55.5 F
Davis

Davis, California

Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 922

Team of the Quarter: Women’s Golf

0

As three-time defending Big West champions heading into this season, the women’s golf team happens to be one of the most successful teams at UC Davis. With results come expectations, and the Aggies had a lot of expectations for this season.

Despite this pressure, the women’s golf team delivered once again. Winning a fourth consecutive Big West Championship, the Aggies exerted their dominance on the field. Ranked 17th in the country at the end of the year, UC Davis excelled in tournaments throughout the season.

The Aggies claimed numerous awards and gained recognition this season for their outstanding play. Senior Demi Runas won the Big West Player of the Year award as well as being recognized as a second-team All-American. Also, freshman Andrea Wong won the Big West Freshman of the Year award. Altogether, the Aggies had five players win awards this season.

The team played well in the Big West championships as they shot a team score of five-over 881 for the week. This score beat the second-place Long Beach State by a massive 29 strokes.

Riding the momentum from their win in the Big West championships, the Aggies went to Oklahoma to play in the NCAA regionals. They finished sixth in the competition and clinched the top-eight finish needed to reach NCAA nationals.

The Aggies’ journey through post-season play ended in the NCAA nationals as they finished 16th overall. However, this was UC Davis’ best finishing ever at the event.

The future is bright for the Aggies, as they are returning six players next season. While the two seniors, Demi Runas and Amy Simanton, were anchors for the UC Davis team, the Aggies still have plenty of talent. The success of the team throughout the season makes it the Team of the Quarter.

— Kenneth Ling

Team of the Year: Women’s Track and Field

0

Known for hosting some of the top track and field events in the United States, Eugene, Ore. will be home to the NCAA Track and Field Championships in less than a month. UC Davis, named the Big West Team of the Year, will send three top-tier athletes to compete in multiple events.

Standout performances from sophomore sprinter Ashley Marshall, middle-distance runners senior Lauren Wallace and sophomore Katie Fry during the NCAA West Regionals, held at the University of Texas, displayed why the Aggies have had tremendous success this season. These three women were a big part of the team’s success throughout the year. During the preliminary rounds each of the runners demonstrated their abilities to cope with weather setbacks.

“After hours of protracted weather delays, we stressed the importance of focusing on the task at hand rather than worrying about the conditions or the later hours,” said head coach Drew Wartenburg.

The three took coach Wartenburg’s advice and ran well in their races. Marshall finished with the eighth fastest time in the 100-meter dash at the meet, with a time of 11.70 seconds. Wallace raced well and earned the second-fastest time in the 800 with a time of 2:04.05. Finally, Fry’s time of 9:58.97 set a school record in the 3,000-meter steeplechase.

Along with the successful trio, seniors Melanise Chapman, Kayla Carter and Emily Bush also competed in Austin, Texas.

“Reaching this round in postseason is gradually becoming the norm in our program, and the staff remains proud of all the athletes that represented UC Davis here this week,” Wartenburg said.

Last season, the team sent a program-high of two runners, which was the most the program had ever had compete since moving to Division I in 2008. With three qualifiers this season, the Aggies continue to make strides toward becoming a perennial contender in track and field. There are high hopes for Marshall, Wallace and Fry at Nationals, along with great expectations for continued growth in the seasons to come.

— Sloan Boettcher

Female Athlete of the Year: Ashley Marshall

0

There were many athletes in contention for this spot, from senior golfer Demi Runas to senior gymnast Katie Yamamura. However, sophomore sprinter Ashley Marshall claims the top spot for her outstanding results throughout the year.

Marshall was absolutely dynamite throughout the year, posting solid times in the various meets she competed in. What made her season special though was her excellence in the postseason races.

She posted a time of 11.70 seconds in the NCAA Regionals for the 100-meter. This placed her as the second fastest sprinter in her heat and the eighth fastest overall. Her top-three finish in her heat allowed her to advance to the NCAA Division I national championships. Marshall becomes the Aggies’ first female sprinter ever to advance to the NCAA championships.

Marshall also qualified for the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) championships in Moscow due to her fast times in the Big West Championships. She qualified for both the 100- and 200-meter, with a time of 11.34 seconds in the 100-meter and a school-record-breaking 23.25 seconds in the 200-meter, respectively.

Scoring valuable points for the team as Marshall won her individual 100- and 200-meter races, she became the Big West title holder for both of these events.

Her results and accomplishments this season were noticed by the Big West as Marshall was named the Big West Track Athlete of the Year. She became the second-straight Aggie to win the award.

