located in Griffin Lounge next to the fireplace, but most students do not realize it is there.

The plan is to make this ceremony into an annual event to honor the Aggie soldiers who passed away and to create greater knowledge of the history of the building.

“This year, we set the foundation for a ceremony that will become an annual event. It’s not necessarily the details of the ceremony that are most important to expand, but rather that through this event, we can increase awareness of the history and meaning of the Memorial Union,” Shuman said.

A new entrance to the MU is set to be constructed near the current north entrance. In addition, a kiosk will be built inside where the names and stories of the Gold Star Aggies can be viewed and permanently honored.

“The department of Campus Recreation and Unions seeks to make the Memorial Union feature a prominent part of the renewal so that all who visit it will know a piece of the history and will have the opportunity to learn more,” Shuman said.

ASUCD President Carly Sandstrom said these new additions to the MU would be an excellent way to honor Aggies who served the country.

“We are recognizing and re-dedicating this Union to those Aggies who were courageous and selfless enough to risk their lives to fight for our country. We are honoring our student heroes for their bravery and sacrifice to protect us,” Sandstrom said.

SASHA COTTERELL can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Campus Judicial Report

Caught in the act
During an exam, a TA noticed that a student was looking for extended periods of time in the directions of the students sitting around him. It was made clear that this was not simply a case of wandering eyes when the student was observed clearly trying to discern what was on his neighbors’ exams. Furthermore, he did not simply look once, but the cheating was noticed again at least 15 minutes after the TA first noticed his actions. On one occasion, the student was looking both directly at his neighbor’s paper when he realized the professor was standing no more than 10 feet away. Upon noticing the professor, he quickly turned his head and looked as if he had been caught doing something. Because it is explicitly against the rules to look at another student’s exam, he accepted probation through graduation and 20 hours of community service.

Similar solutions
A student was referred to Student Judicial Affairs (SJA) when a TA grading lab reports recognized answers from the previous quarter’s solution key. The professor had posted the solutions to the lab from the previous quarter on SmartSite, but it was made clear that the students had to do their own work. A number of students had answers identical to what was posted by the professor online. The Judicial Officer issued a censure to the student, warning that repeated behavior could result in more serious consequences.

Double trouble
While grading quizzes, a TA noticed two students had virtually identical answers to all parts of a quiz, which happened to be distinctly wrong. The two quizzes were next to each other in the stack of quizzes, indicating that the pair were next to each other when the quizzes were collected. Although cheating was not directly observed, the probability of the quizzes being so similar and next to each other as well was incredibly small. Consequently, the students were referred to SJA, and accepted deferred separation as well as 15 hours of community service.

Tech Tips: Real-life swipes

Imagine visiting the ASUCD Coffee House, loading up on delicious entrees such as a garden salad from Croutons, or a seam-bursting burrito from TexMex, pulling up to the checkout counter, and instead of desperately searching for plastic cards in your backpack, wallet or purse (ladies, can I get an amen), you simply swipe your finger to pull up your information and pay for your food. Thanks to engineers at the School of Mines and Technology (SMT) working in a new field called biocryptology, this reality might not be too farfetched.

Biocryptology, currently used in products such as fingerprint door locks and retinal-scan identifications, is a real-life manifestation of science-fiction technologies of a bygone era. Biocryptology is a blossoming field of technology comprised of the functional combination of biometrics (the use of anatomical identification) and cryptology (the study of encoding private information). South Dakota’s student engineers are on the way to improving how college students experience and interact with financial transactions by way of the current plastic technology.

This technology is a major step toward decreasing the inconveniences and increasing the security of students. Through the employment of smart fingerprint scanners, SMT is working to eliminate credit card-based shopping on its campus, and eventually, campuses nationwide.

While credit card-based shopping presents its various problems, identity theft being the most daunting and common, this new biocryptic implementation seeks to forestall common security concerns. The new rendering of fingerprint-based shopping takes into account the various hazards that, in the past, have been associated with anatomical identification. Student engineers have developed a sure-fire way to hinder thieves who may attempt to use another’s prints via removal of a finger or limb by developing smart sensors that verify not only an individuals’ prints, but their functioning blood flow as well.

While it may take a few years for systems such as these to become a reality at the University of California, at least you’ll get the chance to squawk at your grandchildren, “When I was your age, we had to use pieces of plastic to buy things!”

