47.8 F
Davis

Davis, California

Sunday, January 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 1314

Column: Caffiend

0

Excuse me if I ruin your morning, but let me remind you that finals week is fast approaching. This can only mean one thing: caffeine, and lots of it. As you pull each subsequent all-nighter for the paper, exam or project, sleep becomes a necessary sacrifice.

But these aren’t your grandmother’s exams, and coffee is no longer the only energizing option. It represents one of many weapons in the modern college student’s arsenal, which also includes energy drinks and prescription brain boosters. Of course, some methods are healthier than others. Some don’t work at all. Let’s go through them here.

Coffee: The line in front of the CoHo every morning suggests that there’s something to this liquid fuel.

Coffee works as a stimulant through caffeine, which blocks the uptake of adenosine in the brain. Adenosine is an amino acid that works on the brain when you’re getting ready to sleep. When blocked, the brain fires neurons, which alarm the nervous system. The pituitary gland then releases adrenaline to spark a flight-or-fight response. Like prey being stalked by a predator, your eyes dilate to take in more visual data, and your heart beats faster to agitate movement. For more energy still, caffeine signals the liver to release more sugar into the blood stream. Finally, caffeine affects the pleasure center of the mind for its effect on dopamine. Together, these factors combine to create the energizing feeling.

When it comes to your health, coffee has been both heralded and demonized. Studies show that it can reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. Because coffee has antioxidants, it can prevent cancer too. But caffeine has been shown to spike blood pressure, although it’s unclear whether this is an effect associated with soft drink caffeine as opposed to coffee caffeine. Coffee, like alcohol, is also a diuretic, which pushes fluid out of the kidney. This, however, just means that you have to balance your coffee with water, or run the risk of dehydration.

The real issue with caffeine is the crash. The fight or flight responses wear off. The liver stops pumping sugar into your blood. Dopamine only lasts so long. When each of the energizing factors disappears, you experience what is sometimes an abrupt loss of energy. If you’re studying with coffee, you need to take the crash into account. Instead of starting your study session with a cup of joe, pour yourself a cup halfway in. This way, you can coordinate the crash with your sleep.

Energy Drinks: Monster, Red Bull and 5-Hour Energy all claim to have these special ingredients to further increase your energy and mental performance beyond the simple effects of caffeine. While guarana, taurine, niacin, and B-complexes all sound pretty cool, most of the effect comes from caffeine. Unfortunately, nobody really knows how these chemicals interact in the long run, which is cause for some concern.

The difference with energy drinks is that they tend to have more caffeine than a single cup of coffee. If Red Bull gives you wings, it’s from the flight present in the flight-or-fight response, not necessarily the special powers of extra ingredients.

Adderall: Addy is one hell of a drug, and studies show that nearly one in five college students have used it. As a study buddy, evidence suggests the stimulant delivers. Of course, it’s a felony to possess Adderall without a valid prescription. But as so many students use, have used, or will use it, it’s worth considering the risks.

Adderall, taken moderately under the close supervision of a doctor, presents very little risk and almost no long-term harm. The problem is that nobody takes it that way. Most people don’t consult with their doctor before (and certainly not after) buying a pill off the dorm market. Apart from catalyzing a productive study session, addy can cause psychosis, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and schizophrenia if the person taking it does so incorrectly or has a certain genetic predisposition.

To be sure, there’s a placebo effect difficult to account for. And of course, there’s no telling that more energy necessarily means more productivity. The point of energy is just that – to enhance activities reliant upon energy. What you use the energy for is another matter altogether.

RAJIV NARAYAN has slept 10 hours in 6 days, so buy him a cup of coffee if he’s in line with you at the CoHo. Or e-mail him your tricks for keeping up the energy levels at rrnarayan@ucdavis.edu.

Column: For boys who sleep with boys

2

I really hate generalizations. And especially those about us gays. Like anyone else, we don’t all share the same interests and we all have different, unique plans for the future. Gay men, I like to say, are like condoms: We come in different colors, shapes and flavors, and some even come from a different country. We’re both also very effective methods in preventing surprise visits from the stork. Just sayin’.

What many people fail to realize is that “gay” refers to a specific sexual orientation – just one among the many types of sexual attraction – and not an entire way of life. The one and only statement to which presumably all gay men would nod their heads in agreement is this: We fuck (or want to fuck) other men.

So I want this column to serve as a reminder to all my gay honeyboys out there to not only enjoy yourselves as sexual beings, but to also be mindful of the risks associated with your right to have sex with men. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for being sexually active and I pass no judgment on those who occasionally dabble in the art of general skankery, but we need to remember to be careful, be smart and of course, we need to be extremely safe.

According to a recent survey, a number of men who have unprotected sex with men believe their risk of HIV infection is lower than it actually is. Hugh Klein, Ph.D., from the Prevention Sciences Research Center at Morgan State University in Baltimore, presented his research on “barebacking” (condom-less anal sex) at the American Public Health Association’s 138th Annual Meeting. And as both a safe sex enthusiast and gay man, I am completely in shock and even upset with some of Klein’s findings.

The study revealed that, of the 332 American men who participated, about 15 percent of them believed HIV could be washed away in the shower. Another 28 percent were of the belief that a vaccine exists for HIV, but they just hadn’t taken it themselves. And surprisingly enough, a third of the surveyed men think AIDS can be cured.