Marshall’s impressive season still has not ended as she heads to the NCAA national championships from June 5 to 8. The event will be held in Eugene, Ore. at the University of Oregon’s track. Hopefully, Marshall can add to her winning season with a top-five finish at nationals.

One thing is certain as the school year comes to a close: Ashley Marshall has been a constantly dominating presence for the Aggies. As only a sophomore, she has accomplished pretty amazing feats. Good things are in store for both Marshall and the UC Davis women’s track team.

— Kenneth Ling

Column: Watts Legal?

Question: Can my roommates force me to pay the rent for a subleaser who’s replacing me? I’m moving out of my apartment early, and I found a subleaser to take over my room for the summer. The subleaser signed an agreement to take over the remainder of my lease, so she’s on the lease now — not me. But my roommates made me sign a second agreement making me responsible for the new girl’s rent in case the new girl doesn’t pay. Can they go after me for rent if the subleaser doesn’t pay her rent?
— Jennifer W., Davis, Calif.

Answer: Yes, if you sign an agreement to guarantee the new girl’s rent, you’re probably stuck with it.

Landlords and tenants have some flexibility in designing the terms of a rental agreement. Even though almost every landlord in Davis uses the Davis Model Lease, they don’t have to use it.

(I wish landlords wouldn’t use it at all, actually. The Davis Model Lease is a monster of a document, with a bunch of sneaky little clauses that are either void for violating California tenants’ rights laws or inappropriate for student tenants.)

Anyway, landlord-tenant law allows you to sign leases with varying terms. For example, you could agree to pay on the 10th instead of the first, or pay once every four months instead of monthly. The lease could allow you to assign your tenancy to subleaser upon subleaser into infinity, like nested Russian dolls. Or you could pay your rent in bitcoins or sheep. It’s up to you and your landlord.

Part of that flexibility allows people to “guarantee” another person’s lease (or any other contract, for that matter). Imagine if this new tenant had horrible credit, no job, no income and no savings; the landlord wouldn’t trust that she’d pay rent. A guarantor provides reassurance to the landlord that even if the tenant screws up, the landlord will still get paid.

This is actually a good thing for tenants, because it lets people with crappy credit find a place to live. It’s a good thing for people like you who are leaving their lease early, too. If you didn’t sign the guarantee agreement, the landlord might not have let this tenant move in to replace you, and you’d get stuck paying for the apartment over the summer.

So even though you’re on the hook for her rent if she bails, you still have recourse against her if she doesn’t pay. If you end up needing to cover her rent, she should have to reimburse you for it.

Question: I got attacked by a chihuahua in my apartment complex. Since I was sitting on the grass at the time, it jumped up, bit my face and tore my lip. The chihuahua had escaped from a backyard with a broken fence. I complained to the dog’s owners, and they said there’s nothing they could do because the apartment manager has refused to fix the fence. I complained to the manager, and they said they were sorry; the manager said that they knew the dog was dangerous but hadn’t had a chance to fix the fence yet. Can I get my apartment complex to pay my medical bills?
— Tasha Y., Davis, Calif.

Answer: Yes. The apartment complex and the dog owner are probably both liable for the injuries caused by the dog.

“The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place,” according to California Civil Code § 3342(a). Yolo County and the City of Davis both require dogs to be on a leash or under the owner’s control at all times. When a law or ordinance imposes a duty on someone in order to protect the public, a breach of that duty will make the person liable for the resulting injuries, if the injury is inflicted on a victim who the law was supposed to protect. Here, the leash laws are meant to protect you from getting bit, and the dog’s owner breached his duty by letting the dog run wild.

The landlord himself has a duty to exercise reasonable care in the inspection of his property and to remove a known dangerous condition. In this case, your landlord should’ve told the tenant to remove the vicious dog or, at the very least, the landlord should’ve fixed the fence to enclose the dog.

Daniel is a Sacramento attorney, former Davis City Council candidate and graduate of UC Davis School of Law. He’ll answer questions sent to him at governorwatts@gmail.com or tweeted to @governorwatts.

Hammers

Let’s pretend for a moment that hammers hadn’t been invented throughout the entirety of human history. We still had nails and rail spikes (which are just another form of nail designed with a specific purpose), anyway. Now suppose a team of researchers in both private industry and academia started learning more about the exciting field of driving objects into other objects to hold things together.

The common man has long suffered the tyranny of the screw, forever forced to worry about ruining the threading or over-torquing one made of a particularly weak metal and ruining the head. Another alternative had been proposed in bolts, but the conspicuous heads protruding from surfaces made for a less-than-ideal solution to the problem of holding things together.