EMILY SEFEROVICH can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

Column: Living with pests

We’ve all seen them: aphids, dandelions, cockroaches, rats, bread molds, racoons, pigeons and many others. We’ve seen these unique and resilient organisms deemed pests by so many. These creatures are often considered objects to be exterminated or controlled, and for good reason. They harbor disease, they eat what isn’t theirs (according to us, at least) and they can ruin a perfectly ordered garden. I’ll submit that before we go and try rounding up all of these living things and giving them the same treatment as the western black rhinoceros or the American bison, we take a step back and consider a few things.

Thinking like an ecologist (or a child), it becomes abundantly clear that all of these organisms eat and are eaten by others. The removal of any significant proportion of any of their populations would have a tremendous impact on the surrounding trophic levels, otherwise known as participants in food webs, otherwise known as things that eat other things.

For instance, many people are fearful of spiders, but if we were to dramatically thin out their numbers in a short enough time frame, the results would be unpleasant to say the least. The spider’s primary prey, winged arthropods (bugs), would have considerably fewer predators and their populations would soon run rampant in areas where spiders were the predominant form of population control. Without spiders, we could literally be knee-deep in insects within a few years. Moreover, some bird species whose diets may depend heavily on spiders would experience a food scarcity and have no other option but to find new sustenance or die. The resulting behavior of the birds could result in increased competition with other animals, causing a cascade of other struggles for food and further straining a damaged ecosystem. The overabundance of winged arthropods could result in overgrazing of plant matter — or whatever items these flying bugs primarily eat — and could ruin the ecosystem for everybody.

Needless to say, removing a member of an ecosystem could have dire consequences.

It is also important to consider that evolution is a very opportunistic tinkerer and natural selection is a relentless mechanism. Any unoccupied niche in an environment is asking for something to step in and take advantage of the situation. Cockroaches are successful because they’re resilient to so many would-be fatal living conditions. They don’t need to eat much or count calories and they reproduce very quickly in spaces that many overlook. They can also survive pretty much everything except a direct nuclear strike. They can even have their heads cut off and continue to reproduce. Even if we did successfully engineer a system to wipe them out, something else would assume the then-empty role in a more tenacious way than we could imagine.

These garden-variety pests as we like to call them don’t exist the way they do simply to be an inconvenience to us. They’re playing the game of life, and winning. Despite all of the things we do to make non-human/non-human-cultivated life a non-factor — urbanization, proper sanitation, removing the lion’s share of loose food scraps, carpet-bombing crops with insecticides, habitat destruction and the many other things that make humans an inopportune species to share a planet with — these organisms are not only skating by, they’re thriving.

I’m not saying we should rapidly embrace the aphids, cockroaches, spiders and rats of the world. It’s often advantageous for us to remove them from our immediate vicinity for hygiene reasons. But it is important to consider that these organisms are participants in a system so prevalent, so natural that it’s very easy to lose sight of.

The classical mantras of manifest destiny, exploration and conquering the unknown have been synonymous with progress and advancement. But in reality, we humans are participants in a system that extends far beyond our own needs. The tune of mastering the environment should be changed to one of finding a way of successfully coexisting.

ALAN LIN tries to be a conscientious planet-mate. He can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

This week in science

Green Fuel:
Researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Lab have recently developed a process that some might call the environmental savior. This new process removes CO2 from the atmosphere and at the same time creates high-alkalinity, carbon-negative hydrogen, which can be used for both fuel and to offset the acidification of the ocean. The hydrogen can be used as fuel in any hydrogen-fuel capable vehicle and would work to de-acidify the ocean in the same way alka-seltzer works to neutralize the acid in your stomach.

Adaptable Brain:
You may have heard the term “neuroplasticity” before. It refers to the brain’s ability to continuously adapt to new situations and environments. Doctors from the University of New South Wales Black Dog Institute have discovered that the brains of people with depression are far less “plastic,” and are far less able to adapt to new situations. This means that “depressed” brains are less able to learn and retain new information, and are less able to create new connections between different areas of the brain.

Electric Cement:
Researchers working with the Department of Energy and Argonne National Labs have just figured out how to turn liquid cement into liquid metal, essentially turning the cement into a semiconductor that can be used in electronics. This new material can potentially
replace silicon as a conductor in electronics, paving the way for cheaper, more durable products without the need for the rapidly dwindling silicon supply.