Unfortunately, honeybees, I’m not making this up. In case you weren’t completely sure of it yourself: HIV cannot simply be washed away, no matter how much we’d all appreciate that – it’s a virus that infects vital cells of the immune system. HIV then causes AIDS, which is the actual set of immunodeficiency symptoms. Unfortunately, no vaccine against the virus currently exists and there is no known cure for AIDS.

But gay men aren’t oblivious to the severity of HIV and AIDS. In fact, men scored fairly high on the knowledge portion of the survey, said Klein, who asked factual questions about HIV, AIDS, the modes of transmission and the various ways to prevent infection. On average, men answered 11 of the 15 questions correctly, which was a “moderately high level of knowledge,” according to an article on Klein’s research on Medscape.com. Yet, the high levels of knowledge among the participating men didn’t affect their willingness to engage in unprotected sex. Over 50 percent of them believed they had only a slight chance or no chance at all of HIV infection.

The truth is, HIV could potentially affect any one of us – and not just the gays. In fact, statistics show that African American women are more likely than any other demographic group to have HIV and not know it. We all find solace in an “it could never happen to me” mentality at some point, but when it comes to sex – and unprotected sex at that – this frame of mind is misleading and can be dangerous for everyone. It could happen to you. And safe sex should not be taken for granted. Condoms are like a really good friend: If you respect them and grant them the attention they deserve (i.e. if you take the time to put it on properly), they’ll try their hardest to make sure you stay safe, healthy and happy.

While this column is informative for us all, it was my fabulous gay boys whom I wanted to take a moment to especially address. That study scared me, you know? And it’s never bad to learn more – the more educated we are, the safer sex we have, and the healthier we remain! So whether you’re having fun enjoying the unconfined pleasures of single life, in a relationship having tons of great sex, or somewhere in between, you need to be cautious and knowledgeable of the associated risks. Being your friend in the paper (and of course a fellow friend of Dorothy’s), I really want to emphasize how important it is for you and your partner(s) to protect yourselves. Get tested regularly, disclose information honestly, and make sure you completely trust your partner. We gays need to look out for each other. And that’s exactly why I’m here.

MARIO LUGO wishes all you honeybees a wonderful Thanksgiving break. He is personally thankful for his family, his friends, his super cool boyfriend, and the opportunity to reach all of you here every Tuesday. His sincerest gratitude also goes out to all those who enjoy reading his columns just as much as he enjoys writing them! He can be reached at mlugo@ucdavis.edu.

Aggie Daily Calendar

0

TODAY

Institute of Transportation Studies Special Seminar

1 to 3 p.m.

1065 Kemper

Listen in on a discussion about real world simulation testing of today’s powertrain systems. Seats are limited but you can register at wbkuhlman@ucdavis.edu.

Psi Chi and Autism Awareness Fundraiser

4 to 9:30 p.m.

Habit Burger, 500 First St.

If you say you’re with Psi Chi, a percentage of your meal will get donated to both organizations!

Suture Clinic with Kaplan

7 to 9 p.m.

180 Med Sci C

Learn the do’s and don’ts of medical school admissions and practice six different types of sutures.

To receive placement in the AGGIE DAILY CALENDAR, e-mail dailycal@theaggie.org or stop by 25 Lower Freeborn by noon the day prior to your event. Due to space constraints, all event descriptions are subject to editing, and priority will be given to events that are free of charge and geared toward the campus community.

Parking fines to increase in Davis

0

Beginning Dec. 7, there will be a $3 increase for parking violations, increasing the average ticket to $43. The new fine will be applied to tickets received both on campus and in the city of Davis.

“The Council passed a motion to add a $3 increase to all the city’s parking violations to offset the pending state surcharge,” said Councilmember Stephen Souza of Senate Bill 857, which allows the state to take $3 from every fine.

“We could have done nothing or we could lose an extra $3 per parking ticket,” said Jim Ivler, administrative services manager of the Davis Police Department. “Now, the violator pays the extra $3.”

SB 857 is a part of the state’s 2010-2011 budget bill that Governor Schwarzenegger signed into effect on Oct. 8. Funds will be remitted to the state Trial Court Trust Fund.

The parking fine increases will expire July 1, 2013. SB 857 will be repealed on Jan. 1, 2014, unless otherwise extended.

The average parking ticket in Davis is currently $40. Common infringements include time violations and curb markings.

Parking fines were last increased in July 2009 from $35 to $40. Past increases have been enacted to cover rising costs of enforcement, fuel and parking meters.

“If there wasn’t an increase in the parking fines, the state would still be collecting an additional $3 per parking violation from the city,” said Police Lieutenant Glen Glasgow. “This is a way for the city to finance the new legislation.”

According to the city council staff report, the recommended increase will generate approximately $36,000 in additional revenue, all of which will go to the state.

“The Davis City Council’s action was a bit of a ‘pass-through’ based on state action,” said Mayor Pro Tempore Joe Krovoza. “We wanted to hold our revenue neutral.”

Glasgow said there would be no change in parking enforcement or operation adjustments within the Davis Police Department.

It remains to be seen whether the increase in parking fines will deter residents from parking in high traffic regions like the downtown area.

“I don’t think the additional fines will be much of a deterrent,” Ivler said. “I think everything will even out over time.”

CARLY HAASE can be reached at city@theaggie.org.

FDA bans Four Loko

2

After nearly a year of examining the combination of alcohol and caffeine, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced on Saturday an official ban on caffeinated alcoholic beverages. This brings to an end the debate over Four Loko, the product at the center of discussion.

