55.7 F
Davis

Davis, California

Monday, December 22, 2025
Home Blog Page 259

Review: ‘The Circle: A Social Media Competition’

Season 2 brings all the outlandish antics of reality TV without unnecessary drama

“The Circle” has filled the “Love Island”-shaped hole in my heart. In a year that absolutely calls for mind-numbing—and often flat-out ridiculous—reality TV, this show delivers on all fronts. 

In the second season of the miniseries, which consists of 13 episodes that are each roughly 45 minutes long, viewers were introduced to a host of colorful characters. From Teralisha, the confident Leo with bright blue hair, to Bryant, a breathwork instructor and certified nice guy, everyone who appears on screen is memorable and fairly likeable. However, as with any really good trashy show, there’s a catch. 

Any one of the competitors could be lying about their identity. 

If you hadn’t already guessed from the extended title “The Circle: A Social Media Competition,” this game takes place entirely online via a Facebook-esque app that gives the show its name. The players reside in individual rooms and can only communicate with one another through online chats. 

Naturally, this format leads to some serious distrust and paranoia amongst the contestants. The allure of a $100,000 grand prize for the winner means that some will toss morals to the side and completely fabricate a profile in hopes of bringing home the money.

There are also some interesting power dynamics that go down in The Circle. Each week, players rate each other, with those rated in the top two becoming “influencers” and having to decide among themselves which of the other players will be “blocked” from The Circle. 

As a self-proclaimed reality TV aficionado, I appreciated that “The Circle” stuck to certain tropes necessary for any good reality show, including a surplus of attractive people with memorable personalities (cue Mitchell’s love of the word “ferk”), while still seeming fresh and unique. It certainly had elements of classic reality TV shows, including a toned-down version of “Big Brother” gameplay and all the cheesy catchphrases of “Love Island” (#CircleFamForLife).

But “The Circle” is by no means a carbon copy of other beloved shows. 

Even though there is a large prize for the winner, at no point in the season do any of the contestants come anywhere close to the vicious nature of those on similar shows, such as “Survivor” or “America’s Next Top Model.” Everyone genuinely seems like they will be friends at the end of the day, which may be due to both the online structure of the show as well as the (seemingly) minimal intervention of gameplay by the producers.

 Though you can never truly be sure what goes on behind the scenes, the overall tone of the show is lighthearted, and even when there is conspiring, the worst that happens is a contestant being branded with the #TwoFaced and getting blocked from the Circle. This can best be seen in the finale, an episode many other shows peg as a night marked by fighting and the most entertaining drama reality TV has to offer. 

“The Circle,” however, is a little different. The contestants were all ecstatic to meet each other, and the most tension was a brief moment between two contestants who had a slight spat earlier in the season. Even Chloe, the fiery Essex girl with a personality to match her lipstick, voiced no ill will toward Deleesa, a woman catfishing as her husband who’d toyed with Chloe’s emotions all season by strategically flirting with her. The lighthearted nature of the show really shone through in the way the contestants treated each other—sans name-calling, violence or tears of rage.

However, as entertaining as it is, make no mistake—“The Circle” is absolutely identifiable as a Netflix original. There is no lack of cheesy hashtags, and the abundance of forced pop culture references make it clear that there is no one under the age of 40 pitching ideas in the production room. 

And even though “The Circle” is silly and all in good fun, I couldn’t help but feel a bit strange watching a show where people catfish and blatantly lie about their whole personalities to others in the pursuit of a monetary prize. Think too much about the concept, and this jovial show starts to seem more and more like an episode of “Black Mirror,” sugarcoated with a sassy narrator and text conversations so dated that they’re worthy of being put in a millennial museum exhibit about social media. But hey—no one ever claimed that reality TV shows were meant to make you think about much at all. 

Overall, “The Circle” is a great escape from the mundane reality of everyday life. Watching the show transports you into a space that blurs the lines between reality and the facade of social media, all while maintaining the fine balance between kitschy fun and a cringy waste of time. It’s worth the watch—even if it’s just to see a 22-year-old man and the 40-year-old assistant to Lance Bass of NSYNC attempt to make the other players believe they are a 60-year-old gay psychic who dresses as Santa on the weekends. 

Written by: Clara Fischer — arts@theaggie.org

These companies want you to think you’re responsible for climate change

We need to shift how we think about sustainability before it becomes a privilege and not an expectation

Many of you might’ve seen recent misleading statements on Instagram about how watching 30 minutes of Netflix has the carbon footprint of driving roughly four miles. I doubt that any of you read that and went “damn goodbye Daredevil,” and canceled your subscription, but I do think this is part of a harmful narrative that has been pushed by environmental “activists” in recent years. I’ve got a bone to pick with consumer-driven sustainability.

    You can live as sustainable a lifestyle as you want. Choosing to not use plastic straws, riding your bike to work and supporting eco-friendly brands are all great ways to reduce your carbon footprint and I applaud you. But despite all your well-intentioned efforts, 90 companies are responsible for two-thirds of greenhouse gas emissions. Because of these companies, even the most remote places on Earth have found microplastics in the stomachs of wildlife and industrial chemicals in the deepest parts of the ocean. 

    These companies are also notorious for greenwashing, which is the practice of marketing themselves as environmentally friendly or sustainable. Take BP Oil for example, the same company that spilled more 200 million gallons of oil into the Gulf a decade ago in one of the biggest spills in history. A few years ago, they tried to release a carbon footprint calculator to encourage people to find out their impact on climate change and pledge ways to combat it. Chevron has also recently come under fire for similarly trying to portray themselves as having a pristine environmental record. In fact, the company’s “ever-cleaner energy” promises are the subject of a greenwashing lawsuit brought by several environmental organizations against Chevron for misleading the public.

    Companies attempting to shift the blame of climate change onto consumers is one of the most absurd things I’ve ever heard and I’m tired of it. As much as I like to bag on Chevron, it’s not even just fossil fuel companies. Car companies have lobbied against clean air legislation for years, and agriculture has consistently fought stricter clean water laws. To say that it’s my fault for not owning a Hydroflask is ridiculous.

    Consumer driven sustainability is also actually pretty classist. It portrays people who might not be able to afford sustainable clothing brands, healthier vegan food, as somehow below you. Despite this, in a lot of ways low-income communities are more sustainable as they are more likely to use public transportation or buy used items and clothing. This idea of sustainability promotes the concept of sustainability as something that is inaccessible and popularized by the white upper class. 

    Even buying electric cars isn’t necessarily the answer. Many electric vehicles have batteries which are made of rare metals like lithium. These batteries are made from metals which are harvested in a highly extractive and polluting way, and are difficult to recycle. In Europe, a country that is known for being generally better in every aspect of their environmental legislation, only recycled 5% of their lithium batteries in 2011. So where do these batteries go? Landfills. In the future, disposal of these batteries may be less of  an issue; as technology improves, so will the efficiency and recycling of electric vehicle batteries. 

    After reading all this, I’m not trying to get you to completely give up at living a sustainable lifestyle. Your decisions are still immensely important. Encouraging people from a young age to recycle and make individual sustainable choices promotes cleaner environments and more environmentally conscious generations. My only real point here is that we need to shift the way we think about sustainability as a culture. 