Space Rocks:
The Oort cloud is an enormous “cloud” of comets, asteroids and tiny planetesimals that surrounds our solar system. Astronomers from Yale University have recently identified an asteroid from the Oort cloud that is moving slowly enough that we will potentially be able to study it and learn a great deal about the origins of our solar system. The object is completely frozen, so it contains preserved samples from the early years of solar system formation.

Mutant Cockroaches:
Cockroaches love sweets, as many of you know. That is why the traps we set for them are so successful. The traps are filled with sugary sap that draws the roaches in, and traps them. But like something right out of a nightmare, some roaches have actually evolved to find the taste of sugar to be bitter and distasteful, allowing them to avoid the sugary deathtraps. The researchers from North Carolina State University have found that the roaches will actually cringe and attempt to distance themselves from any source of glucose. The best part? This evolution is most definitely our fault.

Super Band-Aids:
New Band-Aids infused with the building blocks of life could help heal wounds far faster than they normally would. These bandages are infused with RNA molecules that contain the genetic instructions for healing. The RNA can be delivered directly to the wound via the bandage. Surgeons can even use these bandages after internal surgery by implanting a dissolving RNA-infused strip on top of surgical cuts.

Bright Sound:
Believe it or not, there are still some things that science cannot answer. One of these things is why an air bubble can produce light when burst with sound waves. This phenomenon was first observed in the 1930s and is called sonoluminescence (light from sound). When an underwater air bubble is collapsed with intense sound waves, small bursts of light are emitted… and no one has any idea why. This may not be “this week in science” material, since we don’t know what it is, but it is very pretty.

HUDSON LOFCHIE can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

I see tech people

0

Ah, technology. The giver of light. The bringer of information. The creator of worlds both Orwellian and Farmvillian. In the sunrise of the digital age, in the shadow of Silicon Valley, I can sit and marvel at the technology that surrounds and permeates life, and I can see how it has changed our world for the better.

Skype connects loved ones across time and space. Facebook and Twitter helped spark the Arab Spring. And Wikipedia lets me discover if Home Alone really did make more money than Home Alone 2. (It did.)

But for all the praise heaped upon technology, Sherry Turkle, author of Alone Together, believes it influences our behavior and values in very potent and not always positive ways. In her book, Turkle expounds upon her study of how robots and social networks isolate us from each other. Instead of making lives easier, it can make life confusing and cold.

We need look no further than our own dining commons for evidence. Only most of the diners there prefer to stare at phone screens instead of their friends’ faces. Games like Doodle Jump become more important than relationships. This even surprises Kevin Durant, who expresses his disapproval eloquently: “Doodle Jump? Man, that’s messed up.”

Champions of social media claim that it democratizes speech. And to an extent, it does. But this democratization also debases quality writing and original thought by throwing them among the riff-raff of the internet. Should your friend who thinks The Avengers was a cinematic masterpiece really be considered alongside a New York Times journalist? I’m not so sure.

Furthermore, Facebook allows you to “like” things such as colon cancer. Like colon cancer? Who in their right mind likes colon cancer? It’s a disease that can make you carry around a bag of your own excrement — not a hot, 20-something grad student you met at your friend’s party.

Technology masquerades hollow, empty gestures — for example, sharing a picture of a soldier — as genuine and legitimate action. Admittedly, sharing is caring. Still, walking up to a service member and shaking his or her hand seems to be a more appropriate Memorial Day activity than clicking a link. They may have fought and died for our freedom to shop in our pajamas, but we should at least try to get out of the house — and houseboats — to thank them for their service.

But for all the distance injected into our lives by technology, Turkle sees a glimmer of hope in a frail, imperfect place: us. We can change, she argues. We can reexamine our relationship with technology, and more importantly, with each other. And all it takes is conscious effort and purposeful acts.

I saw this action taken by a friend of mine who I’ll call “Chris.” Chris invited me and two other friends to dinner at his house because he feels he doesn’t see enough of us. People lose touch when the daily grind takes over. Chicken, rice and asparagus were his way of saying “I treasure your friendship, in a platonic fashion of course.” Cooking them all said, “I don’t want you to die from salmonella.”