“The FDA does not find support for the claim that the addition of caffeine to these alcoholic beverages is ‘generally recognized as safe,’ which is the legal standard,” said Joshua M. Sharfstein, the FDA’s principal deputy commissioner, in a press release. “To the contrary, there is evidence that the combinations of caffeine and alcohol in these products pose a public health concern.”

Taking preemptive action, Phusion Projects, the maker of Four Loko, announced last Tuesday that it was removing caffeine, guarana and taurine from all its products nationwide.

Following controversy over the safety of Four Loko, sometimes called “blackout in a can”, four states – Washington, Utah, Michigan and Oklahoma – have already banned the product.

Four Loko is sold in 12 different flavors and a colorful 23.5 oz. can. The beverage has an alcohol content of 12 percent and contains 135 milligrams of caffeine. One source likened the beverage to the equivalent of five beers and four cups of coffee.

Health officials say the addition of caffeine in alcohol masks the alcohol’s effects, causing consumers to drink more than they normally would. However, Phusion Projects has maintained that the controversial combination is not a hazard.

“If it were unsafe, popular drinks like rum and colas or Irish coffees . . . would face the same scrutiny that our products recently faced,” said Chris Hunter, Jeff Wright and Jaisen Freeman, the company’s managing partners.

“We are taking this step after trying, unsuccessfully, to navigate a difficult and politically charged regulatory environment at both the state and federal levels.”

Among those speaking out against the drink is Sen. Charles Schumer (D-New York), who called the drink a toxic brew. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Schumer received $142,100 in campaign contributions from alcohol companies during the 2009-2010 election cycle.

Phusion Projects has 15 days from last Saturday to take action, allowing stores in California to still legally order and sell the product for the time being.

Olive Market, a local convenience store, has been selling Four Loko for a year but said the drink only recently became popular.

“They didn’t like it before, but now because they heard it was going to be banned they’re buying it in dozens,” said Olive Market manager Tony Sangh. “We decided to stop ordering it because it’s going to be banned; we didn’t want to take a loss.”

Junior atmospheric sciences major, Alex Neigher, is not upset about the ban.

“I’m terrified of the stuff,” he said. “If you pour it into a glass it just looks like something you should not drink. It looks like gasoline. People drink because it gets you really drunk and it’s like three bucks.”

However, Nick Hallchurch, a junior political science major, said he drinks Four Loko more for the alcohol content than the caffeine and will still buy the beverage even after the caffeine has been removed.

“I’d rather get drunk than really pumped up,” he said. “I drink them when I don’t have time to get drunk using beer.”

Scrutiny over Four Loko first started in mid-October when students in both Washington and New Jersey were sent to the hospital after consuming large quantities of the drink.

MELISSA FREEMAN can be reached at city@theagge.org.

Former ASUCD senators reflect on their terms

0

Editor’s note: Last Thursday, Abrham Castillo-Ruiz, Don Ho, Joel Juarez, Andre Lee, Levi Menovske and Bree Rombi termed out as ASUCD senators. The Aggie interviewed the senators to see what they felt were the highlights of their year in office.

Abrham Castillo-Ruiz

Castillo-Ruiz said the only reason he ran was because under-represented communities needed a voice in ASUCD. His platform issues focused on ethnic graduations, increasing AB540 awareness, increasing the number of 24-hour rooms during finals week, opposing Sodexo and fighting for the Chicana/o studies department.

The ethnic/lavender graduations were put into the budget with relative ease, the MU was opened up as a 24-hour room during finals week and Sodexo signed with a union. However, Castillo-Ruiz said he can’t take credit for these actions.

“I felt like it didn’t really come from me, but the job got done and that’s what we wanted,” he said. “I was happy for that.”

Castillo-Ruiz ended up dropping the AB540 issue but was able to restore two of the three lost faculty positions within in the Chicana/o studies department.

“To be honest, because of the way most of those issues turned out, I almost feel like I regret running for senate in the first place,” he said. “But I don’t regret being there purely as a representative.”

Castillo-Ruiz doesn’t plan on staying involved with ASUCD.

“I feel like the kind of change – the kind of impact I want to create – isn’t going to be achieved through ASUCD or some other institution,” he said.

Don Ho

Ho aimed to represent the “Average Joe’s” on campus.

“I feel that most of the campus is underrepresented and I thought I represented that constituency very well,” he said. “I’m proud of my voting record, what I said and did.”

His platform issues included bringing mainstream entertainment to campus, tailgating at sporting events, the edible garden and budget transparency.

“Entertainment Council is there for us but I always felt like they were doing alternative, indie things that are not conducive to mainstream audiences,” Ho said.

Ho also worked with the athletic department for tailgating and worked with Menovske to author a bill for the edible garden.

“I hope for the future senators, there is a lot more collaboration,” he said. “Senate is very divided and everyone’s proud of their individual projects. I wish I’d understood earlier that all the senators and everyone at the table is working toward one goal – we’re just doing it for the students.”

Ho is in the process of working with controller Joey Chen and the webmaster on his last platform issue to make it easy for students to have access to the ASUCD budget by winter quarter.

He also intends to stay involved in ASUCD by applying for a commission or interning for a senator.

“It would be a shame that any leaving senator just forgets that they put so much of their time and so much of their soul into their projects,” he said.

Joel Juarez

An ASUCD senator should represent the entire student body, Juarez said.

“As a queer person of color, I was always pushing for certain issues because I haven’t seen any of those issues addressed by other senators and they weren’t going to be brought up until I brought them up,” he said.

Juarez’s big platform issues were anonymous HIV testing, making financial aid information more accessible and creating a student advocate position.

