58.4 F
Davis

Davis, California

Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Home Blog Page 304

California COVID Notify: the app pioneered by the UC system that can trace contact with COVID-19

0

How six UC campuses are revolutionizing contact tracing to control the spread of COVID-19

UC Davis and the wider UC system have been contributors to COVID-19 research and COVID-prevention tools since the beginning of the pandemic. One of these tools is California COVID Notify, a contact tracing app that can notify participants when they have had a “high risk contact” with a positive case of COVID-19. Developed by Google and Apple, the technology is currently being piloted at six UC campuses across California. Carrie Byington, the executive vice president and head of UC Health, explained why using a tracing app like California COVID Notify is so helpful in tracking the spread of the virus.

“If you think about your average day and if we hope for a time with fewer restrictions, you might come into contact with many people during the day that you don’t know,” Byington said. “If they’re carrying COVID-19, doing contact tracing can be very difficult if you don’t know their name or where they live. Your cell phone can alert you that you have been in contact with one or more people for 15 minutes that might be COVID positive.”

Although contact tracing has been an important tool throughout the pandemic, Dr. David Lubarsky, the CEO of UC Davis Health, explained that it is not efficient enough to keep up with the virus’s spread, especially as California and many other states are seeing spikes in cases right now. Instead, he said that a technological solution like California COVID Notify is extremely helpful in ensuring that people who have had close contact with a positive case find out in a timely manner.

“It really speeds up, if you’re going to get symptoms, getting a test,” Lubarsky said. “It really unmasks people who are asymptomatic who actually have the virus, because you can’t get it if you haven’t had some sort of high-risk exposure. This really cuts into the spread of the disease because responsible people want to know, and they’re going to test themselves and keep themselves out of circulation until they know that they aren’t at risk anymore.”

The technology is being used across universities and at associated health centers,  including UC Davis and UC Davis Health. Lubarsky explained that the heightened risk of exposure that comes with being on a college campus or in an associated health center makes UC Davis a great place to test the technology.

“One of the reasons we’re originally rolling it out at colleges and universities and health systems is because there’s a very obviously highly-educated population and people who are living in close proximity who are not in the same family, so you can’t really limit your interactions the way you could if you stayed in your own home,” Lubarsky said. “There’s so much community spread right now that no matter how perfect [we are] there’s going to be people who catch it in the community and bring it into the campus or health system. [It’s best to] immediately notify everybody that they may have had a high-risk exposure so that they can protect themselves and their loved ones.”

Lubarsky also stated that by comparing the spread of COVID-19 on UC campuses that are using this technology to the spread on campuses without this technology, they can identify the impact of the app. If there is lower transmission and it is seen affecting the actions of students and staff, the app is working effectively. 

The UC felt inclined to institute this specific tracking app because of its secure privacy restrictions, Byington said.

“This app really made sense for us because of the excellent privacy controls,” Byington said. “It is an anonymous app and no data is stored about the user’s identity, so we felt that it would be an innovative tool and one that our campus populations would be willing to accept.”

If a user of the app comes into close contact with a user who is COVID-19 positive, they will be notified only that they have had close contact. Users do not have access to the name of the person they came into contact with, their phone number or when and where they were exposed. Lubarsky explained that the use of encrypted data protects all users from data abuse.  

“The data never passes through some sort of giant data bank,” Lubarsky said. “There’s no storage of the interactions that we’re having as we pass each other. There’s an exchange of an encrypted chain link that says this person and that person were close together and it’s just stored in your two phones. All the data is just in your phone. There’s no risk of abuse of the data because it doesn’t exist anywhere.”

Byington shared that if this technology proves to help curb the community spread across campuses, she hopes to see it implemented across the state.

“We think it would be a really good option for California,” Byington said. “We think it’s something that many people would want to use and we know that the more people that use it, the more likely we are to be able to identify exposures.”

Lubarsky explained that technology like this, that promotes greater awareness of the virus, will be necessary to control the spread. 

“They say ignorance is bliss and the best state to live in is denial, but that’s not the best way to beat this pandemic,” Lubarsky said. “If we can reduce the spread, we can contain the virus.”
Written by Katie DeBenedetti — features@theaggie.org

UC Davis Women’s Basketball 2020-21 season preview

0

Aggies embark on their journey for a fifth straight Big West crown

The UC Davis Women’s Basketball team has been atop the Big West Conference for the past four seasons. Riding high after an NCAA Tournament appearance in 2019, the Aggies prepared to make it two straight appearances in the big dance. But their aspirations were put to a halt by COVID-19 back in mid-March. As they prepared to leave Davis enroute to Anaheim, they received the news. With everything coming so fast, the hardest part was trying to come to terms that some had played their last game of college basketball ever. 

“We were all just really sad,” said Jennifer Gross, the UC Davis Women’s Basketball head coach. “We were entering the tournament really confident and ready. It was heartbreaking, especially for the seniors.”

“It was very abrupt. It was hard. It was really hard,” Gross said. 

With Sophia Song, Nina Bessolo and Katie Toole all in their last year, the cancellation of their season meant an end to their playing careers, a tough blow for everyone involved.

“We didn’t get to send the seniors off the way we wanted to,” said senior forward Cierra Hall. “It was devastating. A lot of hurt went around but we just banded together and said there was nothing we could do in a situation like this but stick together.”

The pandemic did not allow for a normal lead-up to the season, and the teams’ spring and summer were left to figure out a way to stay on course as much as they could. Zoom meetings every week or so allowed them to stay in contact and build the team chemistry that has fueled the program over the years. Fun activities and meaningful conversations about what was going on in the world gave the team the opportunity to stay connected and garner a better understanding of what kind of team they would be leading up into the season. Although all those activities helped, doing them virtually will never feel the same as in person, and for Hall, these times gave her a chance to try to reset and work on herself.

“A lot of mental health work,” said Hall in reference to her time at home. “Just envisioning my game and doing stuff in my house. A lot of dribbling on the sidewalk and working on my mental health, just getting my goals prepared for the next year.”