Fortunately, a team of bright minds got together and decided to apply science and technology to the field of holding things together. After years of planning and meticulous study of the process by which an object can be driven into another, they came up with a solution: why not just hit the things together? Voila! Hammers were born.

The innovation was conceptually very simple but could be utilized to solve a wide variety of problems. No longer did people have to drill preexisting holes to hold things together. The promise of all kinds of furniture and buildings arose from the breakthrough of the hammer. The world might not enter into a terrible shelter crisis after all!

Of course, like with any innovation, there were zealous critics.

Some groups objected to the hammers on moral grounds. According to their patron deity, an electrician that told people to love each other, surfaces weren’t meant to be held together in such an unnatural manner.

Unions of construction workers who would in principle approve of innovations that would improve their line of work also seemed to be a very vocal group in resistance to hammers. It would seem that Craftsman, a major distributor of hammers, had employed many draconian business practices to protect their invention and were running many construction workers out of a job.

Some were concerned about the efficacy of the devices. They worried that the overuse of hammers could lead to a dangerous lack of diversity in building practices that could leave buildings susceptible to collapse from adverse conditions.

There were those who feared the hammers. They called the inventions dangerous and cited bludgeonings as a reason to never produce the devices. They felt that the potential danger of being struck by a hammer was too great a risk for any alleged benefits. Of course, among those fearing for public safety, there were those who took a more moderate stance as well. They just simply didn’t have enough data on the impact hammers had on human health.

The example is a little bit extreme, but it conceptually mirrors the backlash against the idea of genetically modified crops (GMOs).

The human population has risen to about 7 billion and is increasing exponentially. As things currently stand, there might be difficulties associated with feeding the planet in the future. Genetic modification represents a fundamentally simple way of helping to solve that problem. Taking the beneficial genes of our choosing and placing them in existing crops will theoretically help them grow up with traits that we, as a species, want.

Plants could easily be selected to grow faster, bigger and more resistant to harsh growing conditions. A process that could take eons under the conditions of natural selection can be expedited to a matter of months or years.

Fundamentally, a lot of the distaste for GMO food comes from a lack of understanding of what genetic modification entails. The two words are big and sound very science-y together (and I really do suppose that they are), so some people naturally assume that adult specimens of the food are being manipulated in some way in a laboratory. This simply isn’t the case. All living things have a set of instructions that dictate what traits the organism will be born with: blue eyes, freckles, susceptibility to diabetes and a whole slew of other things. Genetic modification allows the manipulation of traits a generation of crops could be born with.

While there may be dangers associated with genetic modification, the process itself isn’t inherently evil or malignant to human society. It is simply a tool that can be used to our benefit as we develop a better understanding.

Other critics of GMOs are often vehemently against Monsanto. But a distaste for the practices of the largest GMO producer isn’t necessarily the most well-thought-out objection to what GMOs actually are. For instance, just because Craftsman may or may not have done something unethical isn’t a reason to give up hammers entirely. Modern internet service providers are frequently critiqued for their service practices of throttling bandwidth and getting away with it because there are few competitors for any region, but one doesn’t see people protesting the internet. Again, the tools provided by a company aren’t inherently good or bad, but they can be very useful.

ALAN LIN can be reached at science@theaggie.org.

UC Davis to become smoke free in 2014

A press release sent to UC Davis students on June 4 stated a new policy to make all UC campuses smoke and tobacco free will go into effect starting Jan. 1 of next year.

John Meyer, Vice Chancellor, Administrative and Resource Management, cited the initiative as part of a system-wide effort announced by UC President Mark Yudof last year. The press release stated that when in effect, “smoking, smokeless tobacco products and unregulated nicotine products will be prohibited on any UC Davis owned property”.

For full information, visit http://BreatheFree.ucdavis.edu.

 

-Adam Khan

 

UC Davis-trained wine educator featured at Winestock SF

Pablo Antinao-Alvarez came to California for the wine, and because its landscape reminded him of his home of Chile. Two years later, in 2006, his formal wine education began. He participated in a winemaking program offered by UC Davis Extension and continued his wine professional and sommelier certification in Napa Valley, California, and Barcelona, Spain.

PA2_4248

At the very first Winestock San Francisco in July, Antinao will be hosting a workshop entitled Wine 101. The class is broken up into three parts — how wine is made, how to train your senses, and how to taste and appreciate wine. Think terms like “legs” and “viscosity.” Antinao’s class is one of nine educational events at the Winestock festival, in addition to the opportunity to taste over 100 wines and nibble on a spread of hors d’oeurves, cheeses and charcuterie. There will also be a three-course menu paired with wines, live music and of course, the chance to mingle with winemakers and Bay Area food artisans.