With the HIV testing, Juarez collaborated with other senators to find money in the budget for health and education services. Juarez also worked on financial aid awareness week, which offered events put on by representatives from the financial aid office that ranged from workshops on budgeting to how to fill out a FAFSA. He hopes to bring the week back this year.

He has also worked on the student advocate program, where a student in legal trouble would have accessibility to legal information, but it has yet to be created.

Juarez plans to stay involved on campus, although his involvement may not be within ASUCD.

Andre Lee

Lee’s original platform issues included creating a program for first-years about bike safety, making Picnic Day more sustainable and creating a rest lounge for students. Lee also had plans for a bike-sharing program, but said he dropped it early on when he realized it was unfeasible.

“The platform I was most recognized for and most interested in was getting a sort of rest lounge on campus,” Lee said. “But it’s been very difficult. There are just so many veto points, so many people with a say.”

Lee collaborated with Transportation and Parking Services (TAPS), AggieTV and the Bike Barn to make an informational video and brochures that were distributed to 400 first-years. He is also working to make the campus more compostable, including Picnic Day.

“Part of the reason I ran a second term is I really want to see these things finished,” Lee said. “I’m humbled the students gave me a second chance.”

However for Lee, being a good ASUCD senator isn’t just about accomplishing platform issues, but attending senate meetings, commission meetings, hiring committees, being effective unit sponsors and holding office hours.

“Everyone runs on a lot of really big platform issues,” he said. “They want to change the world. What gets lost is being competent.”

Levi Menovske

For Menovske, a large part of being a senator is to author legislation. However, he said he only chose to write pieces that applied to his platform issues.

“There are so many different things that fall under student interests that it’s absolutely impossible to represent them all,” Menovske said. “I did a good job of sticking to what I said I would do. I held myself to that standard and didn’t make an effort to take on extra projects.”

Menovske’s platform issues were to start a textbook rental program at the bookstore, lay the groundwork for an edible garden and increase financial aid awareness. Menovske was able to successfully implement the rental program this fall as well as lay the base for the edible garden.

“It was a success overall,” he said. “But it was really just the groundwork. This is a project that I’m really passionate about and I want to see it prosper before I graduate.”

Menovske intends to stay involved in both of his main projects and keep working with ASUCD until he graduates.

Bree Rombi

Rombi’s main issues were bringing class readers to Campus Copies, composting and updating the ASUCD website to include a calendar.

She worked to get Campus Copies a new binding machine and more business through the Education Abroad Center.

Rombi said a lot of people thought it was a waste of time to run on composting as a platform. However, with help from people in the Memorial Union, Grounds Division and Will Klein, a senior environmental science and management major, she was able to bring composting to the MU and the ASUCD Coffee House.

Rombi has only just begun to work on the ASUCD website with Chen.

“A lot of senators that I know did more after senate than as a senator,” Rombi said. “I feel like I did a lot when I was in senate and I still want to continue.”

Of the six senators terming out, Rombi was the only one to meet and exceed the 80-hour office hour requirement, which was one of the reasons she received the Michael J. Tucker award.

AKSHAYA RAMANUJAM can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

UAW Local 2865 reach tentative agreement for three-year contract with UC

0

On Nov. 16, a provisional contract was drawn up between UC and UAW Local 2865, the union representing over 12,000 teaching assistants, readers and tutors at the university.

The vote to ratify the contract will take place at all nine UC teaching campuses from Nov. 29 through Dec. 2. If the majority of UAW Local 2865 members vote no, then UAW and UC return to the bargaining table.

Five UAW bargaining team members have written an open letter to the members of UAW 2865 Local urging them to vote against ratifying the contract. The proposed agreement is not a victory, but represents a significant failure by the union’s leadership, said the letter writers.

“The UAW leadership has bought into the UC story about how they can’t afford to provide us with any significant upgrades,” said Brian Malone, member of the UAW bargaining team and graduate student in literature at UC Santa Cruz.

This new contract stipulates a minimum annual salary increase of 2 percent and the promise of additional increases, with a maximum 4 percent increase per year, if the state gives UC more money than it did in 2007.

“This 2 percent increase in wages compared to the projected 3 percent inflation rate over the next three years is equivalent to us taking a pay cut,” Malone said.

Based on calculations made by UAW, an increase in teaching assistant wages from 2 to 4 percent would cost UC about $3 million systemwide.

“People that are organizing the vote no campaign are mainly concerned with the lack of change made in respect to wages,” said Molly Ball, graduate student in the English department at UC Davis and bargaining team member. “However, the improvements made in regards to childcare were a big win for us.”

A main point of contention during negotiations was the total annual amount of childcare expenses that an Academic Student Employee (ASE) may be reimbursed for, which was increased from $900 to $2,400 a year in the new contract. In addition, the childcare program was extended to include summer.

While this is an improvement from the past contract, this is still not enough money to cover the costs of childcare, Malone said.

“The UAW leadership aimed too low and they are walking away too early,” he said.

According to the UAW 2865 Local website, it would be an ineffective and unwise move to further prolong the contract campaign.

“While we respect the rights of individuals to advocate that we hold out for more, we believe that protracted escalation and a possible strike could undermine the gains we’ve already reached agreement on with UC and weaken public support for our contract,” UAW leadership said.

Despite disapproval from select UAW bargaining team members, it appears that both UAW leadership and UC are content with the new contract.

“We are very pleased to have reached what we believe is a fair agreement, and one that recognizes both the contributions our student employees make to UC’s teaching mission and the budgetary challenges we face,” said Peter Chester, UC’s chief negotiator for the contract.