It shouldn’t be something considered as an individual decision that can be bought and sold in stores, but a real lifestyle. This lifestyle can still be made up of simple actions like biking to work, but a significant portion of it should be dedicated to holding those in power responsible. Companies more powerful than our government are polluting our environment, poisoning our children and then telling us that we’re to blame. If that doesn’t piss you off, I don’t know what would. Imperfect sustainability is okay, as long as you keep that in mind when you go to the ballot box.

Written by: Joe Sweeney — jmsweeney@ucdavis.edu Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by individual columnists belong to the columnists alone and do not necessarily indicate the views and opinions held by The California Aggie.

Students and faculty explain their preference for in-person learning

After over a year of online school, members of the UC Davis community share why they are excited to return to learning in person

With Fall Quarter 2021 scheduled to be in person, plans are being made for a safe return to campus. As students polish their bikes for use again and professors prepare their lecture halls, students and faculty reflect on their experiences with online classes and their preferred methods of learning. 

Rudy Lautner, a third-year environmental science and management major, attributes his preference for in-person learning to the ease of fulfilling interactions in an in-person setting and being on campus. 

“There’s a greater dynamic between students and instructors,” Lautner said. “When you’re there in person, things become a lot more tangible with certain lab courses, or even any lecture course.”

While Lautner prefers an in-person learning experience, he enjoyed seeing teachers adapt and experiment with different class structures online. For example, he appreciated when professors deemphasized the importance of lectures and incorporated more discussion aspects into their courses. 

Above all, Lautner’s takeaway from this year of remote learning was all the different ways in which a course can be structured, from replacing big exams with smaller quizzes to using different assessment methods. He looks forward to returning to campus with in-person learning this fall and seeing how teachers incorporate ideas and lessons from this past year of remote teaching. 

“Teachers have a tremendous opportunity to take what they learned from remote learning from this past year and apply what worked or […] reconsider how to adjust that and how to go back to in-person,” Lautner said. “This pandemic and virtual learning has really shed light on the different needs of students, I think more so than a normal, in-person setting.”

Melany Medina, a second-year psychology major, also prefers in-person learning over online school. Although Medina feels that online classes are more convenient, especially when juggling classes with internships and research opportunities, the social interaction that in-person learning allows is greatly lacking in online learning. 

“I do miss having that in-person communication and social aspect,” Medina said. “To be able to ask the person next to you: ‘What was being asked during lecture? I didn’t understand.’ And from there, you’re able to make new friends or make new study groups.”

Moreover, Medina feels that it is easier to concentrate during in-person classes because of the excitement of the lecture halls and lack of technological distractions. 

Looking ahead to Fall Quarter, Medina predicts that students will have to adapt and change the habits they have grown comfortable with this year online. 

“I feel like it’s going to be a slow adjustment only because we’ve been away for such a long time,” Medina said. “I feel like not a lot of people are going to know what to do or how to be students again. We’re just so used to just waking up, going to lectures online and being in our [pajamas] all day.”

Scott Carrell, a professor of economics at UC Davis, is another member of the Davis community who looks forward to the return of in-person learning and prefers it over remote education.

“I think you just get a lot more social interaction [and] more questions answered,” Carrell said. “And there’s so many distractions in our world today; when you’re sitting at home in Zoomland it’s so easy to be distracted. Not that students aren’t distracted in class, but I think they’re less likely to be distracted if they come to class.”

While he prefers to teach in person, Carrell said he hopes to continue implementing office hours on Zoom and providing recorded lectures. Carrell said that there were new considerations involved with continuing online practices because offering recorded lectures risks lower class attendance.  

“There’s a trade-off,” Carrell said. “If you have the recordings available, then students are less likely to come to class, but if you don’t have the recording available, students who have legitimate reasons for missing class don’t get the content. What I’ll do is hopefully have the recordings available but then offer incentives to actually attend live class through extra credit or attendance [points].”

Additionally, for Carrell, the experience of teaching remotely demonstrated the importance of interaction between students. He hopes to continue to fill this gap and provide opportunities for dialogue next year while teaching in person. 

“Knowing there was [a] lack of interaction between students made me think I need to do more as a professor to try to foster that interaction because I think peers matter and students can learn from one another,” Carrell said. “I have to figure out exactly how I want to do that in a live class, but I do want to foster more interaction between students.”

Looking toward the future, Carrell reflected on what he is most excited for with the return to in-person classes. 

“I like walking around campus and seeing students and young people, they give me energy,” Carrell said. “I go to my office most days, and I miss the college campus atmosphere. There’s more cows on campus now than there are students, so I’m looking forward to seeing the bikes rolling around the circle and a little bit of energy.”

Written by: Nora Farahdel — features@theaggie.org

Tucker Carlson accidentally endorses communism

Twitter erupted, Reddit crashed and 4chan drafted a 63-page death threat

Big news today on Capitol Hill as Republicans face a minor ideological crisis following a viral Tucker Carlson clip. On one of his signature rants in defense of American liberties and the corruption of the left, Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson accidentally slipped into far-left talking points. 

At first, the tangent was barely recognizable as differing from typical content. But after mentions of seizing the means of production and a quote by Leon Trotsky, many viewers did a double-take. 

Debates continue to rage over whether Carlson’s remarks can be more accurately labeled as communism or democratic socialism as Carlson seemingly advocated for the exploited working class at the expense of the “rich.” 

This apparently accidental move has prompted a small exodus of Republicans to the newly formed “Trump-Marx” party. The red hat remains, but it’s got a new hammer and sickle.

Some are claiming Carlson’s statements as the beginning of a clever coup. However, Carlson’s lawyers assure us he is not capable of being that subtle. 

Instead, they are repeating a former defense by Fox News claiming the “‘general tenor’ of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not ‘stating actual facts’ about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in ‘exaggeration’ and ‘non-literal commentary,’” which is an actual thing Fox News lawyers said about their news program.

On TikTok, a hoard of teens and young adults have already begun idolizing Carlson, calling him a “girlboss” and editing him into fan videos soundtracked by Doja Cat hits. 

“baby!!!” tweeted one user along with a photoshopped image of Tucker Carlson in cat ears.

“stan Tucker for clear skin,” tweeted another along with a barrage of emojis that warrant immediate psychiatric attention.

In response, Ted Cruz’s publicity team edited him lounging around his home while Lil Nas X’s newest single “MONTERO (Call Me By Your Name)” plays in the background. A class-action lawsuit has already been filed against Cruz for emotional distress.

Written by: Annabel Marshall — almarshall@ucdavis.edu 

Disclaimer: (This article is humor and/or satire, and its content is purely fictional. The story and the names of “sources” are fictionalized.)

2021 Tokyo Olympic Games to be held as planned—without overseas tourists

Pushing through challenges the pandemic has thrown at it, the Tokyo Olympics will finally be held this July, but with a catch

After many hiccups due to COVID-19 clouding whether the Tokyo Olympics would be held in 2021 after last year’s postponement, the Japanese government, along with the International Olympic Committee (IOC), has officially announced that it will continue as planned—but with the absence of overseas tourists. 