Long months of not playing basketball as a team finally came to an end on Oct. 14, the first day they were allowed to practice together. Their passion for the game of basketball increased during that time, and the team practiced hard in the lead-up to their Nov. 25 opener. This years’ roster has a mix of veteran and young players and as they play their opening games, the excitement only grows stronger.

“The younger players have established themselves very well,” Hall said. “We have established a strong culture here. I think it was easy for the freshmen and those who redshirted last year to see that and to feel that.”

Their strong leadership and team culture has built this program into one that  has brought them so much success throughout the last couple of years. 

“Whenever you lose such talented seniors, it’s hard,” Gross said. “But, I’ve been really impressed with our group of players this year. In terms of leadership, this is one of the best groups we’ve ever had at UC Davis. The chemistry is really building day by day and it’s exciting to see. We have a good balance of veterans that are setting an example everyday and the younger players that are soaking it all up and trying to bring that energy.”

With changes to the conference scheduling, the Aggies’ road to a fifth straight Big West title will look much different than usual. Having started out with their non-conference schedule on Nov. 25 in a win against the University of San Francisco, the team got a feeling of what this season might be like early on. 

On Nov. 27, it was announced that UC Davis’ games against Simpson University on Nov. 28 and Santa Clara University on Dec. 3 would be canceled due to positive COVID-19 tests on the opposing teams. Since they are non-conference games, there is a question whether they will be rescheduled. Nonetheless, with college basketball just recently tipping off, this looks like it will be something to adjust to as the season progresses. 

That leaves the Aggies’ with three non-conference games remaining before Big West play. Meeting in the Causeway Classic in Sacramento, UC Davis takes on the Sacramento State Hornets on Dec. 8. They follow it up by traveling to Stanford later that week to face the highly ranked Cardinals. To finish off their non-conference schedule, they will face Northern Arizona at The Pavilion on Dec. 20.

Coming into the season ranked first in the Big West coaches and media poll, the Aggies will begin their campaign in a series against CSU Bakersfield (Dec. 27-28) in Davis, Calif. They then travel to take on UC Riverside (Jan. 1-2) and then play UC Irvine (Jan. 8-9) at The Pavilion. They then play Cal State Fullerton (Jan. 15-16) in Southern California before coming back to Davis to play newly-added UC San Diego (Jan. 22-23). Following their trip to Santa Barbara (Jan. 29-30), they embark on a week break before returning and visiting Long Beach State (Feb. 12-13). From there, they face Cal Poly (Feb. 26-27) at The Pavilion and finish off the season in Hawaii (Mar. 5-6). 

 With games this season being played back to back in order to reduce travel, this new element allows teams to get familiar with their opponents on consecutive nights. 

“It’s going to be a bit of learning as we go,” said Gross about the back-to-back games. “Our team does have some good depth and we’re going to need that. It’ll be strange to not have that day in-between, but it’s going to be about which team makes adjustments the best.”

With the seniors of last year departing to their future endeavors, the team was left with a lot open on the offensive end. With a Preseason All-Conference player like Hall and redshirt senior guard Mackenzie Trpcic leading the charge alongside returning players like Sage Stobbart, Evanne Turner, Kayla Konrad and more, the Aggies will figure out the offensive side of the ball as the season progresses. 

“One thing we’ve always hung our hats on is our defense,” Gross said. “We have a number of players who can put the ball in the basket but it’s been our defense that has been super reliable and has helped us win the last four championships. The commitment to building a really strong defense and building habits every single day knowing that whether you’re at home or on the road, they’re going to be there for you when you need them.”

This will be a season unlike any other for teams across the country. For the Aggies, they will do their best to make the most of their circumstances. With the constant possibility of games being moved around, the team is hoping that in spite of everything, they can come out on top and win their fifth straight Big West championship. 

“It’s about taking every single day and how we approach it and attack it,” Hall said. “We’re very much focused on getting better and improving every day so we’re able to put the best version of ourselves out on the court each time we play. We know that we have a bit of a target on our backs, so we need to bring the best to every game we play.”
Written by: Omar Navarro — sports@theaggie.org

ASUCD passes emergency UC admission extension resolution

The Senate requested UC regents extend the admissions deadline to Dec. 15, a new STEM committee created and a new External Affairs chair was confirmed

The Nov. 19 ASUCD virtual special Senate meeting was called to order at 6:10 p.m. by Senator Amanjot Gandhoke, in the absence of President Kyle Krueger. 

Emergency resolution SR #3, introduced by interim Senator Michelle Lester, calls on the UC Regents to extend the submission deadline for students for the 2020-2021 admission cycle; as it stands, the deadline is Nov. 30.

“It is a unique situation,” Senator Erika Valle said. “I think we could all agree that with everything being online and remote, the pandemic has been difficult enough for us who are already University of California students.”

The resolution, which would extend the submission deadline to Dec. 15, came to the table as a suggestion from UC Berkeley. Some senators had concerns that the application extension of two weeks was not long enough; however, Senator Jane Casto thought that any extension could make a huge impact on students.

“As long as we can get an extension, that would be awesome,” Casto said. “Even those two weeks would be major for a lot of people.”   

Despite the concerns about the date of extension, Gandhoke was the sole ‘no’ vote and with two additional abstentions, the motion passed.  

Maya Bhadury, a third-year environmental policy analysis and planning and economics double major, authored SB #32, which intends to strengthen environmental sustainability guidelines to increase alignment with the campuswide policies and practices as well as increase audits to twice per quarter. 

“A lot of our policies didn’t line up with campuswide and UCOP wide sustainability policies,” Bhadury said. “We also noticed that EPPC’s auditing duties were insufficient, it was just once per quarter and nothing super strict.”

Senate Recorder Daniel Wallace submitted his resignation for the end of the quarter due to concerns about balancing a demanding work schedule. 

“I’ve enjoyed working with the Senate,” Wallace said. “I hope I’ve been useful in my time here, but I don’t think I’ll be very effective after this quarter.”

The Senate confirmed a new External Affairs Chair, third-year international relations major Natalia Waid, who said she intends to carry forward the vision of the outgoing chair, Shelby Sayler. 