Negotiations have been ongoing since June of this year and a number of UAW members are pleased to see significant improvements made in the contract.

“My impression is that this is the best contract we are going to get at this point,” Ball said.

Malone predicts the campaign will have difficulty passing on a majority of the northern campuses, particularly Berkeley, Santa Cruz and Davis.

“The UC has the money to provide the improvements we’re asking for,” Malone said. “The UAW leadership has failed to get what we deserve and what UC can afford to give us.”

The five members of the bargaining committee launched their vote no campaign on Monday and urge members of UAW 2865 Local to vote no on the tentative agreement as well as vote for a stronger UAW leadership in May 2011.

KATIE LEVERONI can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Aggie Digest

0

During three grueling days of tough swims, the Aggies pushed through the waves and made an impressive showing at the Arena Invitational.

Freshman Madeline Talt finished 24th in the 1650 freestyle, recording a personal best. Talt’s 24th place finish was the highest for any Aggie in any race at the event.

Sophmore Bridget Bugbee and freshman Karley Troup also broke their season times in the 1650 freestyle, taking 37th and 42nd, respectively.

Several other swimmers also broke personal best times.

In the 200 breaststroke, Junior Alyssa Britt clocked in with a time of 2:25.87, and freshman Maya Sprinsock finished shortly after with 2:28.38. Both of the times were a season best for the duo.

Other season bests came from sophomore Victoria Pichay in the 200 backstroke with a time of 2:13.30. Troup also etched another season best in the 200 butterfly with a time of 2:05.74.

The outstanding number of individual achievements is exactly what head coach Barbara Jahn hoped for.

Jahn knew the competition this weekend would be some of the best in the Mountain Pacific Sports Federation, she knew her swimmers would benefit the meet.

The Aggies will take a break for Thanksgiving before returning to action Dec. 2 at the Texas Invite in Austin, Tex.

– Caleigh Guyones

Cross Country Preview

0

Event: NCAA Division I Cross Country Championships

Where: LaVerne Gibson Championship course – Terre Haute, Ind.

When: Today at 9:48 a.m.

Did You Know? Two out of the last three team winners on the men’s side at the Cross Country National Championships came from the West Region – the same region UC Davis is in.

Preview: It’s been a season of firsts for the Aggies this year.

They won their first Big West Conference team title earlier this season.

Now, UC Davis is sending its first male runner to the Division I National Championship since joining Division I.

Fresh off a fifth place showing at the NCAA West Regionals, junior Jonathan Peterson will make the historic run for UC Davis.

Peterson has never finished below 14th place all season. The Clovis, Calif. native has won three races, including the Big West men’s individual title. Peterson finished 17 seconds faster than anyone else at the conference championships. For his performance, Peterson was voted Big West Conference Male Athlete of the Year.

The postseason accolades don’t stop with Peterson, however.

Coach Drew Wartenburg became the first UC Davis cross country coach to be named Big West Men’s Coach of the Year since the program joined division I and the Big West.

Senior Calvin Thigpen wasn’t left out of the awards either. Thigpen finished 20th at the regionals and received All-Region accolades from the U.S. Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association. Thigpen, however, won’t be making the trip to Indiana for the NCAA Championships.

Senior Caitlin Fitzgerald was the highest finisher for the UC Davis women at the West Regionals as she finished 33rd overall.

The opening gun will fire at the NCAA Championships at 9:48 a.m. Peterson will be in fourth box draw for the 10K race.

– Jason Alpert

Women’s volleyball: Tigers outlast Aggies in five-set thriller

0

At the end of the match, it wasn’t about the win.

It wasn’t about the sixth fifth-set loss for the Aggies.

It wasn’t even about the four point lead UC Davis had in the final set.

In the end, it was about the seniors. After the tough loss, UC Davis honored its three seniors – Kayla Varney, Melanie Adams and Ester Hon.

Despite missing the final two games with a knee injury, Varney was a defensive catalyst. She finished her Aggie career second all-time in digs with 1,562.

Coach Jamie Holmes described Adams as the “model of what we want.” Adams was a consistent force for the Aggies this season, finishing close to the top in nearly every offense category.

Hon, a senior walk-on, didn’t get much playing time in her one season at UC Davis, but nonetheless, Holmes was proud of what she brought to the team.

“I want to thank all our seniors,” Holmes said. “Their contributions really have been so great to our program. I think they’ve brought a lot to the transition and buying what we’re selling. We’re going to miss them.”

Despite the emotion, there was still a game to be played.

UC Davis came back from an 8-3 first set deficit to take the opening game 25-22.

The Tigers wouldn’t let the Aggies rally in the second set, taking it 25-21.

The two squads traded the third and fourth set to force the decisive fifth. The Aggies jumped out to 6-2 lead, but the Tigers won the next seven points to take the game and match.

“I thought both teams played a little bit flat,” Holmes said. “It’s that time of the year when both teams are a little bit tired and the emotions carry a squad. Nonetheless, there were some fantastic rallies and without question, both teams really wanted it.”

With the loss, UC Davis closes out the season 16-12 and 7-9 in Big West Conference play. It was the second straight winning season for the Aggies, and the second under Holmes. UC Davis finished 4-6 in five-set matches, something Holmes attributes to the youth on the roster.

“I think our youth comes out in the close matches,” Holmes said. “With that youthfulness, there is a lot of excitement for the foundation of our program. Knowing that we can go to the fifth and be right in there for every match is really encouraging for me thinking about spring.”