The Japanese government announced this restricted access in response to the Japanese public voicing their concerns regarding COVID-19 and its variants possibly entering the country if the Tokyo Olympics are held with foreign spectators. With Japan having occasional difficulties containing the virus and its strains and outbreaks in January and March, Japanese officials have deemed this as the safest decision. This decision was discussed by a committee of the five organizing bodies and was confirmed on March 20, 2021. 

More than 600,000 people outside of Japan have purchased tickets and have been notified to start their refund processes with their ticket sellers. While vaccines have brought more hope and prevention against the pandemic, Japan has reported to have slow vaccination processes, with around 1% of the population vaccinated as of April 26, 2021.

Seiko Hashimoto, the president of the Tokyo Olympic committee, expressed her views on the decision and made it clear that Japan was prepared for it. 

“Unless we are prepared to accept them and the medical situation in Japan is perfect, it will cause a great deal of trouble also to visitors from overseas,” she said.

As for athletes and other staff, according to Japan’s Kyodo news, they would be required to be tested within four days of leaving their country and upon arrival as well. On top of this, athletes would also be expected to comply with a 14 day quarantine requirement and be required to stay within the Olympic Village on Tokyo Bay during those times. 

Yet, despite the decision of barring overseas tourists from attending the Tokyo Olympics, Japan’s recent polls show more than 70% of survey participants are still opposed to holding the games in Japan this year. 

“We should not turn Tokyo into a coronavirus hotspot,” said Dr. Naoto Yueyama, the head of a labor union representing more than 100 doctors. “The Tokyo Olympics should not be held now.”

 Organizers are still deciding whether to have any spectators at all. Considering that postponing the Olympics for one year has already skyrocketed the costs and the fact that tickets are being refunded to those overseas, such a decision may impact the committee and make the overall loss even greater.

The torch relay of the 2021 Tokyo Olympics began on March 25 from Fukushima, but has faced several changes in routes during April. It will, however, continue as scheduled and end on July 23 for the Tokyo Olympics opening ceremony at the National Stadium. Since the majority of spectators won’t be able to attend, fans can join the torch relay virtually through a relay livestream on the official Tokyo Olympics website as well. 

According to the Tokyo Olympic organizers, as of May 12 more than 700 athletes and 6,000 staff members have participated in four test events to see if protocol and COVID-19 countermeasures were effective. The four test events included the International Volleyball Games—Tokyo Challenge 2021, the FINA Diving World Cup 2021, the Hokkaido Sapporo Marathon Festival 2021 and Ready Steady Tokyo—Athletics. There were extensive daily testing and a strict protocol, and officials reported that not one positive case emerged during these test events. One positive result, a coach of an overseas team, was immediately identified upon their arrival and moved to a quarantine facility. Japanese officials are confident with these results and are looking forward to mirroring these efforts in holding the Tokyo Olympics successfully.

The Tokyo Olympics are scheduled to take place between July 23 and August 8, and the Paralympics from August 24 to September 5. With no fans present, strict social distancing and rigorous daily testing, the 2021 Tokyo Olympics will be one of the most difficult experiences for the athletes. Even though multiple countries including Canada, Australia and North Korea announced that they won’t be sending athletes to the 2021 Olympics, Tokyo and the IOC remain adamant that the games will proceed. The only question left is, will the introduction of vaccines marking the end of the pandemic give a feeling of normalcy to the Games, or will the event prove detrimental to the global situation? That remains to be seen, but what is known now is that this summer’s games will be a much different experience than we are accustomed to. 
Written by: Justin Yu-Hsun Chu — sports@theaggie.org

Review: ‘Nomadland’

Director Chloe Zhao’s damning look into the lives of itinerant workers brings attention to a little-known American subculture

    Full disclosure: I love the desert—and I also love neo-Westerns. So naturally, I already had some preexisting bias toward the cinematic artistry that is “Nomadland” prior to watching it. But I think such partiality has proven justified. While it’s certainly not in the same category of “No Country for Old Men” or even “Wind River,” this unassuming narrative project paints an accurate, and at times disheartening, picture of life in the modern American West. 

Set just after the Great Recession, “Nomadland” follows 60-something-year-old Fern (played by Frances McDormand) as she leaves her recently boarded up company town of Empire, NV, in search of migratory work. Fern’s departure from remote northern Nevada takes her on a van-dwelling adventure across the modern U.S., as she works temporary odd jobs ranging from an Amazon warehouse sorter to a national park worker. Based on the 2017 nonfiction novel “Nomadland: Surviving America in the Twenty-First Century” by journalist Jessica Bruder, the film blurs the line between reality and fiction, combining a tiny cast of actors with real life characters. Likewise, this strategy—a routine feature in filmmaker Chloe Zhao’s cinematic portfolio—leaves the picture feeling one-part documentary, one-part entertainment. 

Being only Zhao’s third feature film, “Nomadland” joins “Songs My Brothers Taught Me” and “The Rider” in the Beijing-born director’s burgeoning filmography. The three pictures are comparable in that they can all be vaguely classified as neo-Westerns, utilizing themes of solitary characters set against the aesthetic background of the Western U.S. But what they lack in the traditional motifs of guns and gold, they more than make up with nuanced inquiries into the lives of the people who call these places home. In her first two films, the subjects are largely rural Native Americans. In “Nomadland,” they’re itinerant Americans of all pasts and backgrounds.

By its end, “Nomadland” leaves the viewer with a deeply cynical and nihilist feeling. Not so subtly hidden beneath the gorgeous shots of the American West—ranging from the wooded forests of California’s Mendocino coast to the rugged rock formations of South Dakota’s Badlands National Park—is an ultimately foreboding testament that highlights the woes of American capitalism. Fern, and the many colleagues like her, are left without a secure social safety net as they wander seasonally from job to job. This vulnerability only seems more apparent whenever tragedy strikes in the film, be it terminal cancer or simple car issues.

While the “nomads” form their own distinct community—one notable scene features Fern comfortably wandering around a new RV camp in the morning and generously offering her freshly brewed coffee to strangers and friends alike—there’s still an understanding that many of these friendships are inherently fragile, lasting only as long as the employment opportunities allow. Coming and going like the seasons themselves, there is only so much time for socialization. Even toward the end of the film, when Fern visits her implied love interest Dave (played by David Strathairn) at his family home in Northern California, there is still a feeling of social frailty. This anxiety is confirmed when Dave finally decides to settle down to more permanent fixtures, and Fern promptly turns down his offer to join him. Despite the film’s insistence that nomads are never truly alone because they will always “see [each other] down the road,” the feeling of isolation in this story is largely inescapable. 

Although a far cry from being an overtly political film, “Nomadland” depicts modern society by evoking imagery of so-called “American carnage,” displaying hollowed out, turn-of-the-century industrial towns displaced by the installation of Amazon shipment warehouses. By its end, “Nomadland” is a film of two folds. It is equal parts boring and beautiful, charming and disheartening. So while nobody is likely to cement this movie as the next big blockbuster, Chloe Zhao’s combination of gorgeous cinematography and real life personalities brings a segment of American society to light that is largely ignored by Hollywood, and this feat is worthy of praise indeed. 