During Antinao’s own wine journey, he knew early on that he wanted to travel more and get certified multiple times if he wanted to seriously enter the wine world.

“The more you learn, the more you realize you’ve learned so little,” he says.

Enter his wine school, which is taught in various locations throughout the Central Valley and Central Coast. He teaches Wine 101 ($65), as well as courses on sparkling wines, fortified and dessert wines, and food and wine pairings. Antinao says he loves teaching about wine because he can continue to learn about it, as well as continue to improve his English, his second language.

By the end of July, Antinao hopes to establish brick-and-mortar locations on the Central Coast and in San Francisco. Also in the works: organized wine tours to South America.

To newer wine drinks, Antinao recommends experimenting — there are roughly 10,000 grape varieties in the world, 3,500 wineries in California, 7,000 wineries in the country, and so much to try.

“Today more than ever, it’s an exciting time to explore the world of wine,” he says. “Be open-minded. Be an explorer.”

Winestock SF

July 20-21

Firehouse 8, San Francisco

$50

Tickets and more info here

 

Cool down with popsicles

As the heat climbs to a nearly unbearable 100 degrees outside, consider making popsicles a staple in your diet.

Popsicles are getting trendy (see Buzzfeed roundup) and there’s no reason why they shouldn’t be praised as a gateway frozen treat for DIY-hipsters. There is little work or skill involved, and quite honestly, recipes aren’t needed either. Use your imagination and conjure up the most saliva-inducing flavor combo ever, and throw it into a popsicle mold.

And more practically, popsicles can become a quick, on-the-go breakfast on sticky mornings. Yogurt, berries and a drizzle of honey sounds like a perfectly acceptable breakfast, and it’s perfectly acceptable and delightful when frozen. In my brief two week affair with a popsicle mold, I’ve made apricot-honey-yogurt pops, raspberry-mint-yogurt pops, mango-peach-orange pops, chocolate-marionberry pops and green tea-lemon-mint pops.

popsiclesI encourage you to follow my lead.

Green Tea Lemon Mint Popsicles

2 cups water

2 green tea bags

Handful of mint leaves, roughly 20

1/2 cup sugar

1 lemon

In a small sauce pan, bring the water to a simmer. Add the tea bags and steep for four minutes, tearing up the mint leaves and adding them directly to the water half-way through. Turn off the heat.

Take the bags out, add the sugar and mix until sugar completely dissolves. Squeeze in the juice of one lemon and mix again. Pour the mixture into popsicle molds — there should be enough for six. If you are using popsicle sticks, you’ll need to wait a couple hours so they’ll stay in place. Alternatively, you can hold the sticks in place with foil. Either way, your confection will be ready for devouring in about six hours.

 

U-Pick fruit all summer long

You want to eat fresh fruit all day. You don’t want to spend $5 per pound on peaches at the Davis Food Co-op. You also want to go on a leisurely bike ride, where you pass all the nothingness you too often forget you are surrounded by here in Davis.

Well, maybe not that last bit.

Enter the brilliant concept of U-Pick farms: you go to the farm and pick the produce yourself, thereby eliminating labor and transportation costs and paying a fraction of what you might expect.

And what luck! There’s a U-Pick farm just west of Davis — a 20 to 30 minute bike ride from campus to what is practically the backyard of Arlington-dwellers.

Impossible Acres is open Wednesday through Sunday from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. When you arrive, you can ask for a cardboard tray to load up on goodies as well as a map that highlights what’s ready for harvest. Last week, we were drawn to sweet white peaches and plump marionberries, but there were also rows of ripe pluots, raspberries and nectarines. As a price reference, peaches were 99 cents per pound.

You can check the calendar to see what fruit Impossible Acres expects to be ready each week, though the harvest varies depending on weather and other factors. Pro tip: if you’re biking, bring a backpack and a mason jar to safely pack your precious berries. Bring a plastic bag or two for larger fruit too, as the farm doesn’t have any. If you forget like we did, consider asking for two cardboard trays and duct tape to engineer a box, and bike carefully home.

Dixon man arrested for illegal relationship with a minor

The Davis Police Department was notified on May 22 that the Dixon Police Department was investigating an illegal sexual relationship between a 37 year old Dixon resident and 17 year old Dixon resident.

According to a press release by the Davis Police Department, the suspect, Troy Anthony Hensley, was taken into custody without incident in Davis on March 30. The investigation determined that, while in Davis, Hensley had engaged in a sexual relationship with a minor for three and a half months in 2012. Police also determined that Hensley made threats to the victim and others if they reported the relationship to the police.