Chris inspired me, although I only gave his restaurant a three-star rating on Yelp (A long wait to get in and only tap water? I’m not an animal). He made me want to connect with my friends and family in a more intimate, real manner. So I picked up my pen and wrote a few postcards, complete with Disney movie stamps.

Technology can bring us together. Still, we shouldn’t forget to look up sometimes from the interfaces that launch a thousand apps. For all you know, you might see a face that could launch a thousand ships, much to my Greek homie Homer’s delight. Or exasperation. I’m not quite sure which, since he’s dead and I can’t ask him. But I think he’d agree with me when I say that we can choose to invest in each other, in life, in love. And that mentality, that investment, is something truly worth sharing.

BEN BIGELOW thanks UC Davis veterans and active duty personnel for their sacrifice, and Chris for his perpetual inspiration. He can be reached at babigelow@ucdavis.edu.

Watts Legal?

Question: Who owns my Gmail account after I die? And who can access my Gmail account after I die? There’s some stuff in there I’d prefer my family can’t read, but I don’t know if they’ll be able to.
— David M., Davis, Calif.

Answer:

Nobody owns it. You yourself don’t even own it. You own the intellectual property rights in the content in your accounts (and those rights would pass to your heirs, just like any other property rights), but your use of Gmail, Yahoo! or any other web-based email service is subject to a contract you signed when you opened your account. Remember scrolling through those “terms of service” and then clicking on a box that said “Dude, I totally read this?” (I’m paraphrasing here). Those terms of service still apply.

And those terms don’t specifically explain what happens to your account after you die. But they do say that Google can “suspend or stop a service” like Gmail at any time. They also say Google can change the terms at any time, and could terminate your service for violating any Google policies. One of those policies bans you from transferring your account to another person — including your next of kin.

Although Google’s terms of service seem to ban transferring your account, Google does allow a deceased person’s next-of-kin to download the contents of their Gmail inbox. After you die, your family could get an order from a judge commanding Google to open up the account. Or a family member could just print out and send a copy of the family member’s driver license, a print-out of an email from you (to prove you actually talked to each other using the Gmail account), a death certificate and “proof of authority under local law that [the family member] is the lawful representative of the deceased or his or her estate.” Google will either send the contents of the inbox on a CD or close the account entirely, depending on the request.

Question: We have a roommate who is moving out at the end of the lease and is being profoundly difficult with respect to allowing us to see the bedroom so we can get a new roommate. They requested 24 hours notice, which we try to accommodate, but given our schedules, it is often difficult. The roommate says that if we don’t give them 24 hours notice, or if they don’t consent, that their rights are being violated. However, some laws I’ve read suggest that 24 hours is a reasonable amount of notice and that they can’t refuse to allow us to see the room. What are their rights? What are ours? What options do we have for getting a new roommate for the new lease year? We talked to our landlord, who agrees the tenant is being unreasonable, especially since our lease says that a tenant needs only four hours notice before the “landlord or his agent” shows the room.
— Van T., Davis, Calif.

Answer: 24 hours is plenty of notice. But it’s your landlord, not you, who has the right to show the room.

According to California Civil Code section 1954, a landlord may enter the house to “exhibit the dwelling unit to prospective or actual purchasers, mortgagees, [or] tenants.” And your lease, as you’ve quoted it, says that only four hours is enough notice before the landlord can exhibit the room.

You, however, are not the landlord. You are a co-tenant.

It seems your landlord is on board with you showcasing the house, though. One easy solution would be for your landlord to deputize you, preferably in writing, making you his agent. As his agent, you could enter the room with at least four hours’ notice (according to the lease) or 24 hours’ notice (according to California law). The landlord could write up something saying that “Van T. is my authorized agent and will exhibit your room to prospective tenants on June 5, 2013 at 5 p.m.” Post that on your roommate’s door at least 24 hours in advance along with a highlighted copy of the lease and California Civil Code 1954.

You might also remind them that refusing to allow access is a breach of the lease, and might be grounds for eviction — and payment of the landlord’s attorney fees.

Daniel is a Sacramento attorney, former Davis City Council candidate and graduate of UC Davis School of Law. He’ll answer questions sent to him at governorwatts@gmail.com or tweeted to @governorwatts.