Written by: Brandon Jetter — arts@theaggie.org

90% blue raspberry, 10% horse—the reason behind why Gunrock is blue

How a botched scientific experiment turned into a beloved somewhat accepted university mascot

After a recent outbreak in the UC Davis genetics department, multiple stories have been unearthed from the wreckage. While some were already well-believed, like the fact that UC Davis actually made the tomato in the 1940s or that the on campus turkeys were just a botched experiment attempting to replace campus security with poultry participants. But none are quite as astounding as the true inception and birth of UC Davis’ incredibly mild mascot, Gunrock. 

Apparently back in the ‘80s administration from UC Davis and UC Berkeley made a bet to see which could create a more terrifying and unsettling mascot. Misinterpreting what “creating a mascot” meant, UCD researchers played with the power of gods and accidentally created an entirely new species of horse by mixing human DNA, horse DNA and a whole 7-Eleven’s worth of Blue Raspberry Slushie. The end result: G.U.N.R.O.C.C. (Genetically Unique Neurotic Running Organism of Calamitous Catastrophe), was then released to compete against UC Berekely’s O.S.K.I. (Organism of Sociopathic Killing Intent). And while Gunrock may have been a marvel of biological sciences, the fact that Oski was a man in a suit deemed it far creepier than the genetic abomination; thus UC Berkeley won the competition.

But with the millions upon millions of tuition money the school wasted on the questionable competition, Gunrock could not simply be tossed into Putah Creek. In a hail mary effort, the school branded Gunrock as the school’s mascot, confusing students everywhere and pushing the boundaries on the definition of the word “horse.” The current history of Gunrock is also apparently another ruse created by the university to hide his true origins—everyone knows that horses don’t actually exist and were made up by Hollywood to sell cowboy movies. 

Regardless of all the lies and cover-ups surrounding the blue bastard child of UC Davis, he still remains our mascot to this day. Because it doesn’t matter that horses aren’t dark navy blue, or that they don’t have eyebrows, or that they don’t walk on two feet, or that they don’t do backflips or that in the wild horses come in every other UCD color EXCEPT blue. He is a staple of UC Davis and while we may never get rid of him and replace him with our true mascot—the Tercero cows—we can accept him for what he is now. Just another weird horse mascot that we made blue because a bunch of underpaid grad students broke into a 7-Eleven back in the ‘80s and stole a slushie machine. 

Written by: Ian Cosner — iacosner@ucdavis.edu 

Disclaimer: (This article is humor and/or satire, and its content is purely fictional. The story and or names of “sources” are fictionalized.)

Support for Asian American businesses should be inherent—the pandemic has revealed otherwise

Asian American food and culture are fixtures until they are othered

America loves Asian food and culture until they don’t—and efforts to save local Chinatowns and support Asian American businesses during Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month reproduce a relationship between Asia and America that is based on consumption and commodity, but without care or cultural awareness.

    The way Asian American businesses have been treated during the pandemic is reminiscent of the way Asian American identity is continually renegotiated and never truly 

American, per its designation as a perpetual foreigner. During the pandemic, Asian-owned businesses were first devastated by the pandemic itself and then othered by their own country.

    In Sacramento, a dead cat was left outside a Chinese American-owned business. After three years of building, restaurant owners Noppadol Mangmeesub and Kanokwan Mangmeesub in Ohio closed their business due to the economic effect of the pandemic and concerns about anti-Asian sentiment. Daily threats and the vandalization of Mike Nguyen’s San Antonio restaurant has taken a mental toll on him, and he says he has become so paranoid that he keeps a 10-foot distance from others.

    These three anecdotes are the realities of Asian American businesses all over America—business owners who fear for their life, who had to give up their American dream with the knowledge that in times of a pandemic, their identity can so easily be reduced to a scrawled “Go back 2 China” and an association with a virus with which they had nothing to do. 

    Asian American businesses should not be supported only because it is AAPI Heritage Month or because lawmakers urge us to do so; this responsibility should have been innate. Where was the support for the Asian American business owners who, because of a language barrier, struggled to apply for loans? Where was the support for the Asian American business owners who had to shell out thousands of dollars for private security measures for their restaurants?

    There is a fundamental disconnect with the way America enjoys consuming Asian food without care for the people who make it. Support for Asian American businesses should not be conditional—if Asian American businesses are only worthy of support at a time when our identities are negotiated to be satiable, then this support is superfluous. One-off financial support does not stop the forced renegotiation of Asian American identity from America or erase the way Asian Americans have been continually othered throughout history and now scapegoated during the pandemic. Dollars are a checklist in activism that will not save us from another reckoning of our identities. 

    Support must extend beyond consumption and become attentive to the needs of Asian American businesses. What needs to be addressed is how Asian American hate has been allowed to run so rampantly—and why it is so easy to renegotiate Asian American identity to align with a virus we have no fault in. Why have Asian Americans been placed under siege in our own country?

Written by: Renee Wang — reswang@ucdavis.edu 

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by individual columnists belong to the columnists alone and do not necessarily indicate the views and opinions held by The California Aggie.

Senate resolution to add mental health resources onto student IDs passed at May 6 meeting

With the addition of this information on Aggie identification cards, ASUCD intends to make mental health resources more accessible

The ASUCD meeting was called to order by Vice President Emily Barneond at 6:10 p.m. on May 6. 

Emergency legislation SR #15 proposed that mental health resources be included on all Aggie ID cards to help address what Senator Michael Navarro said are growing concerns about students’ mental health following an increase in mental health crises during the pandemic.

The resolution, presented by Navarro, passed as emergency legislation by unanimous consent. 

Navarro noted that UC Davis has hired more mental health counselors, but he said new employees alone may not be enough to support students. 

“We have to advocate for mental health resources to be put to use by our students,” Navarro said. 

Senator Kabir Sahni presented Constitutional Amendment (CA) #72, which is intended to dissolve the Business and Finance Commission (BNF) and incorporate it into the Internal Affairs Commission (IAC).

“As a commission, BNF has systematically lacked legislative and project substance to no one’s fault,” Sahni said. “Its members applied for a learning experience and were met with disappointment.” 

Sahni said that many of the bills that are sent to BNF are also sent to IAC and that in the last year, BNF has only authored and introduced one bill.

Julian Garcia, the chair of IAC, provided the commission’s recommendation and said that the commission plans to create a vice chair of finance to help accommodate the new role.  

CA #72 was passed unanimously. 

Devin Santiago-Vergara, a third-year political science and psychology double major, and Mallika Hari, a second-year communications major, were sworn in as new senators. 

Professor Scott Carrell, an economics professor, and Rocko DeLuca, the deputy athletics director, gave a presentation to the senate showing the academic rigor of UC Davis athletes in comparison to other campuses. 

“What you can see is, athletes are doing incredibly well at UC Davis relative to all those peer groups in terms of federal graduation rate,” Carrell said.  