Hensley is currently being held at Monroe Detention Center and his bail is set as $1,000,000. He is accused of engaging in an illegal sexual relationship with a minor, making criminal threats and intimidating a witness. Hensley is a former youth basketball coach in Dixon.

The Davis Police Department and the Dixon Police Department are investigating to find out if there are any other victims in the Davis and Dixon area.

Anyone with information regarding Hensley is urged to contact the Davis Police Department at 530-747-5400.

—Paayal Zaveri

Annual Davis BeerFest on Saturday June 1

The ninth annual Davis BeerFest is on Saturday June 1 at Sudwerk Brewing Co. on 2001 Second Street. This event is a fundraiser for local charity Citizens Who Care (CWC) and will last from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.

CWC has been a nonprofit organization in Yolo County for 25 years and they serve the elderly and their family caregivers said Walter Sykes from CWC.

The organization has three main programs to help the elderly. They send volunteers to elderly people who need assistance around the home. They also give caregivers time off by organizing activities at the senior center for elderly residents. Additionally, CWC has a convalescent hospital program which provides companionship and mental stimulation to socially isolated elderly residents.

According to a press release, this year’s BeerFest will feature over 100 different microbrews. Live music performed by three bands, ZuhG, Massive Delicious and Lava pups, will be featured at the event. Sudwerk brewery tours will also be available.

Tickets are $38 in advance, $45 at the door and $10 for designated drivers. Advance tickets can be purchased online, in person at Sudwerks and the local CWC office in Woodland or by phone at 530-758-3704.

All proceeds from the event will benefit CWC’s programs.

— Paayal Zaveri

 

Movement attempts shutdown of Monsanto office in Davis

As early as 6 a.m. on May 24, around 100 protesters had already gathered at the Davis office of Monsanto Company at 1910 Fifth St. — known to most as just Monsanto — to express their discontent with the actions and legacy of the multinational agribusiness corporation.

“We’re just trying to spread awareness about their history and eventually bring them down,” said Kim Sloan, lead activist with the Anti-Monsanto Project (AMP) who was present at the protest.

The protest was initiated by the Anti-Monsanto Project, a movement composed of over 30 Northern California groups and organizations, as part of the worldwide March Against Monsanto movement. The movement aims to “bring awareness to health, agricultural, environmental and political issues associated with Monsanto,” according to the demand letter issued by the AMP.

That letter, according to Sloan, was sent to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Department of Agriculture, Gov. Jerry Brown and California Attorney General Kamala Harris, among others, as part of the lobbying efforts of the AMP. The AMP lobbied at the Capitol on May 22, in addition to marching at the Capitol on May 25 and attempting to shut down the Davis Monsanto office.

Protesters blocked off the driveways leading into the office parking lot from Fifth Street, although the building was still accessible from a back driveway. On multiple occasions, drivers, possibly Monsanto employees, attempted to drive into the lot from Fifth Street before realizing they were blocked and driving away. Protesters formed a human chain across the back driveway at approximately 7 a.m., but let police officers through.

“We’re just out here keeping the peace,” said Davis Police Lt. Ton Phan. “So far there have been no issues and we like that.”

At approximately 7:30 a.m., a man on a bicycle approached the chain, telling the protesters, “I’ll run you down,” if the protestors refused to move and let him pass. The man biked through, and a protester asked if he worked for Monsanto.

“Yes I do, and I’m proud of it,” the bicyclist said.

In addition to the formation of a human chain, protesters employed the use of various chants such as “human need, not corporate greed” along with “hey, hey, no, no, GMO has got to go” and “hey, hey, no, no, shut down Monsanto.” Many protesters stood along Fifth Street with signs and were honked at by motorists, seemingly in approval.

“This is the largest event we’ve ever had in Davis and and we’re expecting around 1,000 people to come through here today,” Sloan said. “On May 22, we lobbied legislators and sent out our demand letter, but today is about education. I believe highly in the value of public participation, especially considering what our government has done with Monsanto.”

Monsanto and politics
Sloan cited the Supreme Court ruling in Bowman v. Monsanto on May 13, in which the court ruled in favor of Monsanto and held that patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the permission of the patent holder — in this case, Monsanto. Monsanto has the patent rights to 96 percent of the GM (genetically-modified) seeds planted in the US, according to a fact sheet issued by the AMP.

“Justice Clarence Walker was an attorney for Monsanto,” Sloan said.