UC Davis will be returning 12 players next year, including setter Jenny Woolway, middle blocker Betsy Sedlak and outside hitter Allison Whitson.

Woolway finished the season first in the Big West in total assists. Sedlak closed out the year with a .399 hitting percentage, good for tops in league and 15th in the nation. Whitson led the team in total kills with 377, good for fifth in the Big West.

“Experience will help us next year, no question. That’s where things get exciting,” Holmes said. “We’ve had so many games go to five and we’ve been right there every time. We’ll get spring training under our belts and a little bit maturity at some positions and that’s super encouraging for next year.”

JASON ALPERT can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Football: Aggies, Mother Nature rain on Hornets’ parade

0

If you said that UC Davis football would go 6-5, beating San Jose State, Cal Poly and Sacramento State, you would have been considered crazy, said quarterback Randy Wright.

The Aggies did all of the above, though, finishing the 2010 campaign with a triumphant 17-16 win over rival Sac State in a rainy, windy and cold 57th Causeway Classic.

If you ask any UC Davis underclassmen, it’s all thanks to one thing – the Aggies’ senior leadership.

“[The seniors’] motivation was all there,” Wright said. “We were three and five at one point, and they didn’t lose the intensity.”

For Biggs, the senior squad is something to remember.

“Our seniors have been tremendous mentors,” Biggs said. “Our seniors wouldn’t allow us as a young football team to do anything but come in and work hard every single day. That’s what I’m going to remember about this team.”

Biggs said Saturday night’s victory was a culmination of his team’s great effort and resilience all year. It reflects a lot about the team as UC Davis picked up two consecutive come-from-behind rivalry wins to close out the season.

UC Davis found itself in an early hole, getting down 13-0 on Sacramento State’s first two possessions.

However, two touchdown passes from Wright to receiver Anthony Soto would be enough to take the short 14-13 lead.

Unfortunately for the Aggies, the Hornets kicked a field goal from 30 yards out as the opening half expired, taking the 16-14 advantage into the break.

Adverse weather and lightning forced a delay of nearly an hour at the intermission. Even after the strange holdup, the rain persisted into the second half.

UC Davis safety Danny Hart had never seen anything like it.

“It was a monsoon out there,” Hart said.

For Hart and senior tight end Dean Rogers, it was even more motivation to get the win.

“It just added to the excitement,” Rogers said. “Mother Nature was toying with us, but it brought our focus back. All we had was each other, the [Aggie Band-Uh!], who was there through thick and thin, and a few undying fans. The rain was a factor, but we just had to fight to the end.”

The second half became a fight for field position, with UC Davis coming out on top.

Unable to move the ball efficiently on offense, the Aggies were forced to punt twice by the middle of the fourth quarter.

The Hornets muffed the second punt, and Aggie Stephen Dunstan was right where he needed to be, recovering the ball on the Hornets’ 10-yard line.

“That was a huge turnover,” Hart said. “If you win the field position, you win the game.”

UC Davis moved the ball to the Sac State four, and kicker Sean Kelley stepped onto the field to cap the drive.

With the rain still pouring, a 21-yard field goal was no guarantee, but Wright recovered a low snap from Joey Waters, and Kelley booted a line drive through the uprights to secure the 17-16 victory.

Despite a slippery ball, Wright threw for 133 yards, finding senior team captains Rogers and Sean Creadick twice each for a total of 95.

Additionally, senior defensive captains Hart and Dozie Amajoyi made seven and nine tackles, respectively.

Biggs and UC Davis football are pleased to have finished the season with a winning record, sending their veterans off with such a thrilling win. With the victory, UC Davis guaranteed its 39th winning season in the past 40 years.

“It’s a rivalry,” Biggs said. “Anytime you win a rivalry, you get the bragging rights for one year. We’ll enjoy it for one year, and we’ll start all over again next year.”

GRACE SPRAGUE can be reached at sports@theaggie.org.

Column: Real Nor Cal Rivalry

0

Think of the best college football rivalry.

First thought has to be Ohio State-Michigan. Next pair that comes to mind is the Big Game – Stanford-Cal. The historical football feud between Harvard and Yale has to be up there too.

The three pairs each bring an aspect to the perfect college football rivalry. Ohio State-Michigan has parity. Stanford-Cal has proximity. Harvard-Yale has history.

There’s a rivalry in our neck of the woods that has all three. The UC Davis and Sacramento State football rivalry has the making to be one of the best ever. It has parity. It has history. And obviously, it has proximity.

“I think rivalries are all the same,” coach Bob Biggs said. “It’s 57 years we’ve been doing this. Anytime you have that kind of longevity, you build a lot of emotion for the game and that’s evident when we play them.”

Proximity: UC Davis and Sacramento State are a mere 20 miles apart. ‘Nuff said.

Parity: Parity is the closeness of games.

If you’ve watched either of the last two Causeway Classics, a close game is just about a guarantee.

Last year saw the Hornets score a touchdown with 28 seconds left to cap off an amazing game.

This year was more of the same. A Sean Kelley field goal and a Jonathan Perkins interception brought the Causeway Carriage back to Davis. The 2010 matchup had it all – rain, lightning, delays, emotion, skill and toughness.

“This team is just so resilient,” Biggs said. “We really had our backs up against the wall three weeks ago. This is kind of the culmination of their great efforts throughout the year. To win three games in a row, I just think that it says a lot about the team.”

While the overall series strongly favors the Aggies, recent history has seen the Hornets catch up. Sac State has won two of the last three match-ups and has made games out of the prior ten.