Both Carrell and DeLuca thanked students for their financial contributions to athletics

“Obviously, we wouldn’t exist without the funding [from] student fees,” DeLuca said.

Sarah Theubet, the committee chair of the Disability Rights Advocacy Committee (DRAC), said it is now fully staffed thanks to the confirmation of Annie Deng, a fourth-year psychology major, and Katherine Hamera, a second-year mechanical engineering and aerospace science and engineering double major. 

“I’m really excited to say that of everyone participating in DRAC, five of the seven committee members are actually people with disabilities,” Theubet said. 
Written by: Kathleen Quinn — campus@theaggie.org

Professors offer tips to develop financial literacy for college students

UC Davis professors discuss topics ranging from student loan debt, to car payments and insurance policies

Many students spend their time in and after college learning how to manage their income, loans and larger purchases. A lack of formal education on these topics, however, has caused many students to struggle with understanding financial literacy. As students continue to make independent financial decisions, UC Davis professors provide students with an introductory background for the future. 

Credit and Student Loans

Due to the pandemic, more Americans faced larger credit card balances and increased debt within the past year. Janine Wilson, an associate professor of teaching economics at UC Davis, said that large credit card balances and accumulating interest do not need to be sources of stress.  

She explained that each month, interest begins to compound, and the costs will increase unless one pays the principal—the amount borrowed originally. In order for the principal to decrease, Wilson recommended that students pay more than their minimum payments owed monthly. 

“What you should be doing, though, is setting aside not just the minimum,” Wilson said. “Try to do more than the minimum every month and put money in your savings account at the same time.”

Beyond contributing more than the minimum payments, she encouraged people to place money into a savings account in addition to paying off debt. 

“Be very careful not to put all your money on paying down debt,” Wilson said. “Share it between savings and debt. Otherwise, you’ll just take out another loan the next time you need to buy something and you’ll never get out from under your debt.”

As a protective measure, Wilson said to always be well informed prior to making financial decisions and to try to limit credit cards to only one. 

“Limit the amount of credit cards you are opening because if you find yourself with too many cards, your credit score goes down,” Wilson said.

According to Wilson, it is important to make payments on time in order to qualify for loans and purchases in the future in addition to building a credit score. 

Similar to credit balances, student loans also have accumulating interest rates, which can increase the total amount that is owed overtime. Heather Rose, an associate professor at the UC Davis School of Education, discussed how loans can be managed after graduation. 

Though the large numbers may appear scary, Rose stated that a college education is one of the biggest investments for the future. If students graduate from UC Davis with $20,000 in student debt, she said the monthly payment for the federal direct loans is about $190 a month with an estimated 2.75% interest rate. With the past interest rate of approximately 5%, students would be expected to pay around $212 a month. 

Loan debt can be managed if it takes 10-20% of the yearly income, which Rose said would require a $24,000 salary after graduation. Even if that is not possible, Rose said that there are loan programs that provide students with aid when trying to navigate their loans after college. 

Wilson also recommended that if student loans are stressful for current students and graduates, people can always increase their payments beyond the minimum in order to reduce the principal. 

“Don’t feel like you have to write a check for the whole thing, but just add a little bit more,” Wilson said. “You add that $50 a month and then it will go down significantly faster because you’re paying interest on less money.”

When deciding whether to prioritize credit card or student loan payments, both professors mentioned that it is a choice that depends on multiple factors. Rose emphasized that missed payments on either option would negatively impact one’s credit score. Wilson and Rose both said that students should observe which option has a higher interest rate. Typically, credit card balances have higher interest rates, so the amount owed will compound faster, and students may want to prioritize them.

Housing and Car Payments

As students earn higher incomes, homes and cars may become more accessible assets that they can purchase. Wilson discussed the possibilities of buying cars and homes on credit and what financial decisions students can undertake.

“The only things you should be buying on credit are your college education, your car, maybe, and your house, definitely.” Wilson said.

To buy a home, Wilson stated that it was most common to take out a 30-year loan to finance the purchase of the house. She mentioned, however, that it is imperative to take out a loan with a fixed interest rate and not a variable interest rate.

Wilson referenced the 2008 housing crisis where buyers were loaning $100,000 using variable interest rates and paying a 3% interest rate for two years. After the two years, however, buyers must switch to paying their loan with the current interest rate set by the government. Consequently, mortgage payments could go up significantly and people could lose their homes if they are unable to make their payments. Thus, she advocated for a fixed interest rate so that people can take out mortgages with an unchanging expectation of how much they owe. 

Rose also said that people can make a lot of mistakes when they are paying for their homes. She stated that people often get distracted by minuscule details that they may neglect more important decisions. 

“Grown ups make a lot of mistakes too,” Rose said. “One of the books, I think it was a book by Elizabeth Warren actually, talks about one of the biggest mistakes people make is not refinancing their house often enough. So just keeping your eyes on the big ticket items is important.”

Wilson stated that another possible way to increase one’s credit is through car loans. Since cars are a depreciating asset—they lose their value yearly—she stated that the most advantageous method is to purchase a car with a three-to-four-year loan. She noted that it does not make sense to purchase a car with a seven-to-10-year loan when the car’s value depreciates and one may only drive the car for five years. Ultimately, she emphasized that one must be aware of these implications in order to reach a conclusion that aligns with one’s financial goals and boundaries. 

“When you walk in to buy a car, know exactly what you want to do,” Wilson said. “Do you want to pay cash for that car? Do you want a three-year loan for that car? Have an idea before you walk in there because it is their job to convince you to do what is most profitable for them and not most advantageous for you.” 

Savings

In order to save for retirement and important purchases, both professors recommended that students and graduates aim to allocate 10-20% of their income for their savings accounts. Wilson stated that people should aim for 10% toward their retirement account and another 10% toward their long-term savings account. This division of funds enables people to save for larger purchases without removing funds from their retirement accounts. 

Rose further emphasized the importance of starting to save early and generating more funds through compound interest. She also recommended that people record their monthly expenses in order to visualize and differentiate between their wants and needs.

Additionally, Wilson encouraged vigilant spending and always tracking one’s purchases. 

“As you start making money, add to your savings,” Wilson said. “Don’t just add to your consumption.”

She believes that regardless of how much one makes, wealth is determined by spending and saving habits. 

“Let me promise you, you will never have so much that you won’t have to worry about money,” Wilson said. “And you’re going to say ‘What, that’s not possible,’ but think of all the basketball stars that have gone bankrupt or multimillionaire business people that have gone bankrupt. How much you spend will determine how rich you feel. It’s not how much you make.”

Insurance 

Rose also noted the importance of preparing for catastrophic events and purchasing insurance plans to prepare for the future. She believes that strong liability insurance beyond the minimum state-required car insurance is important since it protects drivers and their future income if they were found liable for an accident in court. 

Protection of Inherited Assets

Finally, Wilson discussed policies that enable people to protect their funds and assets for their children. Though many people associate trust funds as a plan for the wealthy, trust funds are a protective tool that can easily transfer one’s inherited funds and assets. With a trust fund, Wilson stated that a home, car and other assets would be immediately passed to the children without requiring court review. Trust funds allow these assets to be protected from legal battles, and she said that they provide a sense of security if a loved one unexpectedly passes away. Wilson said that a trust fund would require a lawyer and a $2,500 fee and would be useful to anyone with a home and a savings account. 