“ASUCD is one of the biggest reasons why I ended up choosing UC Davis,” Waid said. “Because I respect the fact that students have so much power and such a strong voice in how they want the campus to be run.”

Waid was previously nominated for Judicial Council Chair by Krueger, but did not receive a hearing because she was not present at the meeting. She said she does not have new projects she would like to implement at this time. 

 A new STEM committee was created via SB #33, authored by Senator Juan Velasco. He said the new committee needs members, citing that committees tend to die quickly without them.

“It is my hope that this committee will allow for an opportunity not just in student government,” Velasco said, encouraging the new committee to create projects that involve STEM. 

Though social sciences will not be included in the new committee, Hunter Ottman, the chair of the ASUCD Environmental Policy and Planning Commission, urged the table to seek out students from a diverse field of study in STEM.

“This is something that is tricky because you can’t put in writing one committee member from each of those fields,” Ottman said. “So, it’s going to be a balancing act to make sure that you are following fair practices for hiring but at the same time trying to make sure it doesn’t go one way or the other.”

Senator Samantha Boudaie introduced an ASUCD buddy system as part of onboarding for new senators that paired senators-elect with senior senators from the opposing slate. She intends to increase positive non-partisan communication on the table. 

“Should they have any confusion, they have someone that they can reach out to that isn’t explicitly in their slate,” Boudaie said. “We’re all on the same team, which is team UC Davis students.” 
Written by: Kathleen Quinn — campus@theaggie.org

Local businesses facing difficulties amidst move to purple tier

Restaurants and other businesses struggle as indoor dining is prohibited and fewer students return to Davis

Yolo County announced in a press release published on Nov. 16 that it would be moving to the purple tier, following an increase in positive cases of COVID-19. As of Nov. 16, the adjusted case rate for Yolo County was 17.4, which is much higher than the threshold of 7.0 for the purple tier. 

Due to the move to the purple tier, local businesses will now have to cease indoor activities or operate at limited capacity. For example, restaurants, gyms, movie theaters, zoos and museums can operate “outdoors only with modifications,” according to the press release.

The move to the purple tier has taken an additional toll on businesses, alongside the decrease in business caused by the pandemic, according to Executive Director of Davis Downtown Brett Maresca via email.

“[The move to the Purple Tier] has hit restaurants, bars, and workout/gym facilities the hardest,” Maresca said via email. “No seating is allowed inside for eating or drinking, and no indoor services can be provided for gyms or workout studios. It overall puts a damper on at least the perception of safety of all business conducted indoors as well, which in turn hurts commerce in other business sectors.”

Maresca also noted that while the return of students to Davis in the fall has been helpful, there haven’t been as many students as previous years, which has been difficult for businesses. 

“A lot of our downtown businesses survive off of the student population, and struggle just to break even during the summers and winter/spring breaks when they are not present,” Maresca said via email. “This year has been extremely difficult without the students here.”

Owner of Mishka’s Café, Sinisa Novakovic, explained the repercussions of the move to the purple tier on business operations. 

“Purple tier for us really means that we cannot have anybody inside, and customers [buy] drinks and pastries either to-go or sit outside,” Novakovic said. 

Novakovic also noted that while business improved by around 20% when more students returned in the fall, it has still remained low, decreasing the number of employees working each shift.

“We really only have—for the most part—two, sometimes three people working per shift because there are far fewer people coming out,” Novakovic said. 

Some furniture also had to be removed to allow for social distancing, alongside other precautionary measures such as having hand-sanitizer available and not serving from customers’ reusable ceramic mugs or to-go containers.

Public Information Officer for Yolo County Jenny Tan explained via email her concerns with the potential of people gathering during the upcoming holiday season, which could potentially lead to a spike in cases.

“I worry about our numbers increasing when they are already quite high,” Tan said via email. “We all need to sacrifice a little bit this year, by not gathering or traveling this holiday season.”

Maresca underscored the importance of continuing to support local businesses, especially in this time when business has taken a downturn. 

“Please support your local businesses!” Maresca said via email. “Without student patronage, more businesses will be disappearing and there will be less to do and shop for in-person in our community! Instead of shopping online for this holiday season, please visit downtown and support the businesses that are here for you.”

Ways to support local businesses include participating in Shop Small Saturday with the Farmers Market, attending music and activities in E Street Plaza, a raffle and more, according to Maresca. More information can be found on Davis Downtown’s website.

Tan also noted that alongside buying from local businesses and ordering from restaurants, students can volunteer at nonprofit organizations and donate food. 

Despite the detrimental effects of COVID-19 on business, Novakovic highlighted that residents of Davis have been “incredibly supportive.”

“It’s been a pleasure trying to stay open in spite of all the difficulties, but what made it much easier is the fact that our regular customers showed their support by showing up and by generously tipping our employees,” Novakovic said. 

 Written by: Shraddha Jhingan — city@theaggie.org


Love Campus offers upgraded way to date during a pandemic

0

Online platforms like Love Campus, created by UC Berkeley students, offer the opportunity to make connections and possibly meet a partner

As dating comes to an abrupt halt during COVID-19, Lena Reibstein, a UC Berkeley third-year studying film and data science and founder of Love Campus, began the show Love Campus as a nationwide alternative for college students to maintain an interactive dating experience during the shutdown. 

Reibstein first created Love is Blind Berkeley, an online platform on Instagram that connected UC Berkeley students through online games and coupling. Inspired by the reality TV show “Love Island,” the organization was structured to combine couples challenges, as well as initially-anonymous profiles, to kickstart connections based on personality instead of physical impressions. Throughout the spring season, other students began to produce Love is Blind accounts for their own colleges in order to organize opportunities for relationships. 

Recently, Reibstein had the idea to consolidate these separate accounts into one general page known as Love Campus. She recruited producers and crew members from each of the other college accounts to produce a show that was open for all U.S. college students. Thus, Love Campus was born from the idea of making dating accessible for students nationwide without foregoing genuine connection.

“[Dating] is about individual choices, who you swipe left on on Tinder, who you meet at a grocery store,” Reibstein said. “It’s become very much up to you to seek that. It’s become very isolated as well […]. It’s become more shallow and looks-based. I think this show gave people the chance to get to know people without photos which is a really enriching opportunity.” 