A sponge that cleans more than your kitchen

If you have ever taken leftover antibiotics for a common cold, you may have been contributing to a growing problem. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics seems to be a more frequent issue, and one that worries many professionals in the health field. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreaks are extremely difficult to combat when they occur, but in the near future, they may become easier to control.

Engineers at University of California, San Diego have created a nanosponge that can safely remove a wide variety of toxins and pathogens from the bloodstream. A study using a lethal dose of a toxin from MRSA was administered to two groups of mice. One group was given an inoculation with nanosponges two minutes prior to the toxin and 89 percent of the mice survived. The other group was given the nanosponge inoculation after the toxin, and only 44 percent survived.

In order for the nanosponge to work, researchers took a commonly used medical nanoparticle and coated it with natural red blood cell material. These new particles essentially act as decoys in the body, with the membrane camouflaging the particles. The artificial “sponges” outnumber natural blood cells by about 3,000 to one, and harmlessly absorb the toxins floating in the bloodstream.

“With so many nanosponges, the chances of toxins interacting with [them] are much higher than the chances of [the toxins] interacting with natural red blood cells,” said Brian T. Luk, a contributing author of the study. “Upon coming into contact with a toxin, the nanosponge will absorb the toxin, thus neutralizing [it] and diverting it away from healthy cells. Eventually, the liver safely metabolizes both the nanosponges and the sequestered toxins without any discernible damage to the liver itself.”

These nanosponges have been designed to absorb and neutralize a multitude of toxins and pathogens — not just those originating from MRSA.

“Current treatments for toxins are tailored specifically to act against the molecular structure of a given toxin, and are therefore quite narrow in their use given the wide-ranging molecular structures of toxins,” Luk said. “We wanted to develop a system that could be used to treat a whole class of toxins, called pore-forming toxins. What all the toxins in this class have in common is that they lock into cellular membranes and punch holes in the membranes, causing the cells to burst.”

Most anti-toxin platforms, or antidotes, must be custom synthesized to the individual toxin type. This is the reason different venomous animals have different anti-venoms. The nanosponges, on the other hand, can remove a broad list of toxins, including snake venom and E. coli, which could revolutionize treatment for a wide range of ailments.

“Instead of creating specific treatments for individual toxins, we are developing a platform that can neutralize toxins caused by a wide range of pathogens, including MRSA and other antibiotic resistant bacteria,” said Liangfang Zhang, a nanoengineering professor at the UCSD Jacobs School of Engineering and the senior author on the study, in the original press release.

There is some concern, as with any new medical technology, that the risks may outweigh the benefits, especially since it has not yet been tested in humans.

Yet the research team at UCSD is confident that when the nanosponges are introduced, they will be effective with no apparent risks at all. Other people in the medical field agree that the risk is minimal.

“If the technology works as described, the risks are pretty minimal from a rejection standpoint. They are constructed of polymer cores that are unlikely to induce a strong immune response and they are also covered in host red cell membranes. The body will probably tolerate these things for a while,” said Stephen McSorley, an associate professor in comparative anatomy, cell biology and physiology at UC Davis. “The other issue is that even if they were rejected, they are designed to do their work so quickly that they don’t need to be in the body for a long period. Anti-venoms work in a similar way, they consist of foreign antibodies (usually from horse or goat) that will eventually be rejected, but they act quickly enough that they neutralize the venom before that becomes an issue.”

These tiny particles are making big waves in the medical field. Should these nanosponges prove successful in human trials, we should expect to see them entering the consumer market in a big way.

NICOLE NOGA can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

Third time’s the charm for Aggies at NCAA Championships

0

After a long four days of play, the UC Davis women’s golf team posted its best finish ever at the Division I NCAA Championships in Athens, Ga. With this being their third trip to the biggest event in collegiate golf, the ladies finished 16th out of 24 in the tournament, which included some of the best women’s college golf teams in the nation.

The competition began May 21, with the Aggies finishing day one tied with University of Texas at 15th, thanks to outstanding performances all around.

Freshmen Betty Chen and Andrea Wong each rose to the occasion in their national finals debuts, with Chen hitting a one-over 73 tying for 33rd individually and Wong ending with a 77, putting her tied for 89th.