Online Resources

Rose also noted that students can take advantage of UC Davis classes that teach about financial management. She currently teaches Personal Finance (ARE 142). Rose also recommended an online video series from UC Berkeley’s Haas School of Business, which provides students with further details on financial literacy. 

Written by: Farrah Ballou — features@theaggie.org

Who’s under the most pressure to win the NBA title this season?

As the Los Angeles Lakers prepare to defend their title, many around the league are entering the playoffs under immense pressure

In a flash, the NBA regular season has come and gone. With the conclusion of 72 games for each squad, a relatively large number of teams will walk into the playoffs either missing or having a player deal with an injury that kept them out multiple games. Regardless, the NBA playoffs are always a time of immense pressure that makes or breaks a player’s legacy.

When looking back at those regarded as all-time greats, the majority of them have had success when the playoffs come around and it only enhances their legacy. But, if you look at all-time greats who retire with a lot of postseason shortcomings, the argument for them changes a bit. Some players thrive in these pressure-packed situations and others wither away. Although full capacity arenas won’t be a factor this year, the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) recent announcement that vaccinated individuals no longer had to socially distance or wear a mask indoors or out could change the amount of fans in the building. 

Whatever the case may be, this year’s playoffs are stacked with players and teams in desperate need of the NBA title. Whether it’s past shortcomings or time running out, The Aggie looks at which players and teams are under the most pressure to take home the championship this year. 

Shooting Guard James Harden, Brooklyn Nets

After Harden forced his way out of Houston back in January, he joined fellow superstars Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irving in Brooklyn. With that much star power on one team, many questioned how the team and first-year head coach Steve Nash would figure out a system to make sure all potential is maximized at all times. But, soon after Harden arrived with the Nets, they rotated injuries among the stars, oftentimes leaving the Nets with a pair of the stars at once. Having played less than 10 games together, the Nets are confident that they can figure it out. A lot of it, however, will come down to Harden and whether he will be able to overcome his playoff demons. 

After six straight years in Houston without an NBA Finals appearance, Harden’s inability to show up in the big moments was on full display on the Rockets as his overall shooting and play declined massively compared to his normal MVP self. This year, he will by far have the most talent on his team than he’s ever had, and with the Nets labeled as the frontrunners to win the Eastern Conference, Harden will have a chance at redemption. Playing alongside that level of superstars could decrease the pressure of some stars, making it easier for them to play their natural game without overthinking. How he will respond to not being the main guy in the playoffs anymore remains to be seen, but what’s certain is that, after all of the criticism and trouble he caused in Houston, Harden is under loads of pressure to not only perform great these playoffs, but also win the NBA title. 

Los Angeles Clippers

The Clippers’ franchise history has revolved around failure and falling just short. Having never made it past the second round, the other Los Angeles team had their season ended last year in grand and embarrassing fashion. After going up 3-1 in the second round series against the Nuggets, the Clippers went on to blow three straight double-digit leads and flame out before the Western Conference Finals once again. All the talk that the Clippers had last year after their additions of stars Kawhi Leonard and Paul George made the criticism for coming up short that much greater.

Making the change at head coach, the Clippers added former Cleveland Cavaliers head coach Tyron Lue to man the helm in Los Angeles. Lue has reshaped this Clippers offense, making it one of the best offenses in NBA history. With their impressive shooting and great acquisitions of role players, they have managed to put themselves on the topic of favorites once again. After last year’s catastrophe, Leonard and George will have all eyes on them as they lead the Clippers on their run this year. Specifically, George, he has had a great and impressive bounceback year, but it won’t matter unless he keeps up that level in the playoffs—something he has been unable to do. Nonetheless, the Clippers as a franchise is under immense pressure to win the NBA championship this year, as coming up short again for a second straight year could bring drastic changes.

Both Power Forward Giannis Antetokounmpo and Milwuakee Bucks

This option could have been the one with the most pressure had Antetokounmpo not signed a contract extension to stay in Milwaukee and was set to become a free agent this summer. Nonetheless, you could make the case that both Antetokounmpo and the Bucks are under a lot of pressure this year and it would still be valid. But, Antetokounmpo’s past two postseason runs have not been what the two-time MVP had expected as he has struggled to get the Bucks back to the NBA Finals. Although his numbers haven’t been drastically different like other superstars, he has had his fair share of shortcomings as the Bucks’ best player. His inability to make shots at the perimeter has made it hard for him to get his baskets in a long seven game series where the other team has the time to prepare and strategize for him. 

While the young MVP does deserve some flack for not being able to get over the hump, some of the blame could also go at his teammates and their inability to make open shots. Since Antetokounmpo generally operates close to the basket, teams often stack the paint and force him to pass it out. This, however, leaves a lot of his teammates with open opportunities that they just haven’t been able to convert. All of these factors come together to explain why the Bucks enter this year’s playoffs with a lot of pressure on their backs. With the emergence of the Philadelphia 76ers, the creation of the Brooklyn Nets super team and other teams in the Eastern Conference getting better, the clock is ticking for Antetokounmpo and Milwaukee to win a championship before it’s too late. 

Point Guard Chris Paul, Phoenix Suns

Speaking of clock is ticking, 36 year old point guard Chris Paul continues to disregard time as he has led his Phoenix Suns near the top of the Western Conference and its first playoff berth in 11 years. Next to young superstar Devin Booker, Paul has been able to stay healthy for the second straight season and continues to wow fans with his fantastic point guard play. Even though his numbers aren’t jaw dropping, his leadership to this young Suns team has been huge and a big part of why they stand in that position heading into the playoffs. 

This pressure is different than those previously mentioned. While Paul also had his playoff failures with the Clippers, he has been able to turn it around in recent years. The problem, however, continues to be health. As mentioned, he has been pretty healthy the last two years. But, at 36 years old and yet to win a championship, time is running out to win a championship. This Phoenix team has the potential to make a deep run and could be Paul’s best shot at an NBA title since the 2017-18 season with the Houston Rockets.

Small Forward LeBron James, Los Angeles Lakers

How could a team that won the NBA championship last year be under pressure to win it again this year? While it is true the Los Angeles Lakers were able to capture their 17th NBA title last October in the bubble, this pressure exists in a grand scheme of things. Like Paul, James is 36 years old and is now playing in his 18th season. Known for his ironman durability, James has suffered injuries that kept him out for an extended period of time for the second time in three seasons. Still, the four-time NBA champion enters this year’s playoffs healthy and if anyone knows what it takes to win a championship, it’s him.

The reason for the pressure comes from an all-time perspective. A fifth championship ring for James would make his argument against the “Greatest of All-Time (GOAT)” Michael Jordan even stronger, as he would stand just one away from tying him. At this point in his career, James has defied father time and is still playing at an MVP level even after 18 years in the league. The only thing left for him to do in his career is accumulate and rack up accolades to the point where it would make his GOAT argument impossible to dismiss. Nobody knows how long James has left at this all-time level, but with his team looking to repeat, another championship title with the Lakers could be another thing that could make his legacy even stronger. 