Biggs went so far as to say this is one of the best Sac State teams he’s ever seen.

“This is one of their better football teams to be honest with you,” the coach said. “We were playing our best football at the end of the year and that hasn’t always been the case. You have two very good football teams playing in very adverse conditions and that makes for a great game.”

History: This is the kicker. This is what makes the match-up a classic rather than a dud.

There have been plenty of memorable games in the rivalry. Whether it was the mud bowls of 1981 and 1985, or the “Monsoon Bowl” of 2001 (I guess you can add 2010 to this one too), each game has been remembered for something different.

The future of the rivalry is what can really make it top-notch. With UC Davis set to join the Big Sky Conference in 2012 and the Hornets already a member, the Causeway Classic can mean so much more.

The new Big Sky will be split into divisions, and more than likely the Aggies and Hornets will be in the same one. With the two squads perennially matched up in the last week of the season, the future Causeway Classics’ can be some of most memorable yet.

Biggs hopes to see something very specific in the upcoming match-ups.

“My dream is to be playing Sac State at the end of the year for the championship and a playoff berth. That would be my dream. And hopefully one day that will happen.”

Biggs’ dream will become reality. Once it does, you can add importance to the list in what could be one of the greatest college rivalries in the nation.

JASON ALPERT would like to give major props to the few Aggie Pack members that stayed for the entire game, lightning and all. Those select fans define dedication. Great work Aggie Pack. To talk about the future of the Causeway Classic, e-mail me at sports@theaggie.org.

Team Jumba says ‘Do svidaniya’ to ‘The Amazing Race’

1

Two taxi rides in St. Petersburg, Russia, turned out to be the kryptonite that eliminated Michael and Kevin Wu from The Amazing Race 17.

In the seventh episode of the season, which aired on Nov. 7, the father-son YouTube stars were the second to last of seven remaining teams to check in at the Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg for the end of the Russian leg of the race. But because they took taxis to two locations, which were not allowed for those tasks, they were forced to wait one hour as a penalty before officially checking in.

During that time, the last team arrived, and the Wus were sent home.

“It was unfortunate to get out, but we understood our mistake,” Kevin said. “We told ourselves we would try not to make any fatal mistakes but during the last episode we made two or three so that really caused us to get last.”

Kevin said he had been confident that he and his dad would be strong competitors and was disappointed to not make it farther in the race.

“It was painful to watch for both of us,” said Kevin, who is currently taking a break from his third year at UC Davis. “I think we’re happy [with our overall performance] but in the back of my mind I really thought we had the potential to go all the way. I’m a very competitive person so nothing short of the top three or being first was something I was going to be excited about.”

During their time on the race, the Wus traveled from Massachusetts to England, Ghana, Sweden, Norway and Russia. At the end of the Ghana leg, Kevin and Michael came in last but were spared by a surprise non-elimination.

As a condition of their non-elimination, the Wus had to perform an extra task, called a “Speed Bump,” during their next leg in Sweden: Sit on a chair made of ice for 10 minutes.

Kevin said this was the most difficult task he had to complete on the race.

“That was painful for me because I was wearing boxer shorts,” he said.

Michael, a computer consultant from Sugar Land, Tex., said a task in England in which teams had to paddle across a river in a small, medieval boat called a coracle was especially memorable for him.

“That was the first time we really worked together,” he said. “And dog sledding [in Sweden] – it wasn’t even like a task, I enjoyed it so much.”

The Wus said they were happy with how they were portrayed on television, and said they received a lot of support from friends, family and fans.

“Every Sunday when the show was over my daughter would call me and say ‘You did great, Dad!'” Michael said. “Monday I come to work and everybody comes over to me, saying ‘Oh, you did great!'”

Many fans have expressed their disappointment over Kevin and Michael’s elimination. On the Kevin Jumba Facebook page, one fan wrote, “I cried after watching The Amazing Race Season 17 Episode 7! I’ll be a fan forever. Don’t stop, Team Jumba!”

One hundred and three people have also joined a Facebook group called “I Only Watched The Amazing Race Cause KevJumba Was On It.”

The Wus said they will continue to make videos together now that the race is over. Despite their elimination, Kevin said he thought the race did bring him and his dad closer. Michael said the experience was priceless.

“I will always treasure these memories I have with my son, even when he’s grown up and has his own life,” Michael said.

ROBIN MIGDOL can be reached at arts@theaggie.org.

Aggie Senate Briefs

0

ASUCD Senate meetings are scheduled to begin Thursdays at 6:10 p.m. Times listed are according to the clock at the Nov. 18 meeting location, the Memorial Union’s Mee Room.

Meeting called to order at 6:16 p.m.

Jack Zwald, ASUCD president, present, left early

Previn Witana, ASUCD vice president, present

Ozzy Arce, ASUCD senator, present

Emmanuel Diaz-Ordaz, ASUCD senator, present

Osahon Ekhator, ASUCD senator, present, arrived late

Andre Lee, ASUCD senator, president pro tempore, present

Tatiana Moana Bush, ASUCD senator, present

Darwin Moosavi, ASUCD senator, present

Matt Provencher, ASUCD senator, present

Selisa Romero, ASUCD senator, present

Rebecca Sterling, ASCUD senator, present

Alison Tanner, ASUCD senator, present

Adam Thongsavat, ASUCD senator, present

Liz Walz, ASUCD senator, present, left early

Farewell addresses

Former Senators Joel Juarez, Andre Lee, Don Ho, Bree Rombi, Levi Menovske and Abrham Castillo-Ruiz gave their farewell speeches.