Love Campus combines the structure of anonymous dating with coupling, and aims to create an environment that allows people to meet organically. The first day, people are placed in an anonymous group chat and communicate with one another. Direct messages are sent and people are able to gauge attraction through conversation and personality. The next day, people are coupled up and encouraged to get to know each other better. 

There are also mini games and challenges each week to foster greater bonds, teamwork and conversations. Couples who win challenges are then granted an online date where they are able to have private conversations with one another. These challenges are documented and then posted on the Love Campus Instagram for the audience to see and react to. To remain as unbiased as possible, all contestants are banned from this account in order for them to form their own opinions. 

Throughout the process couples are allowed to recouple with other people, depending on their compatibility and preferences. Elimination rounds occur every few days with the last couple being crowned the winner. 

“Whenever you’re getting eliminated in any scenario, that’s going to raise your heart rate,” Reibstein said. “I think being in that scenario with someone and going through with that is really effective. The dates and the mini games are structured to build or test connections. When you’re in a place that is designed to build or test your relationship multiple times and you pass [and] grow from those, that can form a bond that is really strong.”  

Designed to eliminate superficial tendencies, Love Campus seeks to build relationships based on interaction and compatibility. Love Campus Producer Daniela Cervantes, a fourth-year at UC Berkeley double majoring in ethnic studies and theater and performance studies, discussed the power of building relationships through their show and the connection they’ve seen among contestants. 

“People’s identities and personalities translate through a screen and are picked up by other people despite them being initially anonymous,” Cervantes said. “Physical attraction isn’t a factor at the beginning. I feel like somehow hotness is still communicated and understood and received even if it’s just through the way they text. Hotness is not a physical thing but an energy that transcends looks.”

Over these two weeks, couples are tested and their compatibility is determined based on their experiences and chemistry with one another. In terms of success, the show has produced multiple couples who will continue to talk after the completion of the show. 

Alana Bright, a first-year USC student studying musical theater, described that she felt an immediate connection with another contestant, Rio. Despite not winning any mini-games, their relationship blossomed and she found herself cherishing the moments of deep conversation and insight with him. She discussed how the show’s producers scheduled  low-pressure events to help foster natural connections. In comparison, she said, real-world dating includes self-inflicted pressure to push the relationship in a certain direction. 

“It’s not just a dating show,” Bright said. “It really penetrates some vulnerable moments and lets you get to know not only a significant other, but people.”

Bright highly recommended the process as a unique opportunity to take part in during this unprecedented time. For her, the show allowed her to create new friends and to meet someone who, coincidentally, also attend USC. 

“What else do you have going on?” Bright said. “Give yourself some time to explore and experiment in a secluded space that does not involve you constantly worried about the pressures of outside life. We can sometimes block ourselves from really meaningful connections out of fear of losing something else or out of fear of something not fitting in a schedule you already have.”

Though season one is completed, season two applications will be open for the upcoming holiday season. Check the Love Campus Instagram for details of when upcoming applications will be released. There will also be applications to work as crew members linked on Instagram. 
Written by: Farrah Ballou — features@theaggie.org

Police logs

Machete man returns to fight his archnemesis—plants!

November 5

“Her Amazon packages were delivered to neighbor’s house by accident and they were not returned or given to respondent as stated in court order.”

November 7

“Four to five subjects playing beer pong. Respondent concerned for the noise primarily, as well as the shelter in place violations and underage consumption.”

November 11

“Coyote ran onto campus near baseball field.”

November 12

“Three subjects horseplaying, screaming.”

November 14

“Has 40 tranquilizer bottles and hasn’t taken any—has two taser guns—wants to tell officers all about it.”

November 15

“Male subject threw a bicycle at the maintenance person after being told he couldn’t make repairs inside lobby.”

November 18

“Male walking around with machete hacking at plants.”

Why kids shows are better than teen shows

What teen shows lack, children’s shows provide

While I admit there are some good teen TV shows out there that are worth watching (“Never Have I Ever,” “One Day at a Time”), kids and tween shows are getting better than shows aimed for a teen audience because they’re trying to teach kids something. Kids are at such an impressionable age that it’s important for them to see characters that have well-rounded qualities. Although, I don’t understand why that stops when it comes to teen shows. They may be young and naive, but teen shows are given the short end of the stick. Most have to deal with bad actors, terrible outfit choices and a string of one-dimensional characters attempting to carry an awful storyline. 

The following kids shows exceeded expectations. It’s reassuring to know that the younger generation still has some quality programs left to watch. 

Ashley Garcia: Genius in Love

Fifteen-year-old Ashley Garcia, a robotics engineer and rocket scientist, moves in with her carefree uncle across the country for her dream job at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). But with the new move comes a transition she’s never truly focused on: high school boys. 

I can recall the amount of TV shows and movies I watched as a child that represented a Latina in a positive spotlight: “Spy Kids,” “Dora the Explorer,” “Maya and Miguel,” “Wizards of Waverly Place” (kind of) and “Big Hero 6.” Latina girls don’t get to see that very often on their screen; what they usually see is a hypersexualized Latina, a maid or a feisty woman. 

It’s so refreshing to see a happy Mexican family where the uncle isn’t an alcoholic but instead a football coach who loves his niece unconditionally. This is the type of show I would have loved as a kid. I could not be happier to know that my younger cousins are watching it and that they can see Ashley, the main character, as a smart young woman who is a three-dimensional character. She’s funny, energetic and competitive; she has personality traits that Latinas don’t always get in shows. 

No Good Nick

“No Good Nick” follows Nick as she sets up her newest con job to be part of the Thomspon family. Nick creates a fake identity, and with the help of her sleazy foster parents, fakes being part of the Thompson family, playing a foster kid whose parents just died. Nick’s true intentions were to sabotage the Thomspon family as revenge because they “ruined her life.”