Written by: Omar Navarro — sports@theaggie.org

The university must do more to promote a culture of transparency for student employees

All students should feel comfortable speaking to the press, no matter where they work

Students and employees should be able to speak to the press. It’s as simple as that. Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right, as is the ability to criticize and push back against the issues we see in our systems, our institutions or our administration.

    Over the past year, members of our staff have encountered scenarios when their interview requests were denied or delayed due to student employees facing barriers from their supervisors. In the fall, a features writer made a press inquiry for an article about campus tour guides and how they had adapted to COVID-19 restrictions—the article was ultimately canceled because employees couldn’t get approval from the supervisor. The tour guides responded, stating that their supervisor would not allow comment from individual tour guides. A campus news writer encountered a similar scenario when contacting a student employee about the ARC closing and reopening in Fall Quarter 2020; the employee said that they would need their manager’s approval to be interviewed. 

For another article, Student Housing employees said that they feared they would lose their job if they agreed to speak to The Aggie about miscommunication in their department and the lack of mental health support they received. The employees decided to speak on the record “on condition of anonymity to protect themselves and their employment.”

While the Editorial Board understands that, in some cases, supervisors would like the most knowledgeable authority to respond to press inquiries to avoid the spread of incorrect information, we believe employees should be able to comment on their work environment and their employment experience without fear of losing their job or jeopardizing professional relationships. Prohibiting or discouraging employees and student employees from speaking with the press or trying to control their message suggests, whether it is true or not, that the supervisors of these workplaces wish to keep information from the public. 

Every member of the UC Davis community should work to promote a culture of transparency. If there is a problem within our system, students should feel that they can speak out against it without fear of retaliation. And even if there are no problems that need to be addressed, students should simply be allowed to express their opinions and feel comfortable sharing their experiences should they choose to do so.

    In the Editorial Board’s Spring Quarter meeting with Chancellor Gary May and other UC Davis administrators on May 5, 2021, we broached this subject, asking why some student employees are not allowed to speak to the press and detailing two of the aforementioned examples.

“No students are excluded from speaking to the press,” May said in the interview. “If a student has a question on a tour about something, please answer it. I don’t think that’s a problem or if someone wants to know about how you feel about the ARC being closed, please feel free to answer that. That’s not something we would try to regulate.”

    Campus Counsel Michael Sweeney elaborated on this idea.

“Every employee, student has the right for freedom of expression, and people understand that the administration should not interfere with that freedom of expression,” Sweeney said in the interview. 

The Editorial Board agrees with these statements, and because members of the administration have expressed their desire for transparency, as campus leaders, they should take action to promote this transparency in all places of work on campus. This could take the form of guidelines for supervisors to follow when they or their employees receive inquiries from The Aggie and other members of the press.

Furthermore, despite this voiced support from campus administrators, clearly students do not feel that they are permitted to share their opinions with the press, either because they have received a direct statement from their supervisor or because they feel they could lose their job if they exercise this right.

Although there are no explicit rules against freedom of expression for students on campus, the university can do more to promote and to create an environment where students feel safe to express their views. Transparency cannot be achieved if students do not feel that they can freely express their beliefs.

Written by: The Editorial Board

New fluorescent sensor developed by UC Davis researchers helps treat mental illness

PsychLight and is able to assist in creating psychiatric drugs

    Researchers at UC Davis have developed a new fluorescent sensor named PsychLight, enhancing the field of psychiatric medicine. In the recent study, researchers found a non-hallucinogenic psychedelic analog that includes antidepressant properties. Psychedelic analogs are hallucinogens that can be compared to regular hallucinogenic drugs but don’t have the same hallucinogenic effects, according to Verywell Mind.

    David Olson, an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine at UC Davis, was involved in the creation of the sensor. Olson and Lin Tian, an associate professor also in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, are co-principal investigators of the study and led the research.

    The Tian Lab focuses on technology development, specifically genetically encoded sensors for neurochemicals utilizing fluorescence imaging. The lab developed a sensor for the serotonin 2A receptor.

    The study was able to develop the first-ever cellular assay for hallucinogenic potential and can help facilitate a drug discovery effort related to the serotonin 2A receptor, according to Olson. Serotonin 2A is involved with processes such as learning and memory, according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Another discovery was the psychedelic analog AAZ-A-154 that has long-lasting antidepressant properties after a single administration, according to Olson.

    The Olson Lab has been interested in understanding the role of the serotonin 2A receptor, also known as the 5-HT2A receptor, and the Tian Lab has also been focusing on creating new tools for understanding a variety of processes in the nervous system.

“It made sense for us to collaborate on this project, taking Tian’s expertise in sensor design and our expertise related to the biology of 5-HT2A receptors and the chemistry to develop this new tool,” Olson said.

    The two discoveries of the fluorescent sensor and AAZ are both important for the future treatment of mental illness. The discovery of the sensor could lead to new ways of performing the GPCR phase of drug discovery that might have significant advantages over current methods, according to Olson. 

    “I think that is what is really useful for how we find medicines for mental health because GCPRs are the primary targets for many psychoactive substances like antipsychotic drugs and antidepressants,” Olson said. “This general approach that Lin’s lab has been really a leader in is really changing the way we approach drug discovery in the central nervous system space.”

The Olson Lab focuses on identifying medicines that can change neurocircuitry instead of medicines that rectify chemical imbalances in the brain. The old-school chemical imbalance method was used to treat brain disorders since there are very few effective medicines for treating mental illnesses. 

“We have moved toward a more modern approach to physically rewire the brain to alleviate these symptoms, and AAZ is the next evolution in that story,” Olson said.

This work would not be possible without the close collaboration of graduate students, according to Tian.

“I feel very fortunate to have worked with these talented graduate students, and those students took initiative of the collaboration,” Tian said. “It is really rewarding to see the next generation of scientists start to collaborate with each other.”

Along with the novel insight on how the serotonin system works, this project was also a great training opportunity for graduate students to be involved in a high-impact paper. 

“UC Davis has a very good training environment for our graduate students and provides an enriching environment for graduate students to grow, collaborate and be successful,” Tian said. 
Written by: Francheska Torres — science@theaggie.org

New COVID-19 test coupled with machine learning allows for quick and numerous screenings

MILO, or Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer, is used with mass spectrometry to rapidly identify the presence of COVID-19

The pandemic has lasted for over a year now with many travelling to health centers and venues to be tested and vaccinated daily. In light of the potential setbacks that frequent testing may pose, UC Davis Health has developed a new screening method for COVID-19 called MALDI-TOF-MS, or matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, that can retrieve testing results within hours while maintaining a high level of sensitivity and accuracy appropriate for detecting infectious diseases. 

    Dr. Nam Tran, a professor of clinical pathology at UC Davis Health in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, is the lead author of the study and helped develop the screening method and coupled it with machine learning to expedite the COVID-19 testing process. The current “gold standard” for testing has been reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), known to be highly accurate and sensitive but with the huge tradeoff of speed and time where results would not be received until days later. 