Sloan mentioned a number of other factors that have fired up the opposition against Monsanto, such as the failure of Proposition 37 to pass in the 2012 elections, a ballot initiative which would have required the labeling of GMO products sold in California. Monsanto was the leading financial contributor in the opposition campaign.

A federal bill recently proposed by California Senator Barbara Boxer and supported by the AMP, the “Genetically Engineered Food Right-To-Know Act,” is once again tackling the issue, and would require the labeling of GMO foods. Sixty-four countries, including China, Japan, Russia and all countries within the EU, currently require GMO foods to be labeled.

“It’s a huge issue in California, but we don’t have as much power on the federal level, so we’re lobbying at the state level hoping to eventually reach the federal level,” Sloan said. “That’s our first step.”

Protester motivations
The event attracted both seasoned and first-time protesters, all of whom had slightly different personal motivations for voicing their concerns.

“This is the first protest I’ve been to in my life,” said Sacramento resident Lynn Sagerdahl. “I’m not much of an activist, but I feel I don’t have a right to talk about it without doing anything.”

Sagerdahl expressed concern about Monsanto’s GM seeds and their effect on bee population, holding a sign reading, “All we are saying is give bees a chance.” March against Monsanto pamphlets available at the protest cite connections between GM seeds and colony collapse disorder (CCD).

“I used to go into my lavender plants and watch the bees, and in the last couple years there are less and less,” Sagerdahl said. “I don’t think companies like Monsanto see the big picture.”

Sagerdahl was not the only first-time protester at the event.

“This is the first protest I’ve been to in my life. I’m passionate about this because it’s killing us and killing our kids,” said physician assistant and midwife Margie DiFelice. “I bought a house in 1989 right next to the fields and would see the planes flying over and spraying. I wouldn’t let my kids play outside then.”

Also at the protest was Andrea Mrotz, leader and organizer of Label GMOs Vallejo/Benicia. Mrotz graduated from UC Davis with a degree in microbiology and is working to ban GMOs in Solano County.

“I did genetic modification in the lab there, so I’m familiar with it,” Mrotz said. “I think a lot of people don’t understand GMOs and what exactly they are, and with my scientific background I want to spread awareness in my community [Vallejo/Benicia].”

Mrotz became involved in the cause around the 2012 elections when she began volunteering on behalf of the Yes on 37 initiative. After the election, she began working with the California grassroots organization behind the initiative, Label GMOs, and wanted to form a group in her community.

“If Marin and Mendocino County can do it, why can’t we?” Mrotz said on banning GMOs.

Mrotz, who held a sign at the protest, has a tattoo on her forearm of an ear of corn. On closer investigation, it is apparent that several of the kernels are drawn to resemble human skulls.

“The biggest scare is biological contamination,” Mrotz said. “It’s not just about protesting, but educating people about the small things they can do, like gardening. We need more people speaking out to be heard.”

Monsanto’s response
Tom Helscher, director of corporate affairs for Monsanto, issued a statement via email regarding the protest.

“While we respect the right of individuals to express their point of view on these topics, harassment of individuals is not an appropriate way to further their cause,” Helscher said. “At Monsanto, we believe we are making a contribution to improving agriculture by helping farmers produce more from their land while conserving natural resources such as water and energy.”

Sloan connected her activism with the AMP to other issues of social justice she finds concerning.

“It’s all one for me. The raping and pillaging of our environment, to me, is connected to violence against women,” Sloan said. “That’s kind of out there. But that’s my ideology.”

MEREDITH STURMER can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

Shrem Art Museum to break ground next year

Plans are in motion to open the new Jan Shrem and Maria Manetti Shrem Museum of Art at UC Davis next year, but the university still needs at least $5 million to outfit the building and officially launch.

The capital budget for this project is $30 million, which has been approved by the Capital Resource Management group and will be provided by donations and campus funds. In addition to the start-up costs, the university aims to raise an endowment of $5 million to $20 million to allow the museum’s program to expand, according to Karen M. Nikos, senior public information representative at UC Davis in an email interview.

“There are four components to launching the new museum: an architecturally significant building, an innovative program, an endowment to sustain the institution and the art collection to be exhibited in the new galleries,” Nikos said.

The museum is named in honor of proprietor of Clos Pegase winery Jan Shrem and his wife, arts patron Maria Manetti Shrem. The couple donated $10 million to the university in 2011, and the funds will be used for the museum.

After a five-month competition, SO-IL, a New York-based firm, was named the museum’s design team in partnership with architectural firm Bohlin Cywinski Jackson and contractor Whiting-Turner. The team was among three finalists that were considered by a jury of faculty and professionals in the art and architecture fields.