I love a moral dilemma that deals with revenge. Kids shows usually have to go a little simpler in terms of ethical dilemmas, but “No Good Nick” does an amazing job at portraying the butterfly effect and the damage it can do to others. It gives children a new perspective that could help them weigh out difficult situations.

The audience doesn’t learn exactly what the Thompson family did to ruin Nick’s life. They don’t see that side of the story until part two of the show. For all of part one you get to see the Thompson family—what kind of people they are and what kind of person Nick is. You start to love them and they grow on you. When the audience sees both sides of the situation, however, they’re stuck in a disagreement with themselves about who did more wrong to whom. My opinion immediately flipped once the other circumstances were factored in: I was on Nick’s side wholeheartedly. 

The Babysitter’s Club

It might just be seeing my childhood books on TV, but I thought “The Babysitter’s Club” was an adorable show that I didn’t mind spending my time on when I was cleaning or needed something quick to watch while eating a small snack. My favorite thing about the show was that they brought in girls from different backgrounds and who had different personalities. They weren’t just a group of the same girls; they had their own quirks, goals, fears and they knew who they were and who they wanted to be.

Compared to the quality of the shows above, these teen shows were terrible—some that lacked direction, some that just kept going for ratings and others that just wanted to waste money on a disappointing series. 

Riverdale 

Much to fellow arts writer Livvy Mullen’s dismay, I hated “Riverdale.” After watching the first season, I quit it. Actually, I don’t think I even finished the first season. The first season of “Riverdale” revolved around a group of best friends going through casual teenage drama while uncovering a murder mystery. Midway into the season, there was a scene in which the new girl, Veronica, gets into the shower with Archie after he just had a breakdown, and I thought to myself, “What am I watching?” 

“Riverdale” is notorious for having their grown actors play “weirdo” teenagers (ahem, Cole Sprouse). I am very aware that because of child labor laws, hiring a teenager makes everyone’s life more difficult, but it is always unsettling to pass off a 30-year-old for a high schooler, knowing well that it could set unrealistic expectations for kids watching the show. 

13 Reasons Why 

While I love Alisha Boe and her performance is stellar in everything she does, after season one of “13 Reasons Why,” the show fell toward a downward spiral. What was most upsetting about the show is that it ignored everything that experts told them not to do—they were extremely explicit. 

Hannah Baker’s suicide was changed for the worse; I read “13 Reasons Why” (the book that the show was based off) when I was younger. It was well thought-out and Hannah’s death was left without much details, leaving the reader to piece together exactly how she commits suicide. The book brought awareness to topics that are usually taboo, and for the most part, the show did too, but it brought up the topics in the wrong way. 

While Hannah’s death scene was ultimately changed by Netflix, the initial showing was too gruesome to look at. I recognize that they portrayed it this way to make sure the audience did not view suicide in a romanticized way, but it was still much too graphic. Adding on to the death scene, they left an intense scene about sexual assault.

I wanted the show to work out well, but after the first season I didn’t feel like they were sticking to the original plan of telling an important story. “13 Reasons Why” is the type of show that is supposed to be important. It’s supposed to bring attention to an issue and that’s why I was looking forward to it when the trailer first came out. But once it did well, instead of seeing it as an opportunity to bring awareness, it was used to stretch out a story to gain ratings. I believe that there are better teen shows that express sensitive issues (see: The Fosters). 

Emily in Paris

My latest review of “Emily in Paris” pretty much sums up everything I hated about the show other than its obvious appeal to the romanticism that we are all craving. But it was still something I wasted my time on. Is it something that I would consider watching another season of? Probably. Will I hate myself for it when I’m done? Most definitely. 

“Emily in Paris” didn’t have any real value; it was just a mindless TV show. There wasn’t a strong plot, all of the characters were irritating and the only notable element of the show was the scenery. But again, my time would have been better spent doing the work I had been avoiding—or watching a children’s show.

As Netflix rolls out new shows by the week, it’s disappointing to see the quality diminish in teen shows. Teens are at a point in their lives when they are still trying to figure themselves out. They are searching for who they want to be and the media makes an immense impression on them. I can’t think of any valid reason as to why they have stopped incorporating valuable themes in shows as we get older. I know plenty of adults that could use a little lesson on empathy.
Written by: Itzelth Gamboa — arts@theaggie.org

COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts performing arts industry, according to local artists and performers

Theater and dance companies adapt to comply with social distancing guidelines

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted several different industries that rely on in-person gatherings including the performing arts. Due to social distancing guidelines, performing arts companies and workers had to adapt to these unprecedented times. 

Steve Isaacson, the treasurer and co-producer of the Davis Musical Theatre Company, noted that the pandemic left a negative impact on the performing arts industry as a whole. 

“Broadway shut down until God knows when,” Isaacson said. “Community theaters are going out of business left and right. Everybody’s had to come up with either new ideas or go out of business.”

Laguna Creek High School’s Infinite Motion Dance Company Director Lauren Galvez reflected via email on the difficulty of working in the performing arts amid the pandemic.

“As a worker in the performing arts during COVID-19, it has been extremely difficult,” Galvez said via email. “It’s hard trying to be flexible when you’re trying to solidify pieces and get a set schedule going for these kids.”

Isaacson explained how Davis Musical Theatre Company was in their 35th anniversary season and preparing for upcoming shows when the pandemic began. After lockdown started, they could no longer have live rehearsals or shows and transitioned to Zoom. 

“[…] we were kind of stopped in our tracks in March,” Isaacson said. “We just had to completely shut down and pivot. This was a very tough time for everyone.”

Galvez said via email that prior to the pandemic, the dancers would regularly have practices three times a week to prepare for upcoming performances. Once the pandemic began, however, the team had to be split into two groups that would occupy the dance room on different days. Other modifications included the reduction of in-person rehearsals to a maximum of an hour-and-a-half and the requirement that dancers wear their masks at all times. 

Gia Battista, the Davis Shakespeare Festival artistic director, described how the Davis Shakespeare Festival typically performed two summer shows, one fall show and hosted a summer camp. When the pandemic began, they canceled the summer camp and in-person shows entirely. 