    “High-throughput PCR testing is unable to achieve turnaround times that would be compatible with businesses and schools,” Tran said via email. “It’s less than ideal to wait for hours or days for results. In contrast, we also have ultrafast PCR systems now at UC Davis Health that can test for SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B in 20 minutes. However, these only test one sample at a time. Both the above solutions are also expensive and require various supply chains common to anyone doing molecular testing.” 

    The major problem of PCR, aside from its speed, was the shortages in the supply chain, where the reagents necessary to run the test are often unavailable. 

    “The problems that arose were supplies,” Tran said via email. “Everyone in the world was competing for the same samples. As different places came up with alternative methods to bypass supply chain problems, we now have issues of different tests with varying degrees of accuracy and precision. Not all PCR tests are created the same.”

    The proposed method in the study went on an alternative route of antigen-based testing to detect proteins rather than the typical RNA test, which produced results at much faster speeds. Dr. Hooman Rashidi, a professor and vice chair of informatics and computational pathology at UC Davis and the AI director for the UC Davis Medical Center, described the advantages and disadvantages of antigen-based testing that the team had agreed to optimize with machine learning.

    “The antigen-based method is definitely way faster,” Rashidi said. “Instead of a few days and batch testing, they now can do them in four or five hours. But the antigen-based assay, if you see the performances and in the paper where we give a list of the most credible ones, their performance measures are not even close to those of the PCR method.”

    The poor performance of antigen-based tests as compared to the current PCR methods were resolved with an automated machine learning platform called MILO, or Machine Intelligence Learning Optimizer, of which both Tran and Rashidi were involved in developing. Coupled with the mass spectrometer machine used, COVID-19 test screening could be expedited without sacrificing any performance measures or running into supply chain shortages to be as accurate as the gold standard of the PCR method. 

    The mass spectrometer MALDI-TOF shoots a laser at the sample to fragment the molecules into ions that produce a readout of analyzable signal peaks. MILO helps to read these signals and identify whether a specific infectious disease is present or not.

    “For the COVID-19 test, MILO finds distinguishing patterns among the many mass spectrometry peaks and signals and deciphers which patterns correspond to the presence or absence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the samples,” according to a recent UC Davis Health press release. “MILO accomplished the analysis in a fraction of the time that a non-automated machine-learning approach would have taken.”

    Rashidi further explained the power of machine learning in using mass spectrometry as the main testing method. 

    “The major problem with mass spec is that it gives you a ton of peaks,” Rashidi said. “Imagine that you now produced hundreds and thousands of peaks, so it’s not humanly possible to figure out which peak patterns are specific for somebody who has COVID or somebody who doesn’t have COVID. The power of our MILO platform is that it can do this in less than a day. It’s like having 50 to 100 data scientists doing the work for you virtually. And that’s the game changer of having something that powerful that can actually evaluate all of those peaks, identify these peak patterns, and then ultimately to get these peak patterns to say yes or no, but also be able to change with changing populations literally within a day.”

    Rashidi did note, however, that this new screening method with MILO coupled to mass spectrometry does not replace PCR methods. Rather, it is a highly efficient screening method, and the true confirmation method is still the PCR test. With the advent of such a powerful tool for screening, Rashidi alluded to how this method of screening can be further extended to future infectious diseases.

    “The goal is not just for COVID testing,” Rashidi said. “The goal is also this whole process—this whole pipeline—that we’ve built with our MILO machine learning platform with mass spectrometry and other things that are basically infrastructural stuff that are around them. These are things that we’ve put together that can easily be applied to the future pandemics.”Written by: Brandon Nguyenscience@theaggie.org

UC Davis and UC Santa Cruz collaborate to research population dynamics of rare and common annual plants

E. wallecei and Eriophyllum mohavense in the Mojave Desert studied by an associate UC Davis professor, among others

Researchers from UC Santa Cruz and UC Davis—including assistant professor of land, air and water resources Rebecca Hernandez—analyzed the population dynamics of rare native annual plant Eriophyllum mohavense and its closely related common native annual plant E. wallecei in a recent study

    According to the study, new rainfall runoff and shade conditions are created by large-scale photovoltaic solar energy facilities that are being developed in desert regions. The researchers measured the impacts of ground-mounted infrastructure on both E. wallecei and Eriophyllum mohavense

    “People will have a sensitive species that they are worried about and won’t have any data on it, but they do have data on a closely related species that is not as sensitive or sensitive at all,” said Karen Tanner, the lead author and Sea Grant Fellow at the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. “The hope is that if the species have a similar enough history and ecological niche, the response to the common species may indicate how the rare species may respond.”

    However, Tanner said that the results of the study revealed that this method was not effective in deducing how the rare species would respond.

    According to the study, altered shade conditions decreased survival of E. wallecei species in drier years but led to an increase of Eriophyllum mohavense survival. Regarding wet years, seed output for both E. wallecei and Eriophyllum mohavense improved. 

    “In natural resource management, managers have to make these decisions about how to protect a species,” Tanner said. “Sometimes we don’t have a whole lot of data on the species. When species are rare, it could mean that they are hard to find. It also could mean that there are logistical and regulatory constraints on what you can do to study them.” 

    Tanner further explained that it can be difficult to make informed decisions about managing species if not a lot of data is available. Tanner said that the Mojave Desert—where the researchers gathered their data—is hot, dry and characterized by extremely variable rainfall. 

    “2011 was a super bloom year,” Tanner said. “That was extremely fortunate for us. The next year, we got to all the places where we collected the first-year data, and it was a very dry year and not a single plant came up. It can be really challenging to study annual species in the desert because they can be very abundant one year and totally absent the next.”

    The comparison between 2011 and 2012 revealed a critical consideration that must be taken into account when gauging potential environmental impacts of these development projects. 

    “When you consider the story of 2011 versus 2012, it’s really problematic if you’re just going out and doing a survey to establish whether or not there are any species on site that you need to be concerned about [especially] if you’re going in a year where you’re not going to see anything,” Tanner said. “When you send people out to do these biological surveys, you can’t send people out to do them in a super dry year and feel confident that you’ve detected everything that may be present.” 

    This research was funded by the California Energy Commission. 

    “Transferring the knowledge gained from this study to solar developers, permitting agencies and other stakeholders is a key step,” said Michael Ward, a media officer at the California Energy Commission, via email. “The researchers are doing exactly that through publication of the final project report, journal articles […], on their website and through public presentations.” 

    Ward also stated that the California Energy Commission may apply the results of these studies to their ongoing projects. 

    “California Energy Commission staff may derive broad applicability from such studies on photovoltaic energy generation and apply it to projects within its jurisdiction, such as concentrating solar thermal, as well as to our ongoing work to support the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, which directs energy development within habitat managed by the Bureau of Land Management throughout the state of California,” Ward said via email.

    In the future, Ward would like to study exotic invasive species in the desert.

    “We do have exotic species in the desert that we’re concerned about,” Ward said via email. “Sometimes these companies, I believe, are required to control populations at their sites to make sure that they don’t get out of hand.”
Written by: Aarya Gupta — science@theaggie.org