“We were looking at a number of things, including visitors’ experience, energy conservation, sustainability and what was most fitting for UC Davis — everything from design and aesthetics to functionality,” said Clayton Halliday, assistant vice chancellor of Design and Construction Management and head of the jury.

According to Halliday, the museum will include spaces for teaching, appreciating and making art, and for students to spend time with one another.

“The design envisions a new type of campus art museum, more open and participatory,” said Lias Papageorgiou, associate principal at SO-IL in an email interview. “The main idea is to blur the edges between inside and outside by creating a portfolio of interconnected exterior and interior spaces all with distinct spatial and lighting qualities that create a variety of opportunities for art display, learning and experimentation.”

The design includes glass walls that connect interior and exterior spaces as well as a distinct 50,000 square-foot steel canopy.

“We thought this was truly the most unique design. It was most fitting for UC Davis and most closely matched with the requirements that we set,” Halliday said. “Right when you walk in, you know it’s all about art and art education.”

LAUREN MASCARENHAS can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Five Davis neighborhoods top Atlantic’s list of most bikeable

On May 17, The Atlantic magazine published a list of the 25 most bikeable neighborhoods in America, based on ratings given to each neighborhood by Bike Score, an extension of the Walk Score and Transit Score. Davis had five neighborhoods in the ranking and Sacramento had seven.

Professors from Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia helped to develop the methodology for rating cities. The rankings are based on thousands of voters from the community near the headquarters in Seattle, Wash. Voters suggested over 100 factors that make a city bikeable.

“Bike Score provides a 0-100 rating of the bikeability of a location based on the availability of bike infrastructure (lanes and trails), the hilliness of the area, nearby amenities and road connectivity, [in addition to] the number of bike commuters,” Walkscore CEO Josh Herst said in an email.

The first Bike Score came out in May 2012, with rankings for only 10 U.S. cities, and today they offer a Bike Score for over 100 U.S. cities. Based on a city’s bike score, cities are put into categories: Biker’s Paradise (90-100), Very Bikeable (70-89), Bikeable (50-69) and Somewhat Bikeable (0-49).

Old North Davis was rated as the number one bikeable neighborhood, with a perfect score of 100. Two other Davis neighborhoods, Old East Davis and Downtown Core, also received perfect scores, along with neighborhoods in Madison, Wis., Boulder, Colo. and Eugene, Ore. University Avenue in Davis was given a score of 99.8, and Interland/University Research Park in Davis received a score of 99.7.

The high ranking that neighborhoods in the City of Davis received from Bike Score doesn’t come as a surprise to David Takemoto-Weerts, TAPS Bicycle Program Coordinator.

“Biking became popular in Davis in the 1960s, before the city started to promote it. [Davis is] flat, has mild weather year round and is surrounded by farmland. If you lived in Davis, your commute was relatively short in the 1960s — two to four miles,” Takemoto-Weerts said.

In the 1960s, when Davis started to become a pioneering bicycle city, a much higher percentage of the city’s population was involved with the university than today, so any efforts to improve bikeability on campus inevitably spread to the surrounding city.

“The city and campus have a symbiotic relationship,” Takemoto-Weerts said.

Several of the top Bike Score cities in the U.S. are known as college towns, including Cambridge, Davis, Berkeley and Boulder.

The bikeability of the UC Davis campus was greatly influenced by Emil Mrak, who was the chancellor of UC Davis from 1959-69. He aimed to make the campus more bicycle-friendly and in 1967 introduced the bicycle-only blocks around campus.

He also made sure that bike parking was available at every building, close to the major entrances to encourage students and faculty to bike to class.

The City of Davis was the first city in the U.S. to implement bike lanes in 1967, no small feat.

“It wasn’t an easy process, [the project] had to go through Caltrans and various legislatures for approval,” Takemoto-Weerts said.

In 2006 Davis became the first city to earn the Platinum Bicycle-Friendly Community Award from the League of American Bicyclists. The City of Davis is also home to the U.S. Bicycling Hall of Fame.

Jimmy Fong, a transportation program specialist for the City of Davis, said that the city plans to improve bikeability for its residents.

“We want to improve safety, continue to educate bikers and incorporate infrastructure updates for problem areas,” Fong said. “In 2017, the 50th anniversary of bike lanes in Davis, we will celebrate with a festival. We want to move up to the Diamond Bicycle-Friendly Community award.”