Battista further explained how they transitioned to an online format with online youth workshops, an online Shakespeare reading group and a digital internship program. At the moment, they are currently focusing on the digital internship, in which interns are producing an online festival with three shows in December. 

Galvez reflected on the tenacity of the dancers despite the new challenges they face. 

“At the end of the day, these kids are still able to have this opportunity to dance, interact with their dance family, and know that they have all this support,” Galvez said via email. “We’re all growing and enduring these hardships together.”

Battista commented on the resourcefulness of the performing arts industry. 

“There have been a lot of companies as well as individual artists who have been really resilient and innovative through this challenging time,” Battista said. “I’ve also really appreciated the resources that have come through from larger performing arts companies who have made their past shows available online for free, and I think this has been a really great resource for a lot of artists and educators.”

Galvez added a note of encouragement to other dancers still pursuing their passion during COVID-19. 

“For all my dancers out there, keep creating and keep exploring,” Galvez said via email. “Your passion will encourage and inspire those around you.”

Battista provided one final comment on the future of arts workers and their place in the fight for social justice. 

“This time has been a huge moment and a huge call for social change and racial justice,” Battista said. “As we work together as collaborators, I’ve seen a lot of companies and artists really taking this time to look inward, and I would just encourage that to continue.”
Written By: Jelena Lapuz — city@theaggie.org

SCOTUS has some fun for a change

Justice Kavanaugh asked to sit out

Setting a landmark precedent for federal decorum, the Supreme Court of the U.S. (SCOTUS) voted on two measures last Sunday: One to hold a “Sunday Barbecue” day and another to divide the court into two teams for their next ruling, “just to make things interesting.” Both measures were approved unanimously by the court, making it the first unanimous decision since the Warren Court approved “Poker Night at the Kennedy’s,” in 1962.
Sources close to the court say that teams are speculated to be split Boys v. Girls, due to various ideological differences, the current gender make-up of the court and the giant “Boys v. Girls Sunday” sign seen hanging outside the Supreme Court since that morning. 

 As Chief Justice Roberts put it: “I think it’ll make this one interesting. It’s just been so stressful on the court these days. I think this will help us take our minds off of it.” 

Reporters from major news outlets were eager to ask the Court why they decided to take a day off during such an important time. Roberts responded: “Oh no, we’re still doing the rulings. We’re just not taking it as seriously this time. Not letting it get to us, y’know?”

When asked why, and how this would affect their rulings in the current case before them, University v. Khomeidi––a case concerning gay rights, orphans, abortions and flag-burning,  Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor heartily slapped one reporter on the back, and told him to “chill out, man. It’s BBQ Sunday.”

Justice Kavanaugh was asked to sit out of the Boys v. Girls team assignments for obvious reasons. “It would make it weird for everyone,” said a sheepish Justice Roberts. Sources say the other justices folded their arms and avoided eye contact for at least 45 seconds.
At this point, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas put an arm around Justice Kavanaugh and led him to the corner of the courtroom, saying: “Hey man, I’ve been there. Just wait 20 years. They forget all about it.” Kavanaugh spent the rest of the court session facing the corner, looking at the ground.
When it came time to decide University v. Khomeidi, there were no lack of surprises. Justices Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito were the majority opinion for the defendant, citing that the “plaintiffs were being waaaaaay too harsh” and that the defendant needed to be “validated and listened to more.”

Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and the ghost of Ruth Bader Ginsburg formed the dissenting opinion that the defendant “got what was coming to him.” Immediately following this point in their opinion, these justices asked that loud snaps be written into the record immediately after that sentence.

Justice Breyer was the surprise swing vote at the last second today, insisting in his opinion that both sides should just “hug it out and make up. The world has too much hate in it, y’know?”

Upon conclusion of the court, Justice Thomas suggested that next week they may play “Cops and Robbers.” “Just to spice things up a little. This job gets stressful.”

Written By: Matthew Simons –– mrsimons@ucdavis.edu 

(This article is humor and/or satire, and its content is purely fictional. The story and the names of “sources” are fictionalized.)

EPA reapproves use of dangerous pesticide

Atrazine, a possible carcinogen and endocrine disruptor, is one of the most commonly used weed killers in the U.S.

From recent findings suggesting that COVID-19 was found in sewage samples in Spain as far back as March 2019 to environmental attorney Robert Bilott’s novel “Exposure” on his decades long battle over unregulated chemical contamination in tap water, water quality has never been so important to the American public. These invisible threats are not just nameless chemicals—they can be found in everyday products. For instance, Atrazine might not be a household name to most people, but it’s one of the most common pesticides in the world. Since the 1950s, it has been one of the most popular weed killers for a variety of agricultural uses. Roughly 70 million pounds are used every single year in the U.S. Because of its overwhelming use, Atrazine has been a subject of hot debate in the U.S. for years. So let’s clear up any misinformation there is out there.

Firstly, Atrazine is definitively bad for the environment. It is a commonly accepted fact that it has a wide array of detrimental side effects on wildlife. Multiple studies have chronicled the dangerous effects of Atrazine on frog reproduction and endocrine systems, even in small doses. It also has been shown to increase induction of mammary glands and rates of prostate cancer in rodents, cause irregularities in fish reproductive organs and generally harm fish reproduction. According to data taken between 1992 and 2001, it is also one of the most commonly found pesticides in streams and groundwater. Ultimately, this hurts the ability of a population as a whole to reproduce. Because of the ubiquitous nature of Atrazine pollution, this is ultimately harmful to the entire species as it is also incredibly persistent. In fact, a study in Germany found little to no decrease in levels of Atrazine concentrations in ground and drinking water even 20 years after it had been banned.

Professor Tyrone Hayes, one of the leading experts on Atrazine, was one of the first researchers in the U.S. to study its effects on African clawed frogs. In a TED Talk in 2018, he remarked: “Now, I showed this to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because I thought they would be interested. After all this is the number one selling chemical in the world at the time and they said ‘that’s not really an adverse effect that would stimulate us to reassess the chemical.’” 

Germany banned it in 1991 and the European Union banned it in 2003, but in April the EPA reaffirmed its approval of the use of Atrazine. Besides the obvious environmental repercussions, there are also public health considerations in banning Atrazine. If it has such an enormously destructive impact on wildlife, what exactly are its effects on people? 