Awards

Rombi received the Michael J. Tucker award.

Dana Percoco presented the Hottie Hot award to Juarez and Rombi.

Appointments and confirmations

Madelaine Sortano was confirmed director of Cal Aggie Camp.

Consideration of old legislation

Senate Bill 17 authored by Sergio Cano, co-authored by Lee and introduced by Rombi, to allow legislation to be readily available to commissioners, passed unanimously.

Senate Bill 18 authored by Ryan Fong, co-authored by Tanner, Allison Bollback and Dannielle Kimpel and introduced by Tanner, to allocate $27.00 from Senate Reserves to purchase six informational posters aimed at raising ASUCD awareness on campus, passed unanimously.

Senate Bill 21 authored by the Internal Affairs Commission, co-authored by Aaron Giampietro, Baxter Boeh-Sobon, Matthew Blair and Sabrina Dias and introduced by the Internal Affairs Commission (IAC), to allocate $2,398.00 from Capital Reserves to purchase two 21.5-inch iMacs for the Office of External Affairs, including University Affairs, City and County Affairs and Lobby Corps, passed unanimously.

Senate Bill 22 authored and introduced by the IAC and co-authored by Lee, to prevent commissions from voting on network or technological capital prior to approval by the Internet and Networking Committee, passed unanimously.

An urgent resolution authored by Cano, co-authored by Caitlin Alday, Josh Lovelace, Tanner and Thongsavat, introduced by Rombi, to oppose the 8 percent fee increase imposed by the UC Board of Regents, passed unanimously.

Approval of past meeting minutes

Approved

Meeting adjourned at 10:43 p.m.

AKSHAYA RAMANUJAM compiles the senate briefs. She can be reached at campus@theaggie.org.

Column: Stoner Etiquette 101

0

Fall quarter is nearing its long-awaited end, and as I push to give out valuable information about marijuana before my last column comes up, I’m brainstorming what should be shared with my college constituents.

There’s so much that can be discussed concerning cannabis, and in particular the political atmosphere is hot right now – there’s more talk on legalization and a trend of higher voter approval of taxes and ordinances on medical marijuana all over the state.

Arizona became the 15th state to legalize the drug for medicinal purposes.

The new nominee for DEA administrator, Michele Leonhart, is not someone you would want to toke with.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently said on Leno, “no one cares if you smoke a joint or not,” and a picture of one graced the front cover of this week’s Time magazine (of which my stoner pals have said, “they could have rolled a nicer joint”).

Publicity-wise, all’s good in the land of green, but there’s certain information on weed that you simply can’t read about in most magazines and newspapers, or watch on television.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Stoner Etiquette 101: a simple list on smoking manners you should know if you’ve recently joined the Stoner Club.

(The first rule of Stoner Club is you do not talk about Stoner Club – though I say knowledge shared is knowledge gained.)

1. Puff, puff, pass.

Thou shalt take two hits from thine’s smoking apparatus before passing to the next smoker. Due to my problems with counting to the number two, I often forget this golden rule.

2. No lighter jacking.

You may have heard of swagger jacking, but lighter jacking is by far a more criminal offense. Nothing’s worse than having a packed bowl for yourself without a lighter in sight. (The late night trip to 7-11 is worth it in the long run, but such a hassle.)

3. Got some to match?

Smoking out your buds with some bud is always a nice gesture, but always receiving and never giving goes against Zen smoking philosophy. It’s polite to contribute and “match” with some of your own weed, or plan on smoking out your supplier in the future.

4. Got five on it?

Same principle. Put down $5 if you have nothing to contribute.

5. Don’t kill the mood.

It’s great that you know about infant mortality rates in Africa, but not everyone wants to hear about that when they’re delightfully away from life’s woes. Paranoid attitudes are unwelcome as well. Be chill.

6. Don’t expect to be smoked out at a party.

It’s always nice to meet friendly and willing tokers at parties, but beware of strangers preying on your weed like starved piranhas in a lake full of bloody caribous. Similarly, don’t assume any stranger will smoke you out like you deserve it.

7. Don’t pass ash, or an empty bowl.

And if there’s nothing left, repack, repack, repack.

8. Spilling bong water is a no.

It’s stinky, like your stinky smoking attitude. And you better hope you didn’t break that bong when you knocked it over!

9. Mind the rotation.

We all get a turn. Don’t forget to pass.

10. Smoke and stick around.

Don’t get smoked out and just bounce. It’s rude.

This list is not exhaustive, but it’s a good starting point for proper manner in social settings. When everyone in the group knows what’s up, you’re bound to have a good, civilized time.

Of course, there are no real rules to smoking marijuana, except to maybe enjoy yourself and relax. Allow your mind to explore and appreciate the world around you. Chill out and take in the moment.

And be a responsible smoker – enjoy yourself, but don’t lose yourself in the high life. Everything is better in moderation. Weed should not get in the way of the daily grind. Rather, adjust your smoking habits to work around pesky midterms and other activities that require more mental attention and responsibility. Take a tolerance break if you have a test coming up.

With that being said, just say no when you have to. Don’t fall into peer pressure, and don’t peer pressure others to smoke if they don’t want to, you jerk.

Take pleasure in random conversation, confusion and epiphanies. The best part of smoking with other people is enjoying everyone’s good vibes. Have fun!

Did MAY YANG miss any other stoner etiquette rules? Tell her what’s up at mayyang@ucdavis.edu.