Both of the Aggies’ seniors shot well on the first day as well, with Demi Runas posting a 74 putting her in 46th, and Amy Simanton firing a solid three-over 75 placing her tied for 64th.

Rolling into day two, the team did not shoot as well as head coach Anna Temple would have wished, falling to 17th, tied with University of Oregon.

“Today was an opportunity for us to move up and we didn’t quite take advantage of that,” Temple said.

However, with two more days of golf left, the Aggies still had plenty of time to improve upon any mistakes made.

Continued success out on the course from Runas and Chen kept the team in contention, with Chen shooting a 72 on day three and Runas going one-under 71. Confidence levels were rising coming into the last day of play for the team as they finished tied for 13th on May 23.

“We played well today,” Temple said. “We have a great opportunity to have everyone play well in the final round and leave this championship with a good result.”

Although they dropped from 13th to 16th in their last round, the girls each contributed to the best finish in the team’s history. Sophomore Beverly Vatananugulkit stepped up her game, hitting four-over 76 and giving the team a solid backing for Friday’s finale.

Despite not winning the tournament, the athletes can be proud of another highly successful season, establishing UC Davis women’s golf among the best in the nation. The team has qualified for three fairly recent NCAA national tournaments, including this year’s tournament.

In the team’s past two appearances at the championships they placed 21st in 2008 and 20th in 2011. Finishing 16th is a new high for the athletes and sets the Aggies up for continued success coming into next year.

The key throughout this season has been standout performances from every player on the roster. From freshman to senior, everyone played solid golf. As a result, the Aggies have picked up quite a few awards this season.

Despite all the success the Aggies have had this year, they are looking forward to next year and hoping to improve their national standings once again. However, the team will have some gaps to fill in 2014, as they are losing two outstanding seniors in Runas and Simanton.

Simanton began her career at UC Davis on a high note, as she was named Big West Freshman of the Year in 2010. Her success continued as she tied for 15th at the 2011 NCAA Finals and finished second twice at the Big West Championships. Simanton was a member of the All-Big West first-team all four years as an Aggie. In her last tournament she finished tied for 102nd, playing strong all week in Georgia.

Although Runas was not able to end her collegiate career with a number one team finish, she still received great news while in Athens. On May 22, it was announced that she was the recipient of the Dr. Hubert Heitman Award as the outstanding female-student athlete of the 2012-13 season, the highest honor awarded to UC Davis student-athletes.

Runas was highly deserving of this top honor, after playing an amazing four seasons with the Aggies. Over the span of her college career, she was chosen Big West Golfer of the Year three times and named to All-Conference first-team all four years. She ends her time at UC Davis ranked 18th in the nation, with two first place tournament finishes her junior year.

Although UC Davis is losing two outstanding seniors, the Aggies still have six of eight returners. As the team finishes higher and higher each season in the finals, the numbers are in their favor to continue to improve upon those rankings in the seasons to come.

SLOAN BOETTCHER can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Summer 2013: Guide to music and movies

Look forward to months of new releases in music and movies.

MUSIC
Boards of Canada — Tomorrow’s Harvest (June)
The Scottish wizards of instrumental electronica, better known as BoC, have defined the atmosphere of the new millenium with their enigmatic, daydreamy instrumentals. After an eight-year break following their last full-length work, the initial singles from Tomorrow’s Harvest point toward a new, brooding direction that is simultaneously tranquil and troubling.

Kanye West — Yeezus (June)
The harder-edged trends of hip-hop’s left field have left their imprint on the first few singles from West’s highly anticipated new album, including a punk/industrial-influenced aesthetic coupled with harsher vocals, percussion and bass. It has yet to be seen whether West’s status as mainstream genre flagship will help to steer his contemporaries away from the dominant pop/club-rap sound with this change in style.

MGMT — MGMT (June)
MGMT’s latest single “Alien Days” suggests an expansion and refinement of the neo-psychedelic grooves the band ventured into on 2010’s Congratulations. While it was this stylistic transformation that alienated some of the early fans of “Kids” and “Time to Pretend,” the new album may prove to be a smart commitment and a further chance to improve their new sound.

Wu-Tang Clan — A Better Tomorrow (July)
For an acclaimed group who releases material about twice each decade, a new album is quite an event. Although no singles have yet been released, the word is out and the buzz is steadily increasing, enhanced by the group’s showing at Coachella last month and by the fact that this year marks their 20th anniversary.