Firstly, it is a possible carcinogen. It has been linked with higher levels of breast cancer and possibly increased rates of prostate cancer. It also has been found to have a wide variety of reproductive side effects from increased birth defects to increased miscarriages. There are also likely harmful effects on the human endocrine system.

The people primarily feeling the brunt of these effects are farmworkers and people living in rural areas where Atrazine is most commonly used. As the majority of farmworkers in the U.S., especially in California, are part of the Latinx community, this is a social justice issue. Also, before anyone starts spouting about the economy, banning Atrazine would likely benefit farmers. It would reduce corn production, which in turn would allow them to increase corn prices. So why not ban a possibly carcinogenic endocrine disruptor? The answer is simple: The EPA is only ignorant on this issue because massive agricultural corporations like Sygenta want them to be.

“To please Syngenta, the Trump EPA has rejected decades of independent research showing atrazine can’t be safely used at any level,” said Nathan Donley, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Environmental Health Program. “The pro-industry zealots now running the EPA’s pesticide office are making a mockery of science and eliminating key safety measures, all for company profits.” 

So what can you do? Well, several public health groups have already sued the Trump Administration’s EPA for this move, but there are still many ways to educate yourself and act on this issue. You can check out The Pesticide Action Network’s action toolkits to learn more. Additionally, you can donate to the Center for Biological Diversity and PAN to support their ongoing efforts and legal fees.

Written by: Joe Sweeney –– jmsweeney@ucdavis.edu
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by individual columnists belong to the columnists alone and do not necessarily indicate the views and opinions held by The California Aggie

Senator term review: Samantha Boudaie

Outgoing Senator Boudaie served as advocate for Jewish community on campus, though not fully accomplishing all platforms

As ASUCD Senator Samantha Boudaie’s one-year term ends, fellow ASUCD senators and unit members looked back at a brief but fruitful career uplifting UC Davis’s Jewish community. 

ASUCD Vice President Emily Barneond said Boudaie was hardworking during her time on the Senate table.

“[Boudaie] is a super active advocate for the Jewish community and scheduled meetings with Chancellor May to advocate for the community she represents,” Barneond said.

Boudaie’s platform of reducing antisemitism at UC Davis came in the form of a report she developed which showed three out of four Jewish students were made to feel uncomfortable on campus.

“I make the joke that I became a statistician in my term because I had to learn the right way to ask these questions, the appropriate methods, collecting the data,” Boudaie said. “I believe that it came out really strong.”

Boudaie said that she has been pushing to inform members of ASUCD about the wants and needs of the Jewish community on campus.

“We thought that it was important that there was some education taught by the Jewish community,” Boudaie said. “So this entire quarter, my staff has worked to assemble and consolidate information from the Jewish community in a programmatic way to be eventually taught to ASUCD.”

It is unclear when and how this will be implemented, as Senator Boudaie only said “it is very likely it will be handed off.”

She also pursued stocking Kosher foods at the ASUCD Coffee House (CoHo) in an effort to foster a welcoming environment for Jewish students.

“[Boudaie’s] biggest collaboration with us was on the idea of bringing more kosher food items to the CoHo,” said CoHo Foodservice Director Darin Schluep via email. “Unfortunately, a lot of the momentum behind the idea was lost due to closures last spring due to COVID.”

COVID-19 also affected her ability to accomplish her first campaign platform, pursuing grant and scholarship opportunities from local businesses and increasing student discounts.  

“We felt it was inappropriate to ask businesses, ‘Hey do you feel like you would like to contribute to student welfare scholarships?’ because they were already hard-hit by the pandemic,” Boudaie said.

Barneond said that Boudaie coordinated on a much-needed rewrite of the ASUCD bylaws.

“[Boudaie] expressed her willingness to work with me when I was still the chairperson of IAC,” Barneond said. “We both recognized a dire need for this rewrite because our government documents have so many grammatical errors.”

Emmanuel Fernandez, the general manager of KDVS, said via email that he was impressed with Boudaie, even though she only recently acquired the unit. 

“I sincerely wish I had more time with her,” Fernandez said via email. “She has proven a very strong ally and advocate for our media unit and has kept all communication about ASUCD succinct and understandable.”

Though Boudaie was unable to meet her platform goal to revamp the hiring process for senate staff during her term, she was able to create a transitional development workshop out of existing training materials.

“[Boudaie] spearheaded that effort, and I think it’ll definitely come through when the new six senators are elected,” Barneond said.

Moving forward, the outgoing senator said she hopes that ASUCD will move away from strict partisanship.

“A lot of the projects were made possible by working with everyone on the table,” Boudaie said. “Be nice and play nice.”
Barneond said Boudaie was one of the most active senators on the table. 

“I’m honestly excited to see where she’ll go and what she’ll do,” Barneond said. 
Written by: Kathleen Quinn — campus@theaggie.org

Monarch butterfly wing length affected by migration behavior, according to UC Davis study

A graduate student discovered this pattern with the help of museums

The size and length of a monarch butterfly can indicate whether it is part of a migrating population. Micah Freedman, who received his  Ph.D. in population biology from UC Davis, is the main author of this study that has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 

The project started in his first year of graduate school while living and working in Guam. During his stay there, Freedman noticed the prevalence of monarch butterflies on the island and became curious as to how and when they arrived there. This question was the root of his five-year Ph.D. project. 

Accompanying him in Guam was Hugh Dingle, an emeritus professor in the department of entomology and nematology at UC Davis. He helped introduce Freedman to these ideas that comprised the project. 

Freedman’s study looked into the massive, seasonal migration of the North American monarch butterfly. In the summer they can be found throughout the U.S. and in some parts of Canada until fall—when they migrate south to spend the winter in Mexico. This is the best studied insect migration of all time as these small bugs travel thousands of miles in their lifetime. 

There are other populations of monarch butterflies that stay put and breed in the same place, one example being those found in Guam. This is where Freedman started to measure and study the size and shape of wings in respect to migration behavior. He then discovered that they were not much different from the monarch butterflies that do migrate in North America. 