The highest-ranking neighborhood on the Atlantic’s list is Old North Davis, which is getting ready to celebrate its 100th anniversary. It was the first suburb of Davis. Old North Davis spans from G Street to the railroad tracks, and from Fifth Street to Seventh Street.

Steve Tracy, the president of the Old North Davis Neighborhood Association, said that the neighborhood is working to improve bikeability for its residents.

“For 10 years we’ve been lobbying to reduce the lane count on Fifth Street to two lanes and add bike lanes, which will be happening this summer,” Tracy said.

Old North Davis will begin to charge for parking in their neighborhood, something they haven’t done in the past. Parking passes will cost approximately $75 annually, and the revenue will be used to improve safety for bikers and neighbors.

Tracy credits the neighborhood’s high Bike Score to the amenities that are available in Old North Davis.

“All kinds of day-to-day services are available in North Davis; the Davis Co-op, restaurants, a lumber yard and more. It is the best place to live in Davis; I’ve been here for 40 years,” Tracy said.

TAYLOR CUNNINGHAM can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

A road less traveled

The Aggies completed their season with a 19-37 record overall and finished with a 5-22 record in conference play. UC Davis baseball may look upon this season as a down year, but there were some positive moments. In a season of struggles, the Aggies can view their experience as a platform to build off of in the future.

Heading into the 2012-13 season, coach Matt Vaughn began his second year as head coach of the UC Davis baseball team. He came into the season with a young Aggie squad consisting of just a few seniors.

“When you lose three starters — Anthony Kubpens, Dayne Quist and Tom Briner — in the same year, that is a big blow,” Vaughn said.

UC Davis opened up their season with a giant victory against Pac-12 foe Washington. In a game in which the Aggies never trailed, the 8-4 victory marked only the second straight year that the Aggies opened up the season with a Pac-12 Conference member. The Aggies would go on to eventually win the four-game series.

“For the most part we did a very good job,” Vaughn said. “To get three wins against a very good Pac-12 — you cannot start much better than that.”

The Aggies continued their early season success with a 22-4 decimation of San Jose State, which interestingly set a Davis school record for batters getting hit by a pitch, as seven batters trotted to first base the hard way.

Davis then struggled mightily however, losing several non-conference series matchups against Utah, Oklahoma State, CSU Bakersfield and Seattle University.

However, a 2-1 thriller at Dobbins Stadium against Stanford proved a high point in the season. Down 1-0 to begin the bottom of the ninth, sophomore John Williams crushed a 3-2 pitch to right field for a triple. Stanford would retire the next two batters, but Williams would eventually score on a costly Stanford wild pitch. The Aggies took advantage of the error. With a single from senior Paul Politi and a walk to junior Steven Patterson, junior Nick Lynch connected on his first pitch with a single to right field, bringing Politi home for a walkoff win.

“This was a big win especially coming off a tough series against Seattle University,” Vaughn said.

Following the exciting Stanford victory, the Aggies began conference play on the road against 21st-ranked Cal Poly, which would lead to another streak of consecutive conference losses. Davis lost their first nine conference games to fourth-ranked Cal State Fullerton and then Long Beach State. In what was statistically the toughest schedule in Big West play, the Aggies were able to maintain consistent hitting throughout, ranking top five in conference with a .281 team batting average.

Davis picked up their first conference victory and series sweep against UC Riverside. In the sweep, Politi shined with two home runs and went 4-5 in their final game of the series. Patterson maintained a hot bat as well, as he went 3-5 with three runs and a game-high five RBI, including a solo home run.

“We weren’t playing well but we were playing hard in that tough stretch,” Vaughn said. “To finally have our efforts pay off with some wins is fun.”

However, following their series sweep of UC Riverside, the Aggies’ struggles in conference remained, losing season series to nationally ranked UC Irvine, Cal Northridge, Hawai’i and UC Santa Barbara.

The Aggies’ bright spot during this span was a road-conference series victory against Pacific which saw junior Harry Stanwyck toss the Aggies’ first shutout of the season and of his career. The final stretch of the Aggie season also saw increased hitting production from Patterson, who held a team-high 13-game hit streak during his streak of 27 consecutive games reaching base.

What separates a good team from a great team is learning from mistakes and hardships. While the Aggies lose several seniors who helped contribute to their conference leading 555 hits and third-ranked .283 batting average, the Aggies still hold onto key contributors such as Patterson, Williams and Lynch.

Meanwhile, the inexperienced pitching staff gained valuable experience and playing time this season on their way to posting a 5.32 ERA. Hopefully, the Aggies can use these experiences as a chance to learn and grow as players.

SHAUN MONCADA can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.