Washed Out — Paracosm (August)
Original chillwave creator Ernest Greene’s breezy production is tailor-made for the summer season; for those unfamiliar with his work, his 2009 single “Feel it All Around” has been the unofficial theme song for the popular sketch show “Portlandia.” On his second album, Greene is sure to elaborate on the perpetually chill aesthetic he helped create.

FILM
Man of Steel (June 14)
It is a sure sign of the long struggle to drag an old-time superhero into the contemporary age that the creative reigns of the Superman franchise are being handed to Zack Snyder, whose gritty yet artistic visual style made 300 and Watchmen some of the most mesmerizing of action films. Working with producer Christopher Nolan, Snyder may just succeed in making the man of steel a more frequent visitor to the big screen.

Monsters University (June 21)
Pixar’s 14th feature-length film will also be the third sequel (in this case, prequel) for the immensely successful animation studio. The story revisits the early scaring days of Mike and Sully as they are first introduced to each other in their college fraternity.

Lone Ranger (July 30)
Walt Disney’s latest family-friendly action film has the chance to spark a new franchise along the line of the Pirates series. With the star power of Armie Hammer (The Social Network) and Johnny Depp, along with the directing talents of Gore Verbinski (Pirates of the Caribbean original trilogy), this western adventure has an auspicious start.

Pacific Rim (July 12)
Just when you thought that the likes of Michael Bay and Roland Emmerich had finally cornered the market on giant robot and monster movies, the genre receives an intriguing outing from Guillermo del Toro (Hellboy, Pan’s Labyrinth), whose grotesquely intricate creations are often a mere visual bonus to strong storytelling.

Elysium (August 9)
South African director Neil Blomkamp’s follow up to 2009’s District 9 stars Matt Damon as a citizen of an impoverished future Earth, who must find a way to infiltrate an extremely luxurious off-world habitat known as Elysium.

Kick-Ass 2 (August 14)
A promising first sequel in a superhero franchise that has not yet worn out its welcome, Kick-Ass 2 goes all out in introducing a wild bevy of new heroes and villains, among them Jim Carrey in prosthetic makeup as ass-kicking patriot Colonel Stars and Stripes, Donald Faison as Dr. Gravity and a returning Christopher Mintz-Plasse as the audaciously titled The Mother Fucker.

ANDREW RUSSELL can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

Why I laugh

0

I can clearly remember walking down the hospital hall, preparing to see my friend’s dying grandfather, John. I had become attached to this gentle, kind man in the two years I had known him. His wife, Mary, met us in the hallway.

She explained how John’s condition was deteriorating. In her aged face I saw the depths of grief and an utter loss of control. Her soft brown eyes were misted with tears.

“The nurse was trying to dress him today and he sat up and said, ‘I’m just an old stubborn Lutheran German farmer!’ and then laid back down in bed unconscious!” she said.

As she recounted this incident, she began to laugh a hearty laugh, as did all those around her. When she looked up, she sighed and said, “It just felt so good to laugh.”

I believe that humor is immensely powerful. From laughter we attain a sense of freedom. When we really laugh hard, we feel overcome by joy. For a second, at least while in the act of laughing, worries are not at the forefront of our consciousness. And sometimes that second of relief is like a tiny space where we can be free. And that sacred space rejuvenates us enough to find the strength to pick up our burdens and continue onward.

The reason I write humorous anecdotes is to try to offer people that laugh-out-loud experience. If I give even one person a moment of joy, then my writing, editing and obsessing is all worth it.

I try to display real-life situations that stress personal imperfections or missteps. So much of the time we compare ourselves to others. We feel that we aren’t as polished, or intelligent, or talented, or beautiful as the person next to us. We fail to acknowledge our common humanity. Our failures, strengths and flooded toilets make us human.

If we learn to love ourselves and others despite our imperfections, we create a far more accepting, healthy mindset. We learn to embrace our messes and see that everyone else has the same dirty dishes in the sink.

When we react to adverse situations with anger or frustration, we allow negativity to overcome us. Sometimes we take our anger out on other people, damaging our relationships. We develop a sense of hopelessness. If we can laugh about at least some of the negative situations we face, we render them powerless, or weaken the blow.