Freedman wondered why this was the case. One theory he had was that they could be related to North American butterflies and could have arrived in Guam recently. To explore this question further, he started going to museums and looking through their natural history collections. 

The Bohart Museum at UC Davis provided pin specimens of butterflies that included information on the date and location they were collected. Freedman described them as snapshots in time of what past butterflies looked like.

He visited multiple museums such as the British Museum of Natural History in London, the American Museum of Natural History in New York, the Smithsonian in Washington DC and the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco. He also viewed university collections from UC Davis, UC Berkeley, Harvard and Cornell. These specimens were important in recreating history, using details like when butterflies got to a certain location and how they have changed over time. It was found that the wings of new non-migratory populations slowly became smaller with time due to natural selection.

“The entire reason that the study was possible was because of all the specimens in museum collections,” Freedman said. 

Museums and curators that take care of these preserved specimens have roles that commonly go unnoticed, but this study highlights the resources they preserve and how important their jobs are to science.

“The study shows very nicely how valuable using specimens can be,” Dingle said. 

Dingle also mentioned that the specimens were helpful in seeing changes over time in an evolutionary sense throughout different conditions.

Freedman also conducted an experiment where he collected live butterflies from a variety of locations around the world and brought them to UC Davis to raise together in a greenhouse under common conditions. 

“The reason we wanted to do that was to determine whether the differences that we were seeing in the wild were actually due to differences in the genetics of butterflies as opposed to differences in the environments that they experience,” Freedman said. 

The butterflies that he raised were from Hawaii, Guam, Australia and Puerto Rico. He found that the morphology of the wing size was due to genetics since the non-migrating butterflies kept their small wings.

Along with Dingle, his Ph.D. advisors Sharon Strauss and Santiago Ramirez, both currently teaching at UC Davis, assisted Freedman with this study. They helped him think through how to do some of the experiments, how to optimize the sampling he was doing, how to do analysis of the specimen and provided some of the funding for the project. The National Geographic Society also funded the study. 

At the conclusion of the study, Freedman discovered that working with a short timescale of 150 years was still enough time to witness evolution in action. Dingle agrees that the study proves, “evolution takes place and can take place very rapidly.” 

“The study demonstrated how migration or loss of migration can be this really big life-history switch that can change all sorts of aspects of the organism’s morphology and their behavior and everything about them,” Freedman said. “You can actually see a real difference between these populations that migrate versus ones that don’t, and I think that’s pretty cool.” 

Written by: Francheska Torres — science@theaggie.org

Trump critic gets COVID-19 after celebrating election in large crowd

Blames Trump

On Oct. 2, 2020, upon hearing the news that President Donald Trump had contracted COVID-19, Ethan Matthews turned to social media to gloat. The enthusiastic President-elect Joe Biden supporter blasted the president with tweets like, “Looks like Don the Con got what he deserved!” and “Maybe you should have worn a mask COVID-Donnie!” 

About a month later, Matthews tested positive for COVID-19. The cause? Likely the large gathering that Matthews attended to celebrate Joe Biden winning the 2020 election. When asked if he regrets his actions, Matthews, between long fits of coughs, responded emphatically, “Not at all, we needed to show Trump we’ve had enough of his response to the virus, and we needed everybody to come together, physically, to show him that we are against his reckless actions in response to COVID-19.”

Despite attending the large gathering Matthews has remained consistent and has put all the blame on President Trump, “Yeah, this is definitely Trump’s fault. I wouldn’t have been out there celebrating if he hadn’t lost. He knew this would happen. Our blood is on your hands Donald.”

Matthews has since recovered from the virus, and wants people to know that they should take this virus as seriously as he did, “I just hope the people see what happened to me and take this virus seriously. I listened to the doctors and have been against this reckless federal government response to the virus, but I still got it. I hope everybody realizes that Trump is responsible for people like me getting the virus.”

When asked if this experience would cause him to take the virus more seriously, Matthews was adamant that he always did, “I believe in Dr. Fauci. I want a president who will listen to him and the other scientists. That’s why those thousands of people and I were out there celebrating, because the scientists will finally be listened to.”

Written By: Ean Kimura — etkimura@ucdavis.edu

(This article is humor and/or satire, and it’s content is purely fictional. The story and or names of “sources” are fictionalized.)

Electoral food

Drawn by: Rushi Tawade –– rntawade@ucdavis.edu 

(This cartoon is humor and/or satire, and its content is purely fictional. The story and names of “sources” are fictionalized.)

UC Admissions extends application deadline to Dec. 4

Website crashes on the eve of Nov. 30 application deadline

System-wide technical difficulties with the UC application website prompted UC admissions to extend the undergraduate application deadline to Friday, Dec. 4 at 11:59 pm. The original UC application deadline for the 2021-2022 school year was Nov. 30. 

“The University of California’s online application system experienced intermittent outages for three hours on Sunday, Nov. 29, that prevented many students from submitting their applications for fall 2021 undergraduate admissions and scholarships,” reads a UC statement that Senior Communications Strategist Stett Holbrook sent via email on the morning of Nov. 30.

“Our information technology team immediately started investigating potential causes as soon as we detected a problem,” the statement said. “The outage stemmed from an issue with one of our servers. In the meantime, we have taken additional measures to ensure the system performs well while continuing to closely monitor it. We understand and regret the inconvenience and stress these technical disruptions may have had on applicants and their families. The University therefore decided to extend the deadline for all freshman and transfer applicants to Friday, Dec. 4, at 11:59 pm PST, in hopes that the additional time will help reduce the anxiety around the application process and deadline.”

UC Admissions extended the UC undergraduate admissions deadline at all UC campuses in response to the website failure and announced the extension via social media platforms. All students who have not submitted their application were notified of the extension, according to Holbrook. High school and transfer counselors were also notified.

“However, we do encourage applications to be submitted as soon as possible!” UC Undergraduate Admissions tweeted. “If you can, please don’t wait to apply until the new deadline date.”

Written by: Hannah Blome — campus@theaggie.org