I’m not suggesting that every problem in life can be laughed away. This is clearly not the case. But laughter can frequently soften pain.

When my father spoke at his college roommate’s funeral, he told an anecdote about “Krekler” that is one of my favorites. Krekler, not unlike many UC Davis students, was struggling to balance engineering coursework, school and friends. One day he came into class exhausted and fell asleep at his desk. He didn’t just fall asleep, though — he fell out of the desk and landed sprawled out on the floor in front of an entire lecture hall.

My father told this story, and a wave of laughter swept through the people attending the funeral. For a brief second, they all shared happiness. They had a communal realization that life is short. A precious memory that makes you laugh has immense power to turn sadness into an appreciation for life’s little moments. In the end, the littlest things always seem to be the biggest.

I often think of one of my favorite Bible passages about an amazing woman, that says, “She is clothed with strength and dignity and she laughs without fear for the future,” Proverbs 31:25. I love that laughter is a form of strength. It’s not just fun — it’s encouraged. It gives us the mindset to continue forward with hope.

Although stories about an overflowing toilet, or whacking a fellow bus passenger might not be earth-shattering, or written with perfect rhetoric, I hope that for some person out there these stories have given a tiny moment of freedom. I hope to deliver a little taste of happiness that helps that person continue forward through the good and bad parts of everyday life.

For more from MARCI MONTANARI, e-mail mcmontanari@ucdavis.edu, follow @MarciLaughs on Twitter, or see marcimontanari.wordpress.com.

Senators close ASUCD budget

The ASUCD Senate table considered the remainder of the 2013-14 budget during the May 23 senate meeting.

The budget for General Programs was seen. Controller Eric Evans said audit fees are increasing to cover taxes.

The executive team, ASUCD President Carly Sandstrom, Vice President Bradley Bottoms and Evans spoke about Aggie Pack and its branding. Evans said more jobs will be created, and funding for tube socks was cut — the money for them will come from elsewhere.

Aggie Pack representatives explained that they need money for outreach, as they measure their success through outreach. The table discussed lowering Aggie Pack personnel stipend from $49 to $42. The executive team was not friendly to lowering the pay and the motion failed.

Armando Figueroa opened the budget for Educational Opportunity Program (EOP). He discussed fundraising, as this year they will fund the Special Transitional Enrichment Program (STEP) for low-income students.

Steven Baissa addressed funding for the Cross Cultural Center (CCC). He said that UC Davis is the only UC campus with this sort of program. He strongly encouraged the table to consider increasing funding, as funding amounts have been the same historically and they will need more to accommodate a growing student body. The budget remained the same at $5,000.

The table then considered the funds for BloodSource. Chucha Marquez, chair of the Gender and Sexulaity Commission (GASC), said the organization “demonizes” queer donors, as there is a regulation in place that prohibits men who have had sex with men to donate blood due to an increased risk for HIV.

The executive team said it is unfair to punish the organization for a federally imposed law. The motion to remove the advertising and holding account line items for BloodSource passed with an 8-3-1 vote.

The budget for the Aggie Public Arts Commission (APAC) was then discussed. The budget closed with some cuts.

The Student Government Administrative Office budget was seen. The senators discussed reducing hours. The motion passed.

The ASUCD Entrepreneurship Fund requested more money for the unit. The budget closed at $6,201, an increase from the previous year’s budget.

The table then discussed funds for Safe Boat. Safe Boat representatives said they are aiming to become less dependent on the Association. The executive team asked about Safe Boat Education, which pays for Houseboat 101 pamphlets that include information on first aid. The table also discussed the amount of funding Safe Boats received from the Club Finance Council (CFC). One of the main topics of discussion was the consideration of $200 needed to purchase toiletries, such as tampons and condoms. Figueroa motioned to amend the Safe Boat Education/Awareness line item, to allocate $130 to it instead. The budget closed with some cuts.

The budget for Environmental Policy and Planning Commission was then seen. The budget closed without any changes.

The table discussed reopening the KDVS budget. Because the unit is under the Campus Media Board, any amendments to the budget must go through them. The table can only pass or fail the budget. After much debate, the table opted to leave the budget as is. They discussed meeting with the Media Board, but the Media Board couldn’t find the time to assemble.

AGGIE NEWS WRITERS can be reached at campus@theaggie.org